AzTrials
AzTrials

Dry Eye SyndromesPhase 1NCT04454281

Topical Naloxone to Diagnose Ocular Pain

A Phase 1 study testing Naloxone Hydrochloride 0.4 MG/ML in people with Dry Eye Syndromes and Neuropathic Pain, run by Seema Capoor at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Chronic ocular neuropathic pain may be misdiagnosed as dry eye disease. Our study aims to identify a population with previous monocular trauma and dry eye symptoms and differentiate neuropathic from dry eye pain using topical corneal naloxone hydrochloride. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Dry Eye Syndromes, Neuropathic Pain
What is being tested?
Naloxone Hydrochloride 0.4 MG/ML
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
1 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
1 Oct 2020to 3 Dec 2020
Phase
Phase 1
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • monocular trauma
  • dry eye disease diagnosis

Who cannot join

  • any pathology that might contribute to ocular pain, including corneal surface ulcers, uveitis, or other chronic inflammatory processes
  • any current corneal surface pathology
  • history of bilateral ocular trauma
  • currently taking any of the following medications: TCAs, opioids, gabapentin, SNRIs
  • pregnant nor breastfeeding.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of Kentucky

    Lexington, Kentucky, 40506

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Topical Naloxone Hydrochloride as a Diagnostic Tool for Ocular Neuropathic Pain

Chronic ocular neuropathic pain may be misdiagnosed as dry eye disease. Our study aims to identify a population with previous monocular trauma and dry eye symptoms and differentiate neuropathic from dry eye pain using topical corneal naloxone hydrochloride.

Read the detailed description

Dry eye is a ubiquitous and debilitating ocular condition that affects tens of millions in the United States (DEWS, 2007). However, there is increasing evidence that the symptoms of dry eye overlap with the distinct condition of ocular neuropathic pain, and that many patients given a dry eye diagnosis are mislabeled (Galor, 2017). These shared symptoms include but are not limited to: hypoesthesia, hyperalgesia, and allodynia. According to the 2017 DEWS II (Dry Eye Workshop) pain and sensation report by the Tear Film and Ocular Surface Society, neuropathic pain can manifest itself in the eye and may present similarly to dry eye, but should not be classified as such (Belmonte, 2017). Our study aims to further characterize this distinction by translating the rodent model of latent sensitization to the human eye.

Latent sensitization is a model of chronic pain that reproduces both its episodic nature and its sensitivity to stress. It can be induced by an array of insults and follows a characteristic time course in which a hyperalgesic pain phase is followed by pain remission phase. Of clinical relevance, administration of mu-opioid antagonists (i.e. naloxone) during the remission phase reinstates animal pain behavior and physiologic reflexes to peak levels seen in the hyperalgesia phase (Marvizon, 2015). This phenomenon suggests that the animals are in a state of latent sensitization that can be unmasked by blocking the activity of the opioid signaling pathway through compounds like naloxone hydrochloride. Furthermore, the undulating course of chronic pain syndromes can be mimicked by introducing environmental and physical stressors that trigger and exacerbate pain states (Marvizon, 2015).

Neuropathic pain is a common cause of chronic pain. It is defined by the International Association for the Study of Pain as pain that arises as a direct consequence of a lesion or disease affecting the somatosensory system. In contrast, nociceptive pain is produced by the normal function of nociceptors. Hence, neuropathic lesions do not necessarily involve the nociceptive pathway; instead, they can involve other somatosensory pathways including tactile, mechanical, and thermal pathways. These lesions manifest allodynia-a central pain sensation following a normally non-painful stimuli and a clinical hallmark of neuropathic pain. In the eye, allodynia may manifest as non-specific dry-eye-like-symptoms to stimuli including wind, temperature change, and humidity (Galor, 2017).

Hyperalgesia is a heightened pain sensation to a normally painful stimulus and is another hallmark of neuropathic pain. Importantly, hyperalgesia is a symptom of both neuropathic and nociceptive pain, however the pathophysiologies are distinct. Neuropathic hyperalgesia is a sustained phenomenon that arises from neuronal remodeling and sensitization of nociceptive peripheral and/or central nerves. In distinction, nociceptive hyperalgesia arises from inflammatory cytokine mediators that sensitize nociceptors and resolves after the conclusion of inflammation. Given all of this, it can be difficult to clinically differentiate the two forms of hyperalgesia; similarly, it can be difficult to differentiate between neuropathic and nociceptive pain.

In our murine model (Cho, 2019), we study latent sensitization of the eye after injuring the cornea with an alkali solution. We find that pain behavior (quantified by the number of eye wipes in thirty seconds after the topical administration of 2M NaCl to the corneal surface) peaks at day 10 post injury and returns to baseline by day 14 post injury (figure 3.1; next page). Topical administration of naloxone (100uM, one drop), reinstated peak pain behavior 16 weeks after initial corneal surface injury (figure 3.2; next page).

We hypothesize that our patient population with monocular trauma and dry eye symptoms mirrors our murine model. The monocular trauma represents the initial corneal surface injury, and the dry eye symptoms represent the breakthrough pain. It is important to note that in other models of latent sensitization, peak pain responses can be reinstated by stressors other than opioid antagonism. Specifically, novel environment stressors and forced swims reproduce peak pain behavior experienced in the hyperalgesic phase. In a similar way, our patient population endorses exacerbation of dry eye symptoms in the setting of stress, sleep, and environmental changes.

Our study aims to differentiate dry eye disease from ocular neuropathic pain by testing the latent sensitization model in the human eye. Given that there is good data to suggest chronic pain states, including our ocular model, can be masked by upregulation of the mu-opioid receptor signaling pathway, we hypothesize that our naloxone hydrochloride drop will induce a hyperalgesic response to hypertonic saline in a population with dry eye diagnosis and monocular trauma. We believe a topical naloxone ophthalmic drop is a potentially easy, cheap, and safe diagnostic tool for ocular neuropathic pain.

Being tested
Naloxone Hydrochloride 0.4 MG/ML
Medical subject headings
Dry Eye Syndromes, Neuralgia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Naloxone Hydrochloride 0.4 MG/MLDrug

    Drug will be topically applied to the corneal surface then study evaluations will ensue.

Study groups in NCT04454281
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Naloxone HCl Low dose: 0.02 mgExperimentalThis arm will receive 0.02 mg naloxone hcl on the experimental visit and balance salt solution on the control visit.
Receives: Drug: Naloxone Hydrochloride 0.4 MG/ML
Naloxone HCl High dose: 0.08 mgExperimentalThis arm will receive 0.08 mg naloxone hcl on the experimental visit and balance salt solution on the control visit.
Receives: Drug: Naloxone Hydrochloride 0.4 MG/ML

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Pain Response to Hypertonic Saline (Muro 128) drop

    The pain response is graded using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) survey. It is graded 1-10; 10 indicates the most severe pain.

    Measured: Immediately after hypertonic drop administered. Measured during both study visits, thus through study completion, an expected average of 4 weeks.

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Ocular Surface Disease Index

    This 12 question survey measures your recent dry eye symptoms using the ocular surface index scale. The scale has a low score of 10 and high score of 100. A higher score means you have worse dry eye symptoms.

    Measured: At any point during study visit. Measured during both study visits, thus through study completion, an expected average of 4 weeks.

  2. Slit Lamp Biomicroscopy

    This test examines many areas of your eye (cornea, lids, inner eye) using a microscope.

    Measured: Before and after hypertonic saline drop. Measured during both study visits, thus through study completion, an expected average of 4 weeks.

  3. Flourescein corneal examination

    A yellow staining dye will be applied to your cornea that will allow us to examine the structural integrity of your cornea.

    Measured: Before and after hypertonic saline drop. Measured during both study visits, thus through study completion, an expected average of 4 weeks.

  4. intraocular pressure

    Intraocular pressure will be measured via Tono-Pen.

    Measured: Before and after hypertonic saline drop. Measured during both study visits, thus through study completion, an expected average of 4 weeks.

  5. visual acuity

    will be measured using ETDRS letter grading system. Your grade will depend on your ability to read small print.

    Measured: Before and after hypertonic saline drop. Measured during both study visits, thus through study completion, an expected average of 4 weeks.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Jul 2020
  2. Study start1 Oct 2020
  3. Primary completion3 Dec 2020
  4. Study completion3 Dec 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator
Enrolment
1 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04454281
Sponsor's protocol ID
48303
Status last verified
Nov 2022
First submitted
24 Jun 2020
Last updated
8 Nov 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 1 study testing Naloxone Hydrochloride 0.4 MG/ML in people with Dry Eye Syndromes and Neuropathic Pain, run by Seema Capoor at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Nov 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Pain Response to Hypertonic Saline (Muro 128) drop (time frame: Immediately after hypertonic drop administered. Measured during both study visits, thus through study completion, an expected average of 4 weeks.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Nov 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in