Bariatric Surgery CandidateNCT04450082
One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass After Sleeve Gastrectomy Failure
An observational study of Bariatric Surgery Candidate, run by Azienda Sanitaria Locale Napoli 2 Nord.
Trial summary
This study is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on 582 obese patients. The primary aim of the study was to evaluate %Excess Weight Loss, Body Mass Index (BMI) and remission of comorbidity at mid- and long-term follow-up after One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass in subjects previously underwent Sleeve… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Bariatric Surgery Candidate
- What is being tested?
- One anastomosis gastric bypass
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 59 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2014to 21 Jun 2020
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients underwent to One anastomosis gastric bypass after sleeve gastrectomy failure
Who may be able to join
- informed consent.
- morbid obesity defined as body mass index (BMI) 40 kg/m2
- Sleeve Gastrectomy failure
Who cannot join
- previous bariatric surgical procedures other than Sleeve Gastrectomy
- endocrine disorders causing obesity
- pregnancy or lactation
- psychiatric illness
- inflammatory bowel disease
- Barrett ́s oesophagus
- severe gastro-oesophageal Reflux Disease with esophagitis B and C
- a large hiatal hernia (>5 cm)
About this study
Official title: One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass After Sleeve Gastrectomy Failure: Does a Single Procedure Fit for All?
This study is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on 582 obese patients. The primary aim of the study was to evaluate %Excess Weight Loss, Body Mass Index (BMI) and remission of comorbidity at mid- and long-term follow-up after One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass in subjects previously underwent Sleeve Gastrectomy. The secondary aim was to investigate the onset of esophagitis and gastritis at Upper Endoscopy (UE) and the presence of nutritional deficiencies in patients undergoing One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass as a redo surgery
Read the detailed description
This study is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on 582 obese patients. It was conducted according to the ethical principles stated in the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects. The study protocol was approved by the Regional Ethics Committee. From January 2014 to February 2019, morbid obesity patients who failed previous treatment with SG and referred to our bariatric center in the Department of General and Emergency Surgery of "A. Rizzoli" Hospital in Lacco Ameno (Naples, Italy) for a new bariatric procedure, were considered in the study. Redo surgery was only considered if patients still met the criteria for primary bariatric surgery according to guidelines [body mass index (BMI) >35 kg/m2 with co-morbidities, BMI >40 kg/m2] at the time clinical and anthropometrical revision8. A postoperative follow-up of at least 24 months was also considered inclusion criteria. Exclusion criteria were as follows: patients in whom Sleeve Gastrectomy was already performed as revision surgery; patients underwent any other abdominal surgical procedure after One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass not correlated to the bariatric procedure, the presence at baseline of esophagitis B according to the Los Angeles scale, Hiatal Hernia (HH) > 5 cm and history of GERD-related symptoms (i.e., heartburn, pyrosis, regurgitation) not responsive to proton pump inhibitors and/or severe Lower Esophageal Sfinter incontinence. All procedures were performed by the same experienced bariatric surgeons.
Pre-operative evaluation All patients underwent a multidisciplinary preoperative evaluation including anthropometric measurements (height in cm, weight in kg, Body Mass Index in kg/m2), comorbidity evaluation, preoperative Upper Endoscopy with Helicobacter Pylori test, abdomen ultrasound, chest x-ray and nutritional status evaluation.
Radiographic barium swallow test was performed for the diagnosis of HH or presence of gastric fundus. Barium swallow X-ray protocol consisted of five swallows of barium always using the same amount of liquid; anteroposterior and oblique views were obtained in upright and supine positions. Measurements were done using a standardized protocol: a distance of more than 2 cm between the gastroesophageal junction and the diaphragmatic hiatus was defined as a sliding Hiatal Hernia. Preoperative assessments of patient eligibility for bariatric surgery included consultation with the multidisciplinary committee (surgeon, radiologist, diabetologist and psychiatrist) to exclude patients with non-adjusted eating patterns or eating disorders.
Failure of Sleeve Gastrectomy was defined as a consequence of Insufficient Weight Loss or Weight Regain. Insufficient Weight Loss or Weight Regain were analyzed considering the modifications of the percentage of excess weight loss <50% and/or the percentage of total weight loss <25%. A failure of Sleeve Gastrectomy was recognized if the subject was not able to reduce the Body Mass Index <35 with the persistence of co-morbidity or Body Mass Index <40 at least 2-year after the primary surgery.
- Conditions
- Bariatric Surgery Candidate
- Being tested
- One anastomosis gastric bypass
- Keywords
- Sleeve gastrectomy, One Anastomosis gastric bypass
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
One anastomosis gastric bypassProcedure or surgery
The linear stapler divides the stomach horizontally at the junction of the corpus and antrum at the level of crow's foot. In cases where the pre-operative study has shown the presence of the gastric fundus, if possible the fundus was dissected and a long, narrow gastric pouch was designed starting from beyond the crow's foot to just lateral the angle of His over a 42-Fr orogastric tube. Gastrojejunostomy was then performed between 200-220 cm distally to the ligament of Treitz using a 45-mm.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| One anastomosis gastric bypass | One anastomosis gastric bypass in Sleeve Gastrectomy failure Receives: Procedure: One anastomosis gastric bypass |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Body Mass Index (kg/m2)
Body Mass Index (kg/m2) at follow-up after OAGB in subjects previously underwent Sleeve Gastrectomy
Measured: 24 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
Gastroesophageal reflux disease(GERD)
Esophagitis grading according to Los Angeles classification with Upper endoscopy (Grade A: One or more mucosal breaks < 5 mm in maximal length; Grade B: One or more mucosal breaks > 5mm, but without continuity across mucosal folds; Grade C: Mucosal breaks continuous between ≥ 2 mucosal folds, but involving less than 75% of the esophageal circumference Grade D Mucosal breaks involving more than 75% of esophageal circumference
Measured: at 24 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Jun 2020
- Study start1 Jan 2014
- Primary completion28 Feb 2019
- Study completion21 Jun 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Bariatric Surgery CandidateStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 59 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Azienda Sanitaria Locale Napoli 2 Nord
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Francesco Pizza, Azienda Sanitaria Locale Napoli 2 Nord
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04450082
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 22062020
- Other IDs
- 22062020
- Status last verified
- Jun 2020
- First submitted
- 24 Jun 2020
- Last updated
- 29 Jun 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Jun 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass After Sleeve Gastrectomy Failure: Does a Single Procedure Fit for All?
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04450082
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 22062020
- Conditions
- Bariatric Surgery Candidate
- Keywords
- Sleeve gastrectomy, One Anastomosis gastric bypass
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 59 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Azienda Sanitaria Locale Napoli 2 NordUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2014 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 28 Feb 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 21 Jun 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 Jun 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on 582 obese patients. The primary aim of the study was to evaluate %Excess Weight Loss, Body Mass Index (BMI) and remission of comorbidity at mid- and long-term follow-up after One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass in subjects previously underwent Sleeve Gastrectomy. The secondary aim was to investigate the onset of esophagitis and gastritis at Upper Endoscopy (UE) and the presence of nutritional deficiencies in patients undergoing One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass as a redo surgery
Detailed description
This study is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on 582 obese patients. It was conducted according to the ethical principles stated in the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects. The study protocol was approved by the Regional Ethics Committee. From January 2014 to February 2019, morbid obesity patients who failed previous treatment with SG and referred to our bariatric center in the Department of General and Emergency Surgery of "A. Rizzoli" Hospital in Lacco Ameno (Naples, Italy) for a new bariatric procedure, were considered in the study. Redo surgery was only considered if patients still met the criteria for primary bariatric surgery according to guidelines [body mass index (BMI) >35 kg/m2 with co-morbidities, BMI >40 kg/m2] at the time clinical and anthropometrical revision8. A postoperative follow-up of at least 24 months was also considered inclusion criteria. Exclusion criteria were as follows: patients in whom Sleeve Gastrectomy was already performed as revision surgery; patients underwent any other abdominal surgical procedure after One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass not correlated to the bariatric procedure, the presence at baseline of esophagitis B according to the Los Angeles scale, Hiatal Hernia (HH) > 5 cm and history of GERD-related symptoms (i.e., heartburn, pyrosis, regurgitation) not responsive to proton pump inhibitors and/or severe Lower Esophageal Sfinter incontinence. All procedures were performed by the same experienced bariatric surgeons.
Pre-operative evaluation All patients underwent a multidisciplinary preoperative evaluation including anthropometric measurements (height in cm, weight in kg, Body Mass Index in kg/m2), comorbidity evaluation, preoperative Upper Endoscopy with Helicobacter Pylori test, abdomen ultrasound, chest x-ray and nutritional status evaluation.
Radiographic barium swallow test was performed for the diagnosis of HH or presence of gastric fundus. Barium swallow X-ray protocol consisted of five swallows of barium always using the same amount of liquid; anteroposterior and oblique views were obtained in upright and supine positions. Measurements were done using a standardized protocol: a distance of more than 2 cm between the gastroesophageal junction and the diaphragmatic hiatus was defined as a sliding Hiatal Hernia. Preoperative assessments of patient eligibility for bariatric surgery included consultation with the multidisciplinary committee (surgeon, radiologist, diabetologist and psychiatrist) to exclude patients with non-adjusted eating patterns or eating disorders.
Failure of Sleeve Gastrectomy was defined as a consequence of Insufficient Weight Loss or Weight Regain. Insufficient Weight Loss or Weight Regain were analyzed considering the modifications of the percentage of excess weight loss <50% and/or the percentage of total weight loss <25%. A failure of Sleeve Gastrectomy was recognized if the subject was not able to reduce the Body Mass Index <35 with the persistence of co-morbidity or Body Mass Index <40 at least 2-year after the primary surgery.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| One anastomosis gastric bypass | – | Procedure: One anastomosis gastric bypassOne anastomosis gastric bypass in Sleeve Gastrectomy failure |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients underwent to One anastomosis gastric bypass after sleeve gastrectomy failure
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- informed consent.
- morbid obesity defined as body mass index (BMI) 40 kg/m2
- Sleeve Gastrectomy failure
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- previous bariatric surgical procedures other than Sleeve Gastrectomy
- endocrine disorders causing obesity
- pregnancy or lactation
- psychiatric illness
- inflammatory bowel disease
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| One anastomosis gastric bypassThe linear stapler divides the stomach horizontally at the junction of the corpus and antrum at the level of crow's foot. In cases where the pre-operative study has shown the presence of the gastric fundus, if possible the fundus was dissected and a long, narrow gastric pouch was designed starting from beyond the crow's foot to just lateral the angle of His over a 42-Fr orogastric tube. Gastrojejunostomy was then performed between 200-220 cm distally to the ligament of Treitz using a 45-mm. | Procedure or surgery | One anastomosis gastric bypass |
Primary outcome
Body Mass Index (kg/m2)
Time frame: 24 months
Body Mass Index (kg/m2) at follow-up after OAGB in subjects previously underwent Sleeve Gastrectomy
1 secondary outcome
Gastroesophageal reflux disease(GERD)
Time frame: at 24 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Jun 2020.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Bariatric Surgery Candidate
Active, not recruiting
Comparing 150cm OAGB With 150cm Biliopancreatic Limb RYGB. A Non-inferiority Trial
Bariatric Surgery Candidate, Obesity
Active, not recruiting
Stepwise PEEP vs Sustained Inflation in Bariatric Surgery Patients
Recruitment, Bariatric Surgery Candidate
RecruitingObservational study
Blood Collection Biorepository for Liver Disease Research
Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis(NASH), Hepatitis C
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Dietary Sugar Absorptive Phenotype for Prediction of Weight Loss Outcome
Obese, Healthy
Active, not recruiting
Evaluation of the Stress Response in Bariatric Surgery With and Without the Use of Opioids
Opioid Use, Unspecified, Bariatric Surgery Candidate
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Bariatric Surgery Candidate, run by Azienda Sanitaria Locale Napoli 2 Nord.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Jun 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Body Mass Index (kg/m2) (time frame: 24 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Jun 2020.