AzTrials
AzTrials

Orthodontic Tooth MovementNCT04468295

Evaluation of the Rate of Maxillary En-masse Retraction Using 0.018-inch Versus 0.022-inch Slot Brackets in Adults

A study testing Bonding, Leveling and alignment and Extraction in people with Orthodontic Tooth Movement, run by Cairo University.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The study compares the rate of en-masse retraction using 0.018-inch versus 0.022-inch slot orthodontic bracket systems in adult patients with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 30 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Orthodontic Tooth Movement
What is being tested?
Bonding, Leveling and alignment and Extraction
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
22 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
28 Sep 2020to 28 Mar 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 30 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion cases that require upper first premolars extraction.
  • Full permanent dentition (not necessitating third molars).
  • Good oral hygiene.

Who cannot join

  • Patients having systemic diseases or on medications that would affect tooth movement.
  • Active periodontal disease or obvious bone loss in maxillary arch.
  • Patients with habits that are detrimental to dental occlusion (thumb sucking, tongue thrusting).
  • Previous orthodontic treatment.
  • Missing teeth.

About this study

Official title: Evaluation of the Rate of Maxillary En-masse Retraction Using 0.018-inch Versus 0.022-inch Slot Brackets in Adult Patients With Maxillary Dentoalveolar Protrusion: A Randomized Clinical Trial

The study compares the rate of en-masse retraction using 0.018-inch versus 0.022-inch slot orthodontic bracket systems in adult patients with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.

Read the detailed description
  • Proper examination of the oral structures is needed to identify caries, fracture or missing teeth.
  • Full set of records ( study models, lateral cephalometric radiographs, photos) will be taken for every patient as part of the routine procedure for treatment of patients in the outpatient clinic of the Orthodontic Department, Cairo University.
  • In intervention group: Bonding of upper and lower arches including 2nd maxillary molars with bracket prescription Roth 0.018-inch (American Orthodontics).
  • In comparator group: Bonding of upper and lower arches including 2nd maxillary molars with bracket prescription Roth 0.022-inch (American Orthodontics).
  • Levelling and alignment in both groups with wire sequence: Ni-Ti (0.014,0.016, 0.016×0.022)
  • Steel ligation of maxillary (2nd premolar, 1st molar and 2nd molar) for anchorage.
  • Extraction of maxillary 1st premolars.
  • Impression will be taken, poured in plaster from which digital models will be fabricated before beginning of en-masse retraction (the baseline model).
  • Lateral cephalometric and periapical radiographs will be taken before starting retraction.
  • En-masse retraction will be done using 0.017x0.025 TMA T-Loop10 in both groups, the loops will be reactivated monthly.
  • Alginate impressions will be taken every month, that will be scanned to obtain digital models to assess the rate of retraction for 6 months.
  • After 6 months, last obtained digital model will be evaluated for assessment of anchorage loss, and Lateral cephalometric and periapical radiographs will be taken to assess changes in the anterior teeth inclinations and apical root resorption respectively.
  • The patients' treatment will be completed as indicated for them.
Being tested
Bonding, Leveling and alignment, Extraction, Retraction, Digital models

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • BondingProcedure or surgery

    Bonding of upper and lower arches including 2nd maxillary molars with bracket prescription Roth 0.018 inch

  • Leveling and alignmentProcedure or surgery

    Leveling and alignment till 0.016 x0.022 Ni Ti

  • ExtractionProcedure or surgery

    Extraction of maxillary 1st premolars

  • RetractionProcedure or surgery

    En-masse retraction using 0.017x0.025 TMA T loop

  • Digital modelsProcedure or surgery

    impression taking and digital scanning

  • measurementProcedure or surgery

    Assessment the rate of retraction for 6 months

Study groups in NCT04468295
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
0.018-inch slot orthodontic bracket systemExperimentalEn-masse retraction using frictionless mechanics with 0.018-inch slot orthodontic bracket system.
Receives: Procedure: Bonding; Procedure: Leveling and alignment; Procedure: Extraction; Procedure: Retraction; Procedure: Digital models; Procedure: measurement
0.022-inch slot orthodontic bracket systemActive comparatorEn-masse retraction using frictionless mechanics with 0.022-inch slot orthodontic bracket system.
Receives: Procedure: Bonding; Procedure: Leveling and alignment; Procedure: Extraction; Procedure: Retraction; Procedure: Digital models; Procedure: measurement

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Retraction Rate

    The rate of en-masse retraction of the anterior teeth

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Jul 2020
  2. Study start28 Sep 2020 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion28 Sep 2021 (estimated)
  4. Study completion28 Mar 2022 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
22 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04468295
Sponsor's protocol ID
CEBC-CU-2020-07-09
Status last verified
Jul 2020
First submitted
9 Jul 2020
Last updated
14 Jul 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Bonding, Leveling and alignment and Extraction in people with Orthodontic Tooth Movement, run by Cairo University.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Jul 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Retraction Rate (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Jul 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in