Metastatic Colorectal CancerPhase 2SOREGATTNCT04450836
Sequences Of REGorafenib And Trifluridine/Tipiracil in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
A Phase 2 study testing Regorafenib then Trifluridine/Tipiracil and Trifluridine/Tipiracil then Regorafenib in people with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer, run by UNICANCER at 36 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
A randomized, phase II study comparing the sequences of regorafenib and trifluridine/tipiracil, after failure of standard therapies in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Regorafenib then Trifluridine/Tipiracil and Trifluridine/Tipiracil then Regorafenib
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 234 participants
- Where
- 36 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 23 Nov 2020to 31 Dec 2024
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients must have provided informed consent before performing any study specific procedures.
- Histological or cytological documented adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum.
- Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (stage IV).
- Measurable disease, defined as at least one unidimensional measurable lesion on a computed tomography (CT) scan according to RECIST v1.1.
- The patient must have progressed following exposure of all the following agents : one fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy (capecitabine or fluorouracil [5-FU], combined with oxaliplatin and/or irinotecan (including FOLFOX, FOLFIRI or FOLFOXIRI) as well as EGFR and/or VEGF inhibitors in patients eligible for these treatments.
- Patients considered eligible for treatment with both regorafenib and trifluridine-tipiracil.
Show all 19Show fewer
- Male or female patients aged ≥18 years.
- ECOG performance status of ≤1.
- Adequate bone marrow, liver and renal functions as assessed by the following laboratory requirements:
- Total bilirubin ≤1.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN).
- Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) ≤2.5 x ULN (≤5 x ULN for patients with liver metastasis).
- Alkaline phosphatase limit ≤2.5 x ULN (≤5 x ULN for patients with liver metastasis).
- Serum creatinine ≤1.5 x ULN.
- International normalized ratio (INR) and partial thromboplastin time (PTT) ≤1.5 x ULN. Patients receiving anticoagulants, such as warfarin or heparin are eligible if there is no prior evidence of an underlying abnormality with coagulation.
- Platelet count ≥75000 /mm³, hemoglobin (Hb) ≥9 g/dL, absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥1500/mm³. Blood transfusions to meet this inclusion criterion are not allowed.
- Women of childbearing potential and men must agree to use a highly effective contraception (1% failure rate) from the signing of the informed consent form until at least 6 months after the last study drug administration. Women using hormonal contraceptive must also use a barrier method.
- Women of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test within 7 days before starting study treatment.
- Patients affiliated to the social security system.
- Patient willing and able to comply with the protocol for the duration of the study including treatment, scheduled visits, and examinations throughout the study, including follow up.
Who cannot join
- Patients with symptomatic brain or meningeal metastasis, unless definitive therapy occurred more than 6 months ago and with a confirmation of tumoral control within 4 weeks of starting study treatment.
- Previous or concurrent cancer that is distinct in primary site or histology from colorectal cancer within 5 years prior to study inclusion, except for curatively treated in situ cervical cancer, non-melanoma skin cancer, and superficial bladder tumors: staged Ta (non-invasive tumor), Tis (carcinoma in situ), and T1 (tumor with lamina propria invasion).
- Prior treatment with regorafenib or any other tyrosine kinase inhibitor.
- Prior treatment with trifluridine/tipiracil.
- Known hypersensitivity to any of the study drugs, study drug classes, or study drug excipients.
- Unresolved toxicity grade >1 (by CTCAE v5.0) caused by prior therapy/procedure, excluding alopecia, hypothyroidism, and oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity grade ≤2.
Show all 32Show fewer
- Patient with moderate or severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh C).
- Known UGT1A1 polymorphisms. History of Gilbert's syndrome.
- Major surgical procedure, open biopsy, or significant traumatic injury within 28 days before starting study treatment.
- Chemotherapy within 21 days of starting study treatment.
- Radiotherapy within 4 weeks of starting study treatment, except for palliative radiotherapy within 2 weeks.
- Active cardiac disease including any of the Following:
- Congestive heart Failure: New York Heart Association (NYHA) class ≥2.
- Unstable angina (angina symptoms at rest), or a new-onset angina (within the 3 months before enrolment).
- Myocardial infarction that occurred less than 6 months before enrolment.
- Cardiac arrhythmias requiring anti-arrhythmic therapy (treatment with beta blockers or digoxin are permitted)
- Uncontrolled hypertension (systolic blood pressure >140 mmHg or diastolic pressure >90 mmHg despite treatment).
- Arterial or venous thrombotic or embolic events such as cerebrovascular accident (including transient ischemic attacks), deep vein thrombosis, or pulmonary embolism within 6 months of starting study treatment.
- Ongoing infection grade 2 (CTCAE v5.0).
- Known history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection.
- Active hepatitis B or C, or chronic hepatitis B or C requiring treatment with antiviral therapy.
- Patients with seizure disorder requiring medication.
- Patients with a history of any bleeding diathesis, irrespective of the severity.
- Any hemorrhage or bleeding event grade ≥3 (CTCAE v5.0) within 4 weeks before starting study treatment.
- Presence of a wound, ulcer, or bone fracture that is not healing.
- Patients unable to swallow oral medications.
- Bowel malabsorption or extended bowel resection that could affect the absorption of regorafenib, occlusive syndrome.
- Presence of gastro-intestinal fistula or perforation.
- Any illness or medical conditions that are unstable or could jeopardize the safety of the patient and their compliance in the study.
- Patients participating in another therapeutic study within the 30 days before enrolment.
- Pregnant or breast feeding women.
- Person deprived of their liberty or under protective custody or guardianship.
Trial locations and contacts
36 sites in 2 countries.
36 sites in 2 countries
France33 sites
Hôpital Privé Pays de Savoie
Annemasse
Centre hospitalier d'Auxerre
Auxerre
Institut Sainte Catherine
Avignon, 84000
Centre Hospitalier de Bayeux
Bayeux
Centre François Baclesse
Caen
Infirmerie Protestante de Lyon
Caluire-et-Cuire, 69300
CH Cotentin
Cherbourg, 50102
Institut de Cancérologie de Bourgogne
Dijon, 21000
Centre Oscar Lambret
Lille
Hôpital Scorff
Lorient, 56322
Centre Léon Bérard
Lyon
Association Hôpital Saint Joseph de Marseille
Marseille, 13008
Hôpital privé du Confluent
Nantes, 44277
Centre Antoine Lacassagne
Nice, 06189
Hôpital Privé des Peupliers
Paris, 75013
APHP - Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou
Paris
Groupe hospitalier Pitié Salpétrière
Paris
CH Périgueux
Périgueux, 24000
CH Saint Jean
Perpignan
CHU de Bordeaux - Hôpital Haut Lévèque
Pessac
Hôpital Privé des Côtes d'Armor - Centre CARIO-HPCA
Plérin
CHU de Poitiers
Poitiers
CHU - Robert Debre
Reims, 51092
Institut Jean Godinot
Reims
Hopital Charles Nicolle
Rouen
CHU Hôpital Nord
Saint-Etienne, 42270
Centre Hospitalier de Saint Malo
St-Malo
Centre Paul Strauss (ICANS)
Strasbourg
CHU de Toulouse
Toulouse, 31059
Centre Hospitalier de Valence
Valence, 26000
Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54519
Paul Brousse
Villejuif, 94800
Gustave Roussy
Villejuif
Belgium3 sites
Clinique Saint Luc
Bouge, 5004
CH de l'Ardenne
Libramont, 6800
CH Verviers
Verviers, 4800
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Phase II Study Comparing the Sequences of Regorafenib and Trifluridine/Tipiracil, After Failure of Standard Therapies in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
A randomized, phase II study comparing the sequences of regorafenib and trifluridine/tipiracil, after failure of standard therapies in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
Read the detailed description
Multicenter, international, comparative, randomized, open-label, phase II study conducted in two parallel groups.
The study population will consist of male and female patients aged ≥18 years old with metastatic colorectal cancer after failure of fluoropyrimidine-, irinotecan-, and oxaliplatin-based chemotherapies, as well as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors in patients eligible for these treatments.
Patients will be randomized according to a 1:1 ratio to treatment arms A and B.
- Arm A: regorafenib until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurs, followed by trifluridine/tipiracil until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurs.
- Arm B: trifluridine/tipiracil until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurs, followed by regorafenib until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurs.
- Conditions
- Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
- Being tested
- Regorafenib then Trifluridine/Tipiracil, Trifluridine/Tipiracil then Regorafenib
- Keywords
- Regorafenib, Trifluridine/Tipiracil, Metastatic colorectal cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Colorectal Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Regorafenib then Trifluridine/TipiracilDrug
Also called STIVARGA, LONSURF
REGORAFENIB 160 mg per day during 3 weeks followed by 1 week off of each 4-week cycle except for cycle 1.
During first cycle: dose is started at 80 mg per day at week 1, 120 mg per day at week 2, 160 mg per day at week 3, followed by 1 week off.
Then TRIFLURIDINE/TIPIRACIL 35 mg/m² Dose administered orally twice daily on Days 1 to 5 and Days 8 to 12 of each 4-week cycle.
Trifluridine/Tipiracil then RegorafenibDrug
Also called LONSURF, STIVARGA
TRIFLURIDINE/TIPIRACIL 35 mg/m² Dose administered orally twice daily on Days 1 to 5 and Days 8 to 12 of each 4-week cycle.
Then REGORAFENIB 160 mg per day during 3 weeks followed by 1 week off of each 4-week cycle except for cycle 1.
During first cycle: dose is started at 80 mg per day at week 1, 120 mg per day at week 2, 160 mg per day at week 3, followed by 1 week off.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A (R-TT) | Experimental | Regorafenib followed by trifluridine-tipiracil. Receives: Drug: Regorafenib then Trifluridine/Tipiracil |
| Arm B (TT-R) | Experimental | Trifluridine-tipiracil followed by Regorafenib. Receives: Drug: Trifluridine/Tipiracil then Regorafenib |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
To evaluate the feasibility of treatment sequence (R-TT or TT-R)
The feasibility of the treatment sequence is defined as the percentage of subjects able to receive both regorafenib and trifluridine/tipiracil according to the sequence in 3rd and 4th line. Subjects will be considered as having received both 3rd and 4th lines if they are administered at least two cycles of each line of therapy, i.e. percentage of patients being treated until the first tumor evaluation.
Measured: Expected duration of 5 months from randomization
Secondary outcomes (10)
To evaluate the efficacy of treatment sequence (R-TT or TT-R) in terms of Overall Survival rate
Overall Survival (OS) is defined as the time interval from randomization until death from any cause.
Measured: Expected duration of 9 months from randomization
To evaluate the efficacy of treatment sequence (R-TT or TT-R) in terms of the progression-free Survival 1 (PFS1)
Progression-free survival 1 (PFS1) is defined as the time interval from randomization until death or the disease progression observed in the first sequence of treatment in each arm, evaluated using Response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) v1.1.
Measured: Expected duration of 3 months from randomization
To evaluate the efficacy of treatment sequence (R-TT or TT-R) in terms of the Progression-free survival 2 (PFS2)
Progression-free survival 2 (PFS2) is defined as the time interval from randomization until death or the disease progression is observed in the later sequence of treatment in each arm, evaluated using RECIST v1.1.
Measured: Expected duration of 6 months from randomization
To evaluate the efficacy of treatment sequence (R-TT or TT-R) in terms of the Disease control rate (DCR)
Disease control rate (DCR) is defined as percentage of patients with a best response that is not progressive disease (PD) (either complete response [CR], partial response [PR], or stable disease [SD]) during treatment. DCR will be assessed in each study arm.
Measured: Expected duration of 6 months from randomization
To evaluate the efficacy of treatment sequence (R-TT or TT-R) in terms of the Objective response rate (ORR)
Objective response rate (ORR) is defined as percentage of patients with a best response being either complete response [CR] or partial response [PR] during treatment. ORR will be assessed in each study arm.
Measured: Expected duration of 6 months from randomization
To evaluate the efficacy of treatment sequence (R-TT or TT-R) in terms of the Time-to-treatment failure 1 (TTF1)
Time-to-treatment failure 1 (TTF1) is defined as the time from randomization to treatment discontinuation for any reason (including disease progression, treatment toxicity, patient preference, or death) during the first sequence of treatment in each arm.
Measured: Expected duration of 3 months from randomization
To evaluate the efficacy of treatment sequence (R-TT or TT-R) in terms of the Time-to-treatment failure 2 (TTF2)
Time-to-treatment failure 2 (TTF2) is defined as the time from randomization to treatment discontinuation for any reason (including disease progression, treatment toxicity, patient preference, or death) during the second sequence of treatment in each arm.
Measured: Expected duration of 6 months from randomization
To evaluate the health-related quality of life of cancer patients during treatment
Quality of life data using the patient reported outcomes, quality of life questionnaire - Core 30 (QLQ-C30) version 3.0 will be collected during the study.
Developed by the EORTC, this self-reported questionnaire assesses the health-related quality of life of cancer patients in clinical trials.
The questionnaire includes five functional scales (physical, everyday activity, cognitive, emotional, and social), three symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea and vomiting), a health/quality of life overall scale, and a number of additional elements assessing common symptoms (including dyspnea, loss of appetite, insomnia, constipation, and diarrhea), as well as, the perceived financial impact of the disease.
All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level.
Measured: Expected 30 days after last study treatment administration, up to 5 years
To evaluate the performance status deterioration
The time to Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) ≥2 deterioration is defined as the time interval between randomization and the first documented ECOG PS ≥2 during the study.
Measured: Expected 30 days after last study treatment administration, up to 5 years
To evaluate the safety (Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events) during treatment
Data concerning adverse events graded using the common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) v5.0 will be collected during the study.
Measured: Expected 30 days after last study treatment administration, up to 5 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Jun 2020
- Study start23 Nov 2020
- Primary completion23 Mar 2024
- Study completion31 Dec 2024
Why it stopped: Following the presentation of the SUNLIGHT study results at ASCO GI and the rapid change in patient management in the majority of centers, the IDMC experts recommended halting inclusion in the SOREGATT study with immediate effect.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Metastatic Colorectal CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by UNICANCERThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 234 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- UNICANCER
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Michel MD DUCREUX, Pr, Principal investigator, Gustave Roussy, Cancer Campus, Grand Paris
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04450836
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- UC-GIG-1910
- Other IDs
- 2019-004196-39, PRODIGE 68 - UCGI 38, 2019
- Acronym
- SOREGATT
- Status last verified
- Mar 2025
- First submitted
- 24 Jun 2020
- Last updated
- 30 Mar 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Mar 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Phase II Study Comparing the Sequences of Regorafenib and Trifluridine/Tipiracil, After Failure of Standard Therapies in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04450836
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SOREGATT / UC-GIG-1910
- Conditions
- Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
- Keywords
- Regorafenib, Trifluridine/Tipiracil, Metastatic colorectal cancer
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Following the presentation of the SUNLIGHT study results at ASCO GI and the rapid change in patient management in the majority of centers, the IDMC experts recommended halting inclusion in the SOREGATT study with immediate effect.
- Enrolment
- 234 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- UNICANCERUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 23 Nov 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 23 Mar 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Jun 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
A randomized, phase II study comparing the sequences of regorafenib and trifluridine/tipiracil, after failure of standard therapies in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
Detailed description
Multicenter, international, comparative, randomized, open-label, phase II study conducted in two parallel groups.
The study population will consist of male and female patients aged ≥18 years old with metastatic colorectal cancer after failure of fluoropyrimidine-, irinotecan-, and oxaliplatin-based chemotherapies, as well as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors in patients eligible for these treatments.
Patients will be randomized according to a 1:1 ratio to treatment arms A and B.
- Arm A: regorafenib until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurs, followed by trifluridine/tipiracil until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurs.
- Arm B: trifluridine/tipiracil until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurs, followed by regorafenib until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurs.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A (R-TT) | Experimental | Drug: Regorafenib then Trifluridine/TipiracilRegorafenib followed by trifluridine-tipiracil. |
| Arm B (TT-R) | Experimental | Drug: Trifluridine/Tipiracil then RegorafenibTrifluridine-tipiracil followed by Regorafenib. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (19 listed)
- Patients must have provided informed consent before performing any study specific procedures.
- Histological or cytological documented adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum.
- Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (stage IV).
- Measurable disease, defined as at least one unidimensional measurable lesion on a computed tomography (CT) scan according to RECIST v1.1.
- The patient must have progressed following exposure of all the following agents : one fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy (capecitabine or fluorouracil [5-FU], combined with oxaliplatin and/or irinotecan (including FOLFOX, FOLFIRI or FOLFOXIRI) as well as EGFR and/or VEGF inhibitors in patients eligible for these treatments.
Key exclusion criteria (32 listed)
- Patients with symptomatic brain or meningeal metastasis, unless definitive therapy occurred more than 6 months ago and with a confirmation of tumoral control within 4 weeks of starting study treatment.
- Previous or concurrent cancer that is distinct in primary site or histology from colorectal cancer within 5 years prior to study inclusion, except for curatively treated in situ cervical cancer, non-melanoma skin cancer, and superficial bladder tumors: staged Ta (non-invasive tumor), Tis (carcinoma in situ), and T1 (tumor with lamina propria invasion).
- Prior treatment with regorafenib or any other tyrosine kinase inhibitor.
- Prior treatment with trifluridine/tipiracil.
- Known hypersensitivity to any of the study drugs, study drug classes, or study drug excipients.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Regorafenib then Trifluridine/TipiracilAlso: STIVARGA, LONSURFREGORAFENIB 160 mg per day during 3 weeks followed by 1 week off of each 4-week cycle except for cycle 1. During first cycle: dose is started at 80 mg per day at week 1, 120 mg per day at week 2, 160 mg per day at week 3, followed by 1 week off. Then TRIFLURIDINE/TIPIRACIL 35 mg/m² Dose administered orally twice daily on Days 1 to 5 and Days 8 to 12 of each 4-week cycle. | Drug | Arm A (R-TT) |
| Trifluridine/Tipiracil then RegorafenibAlso: LONSURF, STIVARGATRIFLURIDINE/TIPIRACIL 35 mg/m² Dose administered orally twice daily on Days 1 to 5 and Days 8 to 12 of each 4-week cycle. Then REGORAFENIB 160 mg per day during 3 weeks followed by 1 week off of each 4-week cycle except for cycle 1. During first cycle: dose is started at 80 mg per day at week 1, 120 mg per day at week 2, 160 mg per day at week 3, followed by 1 week off. | Drug | Arm B (TT-R) |
Primary outcome
To evaluate the feasibility of treatment sequence (R-TT or TT-R)
Time frame: Expected duration of 5 months from randomization
The feasibility of the treatment sequence is defined as the percentage of subjects able to receive both regorafenib and trifluridine/tipiracil according to the sequence in 3rd and 4th line. Subjects will be considered as having received both 3rd and 4th lines if they are administered at least two cycles of each line of therapy, i.e. percentage of patients being treated until the first tumor evaluation.
10 secondary outcomes
To evaluate the efficacy of treatment sequence (R-TT or TT-R) in terms of Overall Survival rate
Time frame: Expected duration of 9 months from randomization
To evaluate the efficacy of treatment sequence (R-TT or TT-R) in terms of the progression-free Survival 1 (PFS1)
Time frame: Expected duration of 3 months from randomization
To evaluate the efficacy of treatment sequence (R-TT or TT-R) in terms of the Progression-free survival 2 (PFS2)
Time frame: Expected duration of 6 months from randomization
To evaluate the efficacy of treatment sequence (R-TT or TT-R) in terms of the Disease control rate (DCR)
Time frame: Expected duration of 6 months from randomization
To evaluate the efficacy of treatment sequence (R-TT or TT-R) in terms of the Objective response rate (ORR)
Time frame: Expected duration of 6 months from randomization
To evaluate the efficacy of treatment sequence (R-TT or TT-R) in terms of the Time-to-treatment failure 1 (TTF1)
Time frame: Expected duration of 3 months from randomization
To evaluate the efficacy of treatment sequence (R-TT or TT-R) in terms of the Time-to-treatment failure 2 (TTF2)
Time frame: Expected duration of 6 months from randomization
To evaluate the health-related quality of life of cancer patients during treatment
Time frame: Expected 30 days after last study treatment administration, up to 5 years
To evaluate the performance status deterioration
Time frame: Expected 30 days after last study treatment administration, up to 5 years
To evaluate the safety (Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events) during treatment
Time frame: Expected 30 days after last study treatment administration, up to 5 years
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Following the presentation of the SUNLIGHT study results at ASCO GI and the rapid change in patient management in the majority of centers, the IDMC experts recommended halting inclusion in the SOREGATT study with immediate effect.). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Mar 2025.
Related trials for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Targeted Therapies in Subpopulations of Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (INTRINSIC)
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
SAMe in Prevention of Oxaliplatin-associated Liver Injury
Colorectal Cancer, Liver Metastases
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of ERAS-0015 in Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors
Metastatic Solid Tumors
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
A Phase Ib/II Study of GFH276 in Combination With Chemotherapy (± Bevacizumab) or Cetuximab in Patients With RAS-mutant Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
CRC
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Michel MD DUCREUX, Pr principal investigator
Gustave Roussy, Cancer Campus, Grand Paris
36 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Regorafenib then Trifluridine/Tipiracil and Trifluridine/Tipiracil then Regorafenib in people with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer, run by UNICANCER at 36 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 19 inclusion and 32 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 36 sites in France, Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Following the presentation of the SUNLIGHT study results at ASCO GI and the rapid change in patient management in the majority of centers, the IDMC experts recommended halting inclusion in the SOREGATT study with immediate effect.). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
To evaluate the feasibility of treatment sequence (R-TT or TT-R) (time frame: Expected duration of 5 months from randomization). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Mar 2025.