AzTrials
AzTrials

Dry Eye DiseasePhase 2COMET-1NCT04498182

A Phase 2b Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of AR-15512 Ophthalmic Solution for the Treatment of Dry Eye Disease

A Phase 2 study testing AR-15512 Ophthalmic Solution in people with Dry Eye Disease, run by Aerie Pharmaceuticals at 15 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a Phase 2b, multicenter, vehicle-controlled, double-masked, randomized study. All subjects enrolled will have dry eye disease. The study consists of Screening and Baseline visits to determine eligibility, followed by efficacy assessments at Day 14 (Visit 3), 28 (Visit 4) and 84 (Visit 5/Study Exit). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 30 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Dry Eye Disease
What is being tested?
AR-15512 Ophthalmic Solution
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
369 participants
Where
15 sitesUnited States
Study dates
26 Oct 2020to 17 Jul 2021
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 30 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Previous history of dry eye disease (DED) within the previous 6 months;
  • Have used and/or desired to use artificial tears for DED symptoms within 2 months prior to the Screening visit;
  • Signs and symptoms of DED at the Screening and Baseline visits;
  • Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) of 20/200 (+0.70 LogMAR) or better in both eyes at both the Screening and Baseline visits;
  • Other protocol-specified inclusion criteria may apply.

Who cannot join

  • History or presence of any ocular disorder or condition (other than DED) in either eye that would, in the opinion of the investigator, likely interfere with the interpretation of the study results or subject safety;
  • Current evidence of other significant ophthalmic diseases which, in the opinion of the investigator, may interfere with study findings or interpretation;
  • Use of contact lenses in either eye within 7 days prior to the Screening visit or planned use during the study;
  • Regular use of ocular medications or nutritional supplements as specified in the protocol within 30 days prior to the Screening visit;
  • Positive pregnancy test at Screening or Baseline visits or currently breastfeeding.
  • Other protocol-specified exclusion criteria may apply.

Trial locations and contacts

15 sites in 1 country.

15 sites in 1 country

United States15 sites
  • Andover Eye Associates

    Andover, Massachusetts, 01810

  • Midwest Cornea Associates, LLC

    Carmel, Indiana, 46290

  • Alpine Research Organization, Inc,

    Clinton, Utah, 84015

  • Vision Institute

    Colorado Springs, Colorado, 80907

  • Complete Eye Care of Medina

    Hamel, Minnesota, 55340

  • Michael Washburn Center for Ophthalmic Research, LLC

    Indianapolis, Indiana, 46240

  • Moyes Eye Center

    Kansas City, Missouri, 64154

  • The Eye Care Institute

    Louisville, Kentucky, 40206

  • Piedmont Eye Center

    Lynchburg, Virginia, 24502

  • Total Eye Care, PA

    Memphis, Tennessee, 38119

  • Eye Research Foundation

    Newport Beach, California, 92663

  • Cornea and Cataract Consultants of Arizona

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85032

  • Andover Eye Associates

    Raynham, Massachusetts, 02767

  • Vita Eye Clinic

    Shelby, North Carolina, 28150

  • Advancing Vision Research, LLC

    Smyrna, Tennessee, 37167

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Phase 2b Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of AR-15512 Ophthalmic Solution for the Treatment of Dry Eye Disease (COMET-1)

This is a Phase 2b, multicenter, vehicle-controlled, double-masked, randomized study. All subjects enrolled will have dry eye disease. The study consists of Screening and Baseline visits to determine eligibility, followed by efficacy assessments at Day 14 (Visit 3), 28 (Visit 4) and 84 (Visit 5/Study Exit). Safety will be assessed at all study visits.

Read the detailed description

At the end of the Screening Visit, all qualified subjects will be assigned to administer AR-15512 vehicle twice a day to both eyes for 14 days (vehicle run-in period). After the vehicle run-in period, subjects will be re-evaluated for signs and symptoms of Dry Eye Disease (DED). Subjects who requalify based on inclusion/exclusion criteria will be randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive AR-15512 0.0014% (lower dose), AR-15512 0.003% (higher dose) or AR-15512 vehicle administered as 1 drop in each eye twice daily for 84 days.

This study will utilize a Controlled Adverse Environment (CAE) chamber, which serves to (1) minimize the factors that could impact the evaluation (temperature, humidity, and airflow) and (2) stress the ocular surface in a safe, standardized, controlled, and reproducible manner. Subjects will be exposed to the CAE for approximately 90 minutes during each CAE visit. Subjects will be exposed to the CAE at the Screening and Baseline visits as well as on Day 28 (Visit 4) and Day 84 (Visit 5). Efficacy endpoints will be evaluated pre- and post- exposure to the CAE.

Aerie Pharmaceuticals was acquired by Alcon on November 22, 2022.

Conditions
Dry Eye Disease
Being tested
AR-15512 Ophthalmic Solution, AR-15512 Ophthalmic Solution Vehicle
Medical subject headings
Dry Eye Syndromes

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • AR-15512 Ophthalmic SolutionDrug

    Ophthalmic solution administered via topical ocular instillation in one of two dose concentrations: 0.0014% (lower dose) or 0.003% (higher dose)

  • AR-15512 Ophthalmic Solution VehicleDrug

    Ophthalmic solution vehicle administered via topical ocular instillation

Study groups in NCT04498182
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
AR-15512 Ophthalmic Solution Higher DoseExperimentalAR-15512 Ophthalmic Solution 0.003%, one drop in each eye twice daily for 84 days. Both eyes will be treated.
Receives: Drug: AR-15512 Ophthalmic Solution
AR-15512 Ophthalmic Solution Lower DoseExperimentalAR-15512 Ophthalmic Solution 0.0014%, one drop in each eye twice daily for 84 days. Both eyes will be treated.
Receives: Drug: AR-15512 Ophthalmic Solution
VehiclePlacebo comparatorAR-15512 Ophthalmic Solution Vehicle, one drop in each eye twice daily for 84 days. Both eyes will be treated.
Receives: Drug: AR-15512 Ophthalmic Solution Vehicle

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Pre-CAE (Controlled Adverse Environment) Ocular Discomfort Score (ODS) on a Visual Analogue Scale at Day 28

    Ocular discomfort was assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) that ranged from 0 millimeters (mm) (no ocular discomfort) to 100 mm (maximum ocular discomfort). Ocular discomfort was assessed at Baseline prior to CAE exposure and at Day 28 prior to CAE exposure. The Day 28 value was subtracted from the Baseline value. A more negative change value indicates a better outcome. This was a subject based assessment, and subject assigned a single score for both eyes. This is a co-primary endpoint.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) (pre-treatment), Day 28

  2. Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Pre-CAE Anesthetized Schirmer Test Score at Day 28

    The Schirmer test measures tear production. Following instillation of topical anesthetic drops, Schirmer strips were placed on the lower eye lids, eyes were closed, and strips remained in place for 5 minutes or until both strips reached a maximum score. The strips were removed, and the amount of wetting was recorded on a scale from 0 mm (no tear production) to 35 mm (maximum tear production). The test was performed at Baseline prior to CAE exposure and at Day 28 prior to CAE exposure. The Day 28 value was subtracted from the Baseline value. A more positive change value indicates a better outcome. One eye (study eye) contributed data to the analysis. This is a co-primary endpoint.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) (pre-treatment), Day 28

Secondary outcomes (36)
  1. Least Squares Mean Pre-CAE Ocular Discomfort Score (ODS) on a Visual Analogue Scale at Day 28

    Ocular discomfort was assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) that ranged from 0 mm (no ocular discomfort) to 100 mm (maximum ocular discomfort) prior to CAE exposure. This was a subject based assessment, and subject assigned a single score for both eyes.

    Measured: Day 28

  2. Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Pre-CAE Ocular Discomfort Score (ODS) on a Visual Analogue Scale at Day 84

    Ocular discomfort was assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) that ranged from 0 mm (no ocular discomfort) to 100 mm (maximum ocular discomfort). Ocular discomfort was assessed at Baseline prior to CAE exposure and at Day 84 prior to CAE exposure. The Day 84 value was subtracted from the Baseline value. A more negative change value indicates a better outcome. This was a subject based assessment, and subject assigned a single score for both eyes.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) (pre-treatment), Day 84

  3. Least Squares Mean Pre-CAE Ocular Discomfort Score (ODS) on a Visual Analogue Scale at Day 84

    Ocular discomfort was assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) that ranged from 0 mm (no ocular discomfort) to 100 mm (maximum ocular discomfort) prior to CAE exposure. This was a subject based assessment, and subject assigned a single score for both eyes.

    Measured: Day 84

  4. Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Pre-CAE Anesthetized Schirmer Test Score at Day 84

    The Schirmer test measures tear production. Following instillation of topical anesthetic drops, Schirmer strips were the placed on the lower eye lids, eyes were closed, and strips remained in place for 5 minutes or until both strips reached a maximum score. The strips were removed, and the amount of wetting was recorded on a scale from 0 mm (no tear production) to 35 mm (maximum tear production). The test was performed at Baseline prior to CAE exposure and at Day 84 prior to CAE exposure. The Day 84 value was subtracted from the Baseline value. A more positive change value indicates a better outcome. One eye (study eye) contributed data to the analysis.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) (pre-treatment), Day 84

  5. Least Squares Mean Pre-CAE Anesthetized Schirmer Test Score at Day 84

    The Schirmer test measures tear production. Following instillation of topical anesthetic drops, Schirmer strips were the placed on the lower eye lids, eyes were closed, and strips remained in place for 5 minutes or until both strips reached a maximum score. The strips were removed, and the amount of wetting was recorded on a scale from 0 mm (no tear production) to 35 mm (maximum tear production). A higher score indicates a better outcome. The test was performed prior to CAE exposure. One eye (study eye) contributed data to the analysis.

    Measured: Day 84

  6. Least Squares Mean Pre-CAE Anesthetized Schirmer Test Score at Day 28

    The Schirmer test measures tear production. Following instillation of topical anesthetic drops, Schirmer strips were the placed on the lower eye lids, eyes were closed, and strips remained in place for 5 minutes or until both strips reached a maximum score. The strips were removed, and the amount of wetting was recorded on a scale from 0 mm (no tear production) to 35 mm (maximum tear production). A higher score indicates a better outcome. The test was performed prior to CAE exposure. One eye (study eye) contributed data to the analysis.

    Measured: Day 28

  7. Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Pre-CAE Pain Score on a Visual Analogue Scale at Day 84

    Ocular pain was assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) that ranged from 0 mm (no ocular pain) to 100 mm (maximum ocular pain). Ocular pain was assessed at Baseline prior to CAE exposure and at Day 84 prior to CAE exposure. The Day 84 value was subtracted from the Baseline value. A more negative change value indicates a better outcome. This was a subject based assessment, and subject assigned a single score for both eyes.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) (pre-treatment), Day 84

  8. Least Squares Mean Pre-CAE Pain Score on a Visual Analogue Scale at Day 84

    Ocular pain was assessed prior to CAE exposure using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) that ranged from 0 mm (no ocular pain) to 100 mm (maximum ocular pain) prior to CAE exposure. This was a subject based assessment, and subject assigned a single score for both eyes.

    Measured: Day 84

  9. Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Pre-CAE Pain Score on a Visual Analogue Scale at Day 28

    Ocular pain was assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) that ranged from 0 mm (no ocular pain) to 100 mm (maximum ocular pain). Ocular pain was assessed at Baseline prior to CAE exposure and at Day 28 prior to CAE exposure. The Day 28 value was subtracted from the Baseline value. A more negative change value indicates a better outcome. This was a subject based assessment, and subject assigned a single score for both eyes.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) (pre-treatment), Day 28

  10. Least Squares Mean Pre-CAE Pain Score on a Visual Analogue Scale at Day 28

    Ocular pain was assessed prior to CAE exposure using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) that ranged from 0 mm (no ocular pain) to 100 mm (maximum ocular pain) prior to CAE exposure. This was a subject based assessment, and subject assigned a single score for both eyes.

    Measured: Day 28

  11. Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Post-CAE Pain Score on a Visual Analogue Scale at Day 84

    Ocular pain was assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) that ranged from 0 mm (no ocular pain) to 100 mm (maximum ocular pain). Ocular pain was assessed at Baseline prior to CAE exposure and at Day 84 following CAE exposure. The Day 84 value was subtracted from the Baseline value. A more negative change value indicates a better outcome. This was a subject based assessment, and subject assigned a single score for both eyes.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) (pre-treatment), Day 84

  12. Least Squares Mean Post-CAE Pain Score on a Visual Analogue Scale at Day 84

    Ocular pain was assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) that ranged from 0 mm (no ocular pain) to 100 mm (maximum ocular pain) following CAE exposure. This was a subject based assessment, and subject assigned a single score for both eyes.

    Measured: Day 84

  13. Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Post-CAE Pain Score on a Visual Analogue Scale at Day 28

    Ocular pain was assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) that ranged from 0 mm (no ocular pain) to 100 mm (maximum ocular pain). Ocular pain was assessed at Baseline prior to CAE exposure and at Day 28 following CAE exposure. The Day 28 value was subtracted from the Baseline value. A more negative change value indicates a better outcome. This was a subject based assessment, and subject assigned a single score for both eyes.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) (pre-treatment), Day 28

  14. Least Squares Mean Post-CAE Pain Score on a Visual Analogue Scale at Day 28

    Ocular pain was assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) that ranged from 0 mm (no ocular pain) to 100 mm (maximum ocular pain) following CAE exposure. This was a subject based assessment, and subject assigned a single score for both eyes.

    Measured: Day 28

  15. Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Pre-CAE Global SANDE Questionnaire Score at Day 28

    The SANDE questionnaire assesses the frequency and severity of dry eye disease symptoms. Subjects used 2 unique, 100 mm Visual Analogue Scales (VAS) to mark the frequency of symptoms (0=rarely, 100=all the time) and the severity of symptoms (0=very mild, 100=very severe) for both eyes together. The Global SANDE score was calculated by multiplying the frequency score by the severity score and obtaining the square root. The final value was rounded nearest whole number. The SANDE questionnaire was completed at Baseline prior to CAE exposure and at Day 28 prior to CAE exposure. The Day 28 value was subtracted from the Baseline value. A more negative change value indicates a better outcome. This was a subject based assessment, and subject assigned a single score for both eyes.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) (pre-treatment), Day 28

  16. Least Squares Mean Pre-CAE Global SANDE Questionnaire Score at Day 28

    The SANDE questionnaire assesses the frequency and severity of dry eye disease symptoms. Subjects used 2 unique, 100 mm Visual Analogue Scales (VAS) to mark the frequency of symptoms (0=rarely, 100=all the time) and the severity of symptoms (0=very mild, 100=very severe) for both eyes together. The Global SANDE score was calculated by multiplying the frequency score by the severity score and obtaining the square root. The final value was rounded nearest whole number. The SANDE questionnaire was completed prior to CAE exposure. This was a subject based assessment, and subject assigned a single score for both eyes.

    Measured: Day 28

  17. Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Pre-CAE Global SANDE Questionnaire Score at Day 84

    The SANDE questionnaire assesses the frequency and severity of dry eye disease symptoms. Subjects used 2 unique, 100 mm Visual Analogue Scales (VAS) to mark the frequency of symptoms (0=rarely, 100=all the time) and the severity of symptoms (0=very mild, 100=very severe) for both eyes together. The Global SANDE score was calculated by multiplying the frequency score by the severity score and obtaining the square root. The final value was rounded nearest whole number. The SANDE questionnaire was completed at Baseline prior to CAE exposure and at Day 84 prior to CAE exposure. The Day 84 value was subtracted from the Baseline value. A more negative change value indicates a better outcome. This was a subject based assessment, and subject assigned a single score for both eyes.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) (pre-treatment), Day 84

  18. Least Squares Mean Pre-CAE Global SANDE Questionnaire Score at Day 84

    The SANDE questionnaire assesses the frequency and severity of dry eye disease symptoms. Subjects used 2 unique, 100 mm Visual Analogue Scales (VAS) to mark the frequency of symptoms (0=rarely, 100=all the time) and the severity of symptoms (0=very mild, 100=very severe) for both eyes together. The Global SANDE score was calculated by multiplying the frequency score by the severity score and obtaining the square root. The final value was rounded nearest whole number. The SANDE questionnaire was completed prior to CAE exposure. This was a subject based assessment, and subject assigned a single score for both eyes.

    Measured: Day 84

  19. Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Pre-CAE Eye Dryness Score on a Visual Analogue Scale at Day 28

    Eye dryness was assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) that ranged from 0 mm (no eye dryness) to 100 mm (maximum eye dryness). Eye dryness was assessed at Baseline prior to CAE exposure and at Day 28 prior to CAE exposure. The Day 28 value was subtracted from the Baseline value. A more negative change value indicates a better outcome. This was a subject based assessment, and subject assigned a single score for both eyes.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) (pre-treatment), Day 28

  20. Least Squares Mean Pre-CAE Eye Dryness Score on a Visual Analogue Scale at Day 28

    Eye dryness was assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) that ranged from 0 mm (no eye dryness) to 100 mm (maximum eye dryness) prior to CAE exposure. This was a subject based assessment, and subject assigned a single score for both eyes.

    Measured: Day 28

  21. Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Pre-CAE Eye Dryness Score on a Visual Analogue Scale at Day 84

    Eye dryness was assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) that ranged from 0 mm (no eye dryness) to 100 mm (maximum eye dryness). Eye dryness was assessed at Baseline prior to CAE exposure and at Day 84 prior to CAE exposure. The Day 84 value was subtracted from the Baseline value. A more negative change value indicates a better outcome. This was a subject based assessment, and subject assigned a single score for both eyes.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) (pre-treatment), Day 84

  22. Least Squares Mean Pre-CAE Eye Dryness Score on a Visual Analogue Scale at Day 84

    Eye dryness was assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) that ranged from 0 mm (no eye dryness) to 100 mm (maximum eye dryness) prior to CAE exposure. This was a subject based assessment, and subject assigned a single score for both eyes.

    Measured: Day 84

  23. Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Pre-CAE Ocular Discomfort Score (ODS) on a Visual Analogue Scale at Day 14

    Ocular discomfort was assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) that ranged from 0 mm (no ocular discomfort) to 100 mm (maximum ocular discomfort). Ocular discomfort was assessed at Baseline prior to CAE exposure and at Day 14 prior to CAE exposure. The Day 14 value was subtracted from the Baseline value. A more negative change value indicates a better outcome. This was a subject based assessment, and subject assigned a single score for both eyes.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) (pre-treatment), Day 14

  24. Mean Change From Baseline in Pre-CAE Ora Calibra® Ocular Discomfort Score (ODS) at Day 28

    Ocular discomfort was assessed using a 5-point proprietary scale where 0=no discomfort and 4=constant discomfort. Ocular discomfort was assessed at Baseline prior to CAE exposure and at Day 28 prior to CAE exposure. The Day 28 value was subtracted from the Baseline value. A more negative change value indicates a better outcome. One eye (study eye) contributed data to the analysis.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) (pre-treatment), Day 28

  25. Mean Change From Baseline in Pre-CAE Ora Calibra® Ocular Discomfort Score (ODS) at Day 84

    Ocular discomfort was assessed using a 5-point proprietary scale where 0=no discomfort and 4=constant discomfort. Ocular discomfort was assessed at Baseline prior to CAE exposure and at Day 84 prior to CAE exposure. The Day 84 value was subtracted from the Baseline value. A more negative change value indicates a better outcome. One eye (study eye) contributed data to the analysis.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) (pre-treatment), Day 84

  26. Least Squares Mean Pre-CAE Ocular Discomfort Score (ODS) on a Visual Analogue Scale at Day 14

    Ocular discomfort was assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) that ranged from 0 mm (no ocular discomfort) to 100 mm (maximum ocular discomfort) prior to CAE exposure. This was a subject based assessment, and subject assigned a single score for both eyes.

    Measured: Day 14

  27. Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Pre-CAE Pain Score on a Visual Analogue Scale at Day 14

    Ocular pain was assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) that ranged from 0 mm (no ocular pain) to 100 mm (maximum ocular pain). Ocular pain was assessed at Baseline prior to CAE exposure and at Day 14 prior to CAE exposure. The Day 14 value was subtracted from the Baseline value. A more negative change value indicates a better outcome. This was a subject based assessment, and subject assigned a single score for both eyes.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) (pre-treatment), Day 14

  28. Least Squares Mean Pre-CAE Pain Score on a Visual Analogue Scale at Day 14

    Ocular pain was assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) that ranged from 0 mm (no ocular pain) to 100 mm (maximum ocular pain) prior to CAE exposure. This was a subject based assessment, and subject assigned a single score for both eyes.

    Measured: Day 14

  29. Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Pre-CAE Global SANDE Questionnaire Score at Day 14

    The SANDE questionnaire assesses the frequency and severity of dry eye disease symptoms. Subjects used 2 unique, 100 mm Visual Analogue Scales (VAS) to mark the frequency of symptoms (0=rarely, 100=all the time) and the severity of symptoms (0=very mild, 100=very severe) for both eyes together. The Global SANDE score was calculated by multiplying the frequency score by the severity score and obtaining the square root. The final value was rounded nearest whole number. The SANDE questionnaire was completed at Baseline prior to CAE exposure and at Day 14 prior to CAE exposure. The Day 14 value was subtracted from the Baseline value. A more negative change value indicates a better outcome. This was a subject based assessment, and subject assigned a single score for both eyes.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) (pre-treatment), Day 14

  30. Least Squares Mean Pre-CAE Global SANDE Questionnaire Score at Day 14

    The SANDE questionnaire assesses the frequency and severity of dry eye disease symptoms. Subjects used 2 unique, 100 mm Visual Analogue Scales (VAS) to mark the frequency of symptoms (0=rarely, 100=all the time) and the severity of symptoms (0=very mild, 100=very severe) for both eyes together. The Global SANDE score was calculated by multiplying the frequency score by the severity score and obtaining the square root. The final value was rounded nearest whole number. The SANDE questionnaire was completed prior to CAE exposure. This was a subject based assessment, and subject assigned a single score for both eyes.

    Measured: Day 14

  31. Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Pre-CAE Eye Dryness Score on a Visual Analogue Scale at Day 14

    Eye dryness was assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) that ranged from 0 mm (no eye dryness) to 100 mm (maximum eye dryness). Eye dryness was assessed at Baseline prior to CAE exposure and at Day 14 prior to CAE exposure. The Day 14 value was subtracted from the Baseline value. A more negative change value indicates a better outcome. This was a subject based assessment, and subject assigned a single score for both eyes.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) (pre-treatment), Day 14

  32. Least Squares Mean Pre-CAE Eye Dryness Score on a Visual Analogue Scale at Day 14

    Eye dryness was assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) that ranged from 0 mm (no eye dryness) to 100 mm (maximum eye dryness) prior to CAE exposure. This was a subject based assessment, and subject assigned a single score for both eyes.

    Measured: Day 14

  33. Percentage of Subjects With a Baseline Anesthetized Schirmer Score Equal to or Less That 5 mm That Achieved an Anesthetized Schirmer Score of Equal to or Greater Than 10 mm at Day 84

    The Schirmer test measures tear production. Following instillation of topical anesthetic drops, Schirmer strips were the placed on the lower eye lids, eyes were closed, and strips remained in place for 5 minutes or until both strips reached a maximum score. The strips were removed, and the amount of wetting was recorded on a scale from 0 mm (no tear production) to 35 mm (maximum tear production). The test was performed at Baseline prior to CAE exposure and at Day 84 prior to CAE exposure. A higher percentage indicates a better outcome. One eye (study eye) contributed data to the analysis.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) (pre-treatment), Day 84

  34. Percentage of Subjects With a Baseline Anesthetized Schirmer Score Equal to or Less That 5 mm That Achieved an Anesthetized Schirmer Score of Equal to or Greater Than 10 mm at Day 28

    The Schirmer test measures tear production. Following instillation of topical anesthetic drops, Schirmer strips were the placed on the lower eye lids, eyes were closed, and strips remained in place for 5 minutes or until both strips reached a maximum score. The strips were removed, and the amount of wetting was recorded on a scale from 0 mm (no tear production) to 35 mm (maximum tear production). The test was performed at Baseline prior to CAE exposure and at Day 28 prior to CAE exposure. A higher percentage indicates a better outcome. One eye (study eye) contributed data to the analysis.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) (pre-treatment), Day 28

  35. Percentage of Subjects That Achieved at Least a 10 mm Increase in Pre-CAE Anesthetized Schirmer Score Relative to Baseline at Day 28

    The Schirmer test measures tear production. Following instillation of topical anesthetic drops, Schirmer strips were the placed on the lower eye lids, eyes were closed, and strips remained in place for 5 minutes or until both strips reached a maximum score. The strips were removed, and the amount of wetting was recorded on a scale from 0 mm (no tear production) to 35 mm (maximum tear production). The test was performed at Baseline prior to CAE exposure and at Day 28 prior to CAE exposure. A higher percentage indicates a better outcome. One eye (study eye) contributed data to the analysis.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) (pre-treatment), Day 28

  36. Percentage of Subjects That Achieved at Least a 10 mm Increase in Pre-CAE Anesthetized Schirmer Score Relative to Baseline at Day 84

    The Schirmer test measures tear production. Following instillation of topical anesthetic drops, Schirmer strips were the placed on the lower eye lids, eyes were closed, and strips remained in place for 5 minutes or until both strips reached a maximum score. The strips were removed, and the amount of wetting was recorded on a scale from 0 mm (no tear production) to 35 mm (maximum tear production). The test was performed at Baseline prior to CAE exposure and at Day 84 prior to CAE exposure. A higher percentage indicates a better outcome. One eye (study eye) contributed data to the analysis.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) (pre-treatment), Day 84

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Aug 2020
  2. Study start26 Oct 2020
  3. Primary completion17 Jul 2021
  4. Study completion17 Jul 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
369 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04498182
Sponsor's protocol ID
AR-15512-CS201
Acronym
COMET-1
Status last verified
Aug 2024
First submitted
31 Jul 2020
Last updated
28 Aug 2024
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Periman LM, Lappin CJ, McDonald MB, Coats J, Pattar GR, Okoro T, Lighthizer N, Senchyna M, Nijm LM. Improvement in Visual-Tasking Daily Living Activities and Work Productivity in Patients with Dry Eye Disease: Integrated Analysis of COMET Studies. Ophthalmol Ther. 2026 Jul 18. doi: 10.1007/s40123-026-01421-1. Online ahead of print.

    PubMed 42470519

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing AR-15512 Ophthalmic Solution in people with Dry Eye Disease, run by Aerie Pharmaceuticals at 15 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Aug 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 15 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 6 Aug 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Pre-CAE (Controlled Adverse Environment) Ocular Discomfort Score (ODS) on a Visual Analogue Scale at Day 28 (time frame: Baseline (Day 1) (pre-treatment), Day 28). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04498182, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Aug 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in