Prostate CancerPhase 1/2PICtureNCT04487847
18F-PSMA-1007 PET Imaging to Detect Primary Prostate Cancer
A Phase 1/2 study testing 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in people with Prostate Cancer, run by Radboud University Medical Center at 1 site in Netherlands.
Trial summary
To study the added value of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET to mpMRI in the detection of local prostate cancer lesions. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Prostate Cancer
- What is being tested?
- 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 75 participants
- Where
- 1 siteNetherlands
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2020to 31 Dec 2023
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Suspicion for PCa (e.g. elevated PSA, suspicious rectal examination)
- Males ≥ 18 years
- ECOG 0-1
- Signed informed consent
Who cannot join
- Prostate biopsy in the last 6 months
- History of prostate cancer
- Second active malignancy
- Any prior surgery in the pelvic area that might interfere with the scans (e.g. hip replacement surgery)
- Any medical condition that in the opinion of the investigator will affect patients' clinical status when participating in this trial.
- Contra-indications for mpMRI or PET: claustrophobia or inability to lay still for the duration of the exam.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: 18F-PSMA-1007 PET to Detect Primary Prostate Cancer: a Comparative Study With mpMRI and Correlation to Histopathology
To study the added value of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET to mpMRI in the detection of local prostate cancer lesions.
Read the detailed description
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most common diagnosed malignancy in males worldwide, with over 1.2 million new patients diagnosed every year. Since the introduction of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) the primary diagnosis consisted of histologic confirmation by transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) systematic biopsies. However, in recent years this has changed into performing multi-parametric MR imaging (mpMRI) prior to prostate biopsy.
MpMRI has proven to be a valuable tool to avoid unnecessary prostate biopsies and prevent over-treatment of low-grade PCa, while maintaining equal or higher detection rates of high-grade PCa. Prostate MRI is evaluated using the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PIRADS). Lesions are given a category score, from 1 (high-grade PCa is unlikely to be present) to 5 (presence of high-grade PCa is highly likely). A PIRADS 3 is an equivocal scan. Nonetheless, mpMRI has room for improvement as its specificity for high-grade tumors is only 73% and local staging is limited with mpMRI. Also, the mpMRI is frequently unclear as 4-39% of detected lesions are classified as PIRADS 3.
Prostate-specific membrane antigen receptor (PSMA) is highly overexpressed by 95% of the prostate cancer cells and seem to positively correlate to aggressiveness of the tumor. PSMA-positron emission tomography (PET) uses this feature by visualizing PSMA expressing prostate tumors. Currently, the PSMA-PET is generally used to detect recurrences or metastases. However, there is an increasing interest for PSMA-PET scans in patients with a primary diagnosis of PCa for staging purposes. Yet, there is no published data on the role of PSMA-PET on PCa prior to biopsy in comparison to the detection rate of mpMRI and histopathology.
This study aims to investigate the added value of a 18F-PSMA-PET to mpMRI in the detection of local prostate cancer lesions.
75 patients with the suspicion on prostate cancer (e.g. elevated PSA and/or abnormal digital rectal exam) will receive a 18F-PSMA-1007 PET following mpMRI. 25 patients with PIRADS 1-2 (probably benign disease), 25 patients with PIRADS 3 (equivocal disease) and 25 patients with PIRADS 4-5 (highly suspicious for malignancy) will be included in this study.
If either the mpMRI or 18F-PSMA-1007 PET shows a potential malignant lesion, a (target) biopsy will be performed.
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer
- Being tested
- 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT
- Keywords
- Prostate cancer, Staging, PET imaging, PSMA-1007, mpMRI
- Medical subject headings
- Prostatic Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CTDiagnostic test
18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| PIRADS 1-2 | Experimental | 25 patients with PIRADS 1-2 (probably benign) on mpMRI Receives: Diagnostic Test: 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT |
| PIRADS 3 | Experimental | 25 patients with PIRADS 3 (equivocal scan) on mpMRI Receives: Diagnostic Test: 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT |
| PIRADS 4-5 | Experimental | 25 patients with PIRADS 4-5 (probably malignant) on mpMRI Receives: Diagnostic Test: 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Compare mpMRI,18F-PSMA-1007 PET and histopathology.
Within each of the three PIRADS groups (1-2, 3, 4-5) the fraction of patients in which the diagnosis based on mpMRI and 18F-PSMA-1007 PET differ is evaluated.
Measured: 30 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Jul 2020
- Study start1 Sep 2020
- Primary completion28 Feb 2023
- Study completion31 Dec 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Prostate CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Radboud University Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Explorative study of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET to detect prostate cancer
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 75 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Radboud University Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- ABX advanced biochemical compounds GmbH
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04487847
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NL73559.091.20
- Acronym
- PICture
- Status last verified
- Feb 2023
- First submitted
- 22 Jul 2020
- Last updated
- 16 Jan 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Woo S, Suh CH, Kim SY, Cho JY, Kim SH. Diagnostic Performance of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 for Detection of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Diagnostic Meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2017 Aug;72(2):177-188. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.01.042. Epub 2017 Feb 11.
PubMed 28196723Barentsz JO, Weinreb JC, Verma S, Thoeny HC, Tempany CM, Shtern F, Padhani AR, Margolis D, Macura KJ, Haider MA, Cornud F, Choyke PL. Synopsis of the PI-RADS v2 Guidelines for Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Recommendations for Use. Eur Urol. 2016 Jan;69(1):41-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.08.038. Epub 2015 Sep 8. No abstract available.
PubMed 26361169de Rooij M, Hamoen EH, Witjes JA, Barentsz JO, Rovers MM. Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Local Staging of Prostate Cancer: A Diagnostic Meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2016 Aug;70(2):233-45. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.029. Epub 2015 Jul 26.
PubMed 26215604van der Leest M, Cornel E, Israel B, Hendriks R, Padhani AR, Hoogenboom M, Zamecnik P, Bakker D, Setiasti AY, Veltman J, van den Hout H, van der Lelij H, van Oort I, Klaver S, Debruyne F, Sedelaar M, Hannink G, Rovers M, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C, Barentsz JO. Head-to-head Comparison of Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy Versus Multiparametric Prostate Resonance Imaging with Subsequent Magnetic Resonance-guided Biopsy in Biopsy-naive Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen: A Large Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study. Eur Urol. 2019 Apr;75(4):570-578. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.11.023. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
PubMed 30477981Prive BM, Israel B, Schilham MGM, Muselaers CHJ, Zamecnik P, Mulders PFA, Witjes JA, Sedelaar M, Mehra N, Verzijlbergen F, Janssen MJR, Gotthardt M, Barentsz JO, van Oort IM, Nagarajah J. Evaluating F-18-PSMA-1007-PET in primary prostate cancer and comparing it to multi-parametric MRI and histopathology. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2021 Jun;24(2):423-430. doi: 10.1038/s41391-020-00292-2. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
PubMed 32999466
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Jan 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- 18F-PSMA-1007 PET to Detect Primary Prostate Cancer: a Comparative Study With mpMRI and Correlation to Histopathology
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04487847
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PICture / NL73559.091.20
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer
- Keywords
- Prostate cancer, Staging, PET imaging, PSMA-1007, mpMRI
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 75 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Radboud University Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- ABX advanced biochemical compounds GmbH
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 28 Feb 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Jul 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To study the added value of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET to mpMRI in the detection of local prostate cancer lesions.
Detailed description
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most common diagnosed malignancy in males worldwide, with over 1.2 million new patients diagnosed every year. Since the introduction of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) the primary diagnosis consisted of histologic confirmation by transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) systematic biopsies. However, in recent years this has changed into performing multi-parametric MR imaging (mpMRI) prior to prostate biopsy.
MpMRI has proven to be a valuable tool to avoid unnecessary prostate biopsies and prevent over-treatment of low-grade PCa, while maintaining equal or higher detection rates of high-grade PCa. Prostate MRI is evaluated using the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PIRADS). Lesions are given a category score, from 1 (high-grade PCa is unlikely to be present) to 5 (presence of high-grade PCa is highly likely). A PIRADS 3 is an equivocal scan. Nonetheless, mpMRI has room for improvement as its specificity for high-grade tumors is only 73% and local staging is limited with mpMRI. Also, the mpMRI is frequently unclear as 4-39% of detected lesions are classified as PIRADS 3.
Prostate-specific membrane antigen receptor (PSMA) is highly overexpressed by 95% of the prostate cancer cells and seem to positively correlate to aggressiveness of the tumor. PSMA-positron emission tomography (PET) uses this feature by visualizing PSMA expressing prostate tumors. Currently, the PSMA-PET is generally used to detect recurrences or metastases. However, there is an increasing interest for PSMA-PET scans in patients with a primary diagnosis of PCa for staging purposes. Yet, there is no published data on the role of PSMA-PET on PCa prior to biopsy in comparison to the detection rate of mpMRI and histopathology.
This study aims to investigate the added value of a 18F-PSMA-PET to mpMRI in the detection of local prostate cancer lesions.
75 patients with the suspicion on prostate cancer (e.g. elevated PSA and/or abnormal digital rectal exam) will receive a 18F-PSMA-1007 PET following mpMRI. 25 patients with PIRADS 1-2 (probably benign disease), 25 patients with PIRADS 3 (equivocal disease) and 25 patients with PIRADS 4-5 (highly suspicious for malignancy) will be included in this study.
If either the mpMRI or 18F-PSMA-1007 PET shows a potential malignant lesion, a (target) biopsy will be performed.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- Explorative study of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET to detect prostate cancer
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| PIRADS 1-2 | Experimental | Diagnostic Test: 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT25 patients with PIRADS 1-2 (probably benign) on mpMRI |
| PIRADS 3 | Experimental | Diagnostic Test: 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT25 patients with PIRADS 3 (equivocal scan) on mpMRI |
| PIRADS 4-5 | Experimental | Diagnostic Test: 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT25 patients with PIRADS 4-5 (probably malignant) on mpMRI |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Suspicion for PCa (e.g. elevated PSA, suspicious rectal examination)
- Males ≥ 18 years
- ECOG 0-1
- Signed informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Prostate biopsy in the last 6 months
- History of prostate cancer
- Second active malignancy
- Any prior surgery in the pelvic area that might interfere with the scans (e.g. hip replacement surgery)
- Any medical condition that in the opinion of the investigator will affect patients' clinical status when participating in this trial.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT | Diagnostic test | PIRADS 1-2, PIRADS 3, PIRADS 4-5 |
Primary outcome
Compare mpMRI,18F-PSMA-1007 PET and histopathology.
Time frame: 30 days
Within each of the three PIRADS groups (1-2, 3, 4-5) the fraction of patients in which the diagnosis based on mpMRI and 18F-PSMA-1007 PET differ is evaluated.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Jan 2025.
- Background: PubMed 28196723Woo S, Suh CH, Kim SY, Cho JY, Kim SH. Diagnostic Performance of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 for Detection of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Diagnostic Meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2017 Aug;72(2):177-188. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.01.042. Epub 2017 Feb 11.
- Results publication: PubMed 26361169Barentsz JO, Weinreb JC, Verma S, Thoeny HC, Tempany CM, Shtern F, Padhani AR, Margolis D, Macura KJ, Haider MA, Cornud F, Choyke PL. Synopsis of the PI-RADS v2 Guidelines for Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Recommendations for Use. Eur Urol. 2016 Jan;69(1):41-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.08.038. Epub 2015 Sep 8. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 26215604de Rooij M, Hamoen EH, Witjes JA, Barentsz JO, Rovers MM. Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Local Staging of Prostate Cancer: A Diagnostic Meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2016 Aug;70(2):233-45. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.029. Epub 2015 Jul 26.
- Results publication: PubMed 30477981van der Leest M, Cornel E, Israel B, Hendriks R, Padhani AR, Hoogenboom M, Zamecnik P, Bakker D, Setiasti AY, Veltman J, van den Hout H, van der Lelij H, van Oort I, Klaver S, Debruyne F, Sedelaar M, Hannink G, Rovers M, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C, Barentsz JO. Head-to-head Comparison of Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy Versus Multiparametric Prostate Resonance Imaging with Subsequent Magnetic Resonance-guided Biopsy in Biopsy-naive Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen: A Large Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study. Eur Urol. 2019 Apr;75(4):570-578. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.11.023. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32999466Prive BM, Israel B, Schilham MGM, Muselaers CHJ, Zamecnik P, Mulders PFA, Witjes JA, Sedelaar M, Mehra N, Verzijlbergen F, Janssen MJR, Gotthardt M, Barentsz JO, van Oort IM, Nagarajah J. Evaluating F-18-PSMA-1007-PET in primary prostate cancer and comparing it to multi-parametric MRI and histopathology. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2021 Jun;24(2):423-430. doi: 10.1038/s41391-020-00292-2. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Prostate Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
Active, not recruitingObservational study
MRI Fusion Biopsy vs. Micro-Ultrasound Guided Biopsy
Prostate Cancer
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
STAR0602 With Nivolumab in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer and in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer, and STAR0602 Alone in Thymic Carcinoma
NSCLC, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Recruiting
Rehabilitation and Sex Therapy to Optimize Recovery After Prostate Cancer Treatment
Prostate Cancer, Urinary Incontinence
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1/2 study testing 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in people with Prostate Cancer, run by Radboud University Medical Center at 1 site in Netherlands.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Jan 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Compare mpMRI,18F-PSMA-1007 PET and histopathology. (time frame: 30 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04487847, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Jan 2025.