AzTrials
AzTrials

Pulmonary Vein IsolationNCT04466358

CLOSE Versus High Density Mapping Guided Catheter Ablation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

A study testing Modified CLOSE protocol and High density mapping guided pulmonary vein isolation in people with Pulmonary Vein Isolation, run by University Medical Centre Ljubljana at 1 site in Slovenia.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this study is to compare two methods of catheter ablation for treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). The first method being a modified CLOSE protocol used for the control group and the second high density mapping guided isolation of pulmonary veins used for the interventional group. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Pulmonary Vein Isolation
What is being tested?
Modified CLOSE protocol and High density mapping guided pulmonary vein isolation
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteSlovenia
Study dates
26 Feb 2021to 1 Oct 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • electrocardiographic evidence of paroxysmal AF in the last six months,
  • unsuccessful treatment with antiarrhythmic drugs or highly symptomatic arrhythmia episodes (EHRA 3 and 4).

Who cannot join

  • age over 80 years,
  • greatly enlarged left atrium (ultrasound parasternal diameter more than 50 mm),
  • life expectancy less than one year,
  • acute life-threatening disease,
  • previous heart surgery,
  • severe left or right ventricular dysfunction (LVEF equal or less than 35 %),
Show all 9Show fewer
  • severe valve failure,
  • presence of a clot in the left atrium,
  • previous atrial fibrillation ablation

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Slovenia1 site
  • UMC Ljubljana

    Ljubljana, 1000

Other trials in Slovenia

About this study

Official title: Comparison of CLOSE Guided and High Density Mapping Guided Catheter Ablation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

The aim of this study is to compare two methods of catheter ablation for treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). The first method being a modified CLOSE protocol used for the control group and the second high density mapping guided isolation of pulmonary veins used for the interventional group. Comparison will be made according to clinical parameters and also durability of pulmonary vein isolation.

Read the detailed description

CLOSE protocol is among the latest methods of catheter ablation of AF. According to this protocol, ablations are guided by ablation index, which takes into account ablation time, the contact force and power supplied by the ablation catheter. In this protocol the distance between individual ablation lesions is less than 6 millimeters (mm), thus ensuring the continuity of the ablation line around the pulmonary veins. After ablation, the electrical isolation of pulmonary veins (entry and exit block) is checked with a multi-electrode circumferential catheter. The electrical inactivity of the ablation line itself is thus checked indirectly via the conduction block. According to recent studies, the success rate of catheter ablation with this protocol after one procedure at one year is approximately 90%. Investigators believe that the presence of electrical activity within the ablation line, which does not translate into and out of the pulmonary veins during the procedure and is not detected by the currently used mapping technique, significantly affects the subsequent clinical success of the procedure. Investigators assume that high-resolution mapping of the ablation line would identify areas of electrical activity within the ablation line (dormant conduction) and that the ablation of these areas during the first procedure would significantly affect both the long-term isolation of the pulmonary veins and the clinical success of the procedure.

The aim of this study is to compare long-term clinical efficacy and efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation of two different methods of catheter ablation for treatment of AF. Participants will be randomised into two groups. In the first group isolation of pulmonary veins will be performed following a modified CLOSE protocol, the isolation will be checked with multipolar circumferential catheter. In the second group the ablation will be performed with the same method but the isolation of pulmonary veins will be checked with high-resolution mapping looking for dormant conduction in the pulmonary vein antra.

Hypothesis:

investigators expect that the incidence of the recurrence od AF in the high resolution mapping group will be lower during clinical follow-up. Investigators also expect that durable pulmonary vein isolation will be present in higher proportion of participants where high resolution mapping was performed.

Study protocol:

Participants will be randomized 1:1 into two groups:

  1. Wide antral circumferential isolation of the pulmonary veins following modified CLOSE protocol (1) - ablation index at the posterior side 400, at the anterior side 550; distance between lesions <6 mm. 30 minutes after the completion of the ablation line, the isolation of the pulmonary veins is checked by inserting multipolar circular catheter into each pulmonary vein. In case of electrical activity ablation is added to close the gap in the line until pulmonary veins are electrically isolated.
  2. Wide antral circumferential isolation of the pulmonary veins following modified CLOSE protocol (1) - ablation index at the posterior side 400, at the anterior side 550; distance between lesions <6 mm. 30 minutes after the completion of the ablation line, the isolation of the pulmonary veins is checked by inserting multipolar circular catheter into each pulmonary vein. Additionally a high density map is created with the multipolar catheter with at least 1000 mapping points for each pulmonary antrum. Signals considered to represent gaps in the line: multicomponent intracardiac electrograms consisting of at least three baseline deviations and/or conduction from vein to the atrium during pacing beyond ablation line (10 milliAmpers, 1 millisecond) and/or voltage amplitude inside the ablation line above 0.1 milliVolts. If intracardiac signals after added ablation on the line persist after additional ablations this region is not considered a gap in the line. The area of the gap is ablated until electric inactivity of the pulmonary vein antrum as evidenced with high density remapping.

Investigators will record the characteristics of the areas where gaps will be recorded: inappropriate drop in impedance during ablation (below 10 Ohms), the parameters of the contact force of the ablation catheter tip during ablation, interlesion distance, characteristics of unipolar recordings of intracardiac electrograms from the tip of the ablation catheter and others.

Twelve (12) months after the procedure, all participants (even without proven atrial tachyarrhythmia) will undergo a re-intervention to check electrical isolation of the pulmonary veins and pulmonary vein antra with a multi-electrode mapping catheter and high density mapping. In case of proven re-isolation of the pulmonary veins or their antra, investigators will find the location of the gap in the ablation line and add additional ablation at this location until electrical isolation will be achieved.

Follow-up:

All participants will have continuous electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring for at least 12 hours after the procedure.

On the day after the procedure following examinations will be performed:

  • 12-lead ECG,
  • transthoracic ultrasound of the pericardium,

All participants will be monitored clinically for at least 12 months after the procedure:

After 3 months of blanking period, participants will come for the first outpatient examination in outpatient clinic of the University Medical Center in Ljubljana. This will be followed by a second outpatient examination after 6 months and a third outpatient examination after 12 months of intervention. In case of palpitations participants will be instructed to come to an earlier examination.

Clinical efficacy of the procedure will be defined as absence of AF episodes longer than 30 seconds detected by 24-hour ECG monitoring. Additionally, episodes of AF detected with event monitors and symptom driven 12-lead ECG recordings will be considered a recurrence.

On the first and second clinical follow-up (3, 6 months) the following examinations will be performed:

  • history taking and clinical examination,
  • 12-lead ECG recording,
  • 24-hour Holter ECG,
  • 1 week event monitor with daily 2 minute ECG recordings that will be sent to the investigator.

On the third clinical follow-up (12 months) the following examinations will be performed:

  • history taking and clinical examination,
  • 12-lead ECG recording,
  • 24-hour Holter ECG,
  • 1 week event monitor with daily 2 minute ECG recordings that will be sent to the investigator,
  • transthoracic ultrasound of the heart.

Medical management: Antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) and anticoagulation (AC) management will be directed by the referring physician. Anticoagulation is continued post-procedurally for at least three months. This continuation of ADDs and AC will be controled by the referring physician and a predefined protocol for discontinuation will not be provided. Subsequent interventions including repeat catheter ablation will be directed by the referring physician and recorded.

Being tested
Modified CLOSE protocol, High density mapping guided pulmonary vein isolation
Keywords
pulmonary vein isolation, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, high density mapping
Medical subject headings
Atrial Fibrillation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Modified CLOSE protocolProcedure or surgery

    Modified CLOSE protocol guided isolation of pulmonary veins.

  • High density mapping guided pulmonary vein isolationProcedure or surgery

    Modified CLOSE protocol guided isolation of pulmonary veins with additional ablations at sites of gaps or dormant conduction as evidenced by high density mapping of pulmonary vein antra.

Study groups in NCT04466358
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Modified CLOSE protocolExperimentalWidth antral circumferential pulmonary vein isolation guided according to CLOSE protocol, confirmed with multipolar circular mapping catheter.
Receives: Procedure: Modified CLOSE protocol
High density mapping guided pulmonary vein isolationActive comparatorWidth antral circumferential pulmonary vein isolation guided according to CLOSE protocol and confirmed with high density mapping of each pulmonary vein antrum, with additional ablation lesions at sites of gap or dormant conduction.
Receives: Procedure: High density mapping guided pulmonary vein isolation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Recurrence of atrial fibrillation

    Atrial fibrillation recorded with 12-lead ECG, event monitor or a 30 seconds episode recorded with Holter ECG.

    Measured: 3-12 months

  2. Durability of pulmonary vein isolation

    Presence of gaps in the circumferential ablation line (reconduction of pulmonary veins) as evidenced at predefined remapping procedure.

    Measured: 12 months

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Characteristics of gaps in ablation lines

    Characteristics of electrograms and ablation lesions in the areas where gaps in the ablation line will be discovered acutely during high density mapping at index procedure. Also, characteristics of electrograms and ablation lesions in the areas where gaps will be discovered at a remote re-mapping procedure at 12 months after the index procedure

    Measured: 0-12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Jul 2020
  2. Study start26 Feb 2021
  3. Primary completion1 Sep 2024
  4. Study completion1 Oct 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
60 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04466358
Sponsor's protocol ID
CLOSEVSHD
Status last verified
Oct 2024
First submitted
7 Jul 2020
Last updated
16 Oct 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Phlips T, Taghji P, El Haddad M, Wolf M, Knecht S, Vandekerckhove Y, Tavernier R, Duytschaever M. Improving procedural and one-year outcome after contact force-guided pulmonary vein isolation: the role of interlesion distance, ablation index, and contact force variability in the 'CLOSE'-protocol. Europace. 2018 Nov 1;20(FI_3):f419-f427. doi: 10.1093/europace/eux376.

    PubMed 29315411
  • Taghji P, El Haddad M, Phlips T, Wolf M, Knecht S, Vandekerckhove Y, Tavernier R, Nakagawa H, Duytschaever M. Evaluation of a Strategy Aiming to Enclose the Pulmonary Veins With Contiguous and Optimized Radiofrequency Lesions in Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: A Pilot Study. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018 Jan;4(1):99-108. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2017.06.023. Epub 2017 Sep 27.

    PubMed 29600792
  • Duytschaever M, De Pooter J, Demolder A, El Haddad M, Phlips T, Strisciuglio T, Debonnaire P, Wolf M, Vandekerckhove Y, Knecht S, Tavernier R. Long-term impact of catheter ablation on arrhythmia burden in low-risk patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: The CLOSE to CURE study. Heart Rhythm. 2020 Apr;17(4):535-543. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.11.004. Epub 2019 Nov 9.

    PubMed 31707159
  • Meissner A, Maagh P, Christoph A, Oernek A, Plehn G. Pulmonary vein potential mapping in atrial fibrillation with high density and standard spiral (lasso) catheters: A comparative study. J Arrhythm. 2017 Jun;33(3):192-200. doi: 10.1016/j.joa.2016.10.562. Epub 2016 Nov 25.

    PubMed 28607614
  • Segerson NM, Lynch B, Mozes J, Marks MM, Noonan DK, Gordon D, Jais P, Daccarett M. High-density mapping and ablation of concealed low-voltage activity within pulmonary vein antra results in improved freedom from atrial fibrillation compared to pulmonary vein isolation alone. Heart Rhythm. 2018 Aug;15(8):1158-1164. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.04.035. Epub 2018 May 3.

    PubMed 29729399
  • Kajdic N, Kalinsek TP, Antolic B, Zizek D, Stublar J, Demsar J, Kuhelj D, Jan M. Impact of High-Density Mapping on Pulmonary Vein Isolation Durability: A Randomized, Single-Center Study. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2025 Jun;48(6):587-597. doi: 10.1111/pace.15196. Epub 2025 May 6.

    PubMed 40326295

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Modified CLOSE protocol and High density mapping guided pulmonary vein isolation in people with Pulmonary Vein Isolation, run by University Medical Centre Ljubljana at 1 site in Slovenia.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Oct 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Slovenia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Recurrence of atrial fibrillation (time frame: 3-12 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04466358, which also lists 6 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Oct 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in