Post-polypectomy BleedingPPBNCT04468737
Effect of Inadequate Bowel Preparation on Urgent Colonoscopy in Patients With PPB.
An observational study of Post-polypectomy Bleeding and Bowel Preparation, run by Ningbo No. 1 Hospital at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study was to explore the effect of abbreviated bowel preparation on repeated colonoscopy in patients with PPB. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Post-polypectomy Bleeding, Bowel Preparation, Urgent Colonoscopy
- What is being tested?
- Bowel preparation
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- How many people
- 34 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2010to 15 Jun 2020
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients undergoing urgent colonoscopy
Who may be able to join
- patients with bleeding after polypectomy patients treated with colonoscopy within 24 hours after bleeding patients who did not receive adequate bowel preparation (oral laxatives).
Who cannot join
- patients whose main outcome indicators were not clearly described patients whose baseline characteristics were missing.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Effect of Inadequate Bowel Preparation on Urgent Colonoscopy in Patients With Post-polypectomy Bleeding (PPB): A Descriptive Study
The purpose of this study was to explore the effect of abbreviated bowel preparation on repeated colonoscopy in patients with PPB.
- Being tested
- Bowel preparation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Bowel preparationBehavioural
Observe patients who undergo bowel preparation by enema or irrigation
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Diagnostic rate
the rate of identified the origin of the bleeding
Measured: 1 Day of colonoscopy
Secondary outcomes (1)
Ileocaecal intubation rate
the rate of colonoscopy entering the cecum
Measured: 1 Day of colonoscopy
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Jul 2020
- Study start1 Jan 2010
- Primary completion1 Jun 2020
- Study completion15 Jun 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Post-polypectomy BleedingStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 34 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ningbo No. 1 Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04468737
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PPB-1.0
- Acronym
- PPB
- Status last verified
- Jun 2020
- First submitted
- 9 Jul 2020
- Last updated
- 14 Jul 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Jul 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effect of Inadequate Bowel Preparation on Urgent Colonoscopy in Patients With Post-polypectomy Bleeding (PPB): A Descriptive Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04468737
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PPB / PPB-1.0
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 34 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Ningbo No. 1 HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2010 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jun 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Jun 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Jul 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study was to explore the effect of abbreviated bowel preparation on repeated colonoscopy in patients with PPB.
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients undergoing urgent colonoscopy
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- patients with bleeding after polypectomy patients treated with colonoscopy within 24 hours after bleeding patients who did not receive adequate bowel preparation (oral laxatives).
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- patients whose main outcome indicators were not clearly described patients whose baseline characteristics were missing.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Bowel preparationObserve patients who undergo bowel preparation by enema or irrigation | Behavioural | – |
Primary outcome
Diagnostic rate
Time frame: 1 Day of colonoscopy
the rate of identified the origin of the bleeding
1 secondary outcome
Ileocaecal intubation rate
Time frame: 1 Day of colonoscopy
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Jul 2020.
Related trials for Post-polypectomy Bleeding
Active, not recruiting
Blood Flow Monitoring to Prevent Post-Polypectomy Induced Ulcer Bleeding
Delayed Post-Polypectomy Induced Ulcer Hemorrhage
RecruitingPhase 3
Aspirin Continuation or Interruption in Patients at Moderate Risk for Cardiovascular Events Undergoing Colonoscopy and/or Polypectomy
Myocardial Infarction (MI), Cardiovascular Events
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Prevention of Delayed Post-polypectomy Bleeding by Endoscopic Sucralfate Spray in High-risk Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Bleeding After GI Endoscopy
RecruitingObservational study
Prevention of Post-Polypectomy Colorectal Bleeding by Clips in Patients on Anticoagulants
Polyp of Colon
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Post-polypectomy Bleeding and Bowel Preparation, run by Ningbo No. 1 Hospital at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Jul 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Diagnostic rate (time frame: 1 Day of colonoscopy). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Jul 2020.