AzTrials
AzTrials

Esophageal NeoplasmQARCNCT04489368

Response Prediction to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation in Esophageal Cancer Using Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning

An observational study of Esophageal Neoplasm, run by Dr Kundan Singh Chufal at 2 sites in 2 countries.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In esophageal carcinoma, neoadjuvant concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (NA-CCRT) followed by surgery is the current standard of care and ample evidence has accumulated supporting the view that complete pathological response (pCR) is a positive prognostic marker for improved outcomes. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Esophageal Neoplasm
What is being tested?
Neo-Adjuvant Radiotherapy, Neo-Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Esophagectomy
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
150 participants
Where
2 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
16 Jan 2020to Jul 2023
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patient records in each participating research center from January 2011 to 1st May 2020

Who may be able to join

  • ECOG Performance Status: 0-2
  • Patients with histopathological or cytopathological confirmed malignancy of the esophagus
  • Histology: Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Adenocarcinoma
  • Patients should have received NeoAdjuvant Concurrent Chemoradiation (NACCRT) followed by Surgery
  • All therapeutic interventions (Radiotherapy, Chemotherapy \& Surgery) delivered within participating institutions
  • At least one pre-NACCRT DICOM imaging dataset (HRCT/ 18-FDG PET-CT/ Radiotherapy planning CT) for each patient

Who cannot join

  • Patients with any metallic implants in the region of interest
  • Patient with locally advanced disease or metastatic disease (T4 disease, Fistula, metastases)
  • Patients with prior history of radiotherapy in the same region
  • Patients developing a second malignancy in the esophagus

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 2 countries.

2 sites in 2 countries

Australia1 site
  • Illawarra Cancer Care Centre

    Wollongong, 2500

Other trials in Australia

India1 site
  • Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute & Research Center

    New Delhi, National Capital Territory of Delhi, 110019

Other trials in India

About this study

Official title: Pathological Response Prediction to Neo-adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Esophageal Carcinoma and Comparison of Engineered Features Versus Deep Learning Models

In esophageal carcinoma, neoadjuvant concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (NA-CCRT) followed by surgery is the current standard of care and ample evidence has accumulated supporting the view that complete pathological response (pCR) is a positive prognostic marker for improved outcomes. Predicting the probability of achieving pCR prior to neoadjuvant treatment could permit modification of treatment protocols for those patients unlikely to achieve pCR.

Radiomics is a new entrant in the field of imaging where specific features are derived from the intensity and distribution pattern of pixels based on a region-of-interest (ROI). The features thus extracted can then be used for prediction modelling similar to other -omics datasets. Preliminary investigations examining its utility have been performed and its applications have thus far focused on screening and survival prediction after treatment. Due to the multi-dimensional nature of data extracted using radiomics, Artificial Intelligence (AI) methods are ideally suited for analysing and modelling radiomic features.

Read more

Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL)[utilising Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN)] are both part of the AI framework. In contrast to ML, DL is a new entrant and has been utilised by some medical researchers for modelling using prediction-type algorithms. Besides significantly reducing the workflow associated with Radiomics-based research, feature engineering and modelling using DL are immune to the effects of incorrect ROI delineation. However, the main limitation of DL is the 'blackbox' effect, in which the underlying basis of a CNN is not known. This has been mitigated in part by the visualisation of activation maps directly on the image dataset to prove biological plausibility of predictions. The comparative performance of both types of modelling is also not known.

Our objective is to investigate pCR probability in our study population using radiomics-based ML and AI-based modelling. We will also investigate the comparative performance of both modelling techniques. For DL based prediction modelling, we will attempt to provide biological plausibility on the basis of activation maps.

Being tested
Neo-Adjuvant Radiotherapy, Neo-Adjuvant Chemotherapy, Esophagectomy
Keywords
Artificial Intelligence, Deep Learning, Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation, Pathologic Response, Radiomics, Radiotherapy
Medical subject headings
Esophageal Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Neo-Adjuvant RadiotherapyRadiation

    Neo-Adjuvant Radiotherapy via any technique, delivered concurrently with Neo-Adjuvant Chemotherapy.

  • Neo-Adjuvant ChemotherapyDrug

    Neo-Adjuvant Chemotherapy, delivered concurrently with Neo-Adjuvant Radiotherapy.

  • EsophagectomyProcedure or surgery

    Esophagectomy, performed 4-6 weeks after completion of Neo-Adjuvant Concurrent ChemoRadiation

Study groups in NCT04489368
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Study GroupPatients undergoing NA-CCRT followed by Surgery
Receives: Radiation: Neo-Adjuvant Radiotherapy; Drug: Neo-Adjuvant Chemotherapy; Procedure: Esophagectomy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Develop models to predict pCR based on pre-neoadjuvant imaging modalities

    Measured: August 2021

  2. Perform a clinical audit of patient outcomes (OS, RFS, pCR rate) after new-adjuvant chemoradiation and esophagectomy

    Measured: January 2020

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Jul 2020
  2. Study start16 Jan 2020
  3. Primary completionJul 2023 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJul 2023 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Other
Enrolment
150 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04489368
Sponsor's protocol ID
RGCIRC/IRB/80/2020
Acronym
QARC
Status last verified
Dec 2022
First submitted
23 Jul 2020
Last updated
28 Dec 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Esophageal Neoplasm, run by Dr Kundan Singh Chufal at 2 sites in 2 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Dec 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Australia, India. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Develop models to predict pCR based on pre-neoadjuvant imaging modalities (time frame: August 2021). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Dec 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in