Vitamin D DeficiencyPhase 3NCT04476511
The Efficacy and the Safety of Vitamin D3 30,000 IU for Loading Dose Schedules
A Phase 3 study testing Cholecalciferol in people with Vitamin D Deficiency, run by Semmelweis University at 7 sites in Hungary.
Trial summary
Treatment: A: Slower Loading Group (SLD): 30.000 IU cholecalciferol once weekly for ten weeks, followed by 30.000 IU cholecalciferol every two weeks for four weeks. B: Moderate Loading Dose group (MLD): 30.000 IU cholecalciferol twice weekly for five weeks, followed by 30.000 IU cholecalciferol every two weeks for… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Vitamin D Deficiency
- What is being tested?
- Cholecalciferol
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 75 participants
- Where
- 7 sitesHungary
- Study dates
- 5 Sep 2018to 15 Dec 2021
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age between 18 and 70 years
- 25OHD level is no more than 16 ng/ml
- Postmenopausal state or adequate contraception in female patients
- Willing and able to give legal informed consent for study entry
Who cannot join
- Severe endocrine or metabolic disease, significant metabolic bone disease (except primary age-related osteoporosis)
- significant obesity (BMI >36 kg/m2)
- hypercalcemia at screening or within one year (seCa > 2.60 mmol/l)
- long standing hypercalciuria, kidney stones within 2 years
- sever kidney injury (KDIGO CKD 3 or more)
- chronic disease which significantly affects bone metabolism, vitamin D metabolism or calcium absorption
Show all 24Show fewer
- significant malabsorption that affects calcium metabolism
- heart failure or angina pectoris
- alcohol or drug abuse
- daily vitamin D intake is more than 1000 IU within 2 months
- suspected or proved pregnancy
- any other symptoms or findings which may interact with the safety of the study drug, evaluated by investigator
- participating in other clinical trial within 3 months of study entry
- planned journey to geographic location with high natural UV-B exposition for mor than 4 days during the study or regular (more than 2 times per month) artificial UV-B exposition (eg. sun parlor)
- Taking prohibited medication:
- glycosides
- magnesium containing medications (eg. antacids)
- cholestyramine and other ion exchange resins, orlistat
- thiazide type diuretics
- microsomal enzyme inductors (eg. anticonvulsants, sedatives)
- corticosteroids
- phosphates
- laxatives
- medications decreasing lipid absorption
Trial locations and contacts
7 sites in 1 country.
7 sites in 1 country
Hungary7 sites
Semmelweis University - Dept. of Medicine and Oncology
Budapest, 1083
Uno Medical Trials Kft.
Budapest, 1135
Central Hospital of the Hungarian Homeland Defence Forces
Budapest
Szalay János Outpatient Clinic
Hajdúnánás, 4080
Somogy County Kaposi Mór Teaching Hospital
Kaposvár, 7400
Jutrix Healthcare Ltd.
Kecskemét, 6000
Rub-Int Health Center
Székesfehérvár, 8000
About this study
Official title: Controlled Randomized Open Label Clinical Study to Compare the Efficacy and the Safety of the Loading Dose Schedules of Vitamin D3 (Colecalciferol) 30,000 IU Product in Deficient Patients
Treatment: A: Slower Loading Group (SLD): 30.000 IU cholecalciferol once weekly for ten weeks, followed by 30.000 IU cholecalciferol every two weeks for four weeks.
B: Moderate Loading Dose group (MLD): 30.000 IU cholecalciferol twice weekly for five weeks, followed by 30.000 IU cholecalciferol every two weeks for four weeks.
Read more
Every patients will receive calcium-citrate supplementation if average daily calcium intake does not reach the recommended daily amount.
Setting: two-arms, controlled, randomised, comparative open-label, multicentric clinical trial aimed to assess the comparative efficacy on 25(OH)D elevation and on safety of the two loading dose schedules of 30.000 IU Vitamin D3 oral tablets (administered as "Moderate Loading Dose"or "Slower Loading Dose") combined with an follow-up maintenance period of biweekly administration. The comparative assessment is based on the elevation of 25(OH)D levels due to treatment efficacy from baseline and by the end of the maintenance (biweekly 30.000 IU) period for each treatment groups, and also the ratio of patients in target range (30-50 ng/ml) in order to evaluate the most beneficial "loading dose" schedule. Upon the serum 25(OH)D levels are exceeded the 55ng/ml limits by the end of the loading period the trial subjects should continue with the standard maintenance dose of vitamin D3 for the remaining four weeks of the study. The evaluation of the comparative safety will be done also by controlling the serum and the urinary calcium levels and the registration of adverse drug reaction.
The primary objective is to assess the efficacy of the orally administered loading dose schedules of vitamin D3 in deficient patients. Efficacy is measured as the elevation of 25(OH)D levels compared to baseline.
Rationale: Oral vitamin D3 is the treatment of choice in vitamin D deficiency. The UK NOS guideline recommended where rapid correction of vitamin D deficiency is required, such as in patients with symptomatic disease or about to start treatment with a potent antiresorptive agent, the recommended treatment regimen is based on fixed loading doses followed by regular maintenance therapy. The loading dose regimen to provide a total of approximately 300,000 IU vitamin D, given either as separate weekly or daily doses over 6 to 10 weeks followed by a maintenance therapy comprising vitamin D in doses equivalent to 800-2000 IU daily in general or up to 4,000 IU daily), given either daily or intermittently at higher doses. (NOS guidelines 2014). Recent research on vitamin D and the widening range of therapeutic applications available for cholecalciferol, which can be classified as both a vitamin and a pro-hormone. Additionally, it was now realized that the Food and Nutrition Board's previously defined Upper Limit (UL) for safe intake at 2,000 IU/day was set far too low and that the physiologic requirement for vitamin D in adults may be as high as 5,000 IU/day, which is less than half of the >10,000 IU that can be produced endogenously with full-body sun exposure.
In a recent study showed that the safety of doses over 2000 IU/day-4000 IU/day for 3 months resulting in a ~360,000 UI cumulative dose. According to the study results, for the majority of the patients the 4000 IU/day (360,000 UI cumulative dose) was needed to achieve a 25(OH)D serum concentration above 75nmol/L (30 ng/mL), which is otherwise set as the target value by Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline (Holick 2011b).
Another study (Verussio et al 2014) cited shows the safety and efficacy of 50.000 IU/week for 8 weeks (400,000 UI cumulative dose for 8 weeks), followed by 25,000 IU twice a month which was more effective in raising the 25(OH)D level to the target range (of >30 ng/L) than 25,000 IU twice a month (50,000 IU/ month). In the latter group only 40% of the patients reached the target 25(OH)D levels at 6 months, compared to the 72% in the first group. The study supports efficacy of dosing and safety of the treatment of vitamin D deficiency a 50,000 IU /week loading dose scheme with a 8 weeks cumulative dose of >400,000 UI.
- Conditions
- Vitamin D Deficiency
- Being tested
- Cholecalciferol
- Keywords
- vitamin D deficiency, vitamin D loading dose
- Medical subject headings
- Vitamin D Deficiency
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CholecalciferolDrug
tablet containing 30.000IU cholecalciferol
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Slower Loading Dose | Active comparator | 30.000IU cholecalciferol once weekly for ten weeks Receives: Drug: Cholecalciferol |
| Moderate Loading Dose | Active comparator | 30.000IU cholecalciferol twice weekly for five weeks Receives: Drug: Cholecalciferol |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin-D increase after loading period
Serum 25OHD level will be measured at screening, after loading period and after maintenance period
Measured: 5/10 weeks
Secondary outcomes (7)
Proportion of subjects reaching target range of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin-D after loading dose
Serum 25OHD level will be measured at screening, after loading period and after maintenance period. Target range: 30-50 ng/ml
Measured: 5/10 weeks
Proportion of subjects remaining in target range of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin-D after maintenance dose
Serum 25OHD level will be measured at screening, after loading period and after maintenance period. Target range: 30-50 ng/ml
Measured: 4 weeks
Efficacy of maintenance dose
Serum 25OHD level will be measured at screening, after loading period and after maintenance period. Target range: 30-50 ng/ml
Measured: 4 weeks
Frequency of adverse events
Adverse event recording will be performed at every study visits and unscheduled visits if applicable.
Measured: up to 20 weeks, continuously
Serum calcium level
Serum calcium level will be measured at screening, after loading period and after maintenance period and whenever clinically relevant.
Measured: up to 20 weeks, continuously
Urinary calcium excretion
Urinary calcium level will be measured at screening, after loading period and after maintenance period and whenever clinically relevant from 24 hours collected urine.
Measured: whole study
Bone turnover markers
osteocalcin; collagen-ß-crosslaps
Measured: up to 20 weeks, continuously
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Jul 2020
- Study start5 Sep 2018
- Primary completion15 Dec 2021
- Study completion15 Dec 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Vitamin D DeficiencyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Semmelweis UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 75 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Semmelweis University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Pharma Patent Kft.
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Istvan Takacs, Semmelweis University
- Investigators
- Istvan Takacs, MD, PhD, DSc, Principal investigator, Semmelweis University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04476511
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PAT17-LOADS
- Other IDs
- 2018-000508-40, 2018
- Status last verified
- Mar 2022
- First submitted
- 5 May 2019
- Last updated
- 4 Mar 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Mar 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Controlled Randomized Open Label Clinical Study to Compare the Efficacy and the Safety of the Loading Dose Schedules of Vitamin D3 (Colecalciferol) 30,000 IU Product in Deficient Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04476511
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PAT17-LOADS
- Conditions
- Vitamin D Deficiency
- Keywords
- vitamin D deficiency, vitamin D loading dose
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 75 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Semmelweis UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Pharma Patent Kft.
- Study start
- 5 Sep 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Dec 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Dec 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Jul 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Treatment: A: Slower Loading Group (SLD): 30.000 IU cholecalciferol once weekly for ten weeks, followed by 30.000 IU cholecalciferol every two weeks for four weeks.
B: Moderate Loading Dose group (MLD): 30.000 IU cholecalciferol twice weekly for five weeks, followed by 30.000 IU cholecalciferol every two weeks for four weeks.
Every patients will receive calcium-citrate supplementation if average daily calcium intake does not reach the recommended daily amount.
Setting: two-arms, controlled, randomised, comparative open-label, multicentric clinical trial aimed to assess the comparative efficacy on 25(OH)D elevation and on safety of the two loading dose schedules of 30.000 IU Vitamin D3 oral tablets (administered as "Moderate Loading Dose"or "Slower Loading Dose") combined with an follow-up maintenance period of biweekly administration. The comparative assessment is based on the elevation of 25(OH)D levels due to treatment efficacy from baseline and by the end of the maintenance (biweekly 30.000 IU) period for each treatment groups, and also the ratio of patients in target range (30-50 ng/ml) in order to evaluate the most beneficial "loading dose" schedule. Upon the serum 25(OH)D levels are exceeded the 55ng/ml limits by the end of the loading period the trial subjects should continue with the standard maintenance dose of vitamin D3 for the remaining four weeks of the study. The evaluation of the comparative safety will be done also by controlling the serum and the urinary calcium levels and the registration of adverse drug reaction.
The primary objective is to assess the efficacy of the orally administered loading dose schedules of vitamin D3 in deficient patients. Efficacy is measured as the elevation of 25(OH)D levels compared to baseline.
Rationale: Oral vitamin D3 is the treatment of choice in vitamin D deficiency. The UK NOS guideline recommended where rapid correction of vitamin D deficiency is required, such as in patients with symptomatic disease or about to start treatment with a potent antiresorptive agent, the recommended treatment regimen is based on fixed loading doses followed by regular maintenance therapy. The loading dose regimen to provide a total of approximately 300,000 IU vitamin D, given either as separate weekly or daily doses over 6 to 10 weeks followed by a maintenance therapy comprising vitamin D in doses equivalent to 800-2000 IU daily in general or up to 4,000 IU daily), given either daily or intermittently at higher doses. (NOS guidelines 2014). Recent research on vitamin D and the widening range of therapeutic applications available for cholecalciferol, which can be classified as both a vitamin and a pro-hormone. Additionally, it was now realized that the Food and Nutrition Board's previously defined Upper Limit (UL) for safe intake at 2,000 IU/day was set far too low and that the physiologic requirement for vitamin D in adults may be as high as 5,000 IU/day, which is less than half of the >10,000 IU that can be produced endogenously with full-body sun exposure.
In a recent study showed that the safety of doses over 2000 IU/day-4000 IU/day for 3 months resulting in a ~360,000 UI cumulative dose. According to the study results, for the majority of the patients the 4000 IU/day (360,000 UI cumulative dose) was needed to achieve a 25(OH)D serum concentration above 75nmol/L (30 ng/mL), which is otherwise set as the target value by Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline (Holick 2011b).
Another study (Verussio et al 2014) cited shows the safety and efficacy of 50.000 IU/week for 8 weeks (400,000 UI cumulative dose for 8 weeks), followed by 25,000 IU twice a month which was more effective in raising the 25(OH)D level to the target range (of >30 ng/L) than 25,000 IU twice a month (50,000 IU/ month). In the latter group only 40% of the patients reached the target 25(OH)D levels at 6 months, compared to the 72% in the first group. The study supports efficacy of dosing and safety of the treatment of vitamin D deficiency a 50,000 IU /week loading dose scheme with a 8 weeks cumulative dose of >400,000 UI.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Slower Loading Dose | Active comparator | Drug: Cholecalciferol30.000IU cholecalciferol once weekly for ten weeks |
| Moderate Loading Dose | Active comparator | Drug: Cholecalciferol30.000IU cholecalciferol twice weekly for five weeks |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Age between 18 and 70 years
- 25OHD level is no more than 16 ng/ml
- Postmenopausal state or adequate contraception in female patients
- Willing and able to give legal informed consent for study entry
Key exclusion criteria (24 listed)
- Severe endocrine or metabolic disease, significant metabolic bone disease (except primary age-related osteoporosis)
- significant obesity (BMI >36 kg/m2)
- hypercalcemia at screening or within one year (seCa > 2.60 mmol/l)
- long standing hypercalciuria, kidney stones within 2 years
- sever kidney injury (KDIGO CKD 3 or more)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Cholecalciferoltablet containing 30.000IU cholecalciferol | Drug | Moderate Loading Dose, Slower Loading Dose |
Primary outcome
Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin-D increase after loading period
Time frame: 5/10 weeks
Serum 25OHD level will be measured at screening, after loading period and after maintenance period
7 secondary outcomes
Proportion of subjects reaching target range of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin-D after loading dose
Time frame: 5/10 weeks
Proportion of subjects remaining in target range of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin-D after maintenance dose
Time frame: 4 weeks
Efficacy of maintenance dose
Time frame: 4 weeks
Frequency of adverse events
Time frame: up to 20 weeks, continuously
Serum calcium level
Time frame: up to 20 weeks, continuously
Urinary calcium excretion
Time frame: whole study
Bone turnover markers
Time frame: up to 20 weeks, continuously
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Mar 2022.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Vitamin D Deficiency
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A First-in-human Study of KK8123 in Adults With X-linked Hypophosphatemia
X-linked Hypophosphatemia
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
REducing Systemic Inflammation With LOw-dose Colchicine to ImproVE Cardiovascular Calcification in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Pilot Randomized Open-Label Trial
Chronic Kidney Disease Mineral and Bone Disorder, Cognitive Function
Recruiting
Role of Vitamin D Supplementation in Children With Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS), Vitamin D Deficiency
RecruitingObservational study
Post Marketing Surveillance Study to Observe Safety and Effectiveness of CRYSVITA® in S. Korean Patients
FGF23-related Hypophosphataemic Rickets and Osteomalacia
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Vitamin D Supplementation Added to Iron Therapy in Children With Iron Deficiency Anemia
Iron Deficiency Anemia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Istvan Takacs, MD, PhD, DSc principal investigator
Semmelweis University
7 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Cholecalciferol in people with Vitamin D Deficiency, run by Semmelweis University at 7 sites in Hungary.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 24 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Mar 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 7 sites in Hungary. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin-D increase after loading period (time frame: 5/10 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Mar 2022.