AzTrials
AzTrials

Affective DisorderNCT04489641

Brief Group Psychotherapy for Anxiety and Depression

A study testing Psychological treatment and Medication in people with Affective Disorder, run by Universidad de Córdoba at 1 site in Spain.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The present work aims to develop a randomized clinical trial with a sample of 100 patients diagnosed with anxiety and depression in primary care. All participants are tested by several self-reports related to emotional disorders in a repeated measures design, pre and post treatment. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Affective Disorder
What is being tested?
Psychological treatment and Medication
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteSpain
Study dates
16 Jan 2020to 16 Dec 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Anxiety
  • Depression

Who cannot join

  • Severe mental disroders
  • Drug abuse
  • Suicidal ideation/severe depression

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Spain1 site
  • Jorge Corpas

    Córdoba, Andalusia

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: Brief Group Psychotherapy for Anxiety and Depression: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Efficacy and Mechanisms of Change

The present work aims to develop a randomized clinical trial with a sample of 100 patients diagnosed with anxiety and depression in primary care. All participants are tested by several self-reports related to emotional disorders in a repeated measures design, pre and post treatment. It is our aim this study will demonstrate that brief psychological treatments should be prioritized over pharmacological treatment in Primary Care. In addition, emotional regulation will be assessed and examined as a key factor in the clinical improvement.

Being tested
Psychological treatment, Medication
Medical subject headings
Mood Disorders

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Psychological treatmentBehavioural

    Psychological treatment

  • MedicationDrug

    Pharmacological intervention

Study groups in NCT04489641
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Brief group psychotherapyExperimentalGroup brief psychological intervention by adaptation of the Guide NICE "Common Mental Health Disorders" (ISBN 978-1-84936-585-7) and the unified protocol for the trasndiagnostic treatment of the emotional disorders of Barlow (Boisseau et al., 2010). This intervention is provided by clinical psychologist in primary care.
Receives: Behavioral: Psychological treatment
Treatment as usual (TAU)Active comparatorMedication provided by a general practitioner.
Receives: Drug: Medication

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Generalised Anxiety Disorder Assessment (GAD-7)

    The GAD-7 score is calculated by assigning scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3, to the response categories of 'not at all', 'several days', 'more than half the days', and 'nearly every day', respectively, and adding together the scores for the seven questions. Scores of 5, 10, and 15 are taken as the cut-off points for mild, moderate and severe anxiety, respectively. When used as a screening tool, further evaluation is recommended when the score is 10 or greater. Using the threshold score of 10, the GAD-7 has a sensitivity of 89% and a specificity of 82% for GAD.

    Measured: 12 weeks

  2. The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)

    The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) is a self-administered version of the PRIME-MD diagnostic instrument for common mental disorders.The PHQ-9 is the depression module, which scores each of the 9 DSM-IV criteria as "0" (not at all) to "3" (nearly every day).

    Measured: 12 weeks

  3. Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition (BDI-II)

    The BDI-II is a widely used 21-item self-report inventory measuring the severity of depression in adolescents and adults. The BDI-II was revised in 1996 to be more consistent with DSM-IV criteria for depression. For example, individuals are asked to respond to each question based on a two-week time period rather than the one-week timeframe on the BDI. The BDI-II is widely used as an indicator of the severity of depression, but not as a diagnostic tool, and numerous studies provide evidence for its reliability and validity across different populations and cultural groups.

    Measured: 12 weeks

  4. The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-15)

    It asseses somatoform symptoms. Scores could vary between 0-30 points.

    Measured: 12 weeks

  5. Patient Health Questionnaire-Panic Disorder (PHQ-PD)

    It measures panic disorder symotmos. Scores vould vary between 0-15 points.

    Measured: 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Emotional Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ)

    It evaluates the tendency to regulate emotions. It consists of 10 items and participants have to respond according to a 7-points Likert scale. It has two subscales: reappraisal and suppression (six and four items respectively). The reappraisal subscale assesses the ability to change negative emotions while the suppression subscale assesses the tendency to repress and hide negative emotions.

    Measured: 12 weeks

  2. Penn State Worry Questionnaire-Abbreviated (PSWQ-A)

    It assesses the tendency to experience worry. It consists of eight items and patients have to respond according to a 5-point Likert-type scale.

    Measured: 12 weeks

  3. Ruminative Response Scale-10 (RRS-10)

    The RRS is the most used measure of rumination. The short version consists of 10 items that are responded on a 4-point Likert-type scale.

    Measured: 12 weeks

  4. Metacognition Questionnaire-30 (MCQ-30)

    This instrument has been used to assess metacognitive beliefs. It consists of 30 items that are responded on a 4-point Likert-type scale.

    Measured: 12 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Jul 2020
  2. Study start16 Jan 2020
  3. Primary completion16 Nov 2020
  4. Study completion16 Dec 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Investigator
Enrolment
100 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04489641
Sponsor's protocol ID
Interventional
Status last verified
Apr 2021
First submitted
23 Jul 2020
Last updated
29 Apr 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Psychological treatment and Medication in people with Affective Disorder, run by Universidad de Córdoba at 1 site in Spain.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Apr 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Generalised Anxiety Disorder Assessment (GAD-7) (time frame: 12 weeks). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Apr 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in