AzTrials
AzTrials

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)RECRUITNCT04460859

RecruitmEnt Assessed by eleCtRical Impedance Tomography

An observational study of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), run by Unity Health Toronto at 4 sites in 4 countries.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The RECRUIT study is a multinational, multicenter physiological observational study conducted by the PLUG working group. It is a single-day study (1.5-2 hours) associated with specific lung (de)recruitment maneuvers to verify the feasibility of measuring the potential for lung recruitment in mechanically ventilated… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Specific lung recruitment maneuvers
How many people
171 participants
Where
4 sitesin 4 countries
Study dates
9 Jun 2020to Jun 2027
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Intubated mechanically ventilated patients will be considered for enrolment in the first week of ARDS diagnosis.

Who may be able to join

  • Intubated moderate and severe ARDS according to the Berlin definition (PaO2/FiO2 ratio <= 200 mmHg)
  • Under continuous sedation with or without paralysis

Who cannot join

  • Age <18 years
  • Bronchopleural fistula
  • Pure COPD exacerbation
  • Contraindication to EIT monitoring (e.g. burns, pacemaker, thoracic wounds limiting electrode belt placement)
  • Hemodynamic instability (Systolic BP < 75 mmHg or MAP < 60 mmHg despite vasopressors and/or heart rate < 55 bpm)
  • Attending physician deems the transient application of high airway pressures to be unsafe

Trial locations and contacts

4 sites in 4 countries. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

4 sites in 4 countries

Brazil1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Faculdade de Medicina da University São Paulo

    São Paulo

    Marcelo Amato, MD, marcelo.amato@fm.usp.br

    Recruiting

Other trials in Brazil

Canada1 site, 1 recruiting
  • St. Michael's Hospital

    Toronto, Ontario, M5B1T8

    Laurent Brochard, MD, 416-864-6060 ext. 5686, Laurent.Brochard@unityhealth.to

    Recruiting

Other trials in Canada

Italy1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico

    Milan

    Tommaso Mauri, MD, tommaso.mauri@unimi.it

    Not yet recruiting

Other trials in Italy

Spain1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Vall d'Hebron University Hospital

    Barcelona

    Oriol Roca, MD, oroca@vhebron.net

    Recruiting

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: RecruitmEnt Assessed by eleCtRical Impedance Tomography: Feasibility, Correlation With Clinical oUtcomes and pIloT Data on Personalised PEEP Selection.

The RECRUIT study is a multinational, multicenter physiological observational study conducted by the PLUG working group. It is a single-day study (1.5-2 hours) associated with specific lung (de)recruitment maneuvers to verify the feasibility of measuring the potential for lung recruitment in mechanically ventilated patients with ARDS by electrical impedance tomography (EIT).

Read the detailed description

Despite higher positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) being associated with multiple physiologic benefits, randomized clinical trials comparing higher vs. lower PEEP levels failed to show improved survival of ARDS patients. Higher PEEP should fully exploit its benefits only when implemented in patients with higher potential for alveolar recruitment (i.e., the decrease of non-aerated lung tissue at higher airway pressure) or in patients with airway closure. Retrospective analysis of randomised clinical trials with PEEP suggests that when high PEEP is used in responders (oxygenation), survival may be better. Conversely, in the absence of significant recruitment, higher PEEP should be avoided and lower PEEP might be recommended.

Titration of PEEP provided by the mechanical ventilator in patients with severe lung injury should thus be based on bedside information on lung recruitability. However, no valid method exists to define the best PEEP to optimize recruitment and minimize lung overdistention. Recruitability varies and is often not assessed. Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) is a non-invasive bedside imaging technique for measuring the potential for lung recruitment in ARDS patients. By performing lung (de)recruitment maneuvers and in-depth analyses, we will define lung recruitability indices and develop methods for real-time and personalized PEEP selection. This study will prove the feasibility of minimizing risks associated with inadequate mechanical ventilation by EIT.

Being tested
Specific lung recruitment maneuvers
Keywords
Mechanical Ventilation, Lung recruitment, ARDS, Electrical impedance tomography
Medical subject headings
Respiratory Distress Syndrome

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Specific lung recruitment maneuversOther

    Specific lung recruitment maneuvers will be performed to measure the potential for lung recruitment at different levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) provided by the mechanical ventilator. Electrical impedance tomography signals, synchronized signals of airway pressure and flow, esophageal pressure (if available), and volumetric capnography (if available) will be recorded continuously, during the time span of the protocol for offline analysis.

Study groups in NCT04460859
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Intubated mechanically ventilated ARDS patientsIntubated mechanically ventilated patients with moderate to severe ARDS according to the Berlin definition
Receives: Other: Specific lung recruitment maneuvers

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Potential for lung recruitment

    The potential for lung recruitment will be assessed with EIT. Several methods will be used and compared, based on e.g. pixel information of lung aeration, and pressure-volume characteristics at different PEEP steps.

    Measured: 2 hours

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Recruitment-to-inflation (R/I) ratio

    Measured: 2 hours

  2. EIT-based optimum PEEP level

    Measured: 2 hours

  3. PEEP level resulting in end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure between 0 and 2 cmH2O

    For those patients with esophageal pressure measurements available

    Measured: 2 hours

  4. Organ dysfunction as per the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score

    SOFA score min-max: 0-24; a higher score is associated with poor prognosis.

    Measured: Day 1, 3, 7

  5. Vital status at ICU discharge, 28 days, and hospital discharge

    Vital status (death/alive) will be assessed via chart review

    Measured: Through study completion, up to 1 year

  6. Ventilator free days

    Measured: Day 28

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Jul 2020
  2. Study start9 Jun 2020
  3. Primary completionDec 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJun 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
171 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04460859
Sponsor's protocol ID
2027
Acronym
RECRUIT
Status last verified
May 2025
First submitted
29 Jun 2020
Last updated
20 May 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Chen L, Del Sorbo L, Grieco DL, Junhasavasdikul D, Rittayamai N, Soliman I, Sklar MC, Rauseo M, Ferguson ND, Fan E, Richard JM, Brochard L. Potential for Lung Recruitment Estimated by the Recruitment-to-Inflation Ratio in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. A Clinical Trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Jan 15;201(2):178-187. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201902-0334OC.

    PubMed 31577153
  • Costa EL, Borges JB, Melo A, Suarez-Sipmann F, Toufen C Jr, Bohm SH, Amato MB. Bedside estimation of recruitable alveolar collapse and hyperdistension by electrical impedance tomography. Intensive Care Med. 2009 Jun;35(6):1132-7. doi: 10.1007/s00134-009-1447-y. Epub 2009 Mar 3.

    PubMed 19255741
  • Frerichs I, Amato MB, van Kaam AH, Tingay DG, Zhao Z, Grychtol B, Bodenstein M, Gagnon H, Bohm SH, Teschner E, Stenqvist O, Mauri T, Torsani V, Camporota L, Schibler A, Wolf GK, Gommers D, Leonhardt S, Adler A; TREND study group. Chest electrical impedance tomography examination, data analysis, terminology, clinical use and recommendations: consensus statement of the TRanslational EIT developmeNt stuDy group. Thorax. 2017 Jan;72(1):83-93. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-208357. Epub 2016 Sep 5.

    PubMed 27596161
  • Jonkman AH, Alcala GC, Pavlovsky B, Roca O, Spadaro S, Scaramuzzo G, Chen L, Dianti J, Sousa MLA, Sklar MC, Piraino T, Ge H, Chen GQ, Zhou JX, Li J, Goligher EC, Costa E, Mancebo J, Mauri T, Amato M, Brochard LJ; Pleural Pressure Working Group (PLUG). Lung Recruitment Assessed by Electrical Impedance Tomography (RECRUIT): A Multicenter Study of COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2023 Jul 1;208(1):25-38. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202212-2300OC.

    PubMed 37097986
  • Otahal M, Mlcek M, Borges JB, Alcala GC, Hladik D, Kuriscak E, Tejkl L, Amato M, Kittnar O. Prone positioning may increase lung overdistension in COVID-19-induced ARDS. Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 3;12(1):16528. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-20881-6.

    PubMed 36192569
  • Mlcek M, Otahal M, Borges JB, Alcala GC, Hladik D, Kuriscak E, Tejkl L, Amato M, Kittnar O. Targeted lateral positioning decreases lung collapse and overdistension in COVID-19-associated ARDS. BMC Pulm Med. 2021 Apr 24;21(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12890-021-01501-x.

    PubMed 33894747

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), run by Unity Health Toronto at 4 sites in 4 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 May 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 4 sites in Brazil, Canada, Italy, Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Laurent Brochard, MD (416-864-5686 ext. 5686, Laurent.Brochard@unityhealth.to), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Potential for lung recruitment (time frame: 2 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04460859, which also lists 6 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 May 2025; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 27 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in