AzTrials
AzTrials

Wound HealingNCT04455490

Clinical Effect of Endoscopic Surgery for Delayed Wound Healing After Achilles Tendon Suture

An observational study of Wound Healing, run by Peking University Third Hospital at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study proposes endoscopic surgery for delayed wound healing after Achilles tendon suture which is a brand new treatment,and retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 4 cases treated with this treatment. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Wound Healing
How many people
4 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
18 Mar 2020to 18 May 2020
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: 4 patients with delayed healing after Achilles tendon suture surgery who were treated at our institution, in the period from April 2008 to July 2019. The patients were 3 men and 1 woman, aged 39 to 60 years. Among them, 3 had surgery on the left Achilles tendon and 1 had surgery on the right Achilles tendon. The time from the first operation (Achilles tendon suture) to foreign body reaction ranged from 1 month to 5 months.

Who may be able to join

  • The diagnostic criteria for delayed wound healing after Achilles tendon suture are met, namely the presence of skin necrosis, wound nonunion, or delayed wound healing.

Who cannot join

  • The expected healing time of wounds with regular dressing changes is <2 weeks.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Peking University Third Hospital

    Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100191

Other trials in China

About this study

This study proposes endoscopic surgery for delayed wound healing after Achilles tendon suture which is a brand new treatment,and retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 4 cases treated with this treatment. The analysis results of the clinical efficacy of the method can serve as a reference for clinical and surgical decision-making and prognosis assessment.

Read the detailed description

Background: Delayed wound healing is a kind of postoperative complication of Achilles tendon suture. Conventional surgical approach is open surgery in order to clean the wound, which requires multiple dressing changes and involves a longer recovery period. We recently developed arthroscopic surgery for delayed wound healing after Achilles tendon suture. This therapy may be an alternative approach to open surgery.

Purposes: In this paper we evaluate the long-term efficacy of endoscopic surgery for delayed wound healing after Achilles tendon suture.

Patients and Methods: Clinical data of 4 patients with delayed wound healing after Achilles tendon suture who underwent endoscopic surgery from April 2008 to October 2017 at our institute were retrospectively analyzed. There were 3 males and 1 females with age of 39-60 years, the follow-up period was 8-43 months). All the patients had unilateral tendon rupture with 3 cases on the left and 1 cases on the right. Scores on Visual analogue scale(VAS) and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Scale were used. The postoperative outcome was evaluated on the basis of Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Achilles score and Achilles tendon total rupture score (ATRS).

Conditions
Wound Healing
Being tested
Self-control
Keywords
Achilles tendon suture, Delayed wound healing, Endoscopy

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Self-controlOther

    We compared relevant scores of patients before and after surgery

Study groups in NCT04455490
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Delayed wound healingPatients with delayed wound healing after Achilles tendon suture who were treated at Peking University Third Hospital
Receives: Other: Self-control

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Visual Analogue Scale

    Use Visual Analog Scale(VAS) to evaluate the pain recovery of patients who received endoscopic surgery. VAS ranges from 0 to 10, higher scores mean a worse outcome.

    Measured: 8 months to 4 years after the surgery

  2. American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Score

    Use American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Score(AOFAS) to evaluate the function recovery of patients who received endoscopic surgery. AOFAS ranges from 0 to 100, higher scores mean a better outcome.

    Measured: 8 months to 4 years after the surgery

  3. Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Achilles

    Use Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Achilles(VISA-A) to evaluate the pain and movement recovery of patients who received endoscopic surgery. VISA-A ranges from 0 to 100, higher scores mean a better outcome.

    Measured: 8 months to 4 years after the surgery

  4. Achilles tendon total rupture score

    Use Achilles tendon total rupture score(ATRS) to evaluate the function and movement recovery of patients who received endoscopic surgery. VISA-A ranges from 0 to 100, higher scores mean a better outcome.

    Measured: 8 months to 4 years after the surgery

  5. Tegner knee motion score

    Use Tegner knee motion score to evaluate the sports ability of patients who received endoscopic surgery. Tegner knee motion score ranges from 0 to 10, higher scores mean a better outcome.

    Measured: 8 months to 4 years after the surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Jul 2020
  2. Study start18 Mar 2020
  3. Primary completion18 Apr 2020
  4. Study completion18 May 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
4 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04455490
Sponsor's protocol ID
M2019492
Status last verified
Jul 2020
First submitted
25 Jun 2020
Last updated
2 Jul 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Wound Healing, run by Peking University Third Hospital at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Jul 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Visual Analogue Scale (time frame: 8 months to 4 years after the surgery). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Jul 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in