Dry Eye SyndromesPhase 1NCT04454281
Topical Naloxone to Diagnose Ocular Pain
A Phase 1 study testing Naloxone Hydrochloride 0.4 MG/ML in people with Dry Eye Syndromes and Neuropathic Pain, run by Seema Capoor at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Chronic ocular neuropathic pain may be misdiagnosed as dry eye disease. Our study aims to identify a population with previous monocular trauma and dry eye symptoms and differentiate neuropathic from dry eye pain using topical corneal naloxone hydrochloride. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Dry Eye Syndromes, Neuropathic Pain
- What is being tested?
- Naloxone Hydrochloride 0.4 MG/ML
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Oct 2020to 3 Dec 2020
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- monocular trauma
- dry eye disease diagnosis
Who cannot join
- any pathology that might contribute to ocular pain, including corneal surface ulcers, uveitis, or other chronic inflammatory processes
- any current corneal surface pathology
- history of bilateral ocular trauma
- currently taking any of the following medications: TCAs, opioids, gabapentin, SNRIs
- pregnant nor breastfeeding.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Topical Naloxone Hydrochloride as a Diagnostic Tool for Ocular Neuropathic Pain
Chronic ocular neuropathic pain may be misdiagnosed as dry eye disease. Our study aims to identify a population with previous monocular trauma and dry eye symptoms and differentiate neuropathic from dry eye pain using topical corneal naloxone hydrochloride.
Read the detailed description
Dry eye is a ubiquitous and debilitating ocular condition that affects tens of millions in the United States (DEWS, 2007). However, there is increasing evidence that the symptoms of dry eye overlap with the distinct condition of ocular neuropathic pain, and that many patients given a dry eye diagnosis are mislabeled (Galor, 2017). These shared symptoms include but are not limited to: hypoesthesia, hyperalgesia, and allodynia. According to the 2017 DEWS II (Dry Eye Workshop) pain and sensation report by the Tear Film and Ocular Surface Society, neuropathic pain can manifest itself in the eye and may present similarly to dry eye, but should not be classified as such (Belmonte, 2017). Our study aims to further characterize this distinction by translating the rodent model of latent sensitization to the human eye.
Latent sensitization is a model of chronic pain that reproduces both its episodic nature and its sensitivity to stress. It can be induced by an array of insults and follows a characteristic time course in which a hyperalgesic pain phase is followed by pain remission phase. Of clinical relevance, administration of mu-opioid antagonists (i.e. naloxone) during the remission phase reinstates animal pain behavior and physiologic reflexes to peak levels seen in the hyperalgesia phase (Marvizon, 2015). This phenomenon suggests that the animals are in a state of latent sensitization that can be unmasked by blocking the activity of the opioid signaling pathway through compounds like naloxone hydrochloride. Furthermore, the undulating course of chronic pain syndromes can be mimicked by introducing environmental and physical stressors that trigger and exacerbate pain states (Marvizon, 2015).
Neuropathic pain is a common cause of chronic pain. It is defined by the International Association for the Study of Pain as pain that arises as a direct consequence of a lesion or disease affecting the somatosensory system. In contrast, nociceptive pain is produced by the normal function of nociceptors. Hence, neuropathic lesions do not necessarily involve the nociceptive pathway; instead, they can involve other somatosensory pathways including tactile, mechanical, and thermal pathways. These lesions manifest allodynia-a central pain sensation following a normally non-painful stimuli and a clinical hallmark of neuropathic pain. In the eye, allodynia may manifest as non-specific dry-eye-like-symptoms to stimuli including wind, temperature change, and humidity (Galor, 2017).
Hyperalgesia is a heightened pain sensation to a normally painful stimulus and is another hallmark of neuropathic pain. Importantly, hyperalgesia is a symptom of both neuropathic and nociceptive pain, however the pathophysiologies are distinct. Neuropathic hyperalgesia is a sustained phenomenon that arises from neuronal remodeling and sensitization of nociceptive peripheral and/or central nerves. In distinction, nociceptive hyperalgesia arises from inflammatory cytokine mediators that sensitize nociceptors and resolves after the conclusion of inflammation. Given all of this, it can be difficult to clinically differentiate the two forms of hyperalgesia; similarly, it can be difficult to differentiate between neuropathic and nociceptive pain.
In our murine model (Cho, 2019), we study latent sensitization of the eye after injuring the cornea with an alkali solution. We find that pain behavior (quantified by the number of eye wipes in thirty seconds after the topical administration of 2M NaCl to the corneal surface) peaks at day 10 post injury and returns to baseline by day 14 post injury (figure 3.1; next page). Topical administration of naloxone (100uM, one drop), reinstated peak pain behavior 16 weeks after initial corneal surface injury (figure 3.2; next page).
We hypothesize that our patient population with monocular trauma and dry eye symptoms mirrors our murine model. The monocular trauma represents the initial corneal surface injury, and the dry eye symptoms represent the breakthrough pain. It is important to note that in other models of latent sensitization, peak pain responses can be reinstated by stressors other than opioid antagonism. Specifically, novel environment stressors and forced swims reproduce peak pain behavior experienced in the hyperalgesic phase. In a similar way, our patient population endorses exacerbation of dry eye symptoms in the setting of stress, sleep, and environmental changes.
Our study aims to differentiate dry eye disease from ocular neuropathic pain by testing the latent sensitization model in the human eye. Given that there is good data to suggest chronic pain states, including our ocular model, can be masked by upregulation of the mu-opioid receptor signaling pathway, we hypothesize that our naloxone hydrochloride drop will induce a hyperalgesic response to hypertonic saline in a population with dry eye diagnosis and monocular trauma. We believe a topical naloxone ophthalmic drop is a potentially easy, cheap, and safe diagnostic tool for ocular neuropathic pain.
- Conditions
- Dry Eye Syndromes, Neuropathic Pain
- Being tested
- Naloxone Hydrochloride 0.4 MG/ML
- Medical subject headings
- Dry Eye Syndromes, Neuralgia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Naloxone Hydrochloride 0.4 MG/MLDrug
Drug will be topically applied to the corneal surface then study evaluations will ensue.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Naloxone HCl Low dose: 0.02 mg | Experimental | This arm will receive 0.02 mg naloxone hcl on the experimental visit and balance salt solution on the control visit. Receives: Drug: Naloxone Hydrochloride 0.4 MG/ML |
| Naloxone HCl High dose: 0.08 mg | Experimental | This arm will receive 0.08 mg naloxone hcl on the experimental visit and balance salt solution on the control visit. Receives: Drug: Naloxone Hydrochloride 0.4 MG/ML |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pain Response to Hypertonic Saline (Muro 128) drop
The pain response is graded using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) survey. It is graded 1-10; 10 indicates the most severe pain.
Measured: Immediately after hypertonic drop administered. Measured during both study visits, thus through study completion, an expected average of 4 weeks.
Secondary outcomes (5)
Ocular Surface Disease Index
This 12 question survey measures your recent dry eye symptoms using the ocular surface index scale. The scale has a low score of 10 and high score of 100. A higher score means you have worse dry eye symptoms.
Measured: At any point during study visit. Measured during both study visits, thus through study completion, an expected average of 4 weeks.
Slit Lamp Biomicroscopy
This test examines many areas of your eye (cornea, lids, inner eye) using a microscope.
Measured: Before and after hypertonic saline drop. Measured during both study visits, thus through study completion, an expected average of 4 weeks.
Flourescein corneal examination
A yellow staining dye will be applied to your cornea that will allow us to examine the structural integrity of your cornea.
Measured: Before and after hypertonic saline drop. Measured during both study visits, thus through study completion, an expected average of 4 weeks.
intraocular pressure
Intraocular pressure will be measured via Tono-Pen.
Measured: Before and after hypertonic saline drop. Measured during both study visits, thus through study completion, an expected average of 4 weeks.
visual acuity
will be measured using ETDRS letter grading system. Your grade will depend on your ability to read small print.
Measured: Before and after hypertonic saline drop. Measured during both study visits, thus through study completion, an expected average of 4 weeks.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Jul 2020
- Study start1 Oct 2020
- Primary completion3 Dec 2020
- Study completion3 Dec 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Dry Eye SyndromesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 1 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Seema Capoor
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Seema Capoor, University of Kentucky
- Investigators
- Seema Capoor, MD, Principal investigator, University of Kentucky
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04454281
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 48303
- Status last verified
- Nov 2022
- First submitted
- 24 Jun 2020
- Last updated
- 8 Nov 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Nov 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Topical Naloxone Hydrochloride as a Diagnostic Tool for Ocular Neuropathic Pain
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04454281
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 48303
- Conditions
- Dry Eye Syndromes, Neuropathic Pain
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Seema CapoorUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Oct 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 3 Dec 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 3 Dec 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Jul 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Chronic ocular neuropathic pain may be misdiagnosed as dry eye disease. Our study aims to identify a population with previous monocular trauma and dry eye symptoms and differentiate neuropathic from dry eye pain using topical corneal naloxone hydrochloride.
Detailed description
Dry eye is a ubiquitous and debilitating ocular condition that affects tens of millions in the United States (DEWS, 2007). However, there is increasing evidence that the symptoms of dry eye overlap with the distinct condition of ocular neuropathic pain, and that many patients given a dry eye diagnosis are mislabeled (Galor, 2017). These shared symptoms include but are not limited to: hypoesthesia, hyperalgesia, and allodynia. According to the 2017 DEWS II (Dry Eye Workshop) pain and sensation report by the Tear Film and Ocular Surface Society, neuropathic pain can manifest itself in the eye and may present similarly to dry eye, but should not be classified as such (Belmonte, 2017). Our study aims to further characterize this distinction by translating the rodent model of latent sensitization to the human eye.
Latent sensitization is a model of chronic pain that reproduces both its episodic nature and its sensitivity to stress. It can be induced by an array of insults and follows a characteristic time course in which a hyperalgesic pain phase is followed by pain remission phase. Of clinical relevance, administration of mu-opioid antagonists (i.e. naloxone) during the remission phase reinstates animal pain behavior and physiologic reflexes to peak levels seen in the hyperalgesia phase (Marvizon, 2015). This phenomenon suggests that the animals are in a state of latent sensitization that can be unmasked by blocking the activity of the opioid signaling pathway through compounds like naloxone hydrochloride. Furthermore, the undulating course of chronic pain syndromes can be mimicked by introducing environmental and physical stressors that trigger and exacerbate pain states (Marvizon, 2015).
Neuropathic pain is a common cause of chronic pain. It is defined by the International Association for the Study of Pain as pain that arises as a direct consequence of a lesion or disease affecting the somatosensory system. In contrast, nociceptive pain is produced by the normal function of nociceptors. Hence, neuropathic lesions do not necessarily involve the nociceptive pathway; instead, they can involve other somatosensory pathways including tactile, mechanical, and thermal pathways. These lesions manifest allodynia-a central pain sensation following a normally non-painful stimuli and a clinical hallmark of neuropathic pain. In the eye, allodynia may manifest as non-specific dry-eye-like-symptoms to stimuli including wind, temperature change, and humidity (Galor, 2017).
Hyperalgesia is a heightened pain sensation to a normally painful stimulus and is another hallmark of neuropathic pain. Importantly, hyperalgesia is a symptom of both neuropathic and nociceptive pain, however the pathophysiologies are distinct. Neuropathic hyperalgesia is a sustained phenomenon that arises from neuronal remodeling and sensitization of nociceptive peripheral and/or central nerves. In distinction, nociceptive hyperalgesia arises from inflammatory cytokine mediators that sensitize nociceptors and resolves after the conclusion of inflammation. Given all of this, it can be difficult to clinically differentiate the two forms of hyperalgesia; similarly, it can be difficult to differentiate between neuropathic and nociceptive pain.
In our murine model (Cho, 2019), we study latent sensitization of the eye after injuring the cornea with an alkali solution. We find that pain behavior (quantified by the number of eye wipes in thirty seconds after the topical administration of 2M NaCl to the corneal surface) peaks at day 10 post injury and returns to baseline by day 14 post injury (figure 3.1; next page). Topical administration of naloxone (100uM, one drop), reinstated peak pain behavior 16 weeks after initial corneal surface injury (figure 3.2; next page).
We hypothesize that our patient population with monocular trauma and dry eye symptoms mirrors our murine model. The monocular trauma represents the initial corneal surface injury, and the dry eye symptoms represent the breakthrough pain. It is important to note that in other models of latent sensitization, peak pain responses can be reinstated by stressors other than opioid antagonism. Specifically, novel environment stressors and forced swims reproduce peak pain behavior experienced in the hyperalgesic phase. In a similar way, our patient population endorses exacerbation of dry eye symptoms in the setting of stress, sleep, and environmental changes.
Our study aims to differentiate dry eye disease from ocular neuropathic pain by testing the latent sensitization model in the human eye. Given that there is good data to suggest chronic pain states, including our ocular model, can be masked by upregulation of the mu-opioid receptor signaling pathway, we hypothesize that our naloxone hydrochloride drop will induce a hyperalgesic response to hypertonic saline in a population with dry eye diagnosis and monocular trauma. We believe a topical naloxone ophthalmic drop is a potentially easy, cheap, and safe diagnostic tool for ocular neuropathic pain.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Naloxone HCl Low dose: 0.02 mg | Experimental | Drug: Naloxone Hydrochloride 0.4 MG/MLThis arm will receive 0.02 mg naloxone hcl on the experimental visit and balance salt solution on the control visit. |
| Naloxone HCl High dose: 0.08 mg | Experimental | Drug: Naloxone Hydrochloride 0.4 MG/MLThis arm will receive 0.08 mg naloxone hcl on the experimental visit and balance salt solution on the control visit. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- monocular trauma
- dry eye disease diagnosis
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- any pathology that might contribute to ocular pain, including corneal surface ulcers, uveitis, or other chronic inflammatory processes
- any current corneal surface pathology
- history of bilateral ocular trauma
- currently taking any of the following medications: TCAs, opioids, gabapentin, SNRIs
- pregnant nor breastfeeding.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Naloxone Hydrochloride 0.4 MG/MLDrug will be topically applied to the corneal surface then study evaluations will ensue. | Drug | Naloxone HCl High dose: 0.08 mg, Naloxone HCl Low dose: 0.02 mg |
Primary outcome
Pain Response to Hypertonic Saline (Muro 128) drop
Time frame: Immediately after hypertonic drop administered. Measured during both study visits, thus through study completion, an expected average of 4 weeks.
The pain response is graded using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) survey. It is graded 1-10; 10 indicates the most severe pain.
5 secondary outcomes
Ocular Surface Disease Index
Time frame: At any point during study visit. Measured during both study visits, thus through study completion, an expected average of 4 weeks.
Slit Lamp Biomicroscopy
Time frame: Before and after hypertonic saline drop. Measured during both study visits, thus through study completion, an expected average of 4 weeks.
Flourescein corneal examination
Time frame: Before and after hypertonic saline drop. Measured during both study visits, thus through study completion, an expected average of 4 weeks.
intraocular pressure
Time frame: Before and after hypertonic saline drop. Measured during both study visits, thus through study completion, an expected average of 4 weeks.
visual acuity
Time frame: Before and after hypertonic saline drop. Measured during both study visits, thus through study completion, an expected average of 4 weeks.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Nov 2022.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Dry Eye Syndromes
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
R-2487 in Patients With Sjogren's Syndrome (SjD)
Sjogren's Syndrome, Sjögren
RecruitingPhase 1
A Trial in Healthy Adult Participants and Adults With Autoimmune Diseases to Test How HBM7020 is Tolerated and How it Behaves in the Body
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
RecruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotyping of Rheumatic Diseases - An Observational Study
Rheumatic Diseases, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
RecruitingObservational study
The Pathogenesis and Natural History of Sjogren's Disease
Sjogren's Syndrome, Salivary Gland
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Evaluation of Allogenic Mesenchymal Stem Cell (MSC) Injection Therapy for Refractory Graft-versus-Host Disease (GVHD) Unresponsive to Conventional Treatments
Dry Eye Disease (DED), Graft-Versus-Host Disease(GVHD)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Seema Capoor, MD principal investigator
University of Kentucky
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1 study testing Naloxone Hydrochloride 0.4 MG/ML in people with Dry Eye Syndromes and Neuropathic Pain, run by Seema Capoor at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Nov 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pain Response to Hypertonic Saline (Muro 128) drop (time frame: Immediately after hypertonic drop administered. Measured during both study visits, thus through study completion, an expected average of 4 weeks.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Nov 2022.