Photobiomodulation Therapylow-laserNCT04495335
Photobiomodulation and Implant Stability
A study testing photobiomodulation in people with Photobiomodulation Therapy, run by T.C. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
Objective: The aim of the present study was to address the following questions: does photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) improve implant stability and affect microbiota around dental implants in the early stage of osseointegration. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Photobiomodulation Therapy
- What is being tested?
- photobiomodulation
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 90 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2020to 30 Oct 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- at least one tooth loss in left and right posterior sides of upper and lower jaws
- adequate alveolar bone volume as horizontal and vertical
Who cannot join
- uncontrolled systemic diseases
- parafunctional (bruxism and/or clenching)
- smoking habits
- any allergies or metabolic bone diseases,
- pregnancy
- surgical periodontal treatment in 6 months
- using antibiotics in the last 6 months
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Kütahya Health Sciences University Faculty of Dentistry
Kütahya, 43100
Berceste Guler, DDs PhD, 905059359207, berceste.guler@ksbu.edu.tr
Ahu Uraz, DDS PhD
About this study
Official title: The Effect of Photobiomodulation Application on Implant Stabilization and Peri-implant Microbiology
Objective: The aim of the present study was to address the following questions: does photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) improve implant stability and affect microbiota around dental implants in the early stage of osseointegration.
Material and Methods: Implants will randomly be divided into two groups and implants will be placed in the test group treating with Gallium-aluminum-arsenate (GaA1As) diode laser with photobiomodulation therapy immediately after surgery and for 15 days. In the control group, implants are not irradiated. The primary stability of the implants will measure by the Resonance frequency analysis (RFA) after insertion and the secondary stability values will record at 30th, 60th, and 90th days after surgery as implant stability quotient (ISQ). Plaque samples will collect for microbiological analyzes at the first 24 hours after implant surgery and six days after 90 days at six sterile endodontic paper points.
Read the detailed description
The same surgical procedure will be operated in the test and control groups by the same surgeon. Full-thickness flaps were raised and dental implant osteotomy preparation will be completed according to the manufacturers' instructions. Laser treatment will be completed using Gallium-Aluminum-Arsenide diode laser. The photobiomodulation application will v-be completed by laser energy immediately and three times a week for just 15 days after surgery. The control group will consist of laser application without energy delivery to the tissue. Immediately after implant placement, the third generation stability resonance frequency (RF) analyzer will be applied for direct measurement of implant stability and the value will be recorded. The microbiological plaque samples will be collected at specific times, according to the following schedule; at the first 24-hour and 90 days after implant surgery. All bacterial DNA specimen will be analyzed with qPCR technique to evaluate Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans (Aa), Porphyromonas gingivalis (Pg), Prevotella intermedia (Pi) , Tannerella forsythia (Tf ) and total amount of bacteria.
- Conditions
- Photobiomodulation Therapy
- Being tested
- photobiomodulation
- Keywords
- Low-level laser therapy implants
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
photobiomodulationDevice
Also called low-level laser therapy
Laser treatment will complete using Gallium-Aluminum-Arsenide (GaA1As) diode laser and application will complete by laser energy immediately and three times a week for just 15 days after surgery.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Test Group (TG) | Experimental | The study included test group with Photobiomodulation treatment after dental implant surgery Receives: Device: photobiomodulation |
| Control Group (CG) | Active comparator | The control group consisted of laser application without energy delivery to the tissue. Receives: Device: photobiomodulation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
primary and secondary implant stability
Immediately after implant placement, the third generation stability resonance frequency (RF) analyzer (Osstell ISQ, Integration Diagnostics AB, Gamlestadsvägen, Goteborg, Sweden) was applied for direct measurement of implant stability and the value was recorded.
Measured: The stability was measured at immediately postoperatively.
primary and secondary implant stability
Immediately after implant placement, the third generation stability resonance frequency (RF) analyzer (Osstell ISQ, Integration Diagnostics AB, Gamlestadsvägen, Goteborg, Sweden) was applied for direct measurement of implant stability and the value was recorded.
Measured: The stability was measured at 30 days postoperatively.
primary and secondary implant stability
Immediately after implant placement, the third generation stability resonance frequency (RF) analyzer (Osstell ISQ, Integration Diagnostics AB, Gamlestadsvägen, Goteborg, Sweden) was applied for direct measurement of implant stability and the value was recorded.
Measured: The stability was measured at 60 days postoperatively.
primary and secondary implant stability
Immediately after implant placement, the third generation stability resonance frequency (RF) analyzer (Osstell ISQ, Integration Diagnostics AB, Gamlestadsvägen, Goteborg, Sweden) was applied for direct measurement of implant stability and the value was recorded.
Measured: The stability was measured at 90 days postoperatively.
Secondary outcomes (2)
Evaluation of the number of peri-implant total microorganisms by PCR
The sample of the dental implant to be sampled is gently isolated with sterile cotton rolls. Then standardized sterile endodontic paper-points with tip size 40 were inserted into crevice very gently avoiding gingival bleeding. The paper-points were immediately put into sterilized Eppendorf tubes.
Measured: Microbiological samples will obtained at the first 24-hour after implant surgery
Evaluation of the number of peri-implant total microorganisms by PCR
The sample of the dental implant to be sampled is gently isolated with sterile cotton rolls. Then standardized sterile endodontic paper-points with tip size 40 were inserted into crevice very gently avoiding gingival bleeding. The paper-points were immediately put into sterilized Eppendorf tubes.
Measured: Microbiological samples will obtained at the 90 days after implant surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Jul 2020
- Study start1 Jan 2020
- Primary completion30 Sep 2020 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Oct 2020 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Photobiomodulation TherapyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Implants were randomly divided into two groups and implants placed in the test group were treated with Gallium-aluminum-arsenate (GaA1As) diode laser with photobiomodulation therapy immediately after surgery and for 15 days. In the control group, implants were not irradiated.
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 90 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- T.C. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Gazi University
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Berceste Guler, T.C. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi
- Investigators
- Suleyman Bozkaya, DDS PhD, Study director, Gazi University Faculty of Dentistry
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04495335
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2020-04/01
- Acronym
- low-laser
- Status last verified
- Jul 2020
- First submitted
- 26 Jul 2020
- Last updated
- 31 Jul 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Lioubavina-Hack N, Lang NP, Karring T. Significance of primary stability for osseointegration of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006 Jun;17(3):244-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01201.x.
PubMed 16672018Kim YD, Kim SS, Hwang DS, Kim SG, Kwon YH, Shin SH, Kim UK, Kim JR, Chung IK. Effect of low-level laser treatment after installation of dental titanium implant-immunohistochemical study of RANKL, RANK, OPG: an experimental study in rats. Lasers Surg Med. 2007 Jun;39(5):441-50. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20508.
PubMed 17523169Amid R, Kadkhodazadeh M, Ahsaie MG, Hakakzadeh A. Effect of low level laser therapy on proliferation and differentiation of the cells contributing in bone regeneration. J Lasers Med Sci. 2014 Fall;5(4):163-70.
PubMed 25653816Bozkaya S, Uraz A, Guler B, Kahraman SA, Turhan Bal B. The stability of implants and microbiological effects following photobiomodulation therapy with one-stage placement: A randomized, controlled, single-blinded, and split-mouth clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2021 Jun;23(3):329-340. doi: 10.1111/cid.12999. Epub 2021 Apr 14.
PubMed 33851765
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 Jul 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of Photobiomodulation Application on Implant Stabilization and Peri-implant Microbiology
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04495335
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- low-laser / 2020-04/01
- Conditions
- Photobiomodulation Therapy
- Keywords
- Low-level laser therapy implants
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 90 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- T.C. Dumlupınar ÜniversitesiUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Gazi University
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Sep 2020 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Oct 2020 (estimated)
- First posted
- 31 Jul 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Objective: The aim of the present study was to address the following questions: does photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) improve implant stability and affect microbiota around dental implants in the early stage of osseointegration.
Material and Methods: Implants will randomly be divided into two groups and implants will be placed in the test group treating with Gallium-aluminum-arsenate (GaA1As) diode laser with photobiomodulation therapy immediately after surgery and for 15 days. In the control group, implants are not irradiated. The primary stability of the implants will measure by the Resonance frequency analysis (RFA) after insertion and the secondary stability values will record at 30th, 60th, and 90th days after surgery as implant stability quotient (ISQ). Plaque samples will collect for microbiological analyzes at the first 24 hours after implant surgery and six days after 90 days at six sterile endodontic paper points.
Detailed description
The same surgical procedure will be operated in the test and control groups by the same surgeon. Full-thickness flaps were raised and dental implant osteotomy preparation will be completed according to the manufacturers' instructions. Laser treatment will be completed using Gallium-Aluminum-Arsenide diode laser. The photobiomodulation application will v-be completed by laser energy immediately and three times a week for just 15 days after surgery. The control group will consist of laser application without energy delivery to the tissue. Immediately after implant placement, the third generation stability resonance frequency (RF) analyzer will be applied for direct measurement of implant stability and the value will be recorded. The microbiological plaque samples will be collected at specific times, according to the following schedule; at the first 24-hour and 90 days after implant surgery. All bacterial DNA specimen will be analyzed with qPCR technique to evaluate Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans (Aa), Porphyromonas gingivalis (Pg), Prevotella intermedia (Pi) , Tannerella forsythia (Tf ) and total amount of bacteria.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Implants were randomly divided into two groups and implants placed in the test group were treated with Gallium-aluminum-arsenate (GaA1As) diode laser with photobiomodulation therapy immediately after surgery and for 15 days. In the control group, implants were not irradiated.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Test Group (TG) | Experimental | Device: photobiomodulationThe study included test group with Photobiomodulation treatment after dental implant surgery |
| Control Group (CG) | Active comparator | Device: photobiomodulationThe control group consisted of laser application without energy delivery to the tissue. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- at least one tooth loss in left and right posterior sides of upper and lower jaws
- adequate alveolar bone volume as horizontal and vertical
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- uncontrolled systemic diseases
- parafunctional (bruxism and/or clenching)
- smoking habits
- any allergies or metabolic bone diseases,
- pregnancy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| photobiomodulationAlso: low-level laser therapyLaser treatment will complete using Gallium-Aluminum-Arsenide (GaA1As) diode laser and application will complete by laser energy immediately and three times a week for just 15 days after surgery. | Device | Control Group (CG), Test Group (TG) |
Primary outcome
primary and secondary implant stability
Time frame: The stability was measured at immediately postoperatively.
Immediately after implant placement, the third generation stability resonance frequency (RF) analyzer (Osstell ISQ, Integration Diagnostics AB, Gamlestadsvägen, Goteborg, Sweden) was applied for direct measurement of implant stability and the value was recorded.
primary and secondary implant stability
Time frame: The stability was measured at 30 days postoperatively.
Immediately after implant placement, the third generation stability resonance frequency (RF) analyzer (Osstell ISQ, Integration Diagnostics AB, Gamlestadsvägen, Goteborg, Sweden) was applied for direct measurement of implant stability and the value was recorded.
primary and secondary implant stability
Time frame: The stability was measured at 60 days postoperatively.
Immediately after implant placement, the third generation stability resonance frequency (RF) analyzer (Osstell ISQ, Integration Diagnostics AB, Gamlestadsvägen, Goteborg, Sweden) was applied for direct measurement of implant stability and the value was recorded.
primary and secondary implant stability
Time frame: The stability was measured at 90 days postoperatively.
Immediately after implant placement, the third generation stability resonance frequency (RF) analyzer (Osstell ISQ, Integration Diagnostics AB, Gamlestadsvägen, Goteborg, Sweden) was applied for direct measurement of implant stability and the value was recorded.
2 secondary outcomes
Evaluation of the number of peri-implant total microorganisms by PCR
Time frame: Microbiological samples will obtained at the first 24-hour after implant surgery
Evaluation of the number of peri-implant total microorganisms by PCR
Time frame: Microbiological samples will obtained at the 90 days after implant surgery
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 Jul 2020.
- Background: PubMed 16672018Lioubavina-Hack N, Lang NP, Karring T. Significance of primary stability for osseointegration of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006 Jun;17(3):244-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01201.x.
- Background: PubMed 17523169Kim YD, Kim SS, Hwang DS, Kim SG, Kwon YH, Shin SH, Kim UK, Kim JR, Chung IK. Effect of low-level laser treatment after installation of dental titanium implant-immunohistochemical study of RANKL, RANK, OPG: an experimental study in rats. Lasers Surg Med. 2007 Jun;39(5):441-50. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20508.
- Background: PubMed 25653816Amid R, Kadkhodazadeh M, Ahsaie MG, Hakakzadeh A. Effect of low level laser therapy on proliferation and differentiation of the cells contributing in bone regeneration. J Lasers Med Sci. 2014 Fall;5(4):163-70.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33851765Bozkaya S, Uraz A, Guler B, Kahraman SA, Turhan Bal B. The stability of implants and microbiological effects following photobiomodulation therapy with one-stage placement: A randomized, controlled, single-blinded, and split-mouth clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2021 Jun;23(3):329-340. doi: 10.1111/cid.12999. Epub 2021 Apr 14.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Photobiomodulation Therapy
Not yet recruiting
ACUTE EFFECTS OF HIGH-INTENSITY LASER THERAPY ON PAIN, MUSCLE STIFFNESS, AND GRIP STRENGTH IN HEALTHY ADULTS
Exercise-Induced Muscle Fatigue, Fatigue Recovery
Recruiting
Shock Wave Therapy Versus High-Intensity Laser Therapy for Coccydynia (Tailbone Pain)
Coccydynia, Coccygodynia
Not yet recruiting
Comparison of High-Intensity and Conventional Physical Therapy in Musculoskeletal Disorders
Low Back Pain, Radicular Syndrome
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Determinants of Radiation Dermatitis in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Receiving Preventive Photobiomodulation
Head and Neck Neoplasms, Radiodermatitis
Recruiting
Evaluating How Red-light Therapy Applied to the Head Affects Symptoms, Daily Life, and Brain Activity in People With Dementia With Lewy Bodies
Photobiomodulation, Dementia With Lewy Bodies
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Suleyman Bozkaya, DDS PhD study director
Gazi University Faculty of Dentistry
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing photobiomodulation in people with Photobiomodulation Therapy, run by T.C. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Jul 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Berceste Guler, PhD (905059359207, berceste.guler@ksbu.edu.tr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
primary and secondary implant stability (time frame: The stability was measured at immediately postoperatively.). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04495335, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Jul 2020.