AzTrials
AzTrials

Sturge-Weber SyndromePhase 2NCT04447846

Novel Cognitive Treatment Targets for Epidiolex in Sturge- Weber Syndrome

A Phase 2 study testing Cannabidiol in people with Sturge-Weber Syndrome, run by Anne Comi, MD at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to better understand the utility of cannabidiol (CBD/ Epidiolex) for improving the treatment of cognitive impairments in Sturge-Weber syndrome (SWS). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 3 to 50 years
Conditions the study is for
Sturge-Weber Syndrome
What is being tested?
Cannabidiol
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
11 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
14 Oct 2019to 9 Dec 2022
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 3 to 50 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

None listed.

Who cannot join

  • Patients with any severe and/or uncontrolled medical conditions at randomization such as:
  • Liver disease such as cirrhosis, decompensated liver disease, and chronic hepatitis (i.e. quantifiable HBV-DNA and/or positive HbsAg, quantifiable HCV-RNA)
  • Uncontrolled diabetes as defined by fasting serum glucose greater than 1.5
  • Active (acute or chronic) or uncontrolled severe infections
  • Active, bleeding diathesis
  • Patients who have a major surgery or significant traumatic injury within 4 weeks of study entry, patients who have not recovered from the side effects of any major surgery (defined as requiring general anesthesia), or patients that may require major surgery during the course of the study.
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Patients who start or discontinue a seizure, mood or behavioral medication in the 4 weeks leading up to screening.
  • Prior treatment with any investigational drug or use of any other cannabis product within the preceding 4 weeks prior to study entry.
  • Patients with a history of non-compliance to medical regimens or who are considered potentially unreliable or will not be able to complete the entire study. This includes those in foster care, or those unable to keep follow-up appointments, maintain close contact with the Principal Investigator, or complete all necessary studies to maintain safety.
  • Pregnant or nursing (lactating) women, where pregnancy is defined as the state of the female after conception and until the termination of gestation, confirmed by a positive hCG laboratory test.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Kennedy Krieger Institute

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21205

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Novel Cognitive Treatment Targets for Epidiolex in Sturge- Weber Syndrome: A Phase II Trial

The purpose of this study is to better understand the utility of cannabidiol (CBD/ Epidiolex) for improving the treatment of cognitive impairments in Sturge-Weber syndrome (SWS).

Read the detailed description

The investigators hope to gain an understanding of the utility of pharmaceutical grade CBD used for the treatment of cognitive impairments in SWS in this open-label study. Anecdotal evidence from a phase I trial investigating the use of CBD for medically refractory seizures suggests CBD may also have a beneficial effect on cognition, mood, and behavior. The investigators hypothesize that CBD/ Epidiolex will improve SWS brain function resulting in improved cognitive function, social interactions, mood, motor function and behavior, as well as reduced migraines. This is an open-label prospective oral drug trial of Epidiolex in 10 subjects. Assessments will be done at baseline and repeated after 6 months on study drug.

Being tested
Cannabidiol
Keywords
Sturge-Weber Syndrome, SWS, Cognitive impairments
Medical subject headings
Sturge-Weber Syndrome, Cognitive Dysfunction

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • CannabidiolDrug

    Also called Epidiolex, CBD

    Initiation of treatment will begin with 5 mg/kg/day given in two divided doses. The dose will be increased by 5 mg/kg/day after seven days and then by 5 mg/kg/day every seven days up to a maximum dose of 20 mg/kg/day given.

Study groups in NCT04447846
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Cannabidiol/ EpidiolexExperimentalAll subjects will receive the experimental Epidiolex (cannabidiol) oral solution to be taken at home twice a day, and will be treated on an outpatient basis. The drug will be taken for 24 weeks unless the subject chooses to participate in the extension phase of the study, in which case the subject will continue to receive the drug for one additional year or until the drug is approved for clinical use for the treatment of cognitive impairments in patients with Sturge-Weber syndrome.
Receives: Drug: Cannabidiol

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. List Sorting Working Memory Test

    Data on cognitive function was collected using the List Sorting Working Memory Test from the NIH Toolbox. Data was collected on working memory performance, which was transformed into a t-score from 0 to 100 where a higher t-score indicates better performance. T-score of 50 indicates the population mean with a standard deviation of 10. Data was collected at baseline and after 6 months on study drug.

    Measured: Baseline, Follow-up (6 months)

Secondary outcomes (18)
  1. Picture Vocabulary Test

    Data on cognitive function was collected using the Picture Vocabulary subtest from the NIH Toolbox. Single words are presented via an audio file, paired simultaneously with 4 screen images of objects, actions, and/or depictions of concepts. The task is to pick the picture that matches the spoken word. Performance on the task was transformed into a t-score from 0 to 100 where a higher t-score indicates better performance. T-score of 50 indicates the population mean with a standard deviation of 10. Data was collected at baseline and after 6 months on study drug.

    Measured: Baseline, Follow-up (6 months)

  2. Seizure Frequency

    Change in seizure frequency by seizure score at pre-treatment baseline and after six months. The seizure score is taken from the Sturge-Weber Neuroscore on a scale of 0 to 4 where 0=none, 1=1+. but controlled, 2=Breakthrough, 3=monthly, 4=Weekly+. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.

    Measured: Baseline, Follow-up (6 months)

  3. Migraine Severity

    Data on migraine severity will be collected using patient responses to questions on a standard six-point scale. Data will be collected on the frequency of an event (e.g. feelings of frustration, performance of daily activities) which will be transformed into a score from 0 to 100 where higher scores indicate a less migraine severity and better outcomes. Data will be collected at baseline and after 6 months on study drug.

    Measured: Baseline, Follow-up (6 months)

  4. Modified House Classification Scores

    Data on motor function was collected using a Modified House Classification. Data was collected on the ability to complete a task with the subject's non-dominant hand which was transformed into a score from 1 to 8 and 0 to 32 where higher scores indicate better motor function. Data was collected at baseline and after 6 months on study drug.

    Measured: Baseline, Follow-up (6 months)

  5. Erhardt Developmental Prehension Assessment Scores

    Data on motor function was collected using the Erhardt Developmental Prehension assessment. Data was collected on the ability to complete a task with each hand, which was scored as age equivalence of task performance (in months). Higher scores indicate better motor function. Data was collected at baseline and after 6 months on study drug.

    Measured: Baseline, Follow-up (6 months)

  6. Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory Computer Adapted Test

    Data on motor function was collected using the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory Computer Adapted Test. Data was collected on the subject's ability to complete tasks involved in daily activities, mobility, and social/ cognitive activities. The data was transformed into scaled scores ranging from 20 to 80, where higher scores indicate better motor function. Data was collected at baseline and after 6 months on study drug.

    Measured: Baseline, Follow-up (6 months)

  7. ABILHAND Questionnaire

    Data on motor function was collected using the ABILHAND questionnaire, a measure of manual ability for adults with upper limb impairments. Data was collected on the subject's ability to complete daily activities that involve the upper limbs. Score was collected as a patient measure with scores ranging from -10 to 10. Higher scores indicate better motor function. Data was collected at baseline and after 6 months on study drug.

    Measured: Baseline, Follow-up (6 months)

  8. Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, Fifth Edition (WISC-V) or Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-IV)

    Data on cognitive function was collected using selected subtests, from either the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, Fifth Edition (WISC-V) or the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-IV). For the WISC-V and WAIS-IV subtests selected, scaled scores were derived from the normative data which account for age and demographic information. The selected WISC-V/WAIS-IV subtests were as follows: Digit Span, Symbol Search, Coding and Processing Speed; the first three subtests were scored from 0-10, the fourth subtest from 0-100, and for all subtests higher score is better. The selected subtests, from the WISC-V and the WAIS-IV, were combined to increase statistical power.

    Statistically rare changes in individual test scores were determined using a reliable change index methodology based upon normative information for these assessments.

    Measured: Baseline, Follow-up (6 months)

  9. Pediatric Neurological Quality of Life (Neuro-QoL)

    Data on cognitive function was collected using Neurological Quality of Life scales from the NIH Toolbox. Data on frequency of an event (e.g. forgetting schoolwork) was collected and transformed into a t-score from 0 to 100 where higher t-scores indicate worse anger, worse anxiety, worse pain, better social relationships, worse stigma, worse depression, better cognitive function, and worse fatigue. T-score of 50 indicates the population mean with a standard deviation of 10. Data was collected at baseline and 6 months on study drug.

    Measured: Baseline, Follow-up (6 months)

  10. Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function, Second Edition (BRIEF-2)

    Data on executive function was collected using the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function, Second Edition (BRIEF-2). Data on the frequency of an event (e.g. becomes upset too easily) was collected and transformed into a t-score. The following BRIEF-2 subtests were evaluated: Behavioral Regulation Index, Emotional Regulation Index, Cognitive Regulation Index, and Global Executive Composite. For each BRIEF-2 subtest, t-scores range from 0 to 100; a score of 50 indicates the population mean with a standard deviation of 10. For all BASC-3 subtests, higher scores are worse outcome.

    Measured: Baseline, Follow-up (6 months)

  11. Social Responsiveness Scale, Second Edition (SRS-2)

    Data on social function was collected using the Social Responsiveness Scale-Second Edition (SRS-2). Data on a child's ability to engage in emotionally appropriate reciprocal social interactions in naturalistic settings was collected and transformed into a t-score from 0 to 100 where higher scores indicate greater impairment in social function. T-score of 50 indicates the population mean with a standard deviation of 10. Data was collected at baseline and 6 months on study drug.

    Measured: Baseline, Follow-up (6 months)

  12. Behavioral Assessment System for Children, Third Edition (BASC-3)

    Data on behavioral function was collected using the Behavioral Assessment System for Children, Third Edition (BASC-3). Data on the frequency of a behavior (e.g. avoids eye contact) was collected and transformed into a t-score. Subscales for the BASC-3 scored were: External Problems Composite, the Internal Problems Composite, the Behavioral Symptoms Index, and the Adaptive Skills Composite. For the first three subscales, lower t-score indicates better outcome; for the fourth, a lower t-score indicates worse outcome. T-scores for all the BASC-3 subscales range from 0 to 100, and a t-score of 50 indicates the population mean with a standard deviation of 10.

    Measured: Baseline, Follow-up (6 months)

  13. Screen for Child Anxiety Related Disorders (SCARED)

    Data on anxiety was collected using the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Disorders (SCARED). Data on the truthfulness of a statement (e.g. I am nervous) was collected and transformed into a score from 0 to 82 where higher scores indicate greater anxiety. Data was collected at baseline and 6 months on study drug.

    Measured: Baseline, Follow-up (6 months)

  14. Quality of Life in Childhood Epilepsy Questionnaire (QOLCE-55)

    Data on quality of life was collected using the Quality of Life in Childhood Epilepsy Questionnaire (QOLCE-55). Data on the frequency of an event (e.g. had trouble concentrating on a task) was collected and transformed into a score from 0 to 100 where higher scores reflect better quality of life. Data was collected at baseline and 6 months on study drug.

    Measured: Baseline, Follow-up (6 months)

  15. Safety of Epidiolex

    Safety of Epidiolex was measured by the number of adverse events and serious adverse events that result from study drug.

    Measured: Baseline, Follow-up (6 months)

  16. Neuroscore

    Data on neurological function was collected using the Neuroscore. Data on frequency of seizures, extent of hemiparesis, assessment of visual field cut, and degree of cognitive functioning was transformed into a score from 0 to 15 where higher scores indicate worse neurologic function. Data was collected at baseline and 6 months on study drug.

    Measured: Baseline, Follow-up (6 months)

  17. Port-wine Birthmark Score

    Data on facial port-wine birthmarks was collected using the Port-wine Birthmark Score. Data on percent of face covered, thickness of birthmark, and darkness of birthmark color was collected and transformed into a score from 0 to 43 where higher scores indicate greater severity and greater surface area involved. Data was collected at baseline and 6 months on study drug.

    Measured: Baseline, Follow-up (6 months)

  18. Adult Neurological Quality of Life (Neuro-QoL)

    Data on cognitive function was collected using Neurological Quality of Life scales from the NIH Toolbox. Data on frequency of an event was collected and transformed into a t-score from 0 to 100. Higher t-scores indicate better communication, better ability to participate in social activity, worse anxiety, worse depression, worse emotional and behavioral dyscontrol, worse fatigue, better positive affect, worse sleep disturbance, better lower and upper extremity functions, worse stigma, better satisfaction with social roles, and better cognitive function. T-score of 50 indicates the population mean with a standard deviation of 10. Data was collected at baseline and 6 months on study drug.

    Measured: Baseline, Follow-up (6 months)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Jun 2020
  2. Study start14 Oct 2019
  3. Primary completion16 Aug 2021
  4. Study completion9 Dec 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
11 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04447846
Sponsor's protocol ID
IRB00204427
Status last verified
May 2023
First submitted
10 Oct 2019
Last updated
25 May 2023
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Cannabidiol in people with Sturge-Weber Syndrome, run by Anne Comi, MD at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 0 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 May 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 25 May 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

List Sorting Working Memory Test (time frame: Baseline, Follow-up (6 months)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 May 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in