PancreatitisNCT04492137
Prospective Comparison Between Ultra Early NKF Versus Standard Cannulation Alone
A study testing Cannulation technique in people with Pancreatitis, run by University of Minho at 1 site in Portugal.
Trial summary
Compare the ultra early fistulotomy strategy with standard cannulation methods for accessing the bile duct during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Pancreatitis
- What is being tested?
- Cannulation technique
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 334 participants
- Where
- 1 sitePortugal
- Study dates
- 1 Jun 2020to 30 Jun 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- ERCP with indication for biliary access
- Naïve papilla
Who cannot join
- Flat papillas
- Intradiverticular / Diverticular border papillas
- Patients unable to sign or understand the informed consent
- Patients with surgically altered anatomy
- Patients with tumors of the papilla
- Previous sphincterotomy
- Spontaneous papillary fistula
- Papilla not visualized
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Portugal1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Santa Luzia Hospital, ULS Alto Minho
Viana do Castelo, 4904-858
Luís Lopes, MD, PhD, MBA, 00351932841974, luis.m.lopes@me.com
João Fernandes, MD, 00351960315790, jotillfernandes@hotmail.com
About this study
Official title: Prospective Comparison Between Ultra Early NKF Versus Standard Cannulation Alone in a Group of High and Low Risk of Pep, Submitted to Pep Prophylaxis
Compare the ultra early fistulotomy strategy with standard cannulation methods for accessing the bile duct during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)
Read the detailed description
- Introduction Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is an advanced procedure which is widely used in the diagnosis and treatment of a variety of benign and malignant pancreatobiliary disorders1,2,3,4,5. Selective cannulation of the common bile duct (CBD) is the most important and challenging step in a biliary endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography6,7. However, in the first ERCP, even in experienced hands, biliary cannulation may fail in up to 15 % - 35 % of cases when using standard methods alone8. In this subset of patients, additional cannulation techniques are needed to access the CBD in order to continue with the ERCP. Precut is the most common strategy used by experienced endoscopists, when conventional methods have failed7. Needle knife fistulotomy (NKF) and conventional precut are the two most common variants. Recently published guidelines recommend opting for NKF, as evidence suggests a lower risk of adverse events, especially pancreatitis, when used early in the biliary cannulation algorithm7,9. Technically NKF is the creation of an artificial fistula between the most protuberant portion of the papilla, which represents the intraduodenal portion of the CBD and the biliary tract by using a diathermic cutter of the needle type6,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18. Its big advantage over conventional precut is that it avoids the contact of the cutting device with the papillary orifice and therefore avoiding direct thermal injury to the pancreatic duct. Although NKF was originally developed as a rescue technique, to be used after previous failed standard cannulations attempts, it is being increasingly used at an early stage during ERCP. Given its safety and feasibility some authors even advocate, the once unreasonable, primary use without previous standard cannulation attempts10,11,19,20.
- Financial resources All participants included in this study will perform ERCP, laboratory tests and other complementary diagnostic tests after a duly justified medical prescription. Therefore there are no additional costs or consumption of hospital resources.
- Ethical considerations In this study, participants will be included after informed consent. Anonymity and confidentiality will be safeguarded by assigning an individual numeric code. It will also be explained the possibility of withdrawing from the study at any time, with the guarantee of the total elimination of data. All researchers involved in the study will adhere to the Rules of Ethical Conduct and Best Practices in order to comply with the precepts of the Declaration of Helsinki, the Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine, the guidelines of the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences and the Guide to Good Clinical Practice.
- Statistical analysis Qualitative variables will be summarized using absolute and relative frequencies, and quantitative variables will be summarized using the mean and standard deviation or the median and interquartile range, depending on their distribution profiles. The normality of the quantitative variables will be assessed using the histogram distribution. A sample of 334 (167 in each group) patients will provide 80% power to detect a difference of 5% in pancreatitis rates between the two groups based on a chi-square test, assuming a pancreatitis rate of 1% among primary fistulotomy, 6 and a one-tailed alpha of 0.05. Relations between categorical variables will be assessed using a chi-square test and Fisher´s exact test. Differences between two or more groups of independent non-normally distributed quantitative variables will be evaluated using a Kruskal-Wallis test. To explain the risk of pancreatitis, a binomial logistic regression model with multiple predictors will be performed. The null hypothesis will be rejected when the test statistics p-values are less than <0.05. Statistical analysis, sample size calculation and graphics will be performed using Stata software (StataCorp. 2015. Stata Statistical Software: Release 14. College Station, StataCorp LP)
- Expected results
The results of this study will contribute to a better understanding of what is the best algorithm to follow when performing an ERCP.
- Conditions
- Pancreatitis
- Being tested
- Cannulation technique
- Keywords
- ERCP, Biliary cannulation, Needle-knife fistulotomy, Standard cannulation methods
- Medical subject headings
- Pancreatitis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Cannulation techniqueProcedure or surgery
Participants in the ultra early NKF group will be submitted to 2 standard cannulation attempts (2 contacts with the papilla) before starting NKF. If any of these 2 attemps is successful, NKF won't take place. If NKF is indeed performed and cannulation is not achieved within 8 minutes, the endoscopist is free to perform techniques other than NKF. On the other hand, participants in the standard cannulation group in which cannulation is not achieved within 8 minutes can cross-over to other advanced cannulation techniques (e.g. NKF). For ethical reasons we choose to exclude flat and intradiverticular/diverticular border papillas.
During ERCP all participants will be submitted to PEP prophylaxis with rectal indomethacin. A pancreatic stent will be placed whenever there is cannulation or opacification of the Wirsung duct.
For the purposes of the study, a dedicated form (attached) will be created with the various variables to be analyzed
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Ultra Early NKF group | Experimental | Patients submitted to Ultra early NKF in a consecutive fashion by an expert endoscopist Receives: Procedure: Cannulation technique |
| Standard cannulation techniques group (including double-guidewire-assisted cannulation) | No intervention | Patients submitted to standard cannulation techniques (including double-guidewire-assisted cannulation) in a consecutive fashion by an expert endoscopist |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Adverse events
Comparison of adverse event rate between the two strategies
Measured: 30 days from the procedure
Technical success
Comparison of technical success between the two strategies
Measured: 1 day (same day of the procedure)
Secondary outcomes (2)
Adverse event rate among sub groups
Comparison of adverse event rate among sub groups (high and low risk of pancreatitis)
Measured: 30 days from the procedure
Technical success among sub groups
Comparison of technical success rate among sub groups (high and low risk of pancreatitis)
Measured: 1 day (same day of the procedure)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Jul 2020
- Study start1 Jun 2020
- Primary completion30 Jun 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Jun 2022 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (20)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for PancreatitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Model description
- We will conduct a prospective randomized study. Participants will be randomized by computer into two groups at a 1:1 ratio 1. participants submitted to ultra early NKF 2. participants submitted to standard cannulation techniques (including double-guidewire-assisted cannulation)
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 334 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Minho
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Unidade Local de Saúde do Alto Minho
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Luis Lopes, University of Minho
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04492137
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 32/2020
- Status last verified
- Aug 2021
- First submitted
- 9 Jul 2020
- Last updated
- 16 Aug 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Canena J, Liberato M, Coutinho AP, Marques I, Romao C, Veiga PM, Neves BC. Predictive value of cholangioscopy after endoscopic management of early postcholecystectomy bile duct strictures with an increasing number of plastic stents: a prospective study (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Feb;79(2):279-88. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.07.022. Epub 2013 Sep 5.
PubMed 24012251Canena J, Coimbra J, Carvalho D, Rodrigues C, Silva M, Costa M, Horta D, Mateus Dias A, Seves I, Ramos G, Ricardo L, Coutinho AP, Romao C, Veiga PM. Endoscopic bilio-duodenal bypass: outcomes of primary and revision efficacy of combined metallic stents in malignant duodenal and biliary obstructions. Dig Dis Sci. 2014 Nov;59(11):2779-89. doi: 10.1007/s10620-014-3199-y. Epub 2014 May 13.
PubMed 24821464Canena J, Liberato M, Meireles L, Marques I, Romao C, Coutinho AP, Neves BC, Veiga PM. A non-randomized study in consecutive patients with postcholecystectomy refractory biliary leaks who were managed endoscopically with the use of multiple plastic stents or fully covered self-expandable metal stents (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Jul;82(1):70-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.11.038. Epub 2015 Mar 11.
PubMed 25771064Canena J. Once upon a Time a Guideline Was Used for the Evaluation of Suspected Choledocholithiasis: A Fairy Tale or a Nightmare? GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jan;25(1):6-9. doi: 10.1159/000481688. Epub 2017 Nov 8. No abstract available.
PubMed 29457044Canena J, Lopes L, Fernandes J, Alexandrino G, Lourenco L, Libanio D, Horta D, Giestas S, Reis J. Outcomes of Single-Operator Cholangioscopy-Guided Lithotripsy in Patients with Difficult Biliary and Pancreatic Stones. GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2019 Mar;26(2):105-113. doi: 10.1159/000488508. Epub 2018 May 16.
PubMed 30976615Lopes L, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Rolanda C. Safety and efficacy of precut needle-knife fistulotomy. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jun;49(6):759-65. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2014.898085. Epub 2014 Mar 18.
PubMed 24641260Testoni PA, Mariani A, Aabakken L, Arvanitakis M, Bories E, Costamagna G, Deviere J, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Dumonceau JM, Giovannini M, Gyokeres T, Hafner M, Halttunen J, Hassan C, Lopes L, Papanikolaou IS, Tham TC, Tringali A, van Hooft J, Williams EJ. Papillary cannulation and sphincterotomy techniques at ERCP: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy. 2016 Jul;48(7):657-83. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-108641. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
PubMed 27299638Testoni PA, Testoni S, Giussani A. Difficult biliary cannulation during ERCP: how to facilitate biliary access and minimize the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Dig Liver Dis. 2011 Aug;43(8):596-603. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2011.01.019. Epub 2011 Mar 4.
PubMed 21377432Lopes L, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Rolanda C. Early precut fistulotomy for biliary access: time to change the paradigm of "the later, the better"? Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Oct;80(4):634-641. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.03.014. Epub 2014 May 6.
PubMed 24814775Jin YJ, Jeong S, Lee DH. Utility of needle-knife fistulotomy as an initial method of biliary cannulation to prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis in a highly selected at-risk group: a single-arm prospective feasibility study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Nov;84(5):808-813. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.04.011. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
PubMed 27102829Jang SI, Kim DU, Cho JH, Jeong S, Park JS, Lee DH, Kwon CI, Koh DH, Park SW, Lee TH, Lee HS. Primary Needle-Knife Fistulotomy Versus Conventional Cannulation Method in a High-Risk Cohort of Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2020 Apr;115(4):616-624. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000480.
PubMed 31913191Mavrogiannis C, Liatsos C, Romanos A, Petoumenos C, Nakos A, Karvountzis G. Needle-knife fistulotomy versus needle-knife precut papillotomy for the treatment of common bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999 Sep;50(3):334-9. doi: 10.1053/ge.1999.v50.98593.
PubMed 10462652Katsinelos P, Gkagkalis S, Chatzimavroudis G, Beltsis A, Terzoudis S, Zavos C, Gatopoulou A, Lazaraki G, Vasiliadis T, Kountouras J. Comparison of three types of precut technique to achieve common bile duct cannulation: a retrospective analysis of 274 cases. Dig Dis Sci. 2012 Dec;57(12):3286-92. doi: 10.1007/s10620-012-2271-8. Epub 2012 Jun 20.
PubMed 22714730Abu-Hamda EM, Baron TH, Simmons DT, Petersen BT. A retrospective comparison of outcomes using three different precut needle knife techniques for biliary cannulation. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2005 Sep;39(8):717-21. doi: 10.1097/01.mcg.0000173928.82986.56.
PubMed 16082283Horiuchi A, Nakayama Y, Kajiyama M, Tanaka N. Effect of precut sphincterotomy on biliary cannulation based on the characteristics of the major duodenal papilla. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Sep;5(9):1113-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2007.05.014. Epub 2007 Aug 6.
PubMed 17689295
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Aug 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prospective Comparison Between Ultra Early NKF Versus Standard Cannulation Alone in a Group of High and Low Risk of Pep, Submitted to Pep Prophylaxis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04492137
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 32/2020
- Conditions
- Pancreatitis
- Keywords
- ERCP, Biliary cannulation, Needle-knife fistulotomy, Standard cannulation methods
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 334 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of MinhoUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Unidade Local de Saúde do Alto Minho
- Study start
- 1 Jun 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2022 (estimated)
- First posted
- 30 Jul 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Compare the ultra early fistulotomy strategy with standard cannulation methods for accessing the bile duct during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)
Detailed description
- Introduction Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is an advanced procedure which is widely used in the diagnosis and treatment of a variety of benign and malignant pancreatobiliary disorders1,2,3,4,5. Selective cannulation of the common bile duct (CBD) is the most important and challenging step in a biliary endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography6,7. However, in the first ERCP, even in experienced hands, biliary cannulation may fail in up to 15 % - 35 % of cases when using standard methods alone8. In this subset of patients, additional cannulation techniques are needed to access the CBD in order to continue with the ERCP. Precut is the most common strategy used by experienced endoscopists, when conventional methods have failed7. Needle knife fistulotomy (NKF) and conventional precut are the two most common variants. Recently published guidelines recommend opting for NKF, as evidence suggests a lower risk of adverse events, especially pancreatitis, when used early in the biliary cannulation algorithm7,9. Technically NKF is the creation of an artificial fistula between the most protuberant portion of the papilla, which represents the intraduodenal portion of the CBD and the biliary tract by using a diathermic cutter of the needle type6,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18. Its big advantage over conventional precut is that it avoids the contact of the cutting device with the papillary orifice and therefore avoiding direct thermal injury to the pancreatic duct. Although NKF was originally developed as a rescue technique, to be used after previous failed standard cannulations attempts, it is being increasingly used at an early stage during ERCP. Given its safety and feasibility some authors even advocate, the once unreasonable, primary use without previous standard cannulation attempts10,11,19,20.
- Financial resources All participants included in this study will perform ERCP, laboratory tests and other complementary diagnostic tests after a duly justified medical prescription. Therefore there are no additional costs or consumption of hospital resources.
- Ethical considerations In this study, participants will be included after informed consent. Anonymity and confidentiality will be safeguarded by assigning an individual numeric code. It will also be explained the possibility of withdrawing from the study at any time, with the guarantee of the total elimination of data. All researchers involved in the study will adhere to the Rules of Ethical Conduct and Best Practices in order to comply with the precepts of the Declaration of Helsinki, the Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine, the guidelines of the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences and the Guide to Good Clinical Practice.
- Statistical analysis Qualitative variables will be summarized using absolute and relative frequencies, and quantitative variables will be summarized using the mean and standard deviation or the median and interquartile range, depending on their distribution profiles. The normality of the quantitative variables will be assessed using the histogram distribution. A sample of 334 (167 in each group) patients will provide 80% power to detect a difference of 5% in pancreatitis rates between the two groups based on a chi-square test, assuming a pancreatitis rate of 1% among primary fistulotomy, 6 and a one-tailed alpha of 0.05. Relations between categorical variables will be assessed using a chi-square test and Fisher´s exact test. Differences between two or more groups of independent non-normally distributed quantitative variables will be evaluated using a Kruskal-Wallis test. To explain the risk of pancreatitis, a binomial logistic regression model with multiple predictors will be performed. The null hypothesis will be rejected when the test statistics p-values are less than <0.05. Statistical analysis, sample size calculation and graphics will be performed using Stata software (StataCorp. 2015. Stata Statistical Software: Release 14. College Station, StataCorp LP)
- Expected results
The results of this study will contribute to a better understanding of what is the best algorithm to follow when performing an ERCP.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- We will conduct a prospective randomized study. Participants will be randomized by computer into two groups at a 1:1 ratio 1. participants submitted to ultra early NKF 2. participants submitted to standard cannulation techniques (including double-guidewire-assisted cannulation)
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Ultra Early NKF group | Experimental | Procedure: Cannulation techniquePatients submitted to Ultra early NKF in a consecutive fashion by an expert endoscopist |
| Standard cannulation techniques group (including double-guidewire-assisted cannulation) | No intervention | –Patients submitted to standard cannulation techniques (including double-guidewire-assisted cannulation) in a consecutive fashion by an expert endoscopist |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- ERCP with indication for biliary access
- Naïve papilla
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Flat papillas
- Intradiverticular / Diverticular border papillas
- Patients unable to sign or understand the informed consent
- Patients with surgically altered anatomy
- Patients with tumors of the papilla
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Cannulation techniqueParticipants in the ultra early NKF group will be submitted to 2 standard cannulation attempts (2 contacts with the papilla) before starting NKF. If any of these 2 attemps is successful, NKF won't take place. If NKF is indeed performed and cannulation is not achieved within 8 minutes, the endoscopist is free to perform techniques other than NKF. On the other hand, participants in the standard cannulation group in which cannulation is not achieved within 8 minutes can cross-over to other advanced cannulation techniques (e.g. NKF). For ethical reasons we choose to exclude flat and intradiverticular/diverticular border papillas. During ERCP all participants will be submitted to PEP prophylaxis with rectal indomethacin. A pancreatic stent will be placed whenever there is cannulation or opacification of the Wirsung duct. For the purposes of the study, a dedicated form (attached) will be created with the various variables to be analyzed | Procedure or surgery | Ultra Early NKF group |
Primary outcome
Adverse events
Time frame: 30 days from the procedure
Comparison of adverse event rate between the two strategies
Technical success
Time frame: 1 day (same day of the procedure)
Comparison of technical success between the two strategies
2 secondary outcomes
Adverse event rate among sub groups
Time frame: 30 days from the procedure
Technical success among sub groups
Time frame: 1 day (same day of the procedure)
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Aug 2021.
- Background: PubMed 24012251Canena J, Liberato M, Coutinho AP, Marques I, Romao C, Veiga PM, Neves BC. Predictive value of cholangioscopy after endoscopic management of early postcholecystectomy bile duct strictures with an increasing number of plastic stents: a prospective study (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Feb;79(2):279-88. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.07.022. Epub 2013 Sep 5.
- Background: PubMed 24821464Canena J, Coimbra J, Carvalho D, Rodrigues C, Silva M, Costa M, Horta D, Mateus Dias A, Seves I, Ramos G, Ricardo L, Coutinho AP, Romao C, Veiga PM. Endoscopic bilio-duodenal bypass: outcomes of primary and revision efficacy of combined metallic stents in malignant duodenal and biliary obstructions. Dig Dis Sci. 2014 Nov;59(11):2779-89. doi: 10.1007/s10620-014-3199-y. Epub 2014 May 13.
- Background: PubMed 25771064Canena J, Liberato M, Meireles L, Marques I, Romao C, Coutinho AP, Neves BC, Veiga PM. A non-randomized study in consecutive patients with postcholecystectomy refractory biliary leaks who were managed endoscopically with the use of multiple plastic stents or fully covered self-expandable metal stents (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Jul;82(1):70-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.11.038. Epub 2015 Mar 11.
- Background: PubMed 29457044Canena J. Once upon a Time a Guideline Was Used for the Evaluation of Suspected Choledocholithiasis: A Fairy Tale or a Nightmare? GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jan;25(1):6-9. doi: 10.1159/000481688. Epub 2017 Nov 8. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 30976615Canena J, Lopes L, Fernandes J, Alexandrino G, Lourenco L, Libanio D, Horta D, Giestas S, Reis J. Outcomes of Single-Operator Cholangioscopy-Guided Lithotripsy in Patients with Difficult Biliary and Pancreatic Stones. GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2019 Mar;26(2):105-113. doi: 10.1159/000488508. Epub 2018 May 16.
- Background: PubMed 24641260Lopes L, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Rolanda C. Safety and efficacy of precut needle-knife fistulotomy. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jun;49(6):759-65. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2014.898085. Epub 2014 Mar 18.
- Background: PubMed 27299638Testoni PA, Mariani A, Aabakken L, Arvanitakis M, Bories E, Costamagna G, Deviere J, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Dumonceau JM, Giovannini M, Gyokeres T, Hafner M, Halttunen J, Hassan C, Lopes L, Papanikolaou IS, Tham TC, Tringali A, van Hooft J, Williams EJ. Papillary cannulation and sphincterotomy techniques at ERCP: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy. 2016 Jul;48(7):657-83. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-108641. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
- Background: PubMed 21377432Testoni PA, Testoni S, Giussani A. Difficult biliary cannulation during ERCP: how to facilitate biliary access and minimize the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Dig Liver Dis. 2011 Aug;43(8):596-603. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2011.01.019. Epub 2011 Mar 4.
- Background: PubMed 24814775Lopes L, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Rolanda C. Early precut fistulotomy for biliary access: time to change the paradigm of "the later, the better"? Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Oct;80(4):634-641. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.03.014. Epub 2014 May 6.
- Background: PubMed 27102829Jin YJ, Jeong S, Lee DH. Utility of needle-knife fistulotomy as an initial method of biliary cannulation to prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis in a highly selected at-risk group: a single-arm prospective feasibility study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Nov;84(5):808-813. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.04.011. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
- Background: PubMed 31913191Jang SI, Kim DU, Cho JH, Jeong S, Park JS, Lee DH, Kwon CI, Koh DH, Park SW, Lee TH, Lee HS. Primary Needle-Knife Fistulotomy Versus Conventional Cannulation Method in a High-Risk Cohort of Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2020 Apr;115(4):616-624. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000480.
- Background: PubMed 10462652Mavrogiannis C, Liatsos C, Romanos A, Petoumenos C, Nakos A, Karvountzis G. Needle-knife fistulotomy versus needle-knife precut papillotomy for the treatment of common bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999 Sep;50(3):334-9. doi: 10.1053/ge.1999.v50.98593.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Pancreatitis
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
A Study Of Effect Of Secretin For In Injection (Chirostim) On Pancreatic Fluid Composition In Healthy Subjects
Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency, Chronic Pancreatitis
RecruitingPhase 3
Comparative Study to Evaluate Microbial Versus Porcine Pancreatic Enzyme Therapy in Chronic Pancreatitis
Pancreatitis, Chronic, Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency (EPI)
Recruiting
Timing of CHolecystectomy In Severe PAncreatitis
Acute Pancreatitis, Cholelithiasis
RecruitingPhase 3
The Cancer of the Pancreas Screening-5 CAPS5)Study
Pancreas Cancer, Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome (PJS)
RecruitingPhase 3
Comparative Effectiveness Between Indomethacin and Pancreatic Stenting in the Prevention of Post ERCP Pancreatitis
Post ERCP Pancreatitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Cannulation technique in people with Pancreatitis, run by University of Minho at 1 site in Portugal.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Aug 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Portugal. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Luís Lopes, MD, PhD, MBA (00351932841974, luis.m.lopes@me.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Adverse events (time frame: 30 days from the procedure). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04492137, which also lists 20 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Aug 2021.