Knee OsteoarthritisNCT04443452
Molecular Pathways Involved in Knee Pain
An observational study of Knee Osteoarthritis and Knee Pain Chronic, run by University of Nottingham at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common form of arthritis and the most common cause of knee pain in the world. The rate of knee arthritis is as high as that of cardiac disease and is the most common problem in individuals over the age of 65. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 45 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Knee Osteoarthritis, Knee Pain Chronic
- What is being tested?
- Quantitative Sensory Testing, Radiographic Evaluation and Ultrasound-guided Aspiration
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 71 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- 6 Nov 2020to 1 Dec 2023
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 45 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Adults equal or above the age of 45 with a history of knee pain of at least 3 months duration that may or may not have been radiographically and no-radiographically classified as having knee pain due to osteoarthritis.
Who may be able to join
- have the ability to give informed consent
- be 45 years or over
- have complaints of knee pain for 3-6 months with or without radiographically established OA (K/L scale score ≥ 1)
- have complaints of knee pain for 3-6 months with or without satisfying the non-radiographic American College of Rheumatology criteria for knee OA
- are willing to undertake knee synovial fluid aspiration
- be able to speak, read, and write in English as all instructions and questionnaires are designed in the English language
Who cannot join
- Inability to give informed consent due to cognitive impairment or otherwise - (capacity levels are already established under General Practitioner care)
- Inability to understand key aspects of the study due to cognitive impairment or otherwise
- Giving history of additional co-morbidities such as cancer, neurological conditions, inflammatory joint diseases including rheumatoid arthritis, diabetic neuropathies, fractures or other conditions causing greater disability than their knee pain
- Acute soft tissue injury to the knee within last 3 months before potential recruitment
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United Kingdom1 site
The University of Nottingham, City Hospital Campus
Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG5 1PB
About this study
Official title: Molecular Pathways Involved in Knee Pain: an Observational Study
Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common form of arthritis and the most common cause of knee pain in the world. The rate of knee arthritis is as high as that of cardiac disease and is the most common problem in individuals over the age of 65.
Central Sensitization (CS) is a marker of widespread pain sensitivity that can occur throughout the central nervous system distribution, leading to changes in the spinal cord as well as in the brain. The presence of CS increases the complexity of the clinical picture and can negatively affect treatment outcomes. CS is present in >20% of patients suffering from knee OA indicating that in the majority of individuals suffering with painful knee OA, knee pain should be related to molecular changes in the joint. CS might be also associated with discrete synovial fluid proteomic signatures due to the generation by the joint of chemical mediators (e.g. nerve growth factor) that drive CS, or CS might moderate the relationship between synovial fluid proteomic signatures and symptoms due to alterations in pain processing.
Read more
The aim of this study is to explore the potential molecular links between pain and structure on knee pain using synovial fluid proteomics. A secondary purpose is to explore the association of knee pain with biomarkers of stress, metabolism and dietary habits.
In a single session, ultrasound-guided synovial fluid, blood urine and saliva extraction, clinical assessment, completion of a questionnaire booklet and knee x-rays will be conducted. The clinical assessment will measure three features of central sensitisation (sensitivity to blunt pressure on the most painful knee, changes in pain felt during repeated light pricking of the knee skin, and reduction in pain that accompanies inflation of a blood pressure cuff on the non-dominant arm), features of leg strength (dynamometer, time up-and-go test) and features of balance (sway). Participant involvement at each session is expected to last less than 3 hours.
Individuals over 45 having complaints of knee pain for 3-6 months are eligible to participate. The clinical assessments, questionnaire completion and subsequent statistical analysis are expected to be completed within 18 months of study commencement.
The findings can provide more insight into the traits of knee pain, allow the examination of possible correlations to each other, and highlight potential detrimental effects of them on knee joint health.
Read the detailed description
Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common cause of disability in the elderly population and most individuals suffering from osteoarthritis are managed in the primary care setting. Knee OA is the most common form of arthritis and the most common cause of knee pain in the world. The rate of knee arthritis is as high as that of cardiac disease and is the most common problem in individuals over the age of 65. In the United Kingdom, 10% of 65 to 74-year-old individuals consult their general practitioners about OA per year. Out of the entire population, 4% attend their general practitioners as a result of knee OA, and half of them (2%) consult their general practitioner for the first time or with the acute flare of knee arthritis.
There is a considerable body of evidence showing augmented central nervous system (CNS) processing in OA. Central Sensitization (CS) is a marker of widespread and centrally augmented pain that refers to those neurophysiological processes that can occur throughout the CNS distribution, leading to changes in the spinal cord as well as in the brain. The presence of CS increases the complexity of the clinical picture and negatively affects a range of outcomes (e.g. pain, disability, negative affect, quality of life) following treatment. CS is not present within all patients with chronic pain rendering identification of those patients and decision-making for the right management approach even harder. Clinically, CS manifests as hypersensitivity to pain, that sometimes spreads beyond peripheral generators and is a marker for pain chronicity. CS of nociceptive pathways is a mechanism of clinical pain amplification in OA and is present in >20% of patients suffering from knee OA. This means that in the majority of individuals suffering with painful knee OA, knee pain should be related to molecular changes in the joint. CS might be also associated with discrete synovial fluid proteomic signatures due to the generation by the joint of chemical mediators (e.g. nerve growth factor) that drive CS, or CS might moderate the relationship between synovial fluid proteomic signatures and symptoms due to alterations in pain processing. Radiographic knee joint changes and pain levels are associated with knee cartilage loss but whether CS indices are linked to radiographic changes has not been established. High levels of CS might increase the risk of cartilage loss by increasing the levels of pain or might be associated with already existing changes.
The investigators will recruit 140 individuals with OA-related knee pain. They will also use standardised quantitative sensory testing (QST) such as pressure pain detection threshold (PPT), temporal summation (TS) and conditioned pain modulation (CPM). PPT specifically, has been used in past knee pain studies and is considered a valid and reliable method to establish tenderness around the knee joint. Similarly, TS has been used previously to establish whether individuals demonstrate amplified, centrally driven localised knee pain. Conditioned pain paradigms are commonly used to assess the function of endogenous pain inhibitory pathways in humans. In this technique, a painful test stimulus is evaluated in the absence and then in the presence of a second, also painful (conditioning), stimulus applied to a remote region of the body. In a typically functioning nociceptive system, the amount of pain experienced with the primary test stimulus will be reduced during the presentation of the secondary conditioning stimulus. Decreased inhibition of experimental pain is found in many patients with idiopathic pain syndromes. It predicts the tendency to develop future chronic pain. The purpose of using QST is to establish objective and quantifiable data that will allow the stratification of patients into 'sensitised' and 'non-sensitised' and permit further analysis.
Quantitative Sensory Testing is a reliable and valid method to assess for the presence of CS and demonstrates predictive capacity in relation to musculoskeletal (MSK) treatment outcomes. The testing consists of pressure pain threshold (PPT), punctate thresholds, temperature sensitivity, temporal summation (TS) and conditioned pain modulation (CPM) used to quantify noxious or innocuous stimuli within healthy individuals and patients alike. QST has been used, among others, as a screening and assessment tool for sensory abnormalities in patients with pain disorders, as well as to assist in the stratification of patients and evaluate the clinical aspects of peripheral and CS.
Regional pain and symptoms of depression and/or anxiety have been shown to facilitate the development of constant pain therefore, signs of depression or anxiety are important to explore correlation of symptoms at a single time-point. Signs of depression and anxiety can be identified with the use of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) that has been shown to be valid in multiple populations. The stress response involves activation of the sympathetic nervous system and the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. Any physical or psychological threat to homeostasis triggers release of corticotrophin-releasing hormone in the hypothalamus, and ultimately raises levels of steroid hormones such as cortisol in the blood stream and saliva. In the short term, cortisol helps to meet the demands of stress by mobilizing energy stores, and assists recovery from stress by inhibiting further release of corticotrophin-releasing hormone. However, continuing stress promotes maladaptive functioning of the HPA axis, which, in turn, may compromise metabolism, impair immune function, and alter cardiovascular control. Cortisol levels in saliva have been implicated in chronic pain presentations (pain severity) and can be considered a useful biological biomarker that can be used to explore psychopathological associations, prognosis and treatment outcomes.
Nutritional information collected via a standardised food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) and metabolic evidence from body secretions can provide significant insight about the course of OA, as the presence of glucosamine and chondroitin sulfate in faecal samples has shown to improve the symptoms of the condition and delay its progression. Nutritional information and metabolic evidence from faecal samples can be used to explore associations of gut microbiota with pain sensitivity and stress levels.
The widely utilised Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) will be also used for the evaluation of knee OA. It is a self-administered questionnaire made of 24 items and consists of three subscales covering pain, stiffness and physical function. It has been used extensively and is considered a valid and reliable tool. For evaluating quality of life, stiffness, generalised well-being, sleeping difficulties and understanding of the diagnosis and treatment, the investigators will use patient-reported outcome measure 'The Versus Arthritis Musculoskeletal Health Questionnaire' (MSK-HQ). MSK-HQ covers a broad aspect of musculoskeletal conditions, and recent studies have shown it to be reliable and valid. Frailty has been also found to be a predictor of disability and a determinant of treatment outcomes and the Simple Frailty Questionnaire (FRAIL) is considered a valid and reliable tool for that purpose.
Both the 30-second sit to stand test (30CST) and the 'time up and go' (TUG) test will be used to see if patients have improved their lower limb fitness levels. 30CST has shown excellent reliability and validity. TUG has been widely used in clinical setups and is a valid tool to assess necessary functional mobility.
In this study, the sleeping pattern of individuals suffering from degenerative changes of the knee will be assessed with the aim to establish whether sleep disturbance is implicated in the development of CS. Disturbed sleep is a frequent complaint of people experiencing chronic pain such as those with knee osteoarthritis (OA). Changes in sleep architecture can affect health even in the presence of apparently adequate sleep duration. Insufficient amounts of slow wave sleep are associated with hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, poor cognition, and obesity. Sleep disturbances are present in 67-88% of people with chronic pain and ≥50% individuals with insomnia have chronic pain. The investigators will also use the Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI) which has been used in multiple studies and validated to measure sleep disturbances. Poor cognition, as well as sleep, has been found to be a marker of persistent pain and a trait of centrally driven pain in knee pain populations. The Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ) is a valid and reliable tool to measure self-reported failures in perception, memory, and motor function.
Musculoskeletal Ultrasound scan (MSK-USS) will be also conducted on the knees of participants to establish if they have inflammation of the synovial membrane. There is enough evidence that inflammation is present in all stages of OA. Synovitis or inflammation of synovial fluid is associated with pain, disease severity and, OA progression. Synovitis manifests as synovial membrane thickening, increased vascularity, and/or joint effusion. Synovial hypertrophy, synovitis and knee effusion are linked with arthritis in the knee and associated with knee pain in osteoarthritis. The synovial fluid will be aspirated (subject to participant consent), in order to establish a phenotype which is strongly associated with OA. Studying synovial fluid biomarkers alongside clinical, radiographic and ultra-sonographic characteristics is one strategy to improve resolution and stratification into targetable OA phenotypes. Synovial fluid aspiration will be ultrasound guided as it increases the accuracy of needle placement compared to blind needling (95.8% versus 77.8%, p < 0.001) reduces procedural pain by 43%, improves effusion detection by 200%, and volume of synovial fluid aspirated by 337% compared with blind synovial fluid aspiration. Ultrasound guidance also reduces procedural pain (43% reduction) in knees with no palpable effusion and increases the responder rate and therapeutic duration by 107% and 36% respectively.
Isometric quadriceps strength will be also assessed to establish current strength levels of vastus medialis muscle and see whether muscle strength associates with centrally driven pain or proteomic synovial concentrations. Quadriceps muscles strength deficits are associated with knee osteoarthritis. Isometric testing will be done at 30 and 60 degrees of flexion as per the protocol of a previous study.
Blood samples will be also extracted to assess the biomarkers (including serum levels and gene expression levels of various molecules) and to establish insulin resistance. Urine samples will be collected to identify the existence of collagen degradation markers (e.g. UTXII) and inflammatory regulator markers (e.g. Maresins).
Collection and study of these parameters can provide more insight into the traits of knee pain, allow the examination of possible correlations to each other, and highlight potential detrimental effects of them on knee joint health.
- Conditions
- Knee Osteoarthritis, Knee Pain Chronic
- Being tested
- Quantitative Sensory Testing, Radiographic Evaluation, Ultrasound-guided Aspiration, Muscle Strength Assessment, Function Assessment (A)
- Medical subject headings
- Osteoarthritis, Knee
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Quantitative Sensory TestingDiagnostic test
Also called Pressure Pain Detection Threshold (PPT), Temporal Summation (TS), Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM)
PPT: An electronic data collection unit will be used featuring an electronic algometer connected with a laptop where the amount of pressure will be displayed on the screen. When the pressure pain detection threshold is reached (the point where the pressure sensation starts to be experienced as pain), the individual will press a button at a handheld device, that will automatically store the pressure value in the system and serve as an indication, for the examiner, to stop the testing.
TS: A pinprick stimulator (Weight: 256mNewton) will be used. The examiner will apply the pen that features a retractable blunt needle in a repetitive manner (once per second for ten seconds). The individual will be asked for the intensity of pain (NRS) at the first and at the last time and the given score will be noted.
CPM: A manual blood pressure sphygmomanometer will be used in conjunction with the electronic algometer described above (PPT).
Radiographic EvaluationRadiation
Also called X-rays
Tibiofemoral and patellofemoral radiographs of the most painful knee will be taken using a standardised protocol (standing posterior-anterior (PA) and skyline views) and will be scored by a single experienced observer in order to generate data for correlation analyses with the primary and secondary outcomes. A Perspex Rosenberg template with lead beads is used for the standing PA view to standardising the degree of knee flexion, foot rotation and magnification. PA radiographs are taken with the participant facing the x-ray tube while standing on the Rosenberg jig and leaning forwards with their thighs touching the anterior aspect of the jig, the x-ray beams passing from the posterior aspect through to the anterior aspect of the knee. Variable jigs are used for the skyline view to obtaining 300 of knee flexion with the participant lying in a reclined supine position on a couch. Grading of radiographs for changes of OA will be based on the Kellgren and Lawrence (K/L) score.
Ultrasound-guided AspirationProcedure or surgery
Also called Synovial Fluid Extraction
Ultrasound scanning will be conducted on the most painful knee to identify synovial effusion. During the ultrasound scan, the supra-patellar pouch, medial and lateral recess of the knees will be assessed for synovial thickening, synovial fluid/effusion and for positive power Doppler. An ultrasonic probe will be used to direct ultrasonic waves onto the knee joint during sonography, and a computer converts the signals received so that they can be presented on the screen. During skin application, a sterile probe cover and sterile acoustic gel will be used. Once the best aspiration location is identified and the location of the needle insertion marked, the skin will be prepared with a cleansing agent such as iodine or chlorhexidine. The needle may be introduced into the skin either parallel to the probe or perpendicular to the probe. Once the aspiration is completed, the needle will be removed, the skin cleansed, and a bandage will be applied.
Muscle Strength AssessmentDiagnostic test
Also called Isometric Dynamometer
Isometric testing will be done at 30 and 60 degrees of flexion as done in the previous study and the participant will be in sitting position with hips and knees strapped to keep the position standardised.
Function Assessment (A)Diagnostic test
Also called Time Up-and-Go Test
The participant will start in a seated position. The participant will stand up upon therapist's command, walk 3 meters, turn around, walk back to the chair and sit down. The time will stop when the participant is seated. The subject can use an assistive device. If the assistive device is used, it will be documented.
Important Note: A practice trial will be completed before the timed trial.
Function Assessment (B)Diagnostic test
Also called 30 seconds Sit-to-Stand Test
The 30-Second Chair Test is administered using a chair. The participant is seated in the middle of the chair with arms crossed at the wrists and held against the chest. The participant will practice a repetition or 2 before completing the test. If a participant must use their arms to complete the test, they are scored 0. The participant is encouraged to complete as many full stands as possible within 30 seconds. The participant is instructed to fully sit between each stand. While monitoring the participant's performance to ensure proper form, the tester silently counts the completion of each correct stand. The score is the total number of stands within 30 seconds (more than halfway up at the end of 30 seconds counts as a full stand). Incorrectly executed stands are not counted. The 30-second chair stand involves recording the number of stands a person can complete in 30 seconds rather than the amount of time it takes to complete a pre-determined number of repetitions.
Balance AssessmentDiagnostic test
Also called Static Balance Test, Postural Sway Test
Static balance and postural sway either in the medial-lateral or antero-posterior direction will be assessed using the RS Scan force plate. The participant will be asked to stand on the plate looking straight forward for 30 seconds in two conditions: first with their eyes open and then with eyes closed. Medial-lateral, antero-posterior and total sway will be recorded.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Prevalent Central Sensitisation | Participants with sensitisation that significantly deviates from the normal mean as assessed by Quantitative Sensory Testing Receives: Diagnostic Test: Quantitative Sensory Testing; Radiation: Radiographic Evaluation; Procedure: Ultrasound-guided Aspiration; Diagnostic Test: Muscle Strength Assessment; Diagnostic Test: Function Assessment (A); Diagnostic Test: Function Assessment (B); Diagnostic Test: Balance Assessment | |
| Non-prevalent Central Sensitisation | All other participants with sensitisation that is not significantly deviating from the normal mean as assessed by Quantitative Sensory Testing Receives: Diagnostic Test: Quantitative Sensory Testing; Radiation: Radiographic Evaluation; Procedure: Ultrasound-guided Aspiration; Diagnostic Test: Muscle Strength Assessment; Diagnostic Test: Function Assessment (A); Diagnostic Test: Function Assessment (B); Diagnostic Test: Balance Assessment |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pain Sensitivity: Pressure Pain Detection Threshold (PPT)
PPT is a non-invasive test during which the sensitivity of the nerves is assessed by recording the amount of pressure applied to the skin. Pressure is applied through a probe. The pressure probe used is mounted in a handheld device connected to a computer. Pressure applied to the skin is gradually increased until the participant indicates (by pressing a button) that the sensation has changed from pressure to pain. The probe will be used on the contralateral forearm (brachioradialis muscle) using a standardised protocol used in other studies within the Pain Centre. Each region will be tested one time with short rest periods between each. The participants will be familiarised with the test before it is administered so that they know what to expect and how to respond.
Measured: At baseline
Pain Sensitivity: Temporal Summation Pain (TS)
TS is a non-invasive test during which repetitive mechanical stimulation is applied over a short period to get their augmented response. A 256mN weighted pinprick stimulator will be used and applied perpendicular to the skin of suprapatellar region of the painful knee (5cm proximal from the centre of patella). The participant will be asked to rate the pain or sharpness they experience from 0-10 where 0 indicates no pain or sharpness and 10 indicates the most intense pain or sharpness imaginable. The response of the participant will be recorded. The same stimulator at the same site will be applied ten times repeatedly at a rate of 1/second. At the end of the series of 10 pinpricks, the participant will be asked to rate the average pain or sharpness they experienced out of the 10 stimuli using the same scale. The TS value will be calculated as the difference between the two ratings (single stimulus minus the average of the 10 stimuli).
Measured: At baseline
Pain Sensitivity: Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM)
CPM is the application of PPT before and while a pressure cuff is inflated. A 7.5cm wide tourniquet cuff will be wrapped around the arm contra-laterally to the most painful knee. The lower rim of tourniquet cuff will be kept 3cm proximal to cubital fossa. The cuff will be inflated with the aim to reach above-systolic pressure with a maximum of 270mm/Hg. After target pressure is achieved, the participant will be asked to repeatedly make a handgrip or squeeze a foam ball until they develop ischemic pain ≥4 out of 10 on a 0-10 scale. Once NRS of 4/10 will be achieved, the probe of algometer will be applied in the same manner as during PPT testing. Once the participant presses the button, the probe will be withdrawn, and the cuff will be deflated released from the participants arm. The difference in PPT score (PPT with conditioning minus PPT without conditioning) will be considered the CPM value. A positive value indicates efficient CPM whereas a negative value indicates impaired CPM.
Measured: At baseline
Secondary outcomes (8)
Central Aspects of Knee Pain (CAP-Knee)
Central augmented pain assessed on a 8-item CAP-Knee questionnaire, where items 1-7 are scored from 0-3, 0 indicating "never" and 3 indicating "often" or "always". Item 8 (pain distribution manikin) was allocated a score of 0 if at most 1 knee is shades, and no other regions below the waist, or a score of 3 if both knees were shaded, or one knee plus any additional shaded areas below the waist. A total sum score (minimum score of "0", maximum score of "24") will be calculated for analysis. The higher the value the higher the levels of central augmented pain.
Measured: At baseline
Anxiety
Anxiety will be assessed with the Anxiety part of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) where patients are asked to indicate their levels of emotion frequency with a 4-level scale (0-3: 0 indicates never and 3 all the time) at 7 questions. A sum of all responses is calculated (minimum score of "0", maximum score of "21") for analysis. The higher the value the higher the levels of anxiety.
Measured: At baseline
Depression
Depression will be assessed with the Depression part of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) where patients are asked to indicate their levels of emotion frequency with a 4-level scale (0-3: 0 indicates all the time and 3 never) at 7 questions. A sum of all responses is calculated (minimum score of "0", maximum score of "21") for analysis. The higher the value the higher the levels of depression.
Measured: At baseline
Cognitive Function
Cognitive function will be assessed with the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ) where participants are asked to indicate symptom frequency with a 0-4 scale (0 indicates never and 4 very often) on 25 statements. A sum of all responses is calculated (minimum score of "0", maximum score of "100") for analysis. The higher the value the more impaired cognitive function is.
Measured: At baseline
Sleep Quality
Sleep quality will be assessed with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) where participants are asked to respond to 18 statements indicating their: 1) sleep duration in minutes/hours on 4 questions, 2) symptom frequency with 4 possible answers spreading from 'not during the past month' to 'three or more times a week' on 12 statements, 3) symptom severity with 4 possible answers spreading from 'no problem at all' to 'very big problem' on 1 statement and 4) sleep quality with 4 possible answers spreading from 'very good' to 'very bad' on 1 statement. Responses are coded from 0-4 (0 indicating no sleeping issues and 4 frequent and severe sleeping problems). A sum of all 18 responses is calculated (minimum score of "0", maximum score of "72" being the maximum) for analysis. The higher the value the less sleep quality there is.
Measured: At baseline
Knee Pain, Stiffness, and Physical Functioning
Knee pain, stiffness and physical functioning will be assessed with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) where participants are asked to rate their symptom severity with a 0-4 scale (0 indicates never and 4 extreme) five items for pain (score range 0-20), two for stiffness (score range 0-8), and 17 for functional limitation (score range 0-68). The higher the value in each domain the more pain, stiffness and physical dysfunction there is.
Measured: At baseline
General Musculoskeletal Health
General health will be assessed with the Musculoskeletal Health Questionnaire (MSK-HQ) where participants are asked to indicate symptom frequency with a 0-4 scale (0 indicates very severe and 4 not at all severe) on 14 statements. A sum of all responses is calculated (minimum score of "0", maximum score of "56") for analysis. The lower the value the more reduced general musculoskeletal health is.
Measured: At baseline
Frailty
Frailty will be measured with a modified questionnaire where participants will be asked to respond to 8 Yes/No questions (Yes is marked with 1 and No with 0) about inability to walk, using aids, weight loss, co-morbidities and levels of physical activity. A total out of all responses (minimum score of "0", maximum score of "8") is calculated for analysis. The higher the score, the higher the levels of frailty
Measured: At baseline
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Jun 2020
- Study start6 Nov 2020
- Primary completion1 Dec 2023
- Study completion1 Dec 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (83)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Knee OsteoarthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 71 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Nottingham
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Versus Arthritis
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Ana M Valdes, PhD, Principal investigator, University of Nottingham
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04443452
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 19098
- Other IDs
- 22473, 275727
- Status last verified
- Apr 2025
- First submitted
- 5 Jun 2020
- Last updated
- 13 Aug 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided: Considerations about data sharing will be taken once the main results of this study have been published
Publications
Peat G, McCarney R, Croft P. Knee pain and osteoarthritis in older adults: a review of community burden and current use of primary health care. Ann Rheum Dis. 2001 Feb;60(2):91-7. doi: 10.1136/ard.60.2.91.
PubMed 11156538Felson DT. Weight and osteoarthritis. Am J Clin Nutr. 1996 Mar;63(3 Suppl):430S-432S. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/63.3.430.
PubMed 8615335Guccione AA, Felson DT, Anderson JJ, Anthony JM, Zhang Y, Wilson PW, Kelly-Hayes M, Wolf PA, Kreger BE, Kannel WB. The effects of specific medical conditions on the functional limitations of elders in the Framingham Study. Am J Public Health. 1994 Mar;84(3):351-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.84.3.351.
PubMed 8129049McCormick, A. Morbidity statistics from general practice. Fourth national study 1991-1992. Office of population censuses and surveys.1995.
Finan PH, Buenaver LF, Bounds SC, Hussain S, Park RJ, Haque UJ, Campbell CM, Haythornthwaite JA, Edwards RR, Smith MT. Discordance between pain and radiographic severity in knee osteoarthritis: findings from quantitative sensory testing of central sensitization. Arthritis Rheum. 2013 Feb;65(2):363-72. doi: 10.1002/art.34646.
PubMed 22961435Malfait AM, Schnitzer TJ. Towards a mechanism-based approach to pain management in osteoarthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2013 Nov;9(11):654-64. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2013.138. Epub 2013 Sep 17.
PubMed 24045707Latremoliere A, Woolf CJ. Central sensitization: a generator of pain hypersensitivity by central neural plasticity. J Pain. 2009 Sep;10(9):895-926. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2009.06.012.
PubMed 19712899Nijs J, Van Oosterwijck J, De Hertogh W. Rehabilitation of chronic whiplash: treatment of cervical dysfunctions or chronic pain syndrome? Clin Rheumatol. 2009 Mar;28(3):243-51. doi: 10.1007/s10067-008-1083-x. Epub 2009 Jan 22.
PubMed 19160000Jull G, Sterling M, Kenardy J, Beller E. Does the presence of sensory hypersensitivity influence outcomes of physical rehabilitation for chronic whiplash?--A preliminary RCT. Pain. 2007 May;129(1-2):28-34. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2006.09.030. Epub 2007 Jan 10.
PubMed 17218057Woolf CJ. Central sensitization: implications for the diagnosis and treatment of pain. Pain. 2011 Mar;152(3 Suppl):S2-S15. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.09.030. Epub 2010 Oct 18.
PubMed 20961685Murphy SL, Lyden AK, Phillips K, Clauw DJ, Williams DA. Subgroups of older adults with osteoarthritis based upon differing comorbid symptom presentations and potential underlying pain mechanisms. Arthritis Res Ther. 2011 Aug 24;13(4):R135. doi: 10.1186/ar3449.
PubMed 21864381French HP, Smart KM, Doyle F. Prevalence of neuropathic pain in knee or hip osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2017 Aug;47(1):1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2017.02.008. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
PubMed 28320529Saunders J, Ding C, Cicuttini F, Jones G. Radiographic osteoarthritis and pain are independent predictors of knee cartilage loss: a prospective study. Intern Med J. 2012 Mar;42(3):274-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2011.02438.x.
PubMed 21299779Geber C, Klein T, Azad S, Birklein F, Gierthmuhlen J, Huge V, Lauchart M, Nitzsche D, Stengel M, Valet M, Baron R, Maier C, Tolle T, Treede RD. Test-retest and interobserver reliability of quantitative sensory testing according to the protocol of the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS): a multi-centre study. Pain. 2011 Mar;152(3):548-556. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.11.013. Epub 2011 Jan 14.
PubMed 21237569Pfau DB, Krumova EK, Treede RD, Baron R, Toelle T, Birklein F, Eich W, Geber C, Gerhardt A, Weiss T, Magerl W, Maier C. Quantitative sensory testing in the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS): reference data for the trunk and application in patients with chronic postherpetic neuralgia. Pain. 2014 May;155(5):1002-1015. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2014.02.004. Epub 2014 Feb 10.
PubMed 24525274
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Aug 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Molecular Pathways Involved in Knee Pain: an Observational Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04443452
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 19098
- Conditions
- Knee Osteoarthritis, Knee Pain Chronic
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 71 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of NottinghamUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Versus Arthritis
- Study start
- 6 Nov 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Dec 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Dec 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Jun 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 13 Aug 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common form of arthritis and the most common cause of knee pain in the world. The rate of knee arthritis is as high as that of cardiac disease and is the most common problem in individuals over the age of 65.
Central Sensitization (CS) is a marker of widespread pain sensitivity that can occur throughout the central nervous system distribution, leading to changes in the spinal cord as well as in the brain. The presence of CS increases the complexity of the clinical picture and can negatively affect treatment outcomes. CS is present in >20% of patients suffering from knee OA indicating that in the majority of individuals suffering with painful knee OA, knee pain should be related to molecular changes in the joint. CS might be also associated with discrete synovial fluid proteomic signatures due to the generation by the joint of chemical mediators (e.g. nerve growth factor) that drive CS, or CS might moderate the relationship between synovial fluid proteomic signatures and symptoms due to alterations in pain processing.
The aim of this study is to explore the potential molecular links between pain and structure on knee pain using synovial fluid proteomics. A secondary purpose is to explore the association of knee pain with biomarkers of stress, metabolism and dietary habits.
In a single session, ultrasound-guided synovial fluid, blood urine and saliva extraction, clinical assessment, completion of a questionnaire booklet and knee x-rays will be conducted. The clinical assessment will measure three features of central sensitisation (sensitivity to blunt pressure on the most painful knee, changes in pain felt during repeated light pricking of the knee skin, and reduction in pain that accompanies inflation of a blood pressure cuff on the non-dominant arm), features of leg strength (dynamometer, time up-and-go test) and features of balance (sway). Participant involvement at each session is expected to last less than 3 hours.
Individuals over 45 having complaints of knee pain for 3-6 months are eligible to participate. The clinical assessments, questionnaire completion and subsequent statistical analysis are expected to be completed within 18 months of study commencement.
The findings can provide more insight into the traits of knee pain, allow the examination of possible correlations to each other, and highlight potential detrimental effects of them on knee joint health.
Detailed description
Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common cause of disability in the elderly population and most individuals suffering from osteoarthritis are managed in the primary care setting. Knee OA is the most common form of arthritis and the most common cause of knee pain in the world. The rate of knee arthritis is as high as that of cardiac disease and is the most common problem in individuals over the age of 65. In the United Kingdom, 10% of 65 to 74-year-old individuals consult their general practitioners about OA per year. Out of the entire population, 4% attend their general practitioners as a result of knee OA, and half of them (2%) consult their general practitioner for the first time or with the acute flare of knee arthritis.
There is a considerable body of evidence showing augmented central nervous system (CNS) processing in OA. Central Sensitization (CS) is a marker of widespread and centrally augmented pain that refers to those neurophysiological processes that can occur throughout the CNS distribution, leading to changes in the spinal cord as well as in the brain. The presence of CS increases the complexity of the clinical picture and negatively affects a range of outcomes (e.g. pain, disability, negative affect, quality of life) following treatment. CS is not present within all patients with chronic pain rendering identification of those patients and decision-making for the right management approach even harder. Clinically, CS manifests as hypersensitivity to pain, that sometimes spreads beyond peripheral generators and is a marker for pain chronicity. CS of nociceptive pathways is a mechanism of clinical pain amplification in OA and is present in >20% of patients suffering from knee OA. This means that in the majority of individuals suffering with painful knee OA, knee pain should be related to molecular changes in the joint. CS might be also associated with discrete synovial fluid proteomic signatures due to the generation by the joint of chemical mediators (e.g. nerve growth factor) that drive CS, or CS might moderate the relationship between synovial fluid proteomic signatures and symptoms due to alterations in pain processing. Radiographic knee joint changes and pain levels are associated with knee cartilage loss but whether CS indices are linked to radiographic changes has not been established. High levels of CS might increase the risk of cartilage loss by increasing the levels of pain or might be associated with already existing changes.
The investigators will recruit 140 individuals with OA-related knee pain. They will also use standardised quantitative sensory testing (QST) such as pressure pain detection threshold (PPT), temporal summation (TS) and conditioned pain modulation (CPM). PPT specifically, has been used in past knee pain studies and is considered a valid and reliable method to establish tenderness around the knee joint. Similarly, TS has been used previously to establish whether individuals demonstrate amplified, centrally driven localised knee pain. Conditioned pain paradigms are commonly used to assess the function of endogenous pain inhibitory pathways in humans. In this technique, a painful test stimulus is evaluated in the absence and then in the presence of a second, also painful (conditioning), stimulus applied to a remote region of the body. In a typically functioning nociceptive system, the amount of pain experienced with the primary test stimulus will be reduced during the presentation of the secondary conditioning stimulus. Decreased inhibition of experimental pain is found in many patients with idiopathic pain syndromes. It predicts the tendency to develop future chronic pain. The purpose of using QST is to establish objective and quantifiable data that will allow the stratification of patients into 'sensitised' and 'non-sensitised' and permit further analysis.
Quantitative Sensory Testing is a reliable and valid method to assess for the presence of CS and demonstrates predictive capacity in relation to musculoskeletal (MSK) treatment outcomes. The testing consists of pressure pain threshold (PPT), punctate thresholds, temperature sensitivity, temporal summation (TS) and conditioned pain modulation (CPM) used to quantify noxious or innocuous stimuli within healthy individuals and patients alike. QST has been used, among others, as a screening and assessment tool for sensory abnormalities in patients with pain disorders, as well as to assist in the stratification of patients and evaluate the clinical aspects of peripheral and CS.
Regional pain and symptoms of depression and/or anxiety have been shown to facilitate the development of constant pain therefore, signs of depression or anxiety are important to explore correlation of symptoms at a single time-point. Signs of depression and anxiety can be identified with the use of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) that has been shown to be valid in multiple populations. The stress response involves activation of the sympathetic nervous system and the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. Any physical or psychological threat to homeostasis triggers release of corticotrophin-releasing hormone in the hypothalamus, and ultimately raises levels of steroid hormones such as cortisol in the blood stream and saliva. In the short term, cortisol helps to meet the demands of stress by mobilizing energy stores, and assists recovery from stress by inhibiting further release of corticotrophin-releasing hormone. However, continuing stress promotes maladaptive functioning of the HPA axis, which, in turn, may compromise metabolism, impair immune function, and alter cardiovascular control. Cortisol levels in saliva have been implicated in chronic pain presentations (pain severity) and can be considered a useful biological biomarker that can be used to explore psychopathological associations, prognosis and treatment outcomes.
Nutritional information collected via a standardised food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) and metabolic evidence from body secretions can provide significant insight about the course of OA, as the presence of glucosamine and chondroitin sulfate in faecal samples has shown to improve the symptoms of the condition and delay its progression. Nutritional information and metabolic evidence from faecal samples can be used to explore associations of gut microbiota with pain sensitivity and stress levels.
The widely utilised Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) will be also used for the evaluation of knee OA. It is a self-administered questionnaire made of 24 items and consists of three subscales covering pain, stiffness and physical function. It has been used extensively and is considered a valid and reliable tool. For evaluating quality of life, stiffness, generalised well-being, sleeping difficulties and understanding of the diagnosis and treatment, the investigators will use patient-reported outcome measure 'The Versus Arthritis Musculoskeletal Health Questionnaire' (MSK-HQ). MSK-HQ covers a broad aspect of musculoskeletal conditions, and recent studies have shown it to be reliable and valid. Frailty has been also found to be a predictor of disability and a determinant of treatment outcomes and the Simple Frailty Questionnaire (FRAIL) is considered a valid and reliable tool for that purpose.
Both the 30-second sit to stand test (30CST) and the 'time up and go' (TUG) test will be used to see if patients have improved their lower limb fitness levels. 30CST has shown excellent reliability and validity. TUG has been widely used in clinical setups and is a valid tool to assess necessary functional mobility.
In this study, the sleeping pattern of individuals suffering from degenerative changes of the knee will be assessed with the aim to establish whether sleep disturbance is implicated in the development of CS. Disturbed sleep is a frequent complaint of people experiencing chronic pain such as those with knee osteoarthritis (OA). Changes in sleep architecture can affect health even in the presence of apparently adequate sleep duration. Insufficient amounts of slow wave sleep are associated with hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, poor cognition, and obesity. Sleep disturbances are present in 67-88% of people with chronic pain and ≥50% individuals with insomnia have chronic pain. The investigators will also use the Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI) which has been used in multiple studies and validated to measure sleep disturbances. Poor cognition, as well as sleep, has been found to be a marker of persistent pain and a trait of centrally driven pain in knee pain populations. The Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ) is a valid and reliable tool to measure self-reported failures in perception, memory, and motor function.
Musculoskeletal Ultrasound scan (MSK-USS) will be also conducted on the knees of participants to establish if they have inflammation of the synovial membrane. There is enough evidence that inflammation is present in all stages of OA. Synovitis or inflammation of synovial fluid is associated with pain, disease severity and, OA progression. Synovitis manifests as synovial membrane thickening, increased vascularity, and/or joint effusion. Synovial hypertrophy, synovitis and knee effusion are linked with arthritis in the knee and associated with knee pain in osteoarthritis. The synovial fluid will be aspirated (subject to participant consent), in order to establish a phenotype which is strongly associated with OA. Studying synovial fluid biomarkers alongside clinical, radiographic and ultra-sonographic characteristics is one strategy to improve resolution and stratification into targetable OA phenotypes. Synovial fluid aspiration will be ultrasound guided as it increases the accuracy of needle placement compared to blind needling (95.8% versus 77.8%, p < 0.001) reduces procedural pain by 43%, improves effusion detection by 200%, and volume of synovial fluid aspirated by 337% compared with blind synovial fluid aspiration. Ultrasound guidance also reduces procedural pain (43% reduction) in knees with no palpable effusion and increases the responder rate and therapeutic duration by 107% and 36% respectively.
Isometric quadriceps strength will be also assessed to establish current strength levels of vastus medialis muscle and see whether muscle strength associates with centrally driven pain or proteomic synovial concentrations. Quadriceps muscles strength deficits are associated with knee osteoarthritis. Isometric testing will be done at 30 and 60 degrees of flexion as per the protocol of a previous study.
Blood samples will be also extracted to assess the biomarkers (including serum levels and gene expression levels of various molecules) and to establish insulin resistance. Urine samples will be collected to identify the existence of collagen degradation markers (e.g. UTXII) and inflammatory regulator markers (e.g. Maresins).
Collection and study of these parameters can provide more insight into the traits of knee pain, allow the examination of possible correlations to each other, and highlight potential detrimental effects of them on knee joint health.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Prevalent Central Sensitisation | – | Diagnostic Test: Quantitative Sensory Testing, Radiation: Radiographic Evaluation, Procedure: Ultrasound-guided Aspiration, Diagnostic Test: Muscle Strength Assessment, Diagnostic Test: Function Assessment (A), Diagnostic Test: Function Assessment (B), Diagnostic Test: Balance AssessmentParticipants with sensitisation that significantly deviates from the normal mean as assessed by Quantitative Sensory Testing |
| Non-prevalent Central Sensitisation | – | Diagnostic Test: Quantitative Sensory Testing, Radiation: Radiographic Evaluation, Procedure: Ultrasound-guided Aspiration, Diagnostic Test: Muscle Strength Assessment, Diagnostic Test: Function Assessment (A), Diagnostic Test: Function Assessment (B), Diagnostic Test: Balance AssessmentAll other participants with sensitisation that is not significantly deviating from the normal mean as assessed by Quantitative Sensory Testing |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 45 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Adults equal or above the age of 45 with a history of knee pain of at least 3 months duration that may or may not have been radiographically and no-radiographically classified as having knee pain due to osteoarthritis.
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- have the ability to give informed consent
- be 45 years or over
- have complaints of knee pain for 3-6 months with or without radiographically established OA (K/L scale score ≥ 1)
- have complaints of knee pain for 3-6 months with or without satisfying the non-radiographic American College of Rheumatology criteria for knee OA
- are willing to undertake knee synovial fluid aspiration
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Inability to give informed consent due to cognitive impairment or otherwise - (capacity levels are already established under General Practitioner care)
- Inability to understand key aspects of the study due to cognitive impairment or otherwise
- Giving history of additional co-morbidities such as cancer, neurological conditions, inflammatory joint diseases including rheumatoid arthritis, diabetic neuropathies, fractures or other conditions causing greater disability than their knee pain
- Acute soft tissue injury to the knee within last 3 months before potential recruitment
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Quantitative Sensory TestingAlso: Pressure Pain Detection Threshold (PPT), Temporal Summation (TS), Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM)PPT: An electronic data collection unit will be used featuring an electronic algometer connected with a laptop where the amount of pressure will be displayed on the screen. When the pressure pain detection threshold is reached (the point where the pressure sensation starts to be experienced as pain), the individual will press a button at a handheld device, that will automatically store the pressure value in the system and serve as an indication, for the examiner, to stop the testing. TS: A pinprick stimulator (Weight: 256mNewton) will be used. The examiner will apply the pen that features a retractable blunt needle in a repetitive manner (once per second for ten seconds). The individual will be asked for the intensity of pain (NRS) at the first and at the last time and the given score will be noted. CPM: A manual blood pressure sphygmomanometer will be used in conjunction with the electronic algometer described above (PPT). | Diagnostic test | Non-prevalent Central Sensitisation, Prevalent Central Sensitisation |
| Radiographic EvaluationAlso: X-raysTibiofemoral and patellofemoral radiographs of the most painful knee will be taken using a standardised protocol (standing posterior-anterior (PA) and skyline views) and will be scored by a single experienced observer in order to generate data for correlation analyses with the primary and secondary outcomes. A Perspex Rosenberg template with lead beads is used for the standing PA view to standardising the degree of knee flexion, foot rotation and magnification. PA radiographs are taken with the participant facing the x-ray tube while standing on the Rosenberg jig and leaning forwards with their thighs touching the anterior aspect of the jig, the x-ray beams passing from the posterior aspect through to the anterior aspect of the knee. Variable jigs are used for the skyline view to obtaining 300 of knee flexion with the participant lying in a reclined supine position on a couch. Grading of radiographs for changes of OA will be based on the Kellgren and Lawrence (K/L) score. | Radiation | Non-prevalent Central Sensitisation, Prevalent Central Sensitisation |
| Ultrasound-guided AspirationAlso: Synovial Fluid ExtractionUltrasound scanning will be conducted on the most painful knee to identify synovial effusion. During the ultrasound scan, the supra-patellar pouch, medial and lateral recess of the knees will be assessed for synovial thickening, synovial fluid/effusion and for positive power Doppler. An ultrasonic probe will be used to direct ultrasonic waves onto the knee joint during sonography, and a computer converts the signals received so that they can be presented on the screen. During skin application, a sterile probe cover and sterile acoustic gel will be used. Once the best aspiration location is identified and the location of the needle insertion marked, the skin will be prepared with a cleansing agent such as iodine or chlorhexidine. The needle may be introduced into the skin either parallel to the probe or perpendicular to the probe. Once the aspiration is completed, the needle will be removed, the skin cleansed, and a bandage will be applied. | Procedure or surgery | Non-prevalent Central Sensitisation, Prevalent Central Sensitisation |
| Muscle Strength AssessmentAlso: Isometric DynamometerIsometric testing will be done at 30 and 60 degrees of flexion as done in the previous study and the participant will be in sitting position with hips and knees strapped to keep the position standardised. | Diagnostic test | Non-prevalent Central Sensitisation, Prevalent Central Sensitisation |
| Function Assessment (A)Also: Time Up-and-Go TestThe participant will start in a seated position. The participant will stand up upon therapist's command, walk 3 meters, turn around, walk back to the chair and sit down. The time will stop when the participant is seated. The subject can use an assistive device. If the assistive device is used, it will be documented. Important Note: A practice trial will be completed before the timed trial. | Diagnostic test | Non-prevalent Central Sensitisation, Prevalent Central Sensitisation |
| Function Assessment (B)Also: 30 seconds Sit-to-Stand TestThe 30-Second Chair Test is administered using a chair. The participant is seated in the middle of the chair with arms crossed at the wrists and held against the chest. The participant will practice a repetition or 2 before completing the test. If a participant must use their arms to complete the test, they are scored 0. The participant is encouraged to complete as many full stands as possible within 30 seconds. The participant is instructed to fully sit between each stand. While monitoring the participant's performance to ensure proper form, the tester silently counts the completion of each correct stand. The score is the total number of stands within 30 seconds (more than halfway up at the end of 30 seconds counts as a full stand). Incorrectly executed stands are not counted. The 30-second chair stand involves recording the number of stands a person can complete in 30 seconds rather than the amount of time it takes to complete a pre-determined number of repetitions. | Diagnostic test | Non-prevalent Central Sensitisation, Prevalent Central Sensitisation |
| Balance AssessmentAlso: Static Balance Test, Postural Sway TestStatic balance and postural sway either in the medial-lateral or antero-posterior direction will be assessed using the RS Scan force plate. The participant will be asked to stand on the plate looking straight forward for 30 seconds in two conditions: first with their eyes open and then with eyes closed. Medial-lateral, antero-posterior and total sway will be recorded. | Diagnostic test | Non-prevalent Central Sensitisation, Prevalent Central Sensitisation |
Primary outcome
Pain Sensitivity: Pressure Pain Detection Threshold (PPT)
Time frame: At baseline
PPT is a non-invasive test during which the sensitivity of the nerves is assessed by recording the amount of pressure applied to the skin. Pressure is applied through a probe. The pressure probe used is mounted in a handheld device connected to a computer. Pressure applied to the skin is gradually increased until the participant indicates (by pressing a button) that the sensation has changed from pressure to pain. The probe will be used on the contralateral forearm (brachioradialis muscle) using a standardised protocol used in other studies within the Pain Centre. Each region will be tested one time with short rest periods between each. The participants will be familiarised with the test before it is administered so that they know what to expect and how to respond.
Pain Sensitivity: Temporal Summation Pain (TS)
Time frame: At baseline
TS is a non-invasive test during which repetitive mechanical stimulation is applied over a short period to get their augmented response. A 256mN weighted pinprick stimulator will be used and applied perpendicular to the skin of suprapatellar region of the painful knee (5cm proximal from the centre of patella). The participant will be asked to rate the pain or sharpness they experience from 0-10 where 0 indicates no pain or sharpness and 10 indicates the most intense pain or sharpness imaginable. The response of the participant will be recorded. The same stimulator at the same site will be applied ten times repeatedly at a rate of 1/second. At the end of the series of 10 pinpricks, the participant will be asked to rate the average pain or sharpness they experienced out of the 10 stimuli using the same scale. The TS value will be calculated as the difference between the two ratings (single stimulus minus the average of the 10 stimuli).
Pain Sensitivity: Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM)
Time frame: At baseline
CPM is the application of PPT before and while a pressure cuff is inflated. A 7.5cm wide tourniquet cuff will be wrapped around the arm contra-laterally to the most painful knee. The lower rim of tourniquet cuff will be kept 3cm proximal to cubital fossa. The cuff will be inflated with the aim to reach above-systolic pressure with a maximum of 270mm/Hg. After target pressure is achieved, the participant will be asked to repeatedly make a handgrip or squeeze a foam ball until they develop ischemic pain ≥4 out of 10 on a 0-10 scale. Once NRS of 4/10 will be achieved, the probe of algometer will be applied in the same manner as during PPT testing. Once the participant presses the button, the probe will be withdrawn, and the cuff will be deflated released from the participants arm. The difference in PPT score (PPT with conditioning minus PPT without conditioning) will be considered the CPM value. A positive value indicates efficient CPM whereas a negative value indicates impaired CPM.
8 secondary outcomes
Central Aspects of Knee Pain (CAP-Knee)
Time frame: At baseline
Anxiety
Time frame: At baseline
Depression
Time frame: At baseline
Cognitive Function
Time frame: At baseline
Sleep Quality
Time frame: At baseline
Knee Pain, Stiffness, and Physical Functioning
Time frame: At baseline
General Musculoskeletal Health
Time frame: At baseline
Frailty
Time frame: At baseline
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Aug 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 11156538Peat G, McCarney R, Croft P. Knee pain and osteoarthritis in older adults: a review of community burden and current use of primary health care. Ann Rheum Dis. 2001 Feb;60(2):91-7. doi: 10.1136/ard.60.2.91.
- Background: PubMed 8615335Felson DT. Weight and osteoarthritis. Am J Clin Nutr. 1996 Mar;63(3 Suppl):430S-432S. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/63.3.430.
- Background: PubMed 8129049Guccione AA, Felson DT, Anderson JJ, Anthony JM, Zhang Y, Wilson PW, Kelly-Hayes M, Wolf PA, Kreger BE, Kannel WB. The effects of specific medical conditions on the functional limitations of elders in the Framingham Study. Am J Public Health. 1994 Mar;84(3):351-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.84.3.351.
- BackgroundMcCormick, A. Morbidity statistics from general practice. Fourth national study 1991-1992. Office of population censuses and surveys.1995.
- Background: PubMed 22961435Finan PH, Buenaver LF, Bounds SC, Hussain S, Park RJ, Haque UJ, Campbell CM, Haythornthwaite JA, Edwards RR, Smith MT. Discordance between pain and radiographic severity in knee osteoarthritis: findings from quantitative sensory testing of central sensitization. Arthritis Rheum. 2013 Feb;65(2):363-72. doi: 10.1002/art.34646.
- Background: PubMed 24045707Malfait AM, Schnitzer TJ. Towards a mechanism-based approach to pain management in osteoarthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2013 Nov;9(11):654-64. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2013.138. Epub 2013 Sep 17.
- Background: PubMed 19712899Latremoliere A, Woolf CJ. Central sensitization: a generator of pain hypersensitivity by central neural plasticity. J Pain. 2009 Sep;10(9):895-926. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2009.06.012.
- Background: PubMed 19160000Nijs J, Van Oosterwijck J, De Hertogh W. Rehabilitation of chronic whiplash: treatment of cervical dysfunctions or chronic pain syndrome? Clin Rheumatol. 2009 Mar;28(3):243-51. doi: 10.1007/s10067-008-1083-x. Epub 2009 Jan 22.
- Background: PubMed 17218057Jull G, Sterling M, Kenardy J, Beller E. Does the presence of sensory hypersensitivity influence outcomes of physical rehabilitation for chronic whiplash?--A preliminary RCT. Pain. 2007 May;129(1-2):28-34. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2006.09.030. Epub 2007 Jan 10.
- Background: PubMed 20961685Woolf CJ. Central sensitization: implications for the diagnosis and treatment of pain. Pain. 2011 Mar;152(3 Suppl):S2-S15. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.09.030. Epub 2010 Oct 18.
- Background: PubMed 21864381Murphy SL, Lyden AK, Phillips K, Clauw DJ, Williams DA. Subgroups of older adults with osteoarthritis based upon differing comorbid symptom presentations and potential underlying pain mechanisms. Arthritis Res Ther. 2011 Aug 24;13(4):R135. doi: 10.1186/ar3449.
- Background: PubMed 28320529French HP, Smart KM, Doyle F. Prevalence of neuropathic pain in knee or hip osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2017 Aug;47(1):1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2017.02.008. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided. Considerations about data sharing will be taken once the main results of this study have been published
Related trials for Knee Osteoarthritis
RecruitingPhase 3
Phase 3 Pivotal Trial Comparing CARTISTEM® and Surgical Comparator for Knee Cartilage Lesions and Osteoarthritis
Knee Cartilage Defects
Recruiting
The Effect of Different Exercise Training Programs on Muscle Oxygenation in Individuals With Knee Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis of Knee
Not yet recruiting
Comparison of Telerehabilitation and Usual Rehabilitation After Knee or Hip Surgery
Orthopedic Surgery, Rehabilitation
Not yet recruiting
Comparison of High-Intensity and Conventional Physical Therapy in Musculoskeletal Disorders
Low Back Pain, Radicular Syndrome
Recruiting
Exploration of Appropriate BIS Range and Propofol Effect-site Concentration During Total Intravenous Anesthesia With Concomitant Adjuvants.
Knee Osteoarthritis, Replacement, Knee
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ana M Valdes, PhD principal investigator
University of Nottingham
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Knee Osteoarthritis and Knee Pain Chronic, run by University of Nottingham at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Aug 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 13 Aug 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pain Sensitivity: Pressure Pain Detection Threshold (PPT) (time frame: At baseline). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04443452, which also lists 83 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Aug 2025.