StrokeNCT04465786
A Closed-loop Brain-computer Interface for Stroke
An observational study of Stroke, run by Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan at 1 site in Taiwan.
Trial summary
It may be hard to acquire stable sensorimotor rhythm from the affected motor cortex for patient without a response of paretic hand. A few studies suggest two ways to approaching closed-loop therapy: peripherally extracting the residual signals, for example electromyogram (EMG) at proximal muscles (deltoids) and… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 80 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Stroke
- How many people
- 70 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTaiwan
- Study dates
- 13 Jul 2020to 31 Aug 2022
- How long will I take part?
- 3 Months
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 80 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Hospitalized participants and healthy controls will be recruited from the Taipei Veterans General Hospital.
Who may be able to join
- first-ever, unilateral infarction or hemorrhage at middle cerebral artery or posterior cerebral artery territory
- early subacute phase of stroke (between 1 and 4 weeks after stroke onset)
Who cannot join
- electroencephagraphy feature is not usable
- Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Upper Extremity score is over 50
- ataxia
- global aphasia
- concomitant neurological diseases
- psychiatric diseases
- participating in other interventional research during this period
- other conditions might interfere with experiment
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Taiwan1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Taipei Veterans General Hospital
Taipei, 112
i-hui Lee, MD, PhD, 886-2-28712121 ext. 8109, ihui_lee@hotmail.com
i-hui Lee, MD, PhD
About this study
Official title: A Closed-loop Brain-computer Interface for Paretic Hand Stimulation After Stroke
It may be hard to acquire stable sensorimotor rhythm from the affected motor cortex for patient without a response of paretic hand. A few studies suggest two ways to approaching closed-loop therapy: peripherally extracting the residual signals, for example electromyogram (EMG) at proximal muscles (deltoids) and centrally extracting the activity patterns from unaffected hemisphere during attempting to move paretic hand. Therefore, understanding neural signatures of residual upper extremity movement among stroke patients might help in discovering potential therapeutic target and developing tailored brain-computer interface (BCI) therapy. Additionally, 59.4% of stroke patients in acute stage impair at least one somatosensory modality. It remains unclear whether the patient with somatosensory impairment hinder BCI effect.
Read the detailed description
Investigators will consecutively enroll subacute (1-4 weeks after stroke onset) patients with first-time, unilateral, subcortical stroke and age-matched healthy controls. All participants will carry on 2 sequential experiments. In the first experiment, participants will perform 2 motor tasks using either paretic/nondominant upper extremity or non-paretic/dominant upper extremity, called motor attempt (M) condition or calibration condition. The second experiment contains 3 conditions: cyclic functional electrical stimulation (cFES), cFES during motor attempt (M-cFES), and functional electrical stimulation during brain-computer interface (BCI-FES) in random order. The sensorimotor oscillations from the electroencephalography (EEG), upper extremity sensorimotor function score (Fugl-Meyer test, Action Research Arm test, and Revised Nottingham Sensation Assessment), corticospinal excitability from the transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), and resting-state functional and structural neuroimage from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) will be assessed before and after the final experiment, as well as 3 months after stroke.
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Keywords
- Stroke, Sensorimotor rhyme, Brain-computer interface
- Medical subject headings
- Stroke
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Sensorimotor rhythms
electroencephalography
Measured: Baseline, during experimental procedures
Secondary outcomes (7)
Fugl-Meyer Assessment
Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) measures both upper-limb and lower-limb motor function. The total score of FMA ranges from 0 to 100, which higher score indicates better motor recovery.
Measured: At baseline (1-4 week of stroke) and at 3 months after stroke
Action Research Arm test
Action Research Arm test (ARAT) measures specific upper-limb and hand function. The total score of ARAT ranges from 0 to 57, which higher score indicates better motor function.
Measured: At baseline (1-4 week of stroke) and at 3 months after stroke
Revised Nottingham Sensation Assessment
Revised Nottingham Sensation Assessment (rNSA) measures various upper-limb sensory function. The total score of rNSA ranges from 0 to 151, which higher score indicates better somatosensory function.
Measured: At baseline (1-4 week of stroke) and at 3 months after stroke
Motor Activity Log
Motor Activity Log (MAL) measures real-use of upper-limb. The averaged index of MAL ranges from 0 to 5, which higher index indicates more frequently use of paretic upper limb.
Measured: At baseline (1-4 week of stroke) and at 3 months after stroke
Resting motor threshold
Transcranial magnetic stimulation test
Measured: At baseline (1-4 week of stroke) and at 3 months after stroke
Motor evoked potential
Transcranial magnetic stimulation test
Measured: At baseline (1-4 week of stroke) and at 3 months after stroke
Resting-state brain connectivity
Magnetic resonance imaging
Measured: At baseline (1-4 week of stroke) and at 3 months after stroke
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Jul 2020
- Study start13 Jul 2020 (estimated)
- Primary completion31 Aug 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Aug 2022 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for StrokeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case crossover
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (estimated)
- Target duration
- 3 Months
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04465786
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2019-08-017B
- Status last verified
- Jul 2020
- First submitted
- 20 Apr 2020
- Last updated
- 10 Jul 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Jul 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Closed-loop Brain-computer Interface for Paretic Hand Stimulation After Stroke
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04465786
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2019-08-017B
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Keywords
- Stroke, Sensorimotor rhyme, Brain-computer interface
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Taipei Veterans General Hospital, TaiwanOther government
- Study start
- 13 Jul 2020 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 31 Aug 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Aug 2022 (estimated)
- First posted
- 10 Jul 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
It may be hard to acquire stable sensorimotor rhythm from the affected motor cortex for patient without a response of paretic hand. A few studies suggest two ways to approaching closed-loop therapy: peripherally extracting the residual signals, for example electromyogram (EMG) at proximal muscles (deltoids) and centrally extracting the activity patterns from unaffected hemisphere during attempting to move paretic hand. Therefore, understanding neural signatures of residual upper extremity movement among stroke patients might help in discovering potential therapeutic target and developing tailored brain-computer interface (BCI) therapy. Additionally, 59.4% of stroke patients in acute stage impair at least one somatosensory modality. It remains unclear whether the patient with somatosensory impairment hinder BCI effect.
Detailed description
Investigators will consecutively enroll subacute (1-4 weeks after stroke onset) patients with first-time, unilateral, subcortical stroke and age-matched healthy controls. All participants will carry on 2 sequential experiments. In the first experiment, participants will perform 2 motor tasks using either paretic/nondominant upper extremity or non-paretic/dominant upper extremity, called motor attempt (M) condition or calibration condition. The second experiment contains 3 conditions: cyclic functional electrical stimulation (cFES), cFES during motor attempt (M-cFES), and functional electrical stimulation during brain-computer interface (BCI-FES) in random order. The sensorimotor oscillations from the electroencephalography (EEG), upper extremity sensorimotor function score (Fugl-Meyer test, Action Research Arm test, and Revised Nottingham Sensation Assessment), corticospinal excitability from the transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), and resting-state functional and structural neuroimage from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) will be assessed before and after the final experiment, as well as 3 months after stroke.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case crossover
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Target follow-up
- 3 Months
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Hospitalized participants and healthy controls will be recruited from the Taipei Veterans General Hospital.
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- first-ever, unilateral infarction or hemorrhage at middle cerebral artery or posterior cerebral artery territory
- early subacute phase of stroke (between 1 and 4 weeks after stroke onset)
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- electroencephagraphy feature is not usable
- Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Upper Extremity score is over 50
- ataxia
- global aphasia
- concomitant neurological diseases
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Sensorimotor rhythms
Time frame: Baseline, during experimental procedures
electroencephalography
7 secondary outcomes
Fugl-Meyer Assessment
Time frame: At baseline (1-4 week of stroke) and at 3 months after stroke
Action Research Arm test
Time frame: At baseline (1-4 week of stroke) and at 3 months after stroke
Revised Nottingham Sensation Assessment
Time frame: At baseline (1-4 week of stroke) and at 3 months after stroke
Motor Activity Log
Time frame: At baseline (1-4 week of stroke) and at 3 months after stroke
Resting motor threshold
Time frame: At baseline (1-4 week of stroke) and at 3 months after stroke
Motor evoked potential
Time frame: At baseline (1-4 week of stroke) and at 3 months after stroke
Resting-state brain connectivity
Time frame: At baseline (1-4 week of stroke) and at 3 months after stroke
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Jul 2020.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Stroke
Recruiting
Delay AvoIding Primary Evaluation for ThRombectomy of Acute StrokE Patients With Large Vessel OCclusion in the Angiography SuiTe
Stroke, Acute
RecruitingPhase 4
Xeomin® and Gait Related Mobility After Stroke
Stroke
RecruitingObservational study
Implementing Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in a Rehabilitation Setting
Aphasia, Stroke
Not yet recruiting
EEG Feedback-Based Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Post-Stroke Dysphagia
Ischemic Stroke, Post-stroke Dysphagia
RecruitingObservational study
Development and Validation of Risk Prediction Models for Stroke and Cognitive Impairment in Moyamoya Disease and Moyamoya Syndrome
Moyamoya Disease, Moyamoya Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Stroke, run by Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan at 1 site in Taiwan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Jul 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Sensorimotor rhythms (time frame: Baseline, during experimental procedures). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Jul 2020.