AzTrials
AzTrials

ExerciseNCT04460261

The Effects of 'Functional' Inspiratory Muscle Training

A study testing Functional Inspiratory Muscle Training in people with Exercise, run by Ismail OZSOY.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study was designed as a prospective and experimental study. Geriatric individuals (age ≥ 65 years) with COPD and non-COPD were included in the study. Training program was identical for both groups and consisted of 4 weeks of foundation IMT followed by 4 weeks of functional IMT. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 65 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Exercise
What is being tested?
Functional Inspiratory Muscle Training
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
45 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Feb 2016to 15 Jan 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 65 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Diagnosing COPD in accordance with Global initiative for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (GOLD) guideline criteria
  • Being over 65 years old
  • Being a stable clinical condition (same medication routine for the past 3 weeks without taking any antibiotics)
  • Independent mobilization
  • Note: Normal spirometry values set as the inclusion criteria for non-COPD group.

Who cannot join

  • Orthopaedic problems
  • Neurological problems
  • Cognitive problems

About this study

Official title: The Effects of a New Integrated Exercise Program Called 'Functional' Inspiratory Muscle Training in Geriatric Individuals With and Without Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

This study was designed as a prospective and experimental study. Geriatric individuals (age ≥ 65 years) with COPD and non-COPD were included in the study. Training program was identical for both groups and consisted of 4 weeks of foundation IMT followed by 4 weeks of functional IMT. Respiratory muscle strength, symptoms, exercise capacity, balance, postural control, physical activity and quality of life were evaluated.

Read the detailed description

The incidence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), which is one of the most important causes of worldwide mortality and morbidity, increases with age and the disease worsens with the effects of aging. The effects of COPD are not only limited to the lungs, it also affects other organs and systems, causing loss of strength in the respiratory muscles. Respiratory muscles are the skeletal muscles that must maintain their continuous activities for the continuity of life. Just like other skeletal muscles, the respiratory muscles can also be trained based on the principles of exercise. Inspiratory muscle training (IMT) is an exercise method used in both patients with COPD and the elderly population. Studies have shown that IMT has positive effects in COPD and elderly individuals. However, in all these studies IMT applications (also known as "foundation or conventional IMT") focus only on the respiratory task of the respiratory muscles. Nevertheless, in addition to their basic task of respiration, respiratory muscles are also involved in core stabilization and postural control.The aim of this study was to create an integrated IMT program for geriatric individuals with and without COPD and investigate its effects.

The participants were divided into two groups as individuals with and without COPD. A total of 8 weeks of IMT was applied for both groups using a threshold pressure loading device The participants were asked to perform IMT twice a day in the morning and evening. Both groups were trained 3 days a week under the supervision of a physiotherapist and other days of the week without a supervisor. The treatment program consisted of 4 weeks of foundation IMT followed by 4 weeks of functional IMT.The intensity of the exercise was adjusted to 40-50% of the MIP. After 10 consecutive breathing cycles, the participants were asked to perform 3-4 breathe controls. As the tolerance increased, consecutive respiratory cycles were increased. The intensity of MIP was adjusted by weekly MIP measurements. Currently, foundation IMT is commonly used to train respiratory muscles. In the present study, foundation IMT was applied during the first 4 weeks of training. The participants were asked to sit in a comfortable upright position. Then the nose clip was placed, and the patients were instructed to tighten their lips around the mouthpiece and breathe against the resistance. During this 4-week-long training, all IMT applications were performed solely in a sitting position, without any loading in other positions. Following the foundation IMT, all participants underwent four weeks of functional IMT. Initially, all participants were taught diaphragmatic breathing and activating abdominal wall musculature. Each training session started with warm-up exercises and ended with cool-down exercises. During the loading phase, core stability, dynamic trunk activation and postural control exercises were applied together with IMT.

Conditions
Exercise
Being tested
Functional Inspiratory Muscle Training
Keywords
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, functional inspiratory muscle training, geriatric individuals
Medical subject headings
Motor Activity, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Functional Inspiratory Muscle TrainingOther

    Both groups were trained 3 days a week under the supervision of a physiotherapist and other days of the week without a supervisor. The treatment program consisted of 4 weeks of foundation IMT followed by 4 weeks of functional IMT. Foundation IMT was applied during the first 4 weeks of training. The participants were asked to sit in a comfortable upright position. Following the foundation IMT, all participants underwent four weeks of functional IMT. Initially, all participants were taught diaphragmatic breathing and activating abdominal wall musculature. Each training session started with warm-up exercises and ended with cool-down exercises. During the loading phase, core stability, dynamic trunk activation and postural control exercises were applied together with IMT.

Study groups in NCT04460261
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
COPD GroupExperimentalPatients with COPD
Receives: Other: Functional Inspiratory Muscle Training
Non-COPD GroupExperimentalNon-COPD
Receives: Other: Functional Inspiratory Muscle Training

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Inspiratory muscle strength

    Inspiratory muscle strength (MIP) was measured using a hand-held mouth pressure device (Micro RMP; Micro Medical, Rochester, UK). Three to five acceptable and reproducible maximal manoeuvres (i.e., differences between values <10%) were performed and the highest value was recorded.

    Measured: 8 weeks

  2. Expiratory muscle strength

    Expiratory muscle strength (MEP) was measured using a hand-held mouth pressure device (Micro RMP; Micro Medical, Rochester, UK). Three to five acceptable and reproducible maximal manoeuvres (i.e., differences between values <10%) were performed and the highest value was recorded.

    Measured: 8 weeks

  3. Dyspnea assessment

    The Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) Dyspnea Scale was used to evaluate dyspnea. Commonly used in the assessment of dyspnea in COPD, mMRC has a five-level scoring system ranging from 0 to 4. A high score indicates an increased sense of dyspnea.

    Measured: 8 weeks

  4. Symptoms assessment

    The COPD Assessment Test (CAT) was used to assess symptoms in patients with COPD. It is a reliable test to evaluate the impact of COPD on a patient's health status. It has eight items and the score ranges from 0 to 40. Higher scores indicate increased symptoms.

    Measured: 8 weeks

  5. Upper extremity functional exercise capacity assessment

    The 6-Minute Pegboard and Ring Test was used to assess upper extremity functional exercise capacity assessment

    Measured: 8 weeks

  6. Lower extremity functional exercise capacity assessment

    The 6-Minute Walking Test (6MWT) was used to assess lower extremity functional exercise capacity assessment.

    Measured: 8 weeks

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Balance assessment

    Balance was assessed using Berg Balance Scale (BBS). This scale consists of 14 items and each item is scored between 0 and 4. A higher score indicates better balance.

    Measured: 8 weeks

  2. Static antero-posterior postural stability assessment

    A portable balance device (Biodex Biosway Portable Balance System, New York, USA) was used to measure static antero-posterior postural stability.A higher score indicates a lower level of postural control.

    Measured: 8 weeks

  3. Static medio-lateral postural stability assessment

    A portable balance device (Biodex Biosway Portable Balance System, New York, USA) was used to measure static medio-lateral postural stability. A higher score indicates a lower level of postural control.

    Measured: 8 weeks

  4. Physical activity assessment

    Physical activity was assessed using the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE). It is a validated 12-item self-administered scale in which higher scores indicate increased physical activity.The overall PASE score ranges from 0 to 400 or more and high scores show better physical activity levels.

    Measured: 8 weeks

  5. Quality of life assessment

    The quality of life was assessed using the World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument-Older Adults Module (WHOQOL-OLD). This questionnaire consists of 24 items in six different domains and higher scores indicate better quality of life.

    Measured: 8 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Jul 2020
  2. Study start1 Feb 2016
  3. Primary completion15 Jan 2018
  4. Study completion15 Jan 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
This study was designed as a prospective and experimental study. The participants were divided into two groups as geriatric individuals with and without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Both groups were trained 3 days a week under the supervision of a physiotherapist and other days of the week without a supervisor. The treatment program consisted of 4 weeks of foundation IMT followed by 4 weeks of functional IMT.
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
45 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04460261
Sponsor's protocol ID
20201987
Status last verified
Jul 2020
First submitted
2 Jul 2020
Last updated
8 Jul 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Functional Inspiratory Muscle Training in people with Exercise, run by Ismail OZSOY.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Jul 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Inspiratory muscle strength (time frame: 8 weeks). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Jul 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in