AzTrials
AzTrials

Acute Coronary SyndromeNCT04444037

Impact of OCT Imaging on Decision Making During PCI in ACS Patients

An observational study of Acute Coronary Syndrome, run by Assiut University at 1 site in Japan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) provides valuable information to guide percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) regarding lesion preparation, stent sizing, and stent optimization. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 16 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Acute Coronary Syndrome
What is being tested?
OCT-guided PCI
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
390 participants
Where
1 siteJapan
Study dates
1 Jan 2019to 30 Apr 2020
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 16 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patient either underwent PCI with angiography alone or OCT guided and is grouped accordingly

Who may be able to join

  • Patients presented with acute coronary syndrome.
  • PCI was done to them with stent implantation.

Who cannot join

  • Multivessel PCI at the index procedure.
  • Patients with ACS due to graft failure post CABG.
  • Patients treated with no stent implantation.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Japan1 site
  • Wakayama Medical University

    Wakayama, 641-8509

Other trials in Japan

About this study

Official title: Impact of Optical Coherence Tomography Imaging on Decision-making During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients Presented With Acute Coronary Syndromes

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) provides valuable information to guide percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) regarding lesion preparation, stent sizing, and stent optimization.

Read the detailed description

OCT can be used in acute coronary syndrome (ACS). ACS has more complex culprit lesion morphologies and larger extent of coronary atherosclerosis compared with stable coronary artery disease. The detailed vascular information obtained by OCT may impact PCI in ACS, and which may improve acute results and late outcomes of PCI. Stent expansion immediately after PCI is a strong predictor of late outcomes of PCI, and it is associated with late clinical outcomes in many previous trials.

Being tested
OCT-guided PCI
Keywords
OCT, stent implantation
Medical subject headings
Acute Coronary Syndrome, Ornithine Carbamoyltransferase Deficiency Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • OCT-guided PCIDevice

    using optical coherence tomography imaging to help PCI procedure

Study groups in NCT04444037
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
OCT-guided PCIPCI procedure was done with intra-coronary imaging OCT.
Receives: Device: OCT-guided PCI
Angiography-guided PCIPCI procedure was done without any intra-coronary imaging assistance, guided by angiography alone

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percent difference in lumen expansion in stent treated lesion

    Compare residual percent diameter stenosis, percent area stenosis, and acute lumen gain between the two groups.

    Measured: Immediately after the procedure

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Clinical outcomes at 1 year follow up

    Cardiac death, MI, clinical-driven target-lesion revascularization (TLR), and stroke

    Measured: During 1 year following the index procedure

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Jun 2020
  2. Study start1 Jan 2019
  3. Primary completion31 Mar 2020
  4. Study completion30 Apr 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
390 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04444037
Sponsor's protocol ID
OCT in ACS patients
Status last verified
Jun 2020
First submitted
20 Jun 2020
Last updated
24 Jun 2020
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: Nothing

Publications

  • Wu S, Liu W, Guo Y, Zeng Y, Zhou Z, Zhao Y, Liu Y, Shi D, Wang Z, Ge H, Wang J, Jin P, Zhou Y. The impact of acute coronary syndrome on late drug-eluting stents restenosis: Insights from optical coherence tomography. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Dec;96(52):e9515. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009515.

    PubMed 29384957
  • Kubo T, Shinke T, Okamura T, Hibi K, Nakazawa G, Morino Y, Shite J, Fusazaki T, Otake H, Kozuma K, Ioji T, Kaneda H, Serikawa T, Kataoka T, Okada H, Akasaka T; OPINION Investigators. Optical frequency domain imaging vs. intravascular ultrasound in percutaneous coronary intervention (OPINION trial): one-year angiographic and clinical results. Eur Heart J. 2017 Nov 7;38(42):3139-3147. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx351.

    PubMed 29121226
  • Khalifa AKM, Kubo T, Ino Y, Terada K, Emori H, Higashioka D, Katayama Y, Takahata M, Shimamura K, Shiono Y, Matsuo Y, Tanaka A, Hozumi T, Akasaka T. Optical Coherence Tomography Comparison of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Among Plaque Rupture, Erosion, and Calcified Nodule in Acute Myocardial Infarction. Circ J. 2020 May 25;84(6):911-916. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-20-0014. Epub 2020 Apr 18.

    PubMed 32307358
  • Kubo T, Shinke T, Okamura T, Hibi K, Nakazawa G, Morino Y, Shite J, Ino Y, Kitabata H, Shimokawa T, Akasaka T. Comparison between Optical COherence tomography guidance and Angiography guidance in percutaneous coronary intervention (COCOA): Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. J Cardiol. 2018 Aug;72(2):170-175. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2018.01.005. Epub 2018 Mar 2.

    PubMed 29486964
  • Otake H, Kubo T, Shinke T, Hibi K, Tanaka S, Ishida M, Kataoka T, Takaya T, Iwasaki M, Sonoda S, Ioji T, Akasaka T. OPtical frequency domain imaging vs. INtravascular ultrasound in percutaneous coronary InterventiON in patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. J Cardiol. 2020 Sep;76(3):317-321. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2020.03.010. Epub 2020 Apr 24.

    PubMed 32340781
  • TIMI Study Group. The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) trial. Phase I findings. N Engl J Med. 1985 Apr 4;312(14):932-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198504043121437. No abstract available.

    PubMed 4038784
  • Ali ZA, Maehara A, Genereux P, Shlofmitz RA, Fabbiocchi F, Nazif TM, Guagliumi G, Meraj PM, Alfonso F, Samady H, Akasaka T, Carlson EB, Leesar MA, Matsumura M, Ozan MO, Mintz GS, Ben-Yehuda O, Stone GW; ILUMIEN III: OPTIMIZE PCI Investigators. Optical coherence tomography compared with intravascular ultrasound and with angiography to guide coronary stent implantation (ILUMIEN III: OPTIMIZE PCI): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016 Nov 26;388(10060):2618-2628. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31922-5. Epub 2016 Oct 30.

    PubMed 27806900
  • Meneveau N, Souteyrand G, Motreff P, Caussin C, Amabile N, Ohlmann P, Morel O, Lefrancois Y, Descotes-Genon V, Silvain J, Braik N, Chopard R, Chatot M, Ecarnot F, Tauzin H, Van Belle E, Belle L, Schiele F. Optical Coherence Tomography to Optimize Results of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome: Results of the Multicenter, Randomized DOCTORS Study (Does Optical Coherence Tomography Optimize Results of Stenting). Circulation. 2016 Sep 27;134(13):906-17. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.024393. Epub 2016 Aug 29.

    PubMed 27573032

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Acute Coronary Syndrome, run by Assiut University at 1 site in Japan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Jun 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Japan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percent difference in lumen expansion in stent treated lesion (time frame: Immediately after the procedure). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04444037, which also lists 8 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Jun 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in