Acute GastroenteritisNCT04463355
Video Discharge Instructions for Pediatric Gastroenteritis in an Emergency Department
A study testing Video discharge instructions in people with Acute Gastroenteritis, run by Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon at 1 site in Spain.
Trial summary
Video discharge instructions (VDI) have been suggested as a useful strategy to improve discharge instructions in pediatric emergency units. The goal of this study is to evaluate if the addition of VDI to usual verbal information improved the comprehension of information provided to caregivers of patients who consult… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 1 month to 16 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Gastroenteritis
- What is being tested?
- Video discharge instructions
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 139 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSpain
- Study dates
- 1 Jun 2019to 1 Jun 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 1 month to 16 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Patients who met ESPGHAN criteria for AGE: decreased stool consistency and/or increased evacuation frequency during a period <7 days, associated or not to fever or vomiting.
- Patients accompanied by a usual caregiver.
Who cannot join
- Patients with severe dehydration
- Patients with chronic comorbidities needing special instructions (i.e. neurologic, respiratory or cardiologic)
- Patients whose caregivers were not able to communicate in Spanish
- Patients who were admitted for hospitalization.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Video Discharge Instructions for Pediatric Gastroenteritis in an Emergency Department: a Randomized, Controlled Trial
Video discharge instructions (VDI) have been suggested as a useful strategy to improve discharge instructions in pediatric emergency units. The goal of this study is to evaluate if the addition of VDI to usual verbal information improved the comprehension of information provided to caregivers of patients who consult for acute gastroenteritis (AGE). An open-label, parallel, randomized trial was designed, enrolling patients who consult for AGE. First, caregivers answer a written test concerning AGE characteristics and management. They are randomly allocated to a control group, which receives verbal discharge instructions, or to an intervention group, which additionally receives video discharge instructions. After discharge, caregivers are contacted by telephone and answer the same test. Main outcome measure is difference between test scores in the first and the second tests, secondary endpoints are how many caregivers score 5/5 on the second test, as well as rate of return visits and caregivers satisfaction with the information received.
Read the detailed description
Video discharge instructions (VDI) have been suggested as a useful strategy to improve discharge instructions in pediatric emergency units. This study is designed to evaluate if the addition of VDI to usual verbal information improves the comprehension of the information provided to caregivers of patients who consult in pediatric emergency department for acute gastroenteritis (AGE). Secondary objectives are evaluating if video instructions improve satisfaction with the information received and decrease return visits.
The study is an open-label, parallel, randomized trial which takes place between June 2019 and June 2020 in the pediatric emergency department of a third-level Spanish hospital which receives 58000 emergencies annually. Up to 3 eligible patients are enrolled every shift when one of the main investigators is present. Simple, 1:1 randomization is performed using R software. Patients are randomly assigned to a group by opening sequentially numbered paper envelopes which contain the group in which the patient will be allocated, ensuring thus allocation concealment. Written informed consent is provided before trial enrollment.
Interventions
The trial is developed in three steps: an initial written test, an information phase and a second follow-up test after discharge. After enrollment, all patients fill-in a written test before discharge, which consists of 5 questions about AGE, 1 point per correct answer. Enrolled subjects are randomly assigned to the control or intervention group. In the first group of subjects (control group) caregivers receive, after completing the test and prior to discharge, the usual verbal information and recommendations about AGE following the guidelines of the Spanish Society of Pediatric Emergencies. In the second group (intervention group) patients are shown a short 2-minute video providing the same information about AGE, in addition to verbal instructions. In both groups, instructions are given by one of the main investigators in order to provide homogeneous and consistent information. Both sets of instructions explicitly include the information that had been previously asked in the test. All patients additionally receive a discharge report which includes instructions concerning aftercare treatment.
After discharge, all caregivers are contacted by telephone and asked the same 5 questions from the initial test. The questionnaire has to be completed by the same caregiver as in the previous test. This test also includes questions about subsequent visits to either emergency units or outpatient pediatric clinics and satisfaction with the information. The first telephonic contact is established 72 hours after discharge, and if unable to contact, repeated every 1-2 days up to a total of 5 days before excluding them and considering them as lost in follow-up.
Statistical Analysis The sample size was calculated to provide a statistical power of 80% at an alpha level of 5% to detect a two-tailed difference of 0.5 points between the two groups. It was calculated that with an estimated loss rate of 15% of patients between randomization and follow-up test, assuming a 1-point variance in test results based on previous studies, this statistical power would be reached by enrolling 75 patients in each group.
All randomized patients who complete both tests are included in the primary-end point analysis as part of the group in which they were randomized, following intention-to-treat principle. The differences in test points and satisfaction between groups are analyzed using Student's T-test, and the differences in proportions are analyzed using Chi-square test. Statistical significance is set at p<0.05. Analysis are performed using Rv3.6.1 and SPSS.25 statistical softwares.
- Conditions
- Acute Gastroenteritis
- Being tested
- Video discharge instructions
- Keywords
- discharge instructions, video, acute gastroenteritis, pediatric emergency department
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Video discharge instructionsBehavioural
Short video (2 minutes) including information about clinical features, management and follow up of pediatric patients with acute gastroenteritis
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control group: usual verbal instructions | No intervention | In this group, caregivers receive, after completing the test and prior to discharge, the usual verbal information and recommendations about AGE following the guidelines of the Spanish Society of Pediatric Emergencies. The instructions are always given by one of the main investigators to provide homogeneity in the information |
| Intervention group: video discharge instructions | Experimental | Additionally to the verbal information, patients are shown a short 2-minute video providing the same information about AGE that would be given by verbal information. Receives: Behavioral: Video discharge instructions |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in test score
We calculated the difference between the score obtained in the initial test and the score obteined in the follow-up test and compared between groups. Scores are based on a 5-question test, minimum score is 0 points and maximum score (best score) is 5 points
Measured: From 3 days to 10 days after first emergency care visit
Secondary outcomes (3)
Number of caregivers getting a total score of 5 points
We measured how many caregivers got a 5-score (perfect) in the follow up test after interventions, and compared between groups
Measured: From 3 days to 10 days after first emergency care visit
Rate of return visits
We asked caregivers whether they had returned to emergency care or to pediatric outpatient clinics for the same problem after the first visit.
Measured: 72 hours from from the first emergency care visit
Satisfaction score with the information received
We asked caregivers to give a score between 1 and 10 (1 very unsatisfied, 10 very satisfied) regarding how useful they felt that the information given to them had been.
Measured: From 3 days to 10 days after first emergency care visit
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Jul 2020
- Study start1 Jun 2019
- Primary completion31 Mar 2020
- Study completion1 Jun 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Acute GastroenteritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Open-label, parallel trial with a control group and an intervention group.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 139 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Gonzalo Solis Garcia, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon
- Investigators
- Gonzalo Solís, M.D., Principal investigator, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04463355
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- GEA01
- Status last verified
- Jul 2020
- First submitted
- 23 Jun 2020
- Last updated
- 9 Jul 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: All collected IPD are available under request.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Jul 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Video Discharge Instructions for Pediatric Gastroenteritis in an Emergency Department: a Randomized, Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04463355
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- GEA01
- Conditions
- Acute Gastroenteritis
- Keywords
- discharge instructions, video, acute gastroenteritis, pediatric emergency department
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 139 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital General Universitario Gregorio MarañonUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jun 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Mar 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Jun 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Jul 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Video discharge instructions (VDI) have been suggested as a useful strategy to improve discharge instructions in pediatric emergency units. The goal of this study is to evaluate if the addition of VDI to usual verbal information improved the comprehension of information provided to caregivers of patients who consult for acute gastroenteritis (AGE). An open-label, parallel, randomized trial was designed, enrolling patients who consult for AGE. First, caregivers answer a written test concerning AGE characteristics and management. They are randomly allocated to a control group, which receives verbal discharge instructions, or to an intervention group, which additionally receives video discharge instructions. After discharge, caregivers are contacted by telephone and answer the same test. Main outcome measure is difference between test scores in the first and the second tests, secondary endpoints are how many caregivers score 5/5 on the second test, as well as rate of return visits and caregivers satisfaction with the information received.
Detailed description
Video discharge instructions (VDI) have been suggested as a useful strategy to improve discharge instructions in pediatric emergency units. This study is designed to evaluate if the addition of VDI to usual verbal information improves the comprehension of the information provided to caregivers of patients who consult in pediatric emergency department for acute gastroenteritis (AGE). Secondary objectives are evaluating if video instructions improve satisfaction with the information received and decrease return visits.
The study is an open-label, parallel, randomized trial which takes place between June 2019 and June 2020 in the pediatric emergency department of a third-level Spanish hospital which receives 58000 emergencies annually. Up to 3 eligible patients are enrolled every shift when one of the main investigators is present. Simple, 1:1 randomization is performed using R software. Patients are randomly assigned to a group by opening sequentially numbered paper envelopes which contain the group in which the patient will be allocated, ensuring thus allocation concealment. Written informed consent is provided before trial enrollment.
Interventions
The trial is developed in three steps: an initial written test, an information phase and a second follow-up test after discharge. After enrollment, all patients fill-in a written test before discharge, which consists of 5 questions about AGE, 1 point per correct answer. Enrolled subjects are randomly assigned to the control or intervention group. In the first group of subjects (control group) caregivers receive, after completing the test and prior to discharge, the usual verbal information and recommendations about AGE following the guidelines of the Spanish Society of Pediatric Emergencies. In the second group (intervention group) patients are shown a short 2-minute video providing the same information about AGE, in addition to verbal instructions. In both groups, instructions are given by one of the main investigators in order to provide homogeneous and consistent information. Both sets of instructions explicitly include the information that had been previously asked in the test. All patients additionally receive a discharge report which includes instructions concerning aftercare treatment.
After discharge, all caregivers are contacted by telephone and asked the same 5 questions from the initial test. The questionnaire has to be completed by the same caregiver as in the previous test. This test also includes questions about subsequent visits to either emergency units or outpatient pediatric clinics and satisfaction with the information. The first telephonic contact is established 72 hours after discharge, and if unable to contact, repeated every 1-2 days up to a total of 5 days before excluding them and considering them as lost in follow-up.
Statistical Analysis The sample size was calculated to provide a statistical power of 80% at an alpha level of 5% to detect a two-tailed difference of 0.5 points between the two groups. It was calculated that with an estimated loss rate of 15% of patients between randomization and follow-up test, assuming a 1-point variance in test results based on previous studies, this statistical power would be reached by enrolling 75 patients in each group.
All randomized patients who complete both tests are included in the primary-end point analysis as part of the group in which they were randomized, following intention-to-treat principle. The differences in test points and satisfaction between groups are analyzed using Student's T-test, and the differences in proportions are analyzed using Chi-square test. Statistical significance is set at p<0.05. Analysis are performed using Rv3.6.1 and SPSS.25 statistical softwares.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Open-label, parallel trial with a control group and an intervention group.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control group: usual verbal instructions | No intervention | –In this group, caregivers receive, after completing the test and prior to discharge, the usual verbal information and recommendations about AGE following the guidelines of the Spanish Society of Pediatric Emergencies. The instructions are always given by one of the main investigators to provide homogeneity in the information |
| Intervention group: video discharge instructions | Experimental | Behavioral: Video discharge instructionsAdditionally to the verbal information, patients are shown a short 2-minute video providing the same information about AGE that would be given by verbal information. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 1 month to 16 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients who met ESPGHAN criteria for AGE: decreased stool consistency and/or increased evacuation frequency during a period <7 days, associated or not to fever or vomiting.
- Patients accompanied by a usual caregiver.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients with severe dehydration
- Patients with chronic comorbidities needing special instructions (i.e. neurologic, respiratory or cardiologic)
- Patients whose caregivers were not able to communicate in Spanish
- Patients who were admitted for hospitalization.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Video discharge instructionsShort video (2 minutes) including information about clinical features, management and follow up of pediatric patients with acute gastroenteritis | Behavioural | Intervention group: video discharge instructions |
Primary outcome
Change in test score
Time frame: From 3 days to 10 days after first emergency care visit
We calculated the difference between the score obtained in the initial test and the score obteined in the follow-up test and compared between groups. Scores are based on a 5-question test, minimum score is 0 points and maximum score (best score) is 5 points
3 secondary outcomes
Number of caregivers getting a total score of 5 points
Time frame: From 3 days to 10 days after first emergency care visit
Rate of return visits
Time frame: 72 hours from from the first emergency care visit
Satisfaction score with the information received
Time frame: From 3 days to 10 days after first emergency care visit
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Jul 2020.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. All collected IPD are available under request.
Related trials for Acute Gastroenteritis
RecruitingObservational study
Prospective Comparison of Pro-Adrenomedullin, C-Reactive Protein, and Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio for Diagnosing Acute Appendicitis
Acute Appendicitis
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Cardiovascular Risk in Patients With IBD
Ulcerative Colitis (UC), Crohn's Diseases
Recruiting
Feasibility and Safety of a Pediatric ERAS Protocol for Laparoscopic Appendectomy
Appendectomy, Laparoscopic, Acute Appendicitis
Not yet recruiting
Automatic Versus As-Needed Follow-up After Hospitalization for Children With Medical Complexity
Children With Medical Complexity, Respiratory Tract Infections (RTI)
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Patient Choice Between Antibiotics and Appendectomy in Uncomplicated Appendicitis (FRENCH 47 - ALACARTE)
Acute Appendicitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Gonzalo Solís, M.D. principal investigator
Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Video discharge instructions in people with Acute Gastroenteritis, run by Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon at 1 site in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Jul 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in test score (time frame: From 3 days to 10 days after first emergency care visit). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Jul 2020.