Retention, UrinaryNCT04445051
Investigation of New Intermittent Catheters in Healthy Volunteers
A study testing SpeediCath® Standard male or female, New intermittent Variant 1 catheter for male or female and New intermittent Variant 2 catheter for male or female in people with Retention, Urinary, run by Coloplast A/S at 1 site in Denmark.
Trial summary
Investigation of non-CE marked intermittent catheters. The study was a randomized, single blinded, cross-over investigation comparing two new catheters with a comparator catheter in 30 adult healthy volunteers. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Retention, Urinary
- What is being tested?
- SpeediCath® Standard male or female, New intermittent Variant 1 catheter for male or female and New intermittent Variant 2 catheter for male or female
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteDenmark
- Study dates
- 1 Mar 2020to 1 Sep 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Minimum 18 years of age and with full legal capacity
- Written informed consent and signed letter of authority and secrecy agreement given
- Willing to comply with not using analgesics 1 up to 24 hours prior to catheterization visits
- Urine Multistix negative for erythrocytes (hematuria)
Who cannot join
- Participation in any other clinical investigations during this investigation
- Known hypersensitivity towards any of the test products
- Symptoms of urinary tract infection (UTI) (Investigators judgement)
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Denmark1 site
Urologisk klinik, Afsnit 2112, Rigshospitalet
Copenhagen, Copenhagen Ø, 2100
About this study
Official title: Exploratory Investigation on Performance and Safety of New Intermittent Catheters in Healthy Volunteers
Investigation of non-CE marked intermittent catheters. The study was a randomized, single blinded, cross-over investigation comparing two new catheters with a comparator catheter in 30 adult healthy volunteers.
Read the detailed description
The CP322 study investigated a novel non-CE marked intermittent catheter for males and females, designed in two different variants, Variant 1 and Variant 2, respectively. The study was conducted in Denmark and was a randomized, single blinded, cross-over investigation comparing the two new variant catheters with a comparator catheter in 30 adult healthy volunteers.
For each participant, the study thus contained three test visits/treatment arms (Comparator, Variant 1 and Variant 2, respectively), to which the 30 participants were randomized using a randomization sequence of six (i.e., there were six different random options for the order in which the participants tested the three catheters). There were 4-14 days between the test visits.
- Conditions
- Retention, Urinary
- Being tested
- SpeediCath® Standard male or female, New intermittent Variant 1 catheter for male or female, New intermittent Variant 2 catheter for male or female
- Medical subject headings
- Urinary Retention
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SpeediCath® Standard male or femaleDevice
Intermittent catheterization through the urethra draining the bladder, using SpeediCath® Standard male or female.
New intermittent Variant 1 catheter for male or femaleDevice
Intermittent catheterization through the urethra draining the bladder, using the new Variant 1 for male or female.
New intermittent Variant 2 catheter for male or femaleDevice
Intermittent catheterization through the urethra draining the bladder, using the new Variant 2 for male or female.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intermittent catheter; SpeediCath® Standard male or female | Active comparator | Participants underwent catheterization with standard of care intermittent catheter. The catheterization was performed by a trained nurse. Receives: Device: SpeediCath® Standard male or female |
| New intermittent catheter Variant 1 for male or female | Experimental | Participants underwent catheterization with the new intermittent catheter Variant 1 for males or females. The catheterization was performed by a trained nurse. Receives: Device: New intermittent Variant 1 catheter for male or female |
| New intermittent catheter Variant 2 for male or female | Experimental | Participants underwent catheterization with the new intermittent catheter Variant 2 for males or females. The catheterization was performed by a trained nurse. Receives: Device: New intermittent Variant 2 catheter for male or female |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Residual Urine at 1st Flow-stop
The residual urine at 1st flow-stop during catheterization (performed by a nurse) represents the volume of urine left in the bladder, the first time the urine stops running out of the catheter during bladder emptying/urination. This was assessed using a pressure sensor with time-logged weighing, meaning that a flow-stop was registered measuring the hydrostatic pressure at the outlet of an intermittent urinary catheter. Simultaneously, the collected urine was weighed and converted to volume, and the residual volume at first flow stop was calculated as the difference between the total urine volume collected and the volume collected at the first flow-stop.
Measured: Immediately after the procedure/catheterization, up to 5 min.
Secondary outcomes (6)
Post-void Residual Urine
The volume of residual urine (urine left in the bladder) post catheterization (performed by the nurse) measured in triplicates using an ultrasound scanner.
Measured: Immediately after the procedure/catheterization, up to 15 min.
Catheterization Insertion Discomfort
Discomfort measured at catheter insertion, using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The VAS is a tool used to rate the intensity of certain sensations and feelings, e.g. discomfort/pain. It is a straight line of 10 cm (in this case horizontal) with one end meaning no discomfort/pain (0 cm) and the other end meaning the worst discomfort/pain imaginable (10 cm). The subject visualizes and marks a point on the line that matches the amount of discomfort/pain experienced. A high score reflects a worse outcome than a lower score.
Measured: Immediately after the procedure/catheterization, up to 5 min.
Catheterization Urination Discomfort
Discomfort measured during catheter emptying/urination, using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The VAS is a tool used to rate the intensity of certain sensations and feelings, e.g. discomfort/pain. It is a straight line of 10 cm (in this case horizontal) with one end meaning no discomfort/pain (0 cm) and the other end meaning the worst discomfort/pain imaginable (10 cm). The subject visualizes and marks a point on the line that matches the amount of discomfort/pain experienced. A high score reflects a worse outcome than a lower score.
Measured: Immediately after the procedure/catheterization, up to 5 min.
Withdrawal Discomfort
Discomfort measured during catheter withdrawal, using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The VAS is a tool used to rate the intensity of certain sensations and feelings, e.g. discomfort/pain. It is a straight line of 10 cm (in this case horizontal) with one end meaning no discomfort/pain (0 cm) and the other end meaning the worst discomfort/pain imaginable (10 cm). The subject visualizes and marks a point on the line that matches the amount of discomfort/pain experienced. A high score reflects a worse outcome than a lower score.
Measured: Immediately after the procedure/catheterization, up to 5 min.
Overall Catheterization Discomfort
Discomfort measured for the overall/entire catheterization procedure, using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The VAS is a tool used to rate the intensity of certain sensations and feelings, e.g. discomfort/pain. It is a straight line of 10 cm (in this case horizontal) with one end meaning no discomfort/pain (0 cm) and the other end meaning the worst discomfort/pain imaginable (10 cm). The subject visualizes and marks a point on the line that matches the amount of discomfort/pain experienced. A high score reflects a worse outcome than a lower score.
Measured: Immediately after the procedure/catheterization, up to 5 min.
Post-catheterization Urination Discomfort
Discomfort measured for the first normal void/urination after the catheterization procedure, using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The VAS is a tool used to rate the intensity of certain sensations and feelings, e.g. discomfort/pain. It is a straight line of 10 cm (in this case horizontal) with one end meaning no discomfort/pain (0 cm) and the other end meaning the worst discomfort/pain imaginable (10 cm). The subject visualizes and marks a point on the line that matches the amount of discomfort/pain experienced. A high score reflects a worse outcome than a lower score.
Measured: Immediately after the first normal void following the procedure/catheterization, up to 5 min.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Jun 2020
- Study start1 Mar 2020
- Primary completion1 Sep 2020
- Study completion1 Sep 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Retention, UrinaryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Coloplast A/S
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Per Bagi, MD, Principal investigator, Blegdamsvej 9, Urologisk klinik Afsnit 2112, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04445051
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CP322
- Status last verified
- Aug 2022
- First submitted
- 28 May 2020
- Last updated
- 3 Jul 2023
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Landauro MH, Tentor F, Pedersen T, Jacobsen L, Bagi P. Improved Performance With the Micro-Hole Zone Intermittent Catheter: A Combined Analysis of 3 Randomized Controlled Studies Comparing the New Catheter Technology With a Conventional Eyelet Catheter. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2023 Nov-Dec 01;50(6):504-511. doi: 10.1097/WON.0000000000001029.
PubMed 37966080
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Jul 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Exploratory Investigation on Performance and Safety of New Intermittent Catheters in Healthy Volunteers
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04445051
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CP322
- Conditions
- Retention, Urinary
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Coloplast A/SIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 1 Mar 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Sep 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Sep 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 Jun 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 3 Jul 2023
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Investigation of non-CE marked intermittent catheters. The study was a randomized, single blinded, cross-over investigation comparing two new catheters with a comparator catheter in 30 adult healthy volunteers.
Detailed description
The CP322 study investigated a novel non-CE marked intermittent catheter for males and females, designed in two different variants, Variant 1 and Variant 2, respectively. The study was conducted in Denmark and was a randomized, single blinded, cross-over investigation comparing the two new variant catheters with a comparator catheter in 30 adult healthy volunteers.
For each participant, the study thus contained three test visits/treatment arms (Comparator, Variant 1 and Variant 2, respectively), to which the 30 participants were randomized using a randomization sequence of six (i.e., there were six different random options for the order in which the participants tested the three catheters). There were 4-14 days between the test visits.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intermittent catheter; SpeediCath® Standard male or female | Active comparator | Device: SpeediCath® Standard male or femaleParticipants underwent catheterization with standard of care intermittent catheter. The catheterization was performed by a trained nurse. |
| New intermittent catheter Variant 1 for male or female | Experimental | Device: New intermittent Variant 1 catheter for male or femaleParticipants underwent catheterization with the new intermittent catheter Variant 1 for males or females. The catheterization was performed by a trained nurse. |
| New intermittent catheter Variant 2 for male or female | Experimental | Device: New intermittent Variant 2 catheter for male or femaleParticipants underwent catheterization with the new intermittent catheter Variant 2 for males or females. The catheterization was performed by a trained nurse. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Minimum 18 years of age and with full legal capacity
- Written informed consent and signed letter of authority and secrecy agreement given
- Willing to comply with not using analgesics 1 up to 24 hours prior to catheterization visits
- Urine Multistix negative for erythrocytes (hematuria)
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Participation in any other clinical investigations during this investigation
- Known hypersensitivity towards any of the test products
- Symptoms of urinary tract infection (UTI) (Investigators judgement)
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SpeediCath® Standard male or femaleIntermittent catheterization through the urethra draining the bladder, using SpeediCath® Standard male or female. | Device | Intermittent catheter; SpeediCath® Standard male or female |
| New intermittent Variant 1 catheter for male or femaleIntermittent catheterization through the urethra draining the bladder, using the new Variant 1 for male or female. | Device | New intermittent catheter Variant 1 for male or female |
| New intermittent Variant 2 catheter for male or femaleIntermittent catheterization through the urethra draining the bladder, using the new Variant 2 for male or female. | Device | New intermittent catheter Variant 2 for male or female |
Primary outcome
Residual Urine at 1st Flow-stop
Time frame: Immediately after the procedure/catheterization, up to 5 min.
The residual urine at 1st flow-stop during catheterization (performed by a nurse) represents the volume of urine left in the bladder, the first time the urine stops running out of the catheter during bladder emptying/urination. This was assessed using a pressure sensor with time-logged weighing, meaning that a flow-stop was registered measuring the hydrostatic pressure at the outlet of an intermittent urinary catheter. Simultaneously, the collected urine was weighed and converted to volume, and the residual volume at first flow stop was calculated as the difference between the total urine volume collected and the volume collected at the first flow-stop.
6 secondary outcomes
Post-void Residual Urine
Time frame: Immediately after the procedure/catheterization, up to 15 min.
Catheterization Insertion Discomfort
Time frame: Immediately after the procedure/catheterization, up to 5 min.
Catheterization Urination Discomfort
Time frame: Immediately after the procedure/catheterization, up to 5 min.
Withdrawal Discomfort
Time frame: Immediately after the procedure/catheterization, up to 5 min.
Overall Catheterization Discomfort
Time frame: Immediately after the procedure/catheterization, up to 5 min.
Post-catheterization Urination Discomfort
Time frame: Immediately after the first normal void following the procedure/catheterization, up to 5 min.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Jul 2023.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37966080Landauro MH, Tentor F, Pedersen T, Jacobsen L, Bagi P. Improved Performance With the Micro-Hole Zone Intermittent Catheter: A Combined Analysis of 3 Randomized Controlled Studies Comparing the New Catheter Technology With a Conventional Eyelet Catheter. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2023 Nov-Dec 01;50(6):504-511. doi: 10.1097/WON.0000000000001029.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Retention, Urinary
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Voiding Position (Standing in the Shower vs. Sitting) on Post- Void Residual Urine Volume (PVR) After Removal of Urinary Catheter in Women Following Vaginal Delivery With Epidural Analgesia: A Double- Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
Postpartum Urinary Retention
Recruiting
Pelvic Health Electrically Evoked Recording (PEER) 2 Study
Overactive Bladder, Fecal Incontinence
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Long-Term Effectiveness and Safety of Sacral Neuromodulation With InterStim for Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction
Overactive Bladder (OAB), Urgency Urinary Incontinence
Active, not recruiting
Preoperative Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy to Minimize Stress Urinary Incontinence After Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia With Outflow Obstruction, Urinary Retention
Recruiting
Tamsulosin for Early Catheter Removal After Rectal Cancer Surgery
Urinary Catheters, Rectal Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Per Bagi, MD principal investigator
Blegdamsvej 9, Urologisk klinik Afsnit 2112, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing SpeediCath® Standard male or female, New intermittent Variant 1 catheter for male or female and New intermittent Variant 2 catheter for male or female in people with Retention, Urinary, run by Coloplast A/S at 1 site in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Jul 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 3 Jul 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Residual Urine at 1st Flow-stop (time frame: Immediately after the procedure/catheterization, up to 5 min.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04445051, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Jul 2023; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.