Dental ImplantsAO4PEEKDevNCT04446078
Hybrid Polyetheretherketone (PEEK)-Acrylic Resin Prostheses and the All-on-4 Concept for Full Arch Rehabilitation
A study testing PEEK- acrylic resin prosthesis supported by 4 dental implants in people with Dental Implants and Dental Materials, run by Malo Clinic at 1 site in Portugal.
Trial summary
It is necessary to evaluate the outcome of implant supported fixed prosthetic rehabilitations using peek material. To test this, the study design to be used will be a prospective single cohort to evaluate the long term outcome of fixed prosthetic implant supported rehabilitations. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Dental Implants, Dental Materials, Mandible
- What is being tested?
- PEEK- acrylic resin prosthesis supported by 4 dental implants
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 37 participants
- Where
- 1 sitePortugal
- Study dates
- 2 May 2014to 9 Feb 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- rehabilitated with implant-supported fixed prostheses through the All-on-4 concept (Nobel Biocare)
Who cannot join
- Patients in active chemotherapy or radiotherapy,
- Presenting insufficient bone volume,
- Unable to provide written informed consent
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
It is necessary to evaluate the outcome of implant supported fixed prosthetic rehabilitations using peek material. To test this, the study design to be used will be a prospective single cohort to evaluate the long term outcome of fixed prosthetic implant supported rehabilitations. The cohort will be evaluated after 5 years of follow-up, regarding prosthetic survival, implant survival, marginal bone resorption, incidence of mechanical complications (loosening or fracture of prosthetic components), biological complications (peri-implant pathology, suppuration, fistulae), incidence of biological complications (peri-implant pathology, suppuration, excessive marginal bone resorption) in-mouth comfort, overall chewing feeling, framework integrity, veneer adhesion, veneer chipping, patient tissue reaction, denture staining, manufacture issues,
Read the detailed description
Problem Peek material is already used in the dentistry field, but proof on its long-term outcome in implant supported fixed rehabilitations is lacking.
Objectives
- To evaluate the long term outcome of fixed prosthetic implant supported rehabilitations using peek material.
- To report the results.
Significance This investigation is of interest, because it will provide an overview of the long term outcome of implant supported fixed prosthetic rehabilitations using peek material.
Hypothesis The hypothesis that this study will evaluate, will be the distribution of survival and other variables of interest in implant supported fixed prosthetic rehabilitations using peek material.
Materials and Methods Methodology This study will be performed at Malo Clinic in Lisbon. It is estimated to last for approximately 5 years. The study design to be used will be a prospective single cohort study to evaluate the long-term outcome of implant supported fixed prosthetic rehabilitations using peek material. The cohort will be evaluated in at least 5 interventions (1 per year), regarding survival and the clinical/technical parameters established in this study. There will be no risk for the participants, has all procedures for collecting information will be minimally invasive and non- traumatizing.
Population The population of this study consists in individuals rehabilitated with a fixed prosthetic rehabilitation supported by immediate function implants, of both genders, without age restrictions.
Sample size It is expected that the sample will consist of 37 consecutively treated patients during the year of 2013.
External variables:
- Withdrawal of the patients;
- The patient missing the control appointment;
- Interruption of the treatment by the patient;
- Patient deceased.
Statistical analysis:
In this study, the data will be treated by means of descriptive and inferential statistics. The data will be treated using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) for Windows version 17.0 ®. Survival will be estimated through life tables. Inferential analysis will be performed for characterization of the cohort and independent variables.
Adverse events:
An adverse event is defined as any undesirable clinical occurrence in a subject whether it is considered to be device related or not. If the adverse event is regarded as device related it is stated as an adverse device effect. An adverse event or adverse device effect may be serious\severe or non-serious\non-severe. If, as result of an adverse event during a clinical investigation, a subject has to be hospitalized, or their hospitalization is unduly prolonged due to potential disability or danger to life because an intervention has been necessitated or the event is terminal, the adverse event or adverse effect is regarded as serious. All serious adverse events must be reported to the Ethic Committee and without any delay.
Ethical aspects:
This investigation will be carried out in accordance to the ethical principles and guidelines stated in the Declaration of Helsinki. The Investigation should be evaluated and approved by a National Ethic Committee prior to including the first subject in the investigation. The application to the Ethic committee is to be made by the responsible investigators, and a copy of the approval should be sent to the monitor before the investigation starts. It is also of great importance that each subject receives oral and written information about the investigation, and that she/he must only participate if they truly want to do so. Also, the subjects must be aware of the fact that they can withdraw from the investigation at any time and for any reason without jeopardizing their future treatment.
Furthermore, the subjects should be made aware of the fact that the data from his/her treatment will be registered in a computer database, but that she/he will only be registered through a code system. This means that the identity of each subject will be unknown to all others than the doctor performing the treatment. Each subject is entitled to take part of the information stored about her/his treatment. This information is to be handed out by the treating doctor.
Database management:
The data collected from the forms will be introduced in a digital database (Microsoft Office Excel 2003®). The database management will be the responsibility of the Malo Clinic.
- Conditions
- Dental Implants, Dental Materials, Mandible, Prosthesis Survival
- Being tested
- PEEK- acrylic resin prosthesis supported by 4 dental implants
- Keywords
- All-on-4; All-on-four
- Medical subject headings
- Prosthesis Failure
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PEEK- acrylic resin prosthesis supported by 4 dental implantsDevice
Patients rehabilitated for edentulism of one or both arches through an implant supported fixed prosthesis
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| PEEK - All-on-4 | Experimental | Patients rehabilitated with a PEEK-acrylic resin prosthesis supported by immediate function dental implants inserted through the All-on-4 concept Receives: Device: PEEK- acrylic resin prosthesis supported by 4 dental implants |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
prosthetic survival
considering the necessity of replacing the prosthesis; fracture of the infrastructure
Measured: 5 years
Secondary outcomes (9)
implant survival
considering the implants' function, censoring as a failure the first implant to fail in a given patient
Measured: 5 years
marginal bone loss
Marginal bone level was defined as the distance between the implant's platform and the most apical bone-implant contact, while the measurements difference between baseline (connection of the definitive prosthesis) and the subsequent evaluation.
Measured: 5 years
Plaque levels
modified plaque index
Measured: 5 years
Bleeding levels
modified bleeding index
Measured: 5 years
Problems during manufacturing
Evaluation of veneer adhesion by detachment of acrylic resin veneer from PEEK infrastructure.
Measured: 5 years
Biological complications
Adverse soft tissue reaction, suppuration, abscess, fistulae and peri-implant pathology (the presence of marginal bone loss and peri-implant pockets of more than 4 mm, with or without the concurrent presence of bleeding on probing or suppuration)
Measured: 5 years
Mechanical complications
Prosthesis, abutments or prosthetic screws fracture or loosening
Measured: 5 years
Patient subjective evaluation concerning overall chewing feeling associated with the specific feel during food mastication
The evaluations performed by the patient were registered on a visual analogue scale ranging between 0-10 (poor to excellent)
Measured: 5 years
Patient subjective evaluation concerning in mouth comfort specified as the patients' overall evaluation according to the expectations when submitting the prosthesis to function
The evaluations performed by the patient were registered on a visual analogue scale ranging between 0-10 (poor to excellent)
Measured: 5 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Jun 2020
- Study start2 May 2014
- Primary completion29 Dec 2021
- Study completion9 Feb 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Dental ImplantsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- prospective cohort
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 37 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Malo Clinic
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Miguel A de Araújo Nobre, PhD, Principal investigator, Malo Clinic
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04446078
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AO4PEEKDevGroup
- Acronym
- AO4PEEKDev
- Status last verified
- Feb 2023
- First submitted
- 22 Jun 2020
- Last updated
- 24 Feb 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Feb 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Hybrid Polyetheretherketone (PEEK)-Acrylic Resin Prostheses and the All-on-4 Concept for Full Arch Rehabilitation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04446078
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AO4PEEKDev / AO4PEEKDevGroup
- Conditions
- Dental Implants, Dental Materials, Mandible, Prosthesis Survival
- Keywords
- All-on-4; All-on-four
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 37 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Malo ClinicUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 2 May 2014 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 29 Dec 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 9 Feb 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 Jun 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
It is necessary to evaluate the outcome of implant supported fixed prosthetic rehabilitations using peek material. To test this, the study design to be used will be a prospective single cohort to evaluate the long term outcome of fixed prosthetic implant supported rehabilitations. The cohort will be evaluated after 5 years of follow-up, regarding prosthetic survival, implant survival, marginal bone resorption, incidence of mechanical complications (loosening or fracture of prosthetic components), biological complications (peri-implant pathology, suppuration, fistulae), incidence of biological complications (peri-implant pathology, suppuration, excessive marginal bone resorption) in-mouth comfort, overall chewing feeling, framework integrity, veneer adhesion, veneer chipping, patient tissue reaction, denture staining, manufacture issues,
Detailed description
Problem Peek material is already used in the dentistry field, but proof on its long-term outcome in implant supported fixed rehabilitations is lacking.
Objectives
- To evaluate the long term outcome of fixed prosthetic implant supported rehabilitations using peek material.
- To report the results.
Significance This investigation is of interest, because it will provide an overview of the long term outcome of implant supported fixed prosthetic rehabilitations using peek material.
Hypothesis The hypothesis that this study will evaluate, will be the distribution of survival and other variables of interest in implant supported fixed prosthetic rehabilitations using peek material.
Materials and Methods Methodology This study will be performed at Malo Clinic in Lisbon. It is estimated to last for approximately 5 years. The study design to be used will be a prospective single cohort study to evaluate the long-term outcome of implant supported fixed prosthetic rehabilitations using peek material. The cohort will be evaluated in at least 5 interventions (1 per year), regarding survival and the clinical/technical parameters established in this study. There will be no risk for the participants, has all procedures for collecting information will be minimally invasive and non- traumatizing.
Population The population of this study consists in individuals rehabilitated with a fixed prosthetic rehabilitation supported by immediate function implants, of both genders, without age restrictions.
Sample size It is expected that the sample will consist of 37 consecutively treated patients during the year of 2013.
External variables:
- Withdrawal of the patients;
- The patient missing the control appointment;
- Interruption of the treatment by the patient;
- Patient deceased.
Statistical analysis:
In this study, the data will be treated by means of descriptive and inferential statistics. The data will be treated using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) for Windows version 17.0 ®. Survival will be estimated through life tables. Inferential analysis will be performed for characterization of the cohort and independent variables.
Adverse events:
An adverse event is defined as any undesirable clinical occurrence in a subject whether it is considered to be device related or not. If the adverse event is regarded as device related it is stated as an adverse device effect. An adverse event or adverse device effect may be serious\severe or non-serious\non-severe. If, as result of an adverse event during a clinical investigation, a subject has to be hospitalized, or their hospitalization is unduly prolonged due to potential disability or danger to life because an intervention has been necessitated or the event is terminal, the adverse event or adverse effect is regarded as serious. All serious adverse events must be reported to the Ethic Committee and without any delay.
Ethical aspects:
This investigation will be carried out in accordance to the ethical principles and guidelines stated in the Declaration of Helsinki. The Investigation should be evaluated and approved by a National Ethic Committee prior to including the first subject in the investigation. The application to the Ethic committee is to be made by the responsible investigators, and a copy of the approval should be sent to the monitor before the investigation starts. It is also of great importance that each subject receives oral and written information about the investigation, and that she/he must only participate if they truly want to do so. Also, the subjects must be aware of the fact that they can withdraw from the investigation at any time and for any reason without jeopardizing their future treatment.
Furthermore, the subjects should be made aware of the fact that the data from his/her treatment will be registered in a computer database, but that she/he will only be registered through a code system. This means that the identity of each subject will be unknown to all others than the doctor performing the treatment. Each subject is entitled to take part of the information stored about her/his treatment. This information is to be handed out by the treating doctor.
Database management:
The data collected from the forms will be introduced in a digital database (Microsoft Office Excel 2003®). The database management will be the responsibility of the Malo Clinic.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- prospective cohort
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| PEEK - All-on-4 | Experimental | Device: PEEK- acrylic resin prosthesis supported by 4 dental implantsPatients rehabilitated with a PEEK-acrylic resin prosthesis supported by immediate function dental implants inserted through the All-on-4 concept |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- rehabilitated with implant-supported fixed prostheses through the All-on-4 concept (Nobel Biocare)
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients in active chemotherapy or radiotherapy,
- Presenting insufficient bone volume,
- Unable to provide written informed consent
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PEEK- acrylic resin prosthesis supported by 4 dental implantsPatients rehabilitated for edentulism of one or both arches through an implant supported fixed prosthesis | Device | PEEK - All-on-4 |
Primary outcome
prosthetic survival
Time frame: 5 years
considering the necessity of replacing the prosthesis; fracture of the infrastructure
9 secondary outcomes
implant survival
Time frame: 5 years
marginal bone loss
Time frame: 5 years
Plaque levels
Time frame: 5 years
Bleeding levels
Time frame: 5 years
Problems during manufacturing
Time frame: 5 years
Biological complications
Time frame: 5 years
Mechanical complications
Time frame: 5 years
Patient subjective evaluation concerning overall chewing feeling associated with the specific feel during food mastication
Time frame: 5 years
Patient subjective evaluation concerning in mouth comfort specified as the patients' overall evaluation according to the expectations when submitting the prosthesis to function
Time frame: 5 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Feb 2023.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Dental Implants
Not yet recruiting
Free Soft Tissue Grafts (FSTG) Using Autograft Palatal Donor Tissue vs. Xenograft Collagen Matrix (Zderm™)
Gingival Recession Localized Moderate, Dental Implant
Not yet recruiting
Safety Assessment of Placing a Single Dental Implant Without Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Simple Cases: A Pilot Study
Tooth Loss and Rehabillitation, Dental Implant Failure
Active, not recruiting
L-PRF Block vs Composite Graft for Horizontal Ridge Augmentation
Alveolar Ridge Resorption After Extraction, Alveolar Bone Loss
RecruitingObservational study
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Dentsply Sirona PrimeTaper Implants
Dental Implants
Active, not recruiting
The Aim of the Study Will be Clinically and Radio Graphically Comparison of Two Implant Designs Used to Treat Atrophied Mandible . Implant Design Comparison Will Done for Implant Stability,Peri-implant Soft Tissue Health Changes and Bone Changes .Patients Will be Divided Randomly Into Two Group
Dental Implant Bone Loss, Peri-Implant Health
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Miguel A de Araújo Nobre, PhD principal investigator
Malo Clinic
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing PEEK- acrylic resin prosthesis supported by 4 dental implants in people with Dental Implants and Dental Materials, run by Malo Clinic at 1 site in Portugal.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Feb 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Portugal. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
prosthetic survival (time frame: 5 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Feb 2023.