Shoulder DislocationNCT04479397
Sling vs Nothing After Latarjet Procedure
A study testing Latarjet Surgery for anterior shoulder instability and No sling in postoperative care in people with Shoulder Dislocation, run by Hugo Bothorel at 1 site in Switzerland.
Trial summary
Traumatic anterior shoulder instability is a common injury for the contact athlete, with high rates of recurrence in some athletic populations. The specific indication for the Latarjet procedure differs amongst surgeons, however it is generally accepted that it is indicated in patients with anterior glenohumeral… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Shoulder Dislocation
- What is being tested?
- Latarjet Surgery for anterior shoulder instability and No sling in postoperative care
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 86 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSwitzerland
- Study dates
- 1 Mar 2020to 30 Sep 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- all patients over 18 years old who have an anterior shoulder instability with one of the following criteria: an anterior glenoid bone defect > 20%, contact athlete or patients with failed Bankart repair-either open or arthroscopic will be considered eligible.
Who cannot join
- We exclude patients with a subscapularis tear, other trauma of the involved upper extremity (e.g. associated scapular or clavicular fractures, acromioclavicular dislocation), pre-operative stiffness, pre-operative sign of dislocation on standard X-ray, CT, CT arthrogram, MRI or MRA, contra-indication to CT (i.e pregnancy), and an inability to follow properly post-surgery recommendations.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Post-operative Mobilization After Anterior Shoulder Stabilization With the Latarjet Procedure: Sling Versus Nothing. A Randomized Prospective Study.
Traumatic anterior shoulder instability is a common injury for the contact athlete, with high rates of recurrence in some athletic populations. The specific indication for the Latarjet procedure differs amongst surgeons, however it is generally accepted that it is indicated in patients with anterior glenohumeral instability that are unlikely to have a successful outcome from either an arthroscopic or open anatomical Bankart repair.
Overall the rate of reoperation following a Latarjet is around 5-7%. Infection, hematoma as well as screw removal and glenoid bony rim fractures are the most common indications for reoperation. The rate of instability after a Latarjet is low, with 1.7%-5.0% rate of dislocation.
Read more
However, in terms of rehabilitation, there are only a few studies and evidence of best practices. A recent review of the literature has highlighted four studies, comparing different rehabilitation protocols, which include different immobilization periods ranging from 0 to 3 weeks, and different types of mobilization (under physiotherapist supervision or not, with machine or not). They found a similar rate of recurrent dislocation between the different protocols. But early passive motion enables to improve the range of motion during first 3-6 months, with similar results at one year.
One main aspect which the surgeon can influence is immobilization time. In all above-mentioned studies, patients had to wear a sling for at least 3 weeks, even in the early mobilization groups. Short protocols with encouraging results have been recently emphasized by in other fields of shoulder surgery. The investigators would like to determine if the absence of postoperative immobilization could lead to improved function and better range of motion. To the investigators best knowledge, no study has sought to compare the usefulness of sling wearing after Latarjet procedure. Avoiding the sling could simplify rehabilitation and should provide a return to normal function faster.
Read the detailed description
The aim of this study is to compare rehabilitation with the wearing of a sling, to rehabilitation without any immobilization after Latarjet procedure for treatment of anterior shoulder instability. Ultimately, the goal would be to offer to patients a simplified rehabilitation management, with a faster recovery, less pain and a quicker return to activities of daily living, work and sport.
As primary outcome, investigators will evaluate if the Rowe score is superior without postoperative immobilization (without a sling during the first 3 weeks) at 6 months after surgery compared to sling wearing.
Secondary outcomes include radiological criteria (X-rays and computed tomography (CT) at 6 months for bony union), return to sport, work absenteeism, other complication rate (especially redislocation), and the undermentioned subjective and clinical scores before surgery and at 1.5, 6 and 12 postoperative months.
All patients will be assessed with commonly used subjective scores in the form of self-administered questionnaires. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is a widely used single-item test where a patient rates pain intensity between 0 and 10. This scale is useful for patient preoperative and postoperative monitoring and has also been correlated with patient pain, anxiety and apprehension. Patient satisfaction (are patients satisfied, yes/no) will be assessed as well. Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV) is a single-question test where a patient is asked to rate his overall shoulder function as a percentage of normal shoulder. It is a quick and easily administered score that has also been validated for various shoulder disabilities, such as instability.
The following clinical scores will be analyzed as well Rowe score for instability is a three-item test with four choices each, measuring shoulder function, stability, and motion. The final result is converted into a value between 0 and 100. These scores have been specifically developed for shoulder instability.
Except for VAS, higher results mean higher function. ROM will be determined using a Vicon motion capture system (Vicon, Oxford Metrics, Oxford, UK) consisting of six cameras sampling at 120 Hz already available in our facility.
- Conditions
- Shoulder Dislocation
- Being tested
- Latarjet Surgery for anterior shoulder instability, No sling in postoperative care
- Keywords
- Latarjet, Post operative, Sling
- Medical subject headings
- Shoulder Dislocation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Latarjet Surgery for anterior shoulder instabilityProcedure or surgery
Bone block procedure for anterior shoulder instability
No sling in postoperative careProcedure or surgery
No sling will be used in postoperative care.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Sling Arm | Active comparator | This arm of the study will receive a sling for 3 weeks in postoperative care. Receives: Procedure: Latarjet Surgery for anterior shoulder instability |
| No Sling Arm | Experimental | This arm of the study will not receive a sling during the postoperative care, Receives: Procedure: Latarjet Surgery for anterior shoulder instability; Procedure: No sling in postoperative care |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Rowe score
The Rowe Score consists of a total of 100 points divided into three domains: (1) stability, which corresponds to a total 50 points; (2) mobility, which corresponds to 20 points; (3) function, which corresponds to 30 points.
Measured: 12 postoperative months
Secondary outcomes (8)
The Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is a widely used single-item test where a patient rates pain intensity between 0 and 10. This scale is useful for patient preoperative and postoperative monitoring and has also been correlated with patient pain, anxiety and apprehension.
Measured: 12 postoperative months
Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV)
The SSV is defined as a patient's subjective shoulder assessment expressed as a percent- age of an entirely normal shoulder, which would score 100%.
Measured: 12 postoperative months
Patient satisfaction
Patients will be asked "are you satisfied, yes/no"
Measured: 12 postoperative months
Bony union
Will be evaluated using a CT scan and/or X-ray
Measured: 12 postoperative months
Return to work
Time, in days, till patients return to work
Measured: 12 postoperative months
Return to sport
Time, in days, untill patients return to sports
Measured: 12 postoperative months
Redislocation
Did the shoulder redislocate postoperatively, yes or no
Measured: 12 postoperative months
Range of motion
ROM will be determined using a Vicon motion capture system (Vicon, Oxford Metrics, Oxford, UK) consisting of six cameras sampling at 120 Hz already available in our facility.
Measured: 12 postoperative months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Jul 2020
- Study start1 Mar 2020
- Primary completion30 Sep 2023
- Study completion30 Sep 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (22)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Shoulder DislocationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 86 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hugo Bothorel
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Hugo Bothorel, La Tour Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04479397
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2019-02469
- Other IDs
- 2019
- Status last verified
- Mar 2024
- First submitted
- 15 Jul 2020
- Last updated
- 21 Mar 2024
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Griesser MJ, Harris JD, McCoy BW, Hussain WM, Jones MH, Bishop JY, Miniaci A. Complications and re-operations after Bristow-Latarjet shoulder stabilization: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 Feb;22(2):286-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.09.009.
PubMed 23352473Whitehouse T, Orr R, Fitzgerald E, Harries S, McLellan CP. The Epidemiology of Injuries in Australian Professional Rugby Union 2014 Super Rugby Competition. Orthop J Sports Med. 2016 Mar 22;4(3):2325967116634075. doi: 10.1177/2325967116634075. eCollection 2016 Mar.
PubMed 27069947van der Linde JA, van Wijngaarden R, Somford MP, van Deurzen DF, van den Bekerom MP. The Bristow-Latarjet procedure, a historical note on a technique in comeback. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Feb;24(2):470-8. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3704-7. Epub 2015 Aug 1.
PubMed 26231148An VV, Sivakumar BS, Phan K, Trantalis J. A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and patient-reported outcomes following two procedures for recurrent traumatic anterior instability of the shoulder: Latarjet procedure vs. Bankart repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016 May;25(5):853-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.11.001. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
PubMed 26809355Cunningham G, Ladermann A. Redefining anterior shoulder impingement: a literature review. Int Orthop. 2018 Feb;42(2):359-366. doi: 10.1007/s00264-017-3515-1. Epub 2017 Jun 6.
PubMed 28585076Ma R, Brimmo OA, Li X, Colbert L. Current Concepts in Rehabilitation for Traumatic Anterior Shoulder Instability. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2017 Dec;10(4):499-506. doi: 10.1007/s12178-017-9449-9.
PubMed 29038953Ialenti MN, Mulvihill JD, Feinstein M, Zhang AL, Feeley BT. Return to Play Following Shoulder Stabilization: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Orthop J Sports Med. 2017 Sep 14;5(9):2325967117726055. doi: 10.1177/2325967117726055. eCollection 2017 Sep.
PubMed 28944249Young AA, Maia R, Berhouet J, Walch G. Open Latarjet procedure for management of bone loss in anterior instability of the glenohumeral joint. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011 Mar;20(2 Suppl):S61-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2010.07.022. Epub 2010 Dec 9. No abstract available.
PubMed 21145262Ladermann A, Lubbeke A, Stern R, Cunningham G, Bellotti V, Gazielly DF. Risk factors for dislocation arthropathy after Latarjet procedure: a long-term study. Int Orthop. 2013 Jun;37(6):1093-8. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-1848-y. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
PubMed 23508865Cunningham G, Benchouk S, Kherad O, Ladermann A. Comparison of arthroscopic and open Latarjet with a learning curve analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Feb;24(2):540-5. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3910-3. Epub 2015 Dec 12.
PubMed 26658571Tirefort J, Schwitzguebel AJ, Collin P, Nowak A, Plomb-Holmes C, Ladermann A. Postoperative Mobilization After Superior Rotator Cuff Repair: Sling Versus No Sling: A Randomized Prospective Study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Mar 20;101(6):494-503. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00773.
PubMed 30893230Domos P, Lunini E, Ascione F, Serra N, Bercik MJ, Neyton L, Godeneche A, Walch G. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of open Latarjet procedure in patients aged 40 years or older. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 Sep;28(9):e304-e312. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.02.004. Epub 2019 Apr 28.
PubMed 31043350Boileau P, Saliken D, Gendre P, Seeto BL, d'Ollonne T, Gonzalez JF, Bronsard N. Arthroscopic Latarjet: Suture-Button Fixation Is a Safe and Reliable Alternative to Screw Fixation. Arthroscopy. 2019 Apr;35(4):1050-1061. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.11.012. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
PubMed 30857907Gilbart MK, Gerber C. Comparison of the subjective shoulder value and the Constant score. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007 Nov-Dec;16(6):717-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.02.123.
PubMed 18061114Martinez-Urrutia A. Anxiety and pain in surgical patients. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1975 Aug;43(4):437-42. doi: 10.1037/h0076898. No abstract available.
PubMed 1159142
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Mar 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Post-operative Mobilization After Anterior Shoulder Stabilization With the Latarjet Procedure: Sling Versus Nothing. A Randomized Prospective Study.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04479397
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2019-02469
- Conditions
- Shoulder Dislocation
- Keywords
- Latarjet, Post operative, Sling
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 86 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hugo BothorelUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Mar 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Sep 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Sep 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Jul 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Traumatic anterior shoulder instability is a common injury for the contact athlete, with high rates of recurrence in some athletic populations. The specific indication for the Latarjet procedure differs amongst surgeons, however it is generally accepted that it is indicated in patients with anterior glenohumeral instability that are unlikely to have a successful outcome from either an arthroscopic or open anatomical Bankart repair.
Overall the rate of reoperation following a Latarjet is around 5-7%. Infection, hematoma as well as screw removal and glenoid bony rim fractures are the most common indications for reoperation. The rate of instability after a Latarjet is low, with 1.7%-5.0% rate of dislocation.
However, in terms of rehabilitation, there are only a few studies and evidence of best practices. A recent review of the literature has highlighted four studies, comparing different rehabilitation protocols, which include different immobilization periods ranging from 0 to 3 weeks, and different types of mobilization (under physiotherapist supervision or not, with machine or not). They found a similar rate of recurrent dislocation between the different protocols. But early passive motion enables to improve the range of motion during first 3-6 months, with similar results at one year.
One main aspect which the surgeon can influence is immobilization time. In all above-mentioned studies, patients had to wear a sling for at least 3 weeks, even in the early mobilization groups. Short protocols with encouraging results have been recently emphasized by in other fields of shoulder surgery. The investigators would like to determine if the absence of postoperative immobilization could lead to improved function and better range of motion. To the investigators best knowledge, no study has sought to compare the usefulness of sling wearing after Latarjet procedure. Avoiding the sling could simplify rehabilitation and should provide a return to normal function faster.
Detailed description
The aim of this study is to compare rehabilitation with the wearing of a sling, to rehabilitation without any immobilization after Latarjet procedure for treatment of anterior shoulder instability. Ultimately, the goal would be to offer to patients a simplified rehabilitation management, with a faster recovery, less pain and a quicker return to activities of daily living, work and sport.
As primary outcome, investigators will evaluate if the Rowe score is superior without postoperative immobilization (without a sling during the first 3 weeks) at 6 months after surgery compared to sling wearing.
Secondary outcomes include radiological criteria (X-rays and computed tomography (CT) at 6 months for bony union), return to sport, work absenteeism, other complication rate (especially redislocation), and the undermentioned subjective and clinical scores before surgery and at 1.5, 6 and 12 postoperative months.
All patients will be assessed with commonly used subjective scores in the form of self-administered questionnaires. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is a widely used single-item test where a patient rates pain intensity between 0 and 10. This scale is useful for patient preoperative and postoperative monitoring and has also been correlated with patient pain, anxiety and apprehension. Patient satisfaction (are patients satisfied, yes/no) will be assessed as well. Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV) is a single-question test where a patient is asked to rate his overall shoulder function as a percentage of normal shoulder. It is a quick and easily administered score that has also been validated for various shoulder disabilities, such as instability.
The following clinical scores will be analyzed as well Rowe score for instability is a three-item test with four choices each, measuring shoulder function, stability, and motion. The final result is converted into a value between 0 and 100. These scores have been specifically developed for shoulder instability.
Except for VAS, higher results mean higher function. ROM will be determined using a Vicon motion capture system (Vicon, Oxford Metrics, Oxford, UK) consisting of six cameras sampling at 120 Hz already available in our facility.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Sling Arm | Active comparator | Procedure: Latarjet Surgery for anterior shoulder instabilityThis arm of the study will receive a sling for 3 weeks in postoperative care. |
| No Sling Arm | Experimental | Procedure: Latarjet Surgery for anterior shoulder instability, Procedure: No sling in postoperative careThis arm of the study will not receive a sling during the postoperative care, |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- all patients over 18 years old who have an anterior shoulder instability with one of the following criteria: an anterior glenoid bone defect > 20%, contact athlete or patients with failed Bankart repair-either open or arthroscopic will be considered eligible.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- We exclude patients with a subscapularis tear, other trauma of the involved upper extremity (e.g. associated scapular or clavicular fractures, acromioclavicular dislocation), pre-operative stiffness, pre-operative sign of dislocation on standard X-ray, CT, CT arthrogram, MRI or MRA, contra-indication to CT (i.e pregnancy), and an inability to follow properly post-surgery recommendations.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Latarjet Surgery for anterior shoulder instabilityBone block procedure for anterior shoulder instability | Procedure or surgery | No Sling Arm, Sling Arm |
| No sling in postoperative careNo sling will be used in postoperative care. | Procedure or surgery | No Sling Arm |
Primary outcome
Rowe score
Time frame: 12 postoperative months
The Rowe Score consists of a total of 100 points divided into three domains: (1) stability, which corresponds to a total 50 points; (2) mobility, which corresponds to 20 points; (3) function, which corresponds to 30 points.
8 secondary outcomes
The Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time frame: 12 postoperative months
Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV)
Time frame: 12 postoperative months
Patient satisfaction
Time frame: 12 postoperative months
Bony union
Time frame: 12 postoperative months
Return to work
Time frame: 12 postoperative months
Return to sport
Time frame: 12 postoperative months
Redislocation
Time frame: 12 postoperative months
Range of motion
Time frame: 12 postoperative months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Mar 2024.
- Background: PubMed 23352473Griesser MJ, Harris JD, McCoy BW, Hussain WM, Jones MH, Bishop JY, Miniaci A. Complications and re-operations after Bristow-Latarjet shoulder stabilization: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 Feb;22(2):286-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.09.009.
- Results publication: PubMed 27069947Whitehouse T, Orr R, Fitzgerald E, Harries S, McLellan CP. The Epidemiology of Injuries in Australian Professional Rugby Union 2014 Super Rugby Competition. Orthop J Sports Med. 2016 Mar 22;4(3):2325967116634075. doi: 10.1177/2325967116634075. eCollection 2016 Mar.
- Results publication: PubMed 26231148van der Linde JA, van Wijngaarden R, Somford MP, van Deurzen DF, van den Bekerom MP. The Bristow-Latarjet procedure, a historical note on a technique in comeback. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Feb;24(2):470-8. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3704-7. Epub 2015 Aug 1.
- Results publication: PubMed 26809355An VV, Sivakumar BS, Phan K, Trantalis J. A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and patient-reported outcomes following two procedures for recurrent traumatic anterior instability of the shoulder: Latarjet procedure vs. Bankart repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016 May;25(5):853-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.11.001. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
- Results publication: PubMed 28585076Cunningham G, Ladermann A. Redefining anterior shoulder impingement: a literature review. Int Orthop. 2018 Feb;42(2):359-366. doi: 10.1007/s00264-017-3515-1. Epub 2017 Jun 6.
- Results publication: PubMed 29038953Ma R, Brimmo OA, Li X, Colbert L. Current Concepts in Rehabilitation for Traumatic Anterior Shoulder Instability. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2017 Dec;10(4):499-506. doi: 10.1007/s12178-017-9449-9.
- Results publication: PubMed 28944249Ialenti MN, Mulvihill JD, Feinstein M, Zhang AL, Feeley BT. Return to Play Following Shoulder Stabilization: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Orthop J Sports Med. 2017 Sep 14;5(9):2325967117726055. doi: 10.1177/2325967117726055. eCollection 2017 Sep.
- Results publication: PubMed 21145262Young AA, Maia R, Berhouet J, Walch G. Open Latarjet procedure for management of bone loss in anterior instability of the glenohumeral joint. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011 Mar;20(2 Suppl):S61-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2010.07.022. Epub 2010 Dec 9. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 23508865Ladermann A, Lubbeke A, Stern R, Cunningham G, Bellotti V, Gazielly DF. Risk factors for dislocation arthropathy after Latarjet procedure: a long-term study. Int Orthop. 2013 Jun;37(6):1093-8. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-1848-y. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
- Results publication: PubMed 26658571Cunningham G, Benchouk S, Kherad O, Ladermann A. Comparison of arthroscopic and open Latarjet with a learning curve analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Feb;24(2):540-5. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3910-3. Epub 2015 Dec 12.
- Results publication: PubMed 30893230Tirefort J, Schwitzguebel AJ, Collin P, Nowak A, Plomb-Holmes C, Ladermann A. Postoperative Mobilization After Superior Rotator Cuff Repair: Sling Versus No Sling: A Randomized Prospective Study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Mar 20;101(6):494-503. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00773.
- Results publication: PubMed 31043350Domos P, Lunini E, Ascione F, Serra N, Bercik MJ, Neyton L, Godeneche A, Walch G. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of open Latarjet procedure in patients aged 40 years or older. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 Sep;28(9):e304-e312. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.02.004. Epub 2019 Apr 28.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Shoulder Dislocation
Recruiting
SMR Stemless Reverse vs SMR Reverse Shoulder System
Arthroplasty, Replacement
RecruitingObservational study
Prospective Descriptive Study of Injuries Associated to Anterior Shoulder Dislocations in Patients Over 40 Years
Anterior Glenohumeral Dislocations
Not yet recruiting
Early arthroscoPic Stabilization veRsus rehabilitatiOn of the Shoulder in Adolescents With a trauMatic First-time Anterior Shoulder Dislocation ePisode.
Shoulder Dislocation
Recruiting
Validation of an Upper Extremity Physical Performance Test Battery in Patients After Shoulder Dislocation
Return to Sport, Shoulder Dislocation or Subluxation
RecruitingObservational study
Exactech Proximal Humerus Fracture Plate System Post Market Clinical Follow-up
Proximal Humeral Fracture, Fracture Dislocation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Latarjet Surgery for anterior shoulder instability and No sling in postoperative care in people with Shoulder Dislocation, run by Hugo Bothorel at 1 site in Switzerland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Mar 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Rowe score (time frame: 12 postoperative months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04479397, which also lists 22 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Mar 2024.