Functional DisorderAHEADNCT04464447
Feasibility and Pilot Testing of Group-based ACT for Adolescents With Functional Somatic Syndromes
A study testing Acceptance and Commitment Therapy in people with Functional Disorder, run by University of Aarhus.
Trial summary
Recurrent and impairing functional somatic syndromes (FSS) are common in adolescents. Despite a high need for care, empirically supported treatments are lacking for youth. The aim of the uncontrolled was to assess feasibility and treatment potential of group-based Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) in a generic… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 15 to 19 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Functional Disorder
- What is being tested?
- Acceptance and Commitment Therapy
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 21 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 29 May 2013to 24 Apr 2015
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 15 to 19 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Bodily Distress Syndrome, multi-organ type of at least 12 months' duration
- Raised since early childhood in Denmark or born by Danish parents
- Understand, speak and read Danish
- Moderate or severe impairment
Who cannot join
- Acute psychiatric disorder demanding other treatment, or if the patient is suicidal.
- A lifetime diagnosis of psychosis, mania or depression with psychotic symptoms (ICD-10: F20-29, F30-31, F32.2, F33.3), serious cognitive deficits or developmental disorders such as mental retardation and autism (ICD-10: F70, F84)
- Substance abuse of e.g. narcotics, alcohol or medication.
- Pregnancy at time of inclusion
- Not able to participate in group-based treatment, e.g. patients with severe ADHD (ICD-10: F90), severe social phobia (ICD-10: F40.1) or conduct disorder (ICD-10: F91)
About this study
Official title: Feasibility of Group-based Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Adolescents (AHEAD) With Functional Somatic Syndromes: A Pilot Study
Recurrent and impairing functional somatic syndromes (FSS) are common in adolescents. Despite a high need for care, empirically supported treatments are lacking for youth. The aim of the uncontrolled was to assess feasibility and treatment potential of group-based Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) in a generic treatment approach for adolescents with multiple FSS i.e. "ACT for Health in Adolescents" (AHEAD).
- Conditions
- Functional Disorder
- Being tested
- Acceptance and Commitment Therapy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Acceptance and Commitment TherapyBehavioural
The treatment "ACT for Health in Adolescents" (AHEAD) is an ACT-based Group intervention consisting of 9 modules (27 hours in total) delivered over a period of 3 months, with a follow-up meeting (3 hours) 3 months after the last module. Six to eight patients participate in each treatment Group. An information meeting (3 hours) for close relatives is held at the beginning of the Group treatment and the adolescents and their parents were invited to a 1½-hour individual consultation after the 8th module.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group-based Acceptance and Commitment Therapy | Other | Group-based Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) for adolescents presenting with multiple functional somatic syndromes. Receives: Behavioral: Acceptance and Commitment Therapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Short Form Health Survey-36 (SF36) (Assessment of an aggregate score measuring physical health)
Questionnaire, patient rated. Physical health measured with aggregate scores of the scales PF (physical functioning), BP (bodily pain) and VT (vitality). Score range 15-65. Higher scores indicating a higher degree of self-rated physical health.
Measured: At baseline (i.e. at clinical assessment), and at 2, 4, 5, and 8 months (corresponding to group start, 8th, 9th module and follow up meeting)
Secondary outcomes (10)
Change in Bodily Distress Syndrome checklist (BDS checklist)
Questionnaire, patient rated. Assessment of symptom severity. Score range 0-100. Higher score indicating a higher degree of symptom severity.
Measured: At baseline (i.e. at clinical assessment), and at 2, 4, 5, and 8 months (corresponding to group start, 8th, 9th module and follow up meeting)
Change in Limitation index Questionnaire
Questionnaire, patient rated. Assessment of symptom interference. Score range 0-36 with higher score indicating a higher degree of limitation.
Measured: At baseline (i.e. at clinical assessment), before psychiatric consultation (approximately 2 weeks after clinical assessment), and at 2, 3, 4, 5, and 8 months (corresponding to before therapy, after 4th, 8th, 9th module and at follow up meeting)
Change in Whiteley 7
Questionnaire, patient rated. Assessment of illness worry. Overall mean item score range from 0-4 with higher scores indicating a higher degree of illness worry.
Measured: At baseline (i.e. at clinical assessment), and at 2, 4, 5, and 8 months (corresponding to group start, 8th, 9th module and follow up meeting)
Change in SCL-8 Questionnaire
Questionnaire, patient rated. Assessment of emotional distress. Overall mean score range from 0-4 with higher scores indicating a higher degree of emotional distress.
Measured: At baseline (i.e. at clinical assessment), and at 2, 4, 5, and 8 months (corresponding to group start, 8th, 9th module and follow up meeting)
Change in SF-36 PCS
Aggregate score from questionnaire - physical component summary. Patient rated. The aggregate score has a mean of 50 and a SD of 10, but no range. Higher scores indicate better physical health.
Measured: At baseline (i.e. at clinical assessment), and at 2, 4, 5, and 8 months (corresponding to group start, 8th, 9th module and follow up meeting)
Change in SF-36 MCS
Aggregate score from questionnaire - mental component summary. Patient rated. The aggregate score has a mean of 50 and a SD of 10, but no range. Higher scores indicate better mental health.
Measured: At baseline (i.e. at clinical assessment), and at 2, 4, 5, and 8 months (corresponding to group start, 8th, 9th module and follow up meeting)
Change in IPQ-R Illness Perceptions Questionnaire
Questionnaire, patient rated. Treatment target. Score range 0-80 with higher scores reflecting a more maladaptive view of the illness.
Measured: At baseline (i.e. at clinical assessment) and at 2, 3, 4, 5, and 8 months (corresponding to before therapy, after 4th, 8th, 9th module and at follow up meeting)
Change in BRIQ Behavioural Responses to Illness Questionnaire
Questionnaire, patient rated. Assessment of illness related behaviour. Treatment target. Measures two dimensions of illness behaviour i.e. limiting behaviour (score range 7-35) and all-or-nothing behaviour (score range 6-30). Higher scores indicate a higher degree of maladaptive behaviour.
Measured: At baseline (i.e. at clinical assessment) and at 2, 3, 4, 5, and 8 months (corresponding to before therapy, after 4th, 8th, 9th module and at follow up meeting)
Change in AFQ-Y8 (Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire in Youth)
Questionnaire, patient rated. Assessment of psychological flexibility. Treatment target. Score range 0-32 with higher scores relfecting a higher degree of psychological inflexibility.
Measured: At baseline (i.e. at clinical assessment) and at 2, 3, 4, 5, and 8 months (corresponding to before therapy, after 4th, 8th, 9th module and at follow up meeting)
PGIC (Patient Global Impression of Change)
Questionnaire, patient rated. 7 point scale with answers ranging from "no change or condition gotten worse" to "a great deal better and a considerable improvement that has made all the difference".
Measured: At 8 months corresponding to at follow up meeting
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Jul 2020
- Study start29 May 2013
- Primary completion15 Apr 2015
- Study completion24 Apr 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Functional DisorderStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of AarhusThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 21 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Aarhus
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Aarhus University Hospital
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Charlotte U Rask, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Aarhus University and during study the Research Clinic for Functional Disorders and Psychosomatics
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04464447
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AHEAD pilot
- Acronym
- AHEAD
- Status last verified
- Jun 2020
- First submitted
- 27 Jun 2020
- Last updated
- 14 Jun 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Has not been incorporated in the consent from the patients. However, some data will be available upon request.
Publications
Kallesoe KH, Schroder A, Wicksell RK, Preuss T, Jensen JS, Rask CU. Feasibility of group-based acceptance and commitment therapy for adolescents (AHEAD) with multiple functional somatic syndromes: a pilot study. BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Sep 21;20(1):457. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02862-z.
PubMed 32957944
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Jun 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Feasibility of Group-based Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Adolescents (AHEAD) With Functional Somatic Syndromes: A Pilot Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04464447
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AHEAD / AHEAD pilot
- Conditions
- Functional Disorder
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 21 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of AarhusUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Aarhus University Hospital
- Study start
- 29 May 2013 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Apr 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- 24 Apr 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Jul 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Recurrent and impairing functional somatic syndromes (FSS) are common in adolescents. Despite a high need for care, empirically supported treatments are lacking for youth. The aim of the uncontrolled was to assess feasibility and treatment potential of group-based Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) in a generic treatment approach for adolescents with multiple FSS i.e. "ACT for Health in Adolescents" (AHEAD).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group-based Acceptance and Commitment Therapy | Other | Behavioral: Acceptance and Commitment TherapyGroup-based Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) for adolescents presenting with multiple functional somatic syndromes. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 15 to 19 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Bodily Distress Syndrome, multi-organ type of at least 12 months' duration
- Raised since early childhood in Denmark or born by Danish parents
- Understand, speak and read Danish
- Moderate or severe impairment
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Acute psychiatric disorder demanding other treatment, or if the patient is suicidal.
- A lifetime diagnosis of psychosis, mania or depression with psychotic symptoms (ICD-10: F20-29, F30-31, F32.2, F33.3), serious cognitive deficits or developmental disorders such as mental retardation and autism (ICD-10: F70, F84)
- Substance abuse of e.g. narcotics, alcohol or medication.
- Pregnancy at time of inclusion
- Not able to participate in group-based treatment, e.g. patients with severe ADHD (ICD-10: F90), severe social phobia (ICD-10: F40.1) or conduct disorder (ICD-10: F91)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Acceptance and Commitment TherapyThe treatment "ACT for Health in Adolescents" (AHEAD) is an ACT-based Group intervention consisting of 9 modules (27 hours in total) delivered over a period of 3 months, with a follow-up meeting (3 hours) 3 months after the last module. Six to eight patients participate in each treatment Group. An information meeting (3 hours) for close relatives is held at the beginning of the Group treatment and the adolescents and their parents were invited to a 1½-hour individual consultation after the 8th module. | Behavioural | Group-based Acceptance and Commitment Therapy |
Primary outcome
Change in Short Form Health Survey-36 (SF36) (Assessment of an aggregate score measuring physical health)
Time frame: At baseline (i.e. at clinical assessment), and at 2, 4, 5, and 8 months (corresponding to group start, 8th, 9th module and follow up meeting)
Questionnaire, patient rated. Physical health measured with aggregate scores of the scales PF (physical functioning), BP (bodily pain) and VT (vitality). Score range 15-65. Higher scores indicating a higher degree of self-rated physical health.
10 secondary outcomes
Change in Bodily Distress Syndrome checklist (BDS checklist)
Time frame: At baseline (i.e. at clinical assessment), and at 2, 4, 5, and 8 months (corresponding to group start, 8th, 9th module and follow up meeting)
Change in Limitation index Questionnaire
Time frame: At baseline (i.e. at clinical assessment), before psychiatric consultation (approximately 2 weeks after clinical assessment), and at 2, 3, 4, 5, and 8 months (corresponding to before therapy, after 4th, 8th, 9th module and at follow up meeting)
Change in Whiteley 7
Time frame: At baseline (i.e. at clinical assessment), and at 2, 4, 5, and 8 months (corresponding to group start, 8th, 9th module and follow up meeting)
Change in SCL-8 Questionnaire
Time frame: At baseline (i.e. at clinical assessment), and at 2, 4, 5, and 8 months (corresponding to group start, 8th, 9th module and follow up meeting)
Change in SF-36 PCS
Time frame: At baseline (i.e. at clinical assessment), and at 2, 4, 5, and 8 months (corresponding to group start, 8th, 9th module and follow up meeting)
Change in SF-36 MCS
Time frame: At baseline (i.e. at clinical assessment), and at 2, 4, 5, and 8 months (corresponding to group start, 8th, 9th module and follow up meeting)
Change in IPQ-R Illness Perceptions Questionnaire
Time frame: At baseline (i.e. at clinical assessment) and at 2, 3, 4, 5, and 8 months (corresponding to before therapy, after 4th, 8th, 9th module and at follow up meeting)
Change in BRIQ Behavioural Responses to Illness Questionnaire
Time frame: At baseline (i.e. at clinical assessment) and at 2, 3, 4, 5, and 8 months (corresponding to before therapy, after 4th, 8th, 9th module and at follow up meeting)
Change in AFQ-Y8 (Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire in Youth)
Time frame: At baseline (i.e. at clinical assessment) and at 2, 3, 4, 5, and 8 months (corresponding to before therapy, after 4th, 8th, 9th module and at follow up meeting)
PGIC (Patient Global Impression of Change)
Time frame: At 8 months corresponding to at follow up meeting
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Jun 2021.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32957944Kallesoe KH, Schroder A, Wicksell RK, Preuss T, Jensen JS, Rask CU. Feasibility of group-based acceptance and commitment therapy for adolescents (AHEAD) with multiple functional somatic syndromes: a pilot study. BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Sep 21;20(1):457. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02862-z.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Has not been incorporated in the consent from the patients. However, some data will be available upon request.
Related trials for Functional Disorder
Recruiting
Acupuncture for ADHD: Acupoint Data Mining, Clinical Effectiveness, and Interviews to Explore Treatment Outcomes.
Acupuncture, ADHD - Attention Deficit Disorder With Hyperactivity
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study of Brenipatide (LY3537031) in Participants With Irritable Bowel Syndrome-Diarrhea (IBS-D)
Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Diarrhea
Recruiting
Acute Genital Nerve Stimulation for Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction in Individuals Living With Spinal Cord Injury
Fecal Incontinence
Recruiting
REACH Study (Recovery Environments: Assessing Cognitive & Brain Health in Community Mental Health)
Schizophrenia, Schizo Affective Disorder
Active, not recruitingObservational study
SCIVAX: Biomarkers of Immune Dysfunction and Vaccine Responsiveness in Chronic SCI
Spinal Cord Injuries, Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Charlotte U Rask, MD, PhD principal investigator
Aarhus University and during study the Research Clinic for Functional Disorders and Psychosomatics
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Acceptance and Commitment Therapy in people with Functional Disorder, run by University of Aarhus.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Jun 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Short Form Health Survey-36 (SF36) (Assessment of an aggregate score measuring physical health) (time frame: At baseline (i.e. at clinical assessment), and at 2, 4, 5, and 8 months (corresponding to group start, 8th, 9th module and follow up meeting)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04464447, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Jun 2021.