AzTrials
AzTrials

Spinal Cord InjuryNCT04500223

The Effect of Neck Stabilization Exercise Plus Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation on Pulmonary Function of SCI

A study testing Cervical Cranioflexion exercise plus cardiopulmonary exercise and Cervical stretch exercise plus cardiopulmonary rehabilitation in people with Spinal Cord Injury, run by Taoyuan General Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Cervicocranial flexion exercise (CCFE) and superficial neck flexor endurance training have been widely implemented in clinical practice for curing chronic neck pain. By means of CCFE, the muscle balance between deep neck flexor and superficial flexor would be optimal during neck movement. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Spinal Cord Injury
What is being tested?
Cervical Cranioflexion exercise plus cardiopulmonary exercise and Cervical stretch exercise plus cardiopulmonary rehabilitation
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
13 participants
Where
1 siteTaiwan
Study dates
1 Apr 2020to 28 Feb 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • SCI onset in a year.
  • Motor level above T12 and American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) grade A, B, C, or D.
  • Age from 20~70.
  • FEV1< 80% prediction value.

Who cannot join

  • Ventilation dependent
  • Tracheostomy
  • Psychiatric condition
  • Progressive diseases
  • infection
  • Cancer
  • Unable to speak Chinese or English.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Taiwan1 site
  • Taoyaun General Hospital, Ministry of Wealth and Health

    Taoyuan, Taoyuan Dist., 330

Other trials in Taiwan

About this study

Cervicocranial flexion exercise (CCFE) and superficial neck flexor endurance training have been widely implemented in clinical practice for curing chronic neck pain. By means of CCFE, the muscle balance between deep neck flexor and superficial flexor would be optimal during neck movement. In other words, the superficial neck flexor( scalenes, SCM, and trapezius) would not overactive and the fatigue threshold might increase. Superficial neck flexor endurance training is proved to be efficient in reducing superficial cervical flexor muscle fatigue as well as increasing cervical flexion strength.

Reasonably, Cervicocranial flexion exercise (CCFE) and superficial neck flexor endurance training are also beneficial to pulmonary function due to training the respiratory accessory muscle (scalens and SCM). Hence this article hypothesizes that Cervicocranial flexion exercise (CCFE) and superficial neck flexor endurance training combined with common pulmonary rehabilitation will manifest better outcomes (pulmonary function, dyspnea situation, pain and stiffness level of neck) than pulmonary rehabilitation only.

Read the detailed description

2.1 subject 20 patients were recruited in this article during 2020/03 to 2021/02. The inclusion criteria were 1.) SCI onset in a year; 2.) motor level above T12 and American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) grade A, B, C, or D; 3.) age from 20~70; 4.) FEV1< 80% prediction value. The exclusion criteria were 1.) ventilation dependence 2.) Tracheostomy 3.) Psychiatric condition 4.) Progressive diseases 5.) infection 6.) cancer 7.)unable to speak Chinese or English. Patient who met the criteria would were asked to provide written informed consent. The IRB were approved by Tao Yuan General Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare, IRB committee.(TYGH108045 ) 2.2 procedure The subjects included in this study were randomized assigned to experimental group and control group. The randomization orders were decided by computer, and all the contents were concealed into a dark color envelop. Before first treatment, the envelops were opened to determine which treatment protocol were adopted. The treatment of experimental group was consist of Cervicocranial flexion exercise (CCFE) and neck flexor endurance training plus normal cardiopulmonary rehabilitation. The treatment of control group was composed of general neck stretch exercise plus cardiopulmonary rehabilitation. Subsequently, initial measurement was conducted including lung capacity test, dyspnea situation, pain and stiffness of neck. Moreover, lung function such as FVC and FEV1, dyspnea situation, pain and stiffness of neck were also recorded one time in a week as a short-term outcome. Then, the treatment protocols were both executed for 30 minutes, ten times in a month. After completing the treatment process, the final measurement were conducted as the initial treatment. All the outcome were collected and analyzed by statistically method.

2.3 Outcome measurement Lung capacity was evaluated by in lung function examination center of Taoyaun general hospital. The parameters revealed by this test. Before the examination, bronchodilator should not be used to avoid interfering the outcome of examination. In addition, portable lung capacity device(ezOxygen, Taipei, Taiwan) were adopted to record lung function parameters such as FVC and FEV1. First, subjects were instructed to hold deep breath and let his mouth firmly contact to the mouthpiece. Second, subjects were asked to exhale the air into the mouth and the process was repeated three times, between each sessions, subjects were allowed to rest at least thirty seconds. Three tests were recorded and the mean value was calculated. The dyspnea situation was evaluated by the questionnaire Baseline Dyspnea Index (BDI) and Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI). The BDI measured the severity of dyspnea at the baseline and the TDI measured the change from baseline. Both questionnaires are composed of three parts: functional impairment, magnitude of task, and magnitude of effort required to evoke dyspnea. Each part in BDI is scored from 0(very severe) to 4(no impairment) and total score from 0~12( the lower the score, the worse the severity of dyspnea) is also recorded. Each component in TDI is rated by seven grades ranging from -3 (major deterioration) to +3 (major improvement). Total score ranged from - 9 to + 9. The lower the score is, the more deterioration of the severity of dyspnea revealed. The minimal clinical important difference(MCID) of TDI is ≥1 unit[31]. The number rating scale NRS is used to define the level of neck pain and stiffness. The MCID of neck pain VAS is 1.5.

2.4 Treatment Experimental group is consist of CCFE and neck flexor endurance training plus normal cardiopulmonary rehabilitation. Subjects were instructed to perform chin in without excessive SCM contraction. CCFE was conducted in supine position. Subjects were asked to maintain chin for 10 seconds each repetition, ten repetitions for a set, 3 sets in a treatment session[30]. The physiotherapist with abundant experience related to CCFE supervised all the treatment process to confirm the quality of execution. If no symptoms revealed, the neck endurance exercise would involve into the treatment sessions. Neck endurance exercise was also conducted in supine position. Subjects were taught to lift their head with a neutral upper cervical spine first. Then, they gradually move the head and neck through as full range as possible without induce discomfort or neck related symptom. This exercise was performed 12~15 repetition depends on patient's condition[33]. If the subjects were unable to achieve the training level, subject's bed were inclined up from horizontal. Hence, the demand of lifting neck and head declined and subjects could perform aimed repetitions. The cardiopulmonary rehabilitation protocol was based on Wu, Y.-T. et al[9], and it was divide into three stages. In first stage, subjects lied in supine position, and they were instructed to do diaphragm breath, pursed-lip breath, lateral coastal breath, cough training, and rib mobilization. The dosage and type of therapy was decided depending on subjects situation everyday. The total cardiopulmonary training was controlled in 20 minutes. In second stage, the incentive spirometer (picture A) was integrated into the therapy. Subjects were asked to inhale the air slowly with eye contact at the chamber of the spirometer for controlling the air flow velocity. Subject were also asked to inhale as many volumes as possible. Back support was inclined to hold subject in semi-sitting position. 15 repetitions was given to subjects and subjects received 20 second rest between each repetition. In addition, some upper extremities training combined with breath exercise were also involved in after incentive spirometer training. 15 repetitions, 3 sets was given to subjects. In stage 3, the upper extremities exercise were combined with spirometer training. 15 repetitions, 3 sets was given to subjects. The experienced physiotherapist decided the stages depends on patient's capability, that is, the stages were not the same for every subject. The control group were composed of neck stretch exercise plus cardiopulmonary rehabilitation. The neck stretch exercises were executed by physiotherapist before cardiopulmonary training. Neck flexion, neck extension, neck right rotation, neck left rotation, neck right side-bending, and neck left side-bending were applied to subjects 5 times for each direction, and neck maintained at end position for 30 seconds each time.

2.5 Statistical analysis The primary variable of the study were vital capacity, respiratory complication ,and dyspnea. The secondary variable of the study were FEV1, pain and stiffness of neck. Descriptive statistics for the categorical variable were documented as frequency counts and percentages. The continuous variables were reported as mean + SD, if they were normal distribution, or they were recorded as median and range.

The Wilcox signed test was adopted to analyze the treatment before and after the treatment sessions (time effect). The Mann-Whitney U was applied for the difference before and after treatment between two groups (group effect), and the baseline of two groups was also analyzed by this method. The significant level was set as p value< 0.05. All the statistical data analysis were performed by SPSS version 22.

Being tested
Cervical Cranioflexion exercise plus cardiopulmonary exercise, Cervical stretch exercise plus cardiopulmonary rehabilitation
Keywords
Cervical exercise, Cardiopulmonary rehabilitation, Pulmonary function
Medical subject headings
Spinal Cord Injuries

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Cervical Cranioflexion exercise plus cardiopulmonary exerciseOther

    Intervention:Cervical Cranioflexion exercise plus cardiopulmonary exercise

  • Cervical stretch exercise plus cardiopulmonary rehabilitationOther

    control:Cervical stretch exercise plus cardiopulmonary rehabilitation

Study groups in NCT04500223
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Cervical Cranioflexion exercise plus cardiopulmonary exerciseExperimentalsubjects who received Cervical Cranioflexion exercise plus cardiopulmonary exercise
Receives: Other: Cervical Cranioflexion exercise plus cardiopulmonary exercise
Cervical stretch exercise plus cardiopulmonary rehabilitationActive comparatorsubjects who received Cervical stretch exercise plus cardiopulmonary rehabilitation
Receives: Other: Cervical stretch exercise plus cardiopulmonary rehabilitation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. FVC change

    liter

    Measured: initial points, first week, second week, final points.(total 3 week)

  2. FEV1/FVC change

    percentage

    Measured: initial points, first week, second week, final points.(total 3 week)

  3. Baseline Dyspnea Index (BDI) and Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI) score change

    points

    Measured: initial points, first week, second week, final points.(total 3 week)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Aug 2020
  2. Study start1 Apr 2020
  3. Primary completion1 Feb 2021
  4. Study completion28 Feb 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
13 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04500223
Sponsor's protocol ID
TYGH108045
Status last verified
Jul 2023
First submitted
7 May 2020
Last updated
28 Jul 2023
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Burns AS, Marino RJ, Flanders AE, Flett H. Clinical diagnosis and prognosis following spinal cord injury. Handb Clin Neurol. 2012;109:47-62. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-52137-8.00003-6.

    PubMed 23098705
  • Brown R, DiMarco AF, Hoit JD, Garshick E. Respiratory dysfunction and management in spinal cord injury. Respir Care. 2006 Aug;51(8):853-68;discussion 869-70.

    PubMed 16867197
  • Mueller G, de Groot S, van der Woude L, Hopman MT. Time-courses of lung function and respiratory muscle pressure generating capacity after spinal cord injury: a prospective cohort study. J Rehabil Med. 2008 Apr;40(4):269-76. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0162.

    PubMed 18382822
  • Fishburn MJ, Marino RJ, Ditunno JF Jr. Atelectasis and pneumonia in acute spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1990 Mar;71(3):197-200.

    PubMed 2317137
  • Reines HD, Harris RC. Pulmonary complications of acute spinal cord injuries. Neurosurgery. 1987 Aug;21(2):193-6. doi: 10.1227/00006123-198708000-00010.

    PubMed 3658131
  • van den Berg ME, Castellote JM, de Pedro-Cuesta J, Mahillo-Fernandez I. Survival after spinal cord injury: a systematic review. J Neurotrauma. 2010 Aug;27(8):1517-28. doi: 10.1089/neu.2009.1138.

    PubMed 20486810
  • Schilero GJ, Spungen AM, Bauman WA, Radulovic M, Lesser M. Pulmonary function and spinal cord injury. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2009 May 15;166(3):129-41. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2009.04.002. Epub 2009 Apr 9.

    PubMed 19442929
  • Fawcett JW, Curt A, Steeves JD, Coleman WP, Tuszynski MH, Lammertse D, Bartlett PF, Blight AR, Dietz V, Ditunno J, Dobkin BH, Havton LA, Ellaway PH, Fehlings MG, Privat A, Grossman R, Guest JD, Kleitman N, Nakamura M, Gaviria M, Short D. Guidelines for the conduct of clinical trials for spinal cord injury as developed by the ICCP panel: spontaneous recovery after spinal cord injury and statistical power needed for therapeutic clinical trials. Spinal Cord. 2007 Mar;45(3):190-205. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3102007. Epub 2006 Dec 19.

    PubMed 17179973
  • Wu, Y.-T., 脊髓損傷病人的呼吸功能復健, in Cardiopulmonary Physical Therapy-Basic to practice-second edition. 2012: Taiwan. p. 417~432

  • Hopman MT, van der Woude LH, Dallmeijer AJ, Snoek G, Folgering HT. Respiratory muscle strength and endurance in individuals with tetraplegia. Spinal Cord. 1997 Feb;35(2):104-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3100353.

    PubMed 9044518
  • Mateus SR, Beraldo PS, Horan TA. Maximal static mouth respiratory pressure in spinal cord injured patients: correlation with motor level. Spinal Cord. 2007 Aug;45(8):569-75. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101998. Epub 2006 Nov 28.

    PubMed 17130889
  • Liaw MY, Lin MC, Cheng PT, Wong MK, Tang FT. Resistive inspiratory muscle training: its effectiveness in patients with acute complete cervical cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000 Jun;81(6):752-6. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(00)90106-0.

    PubMed 10857519
  • Berlowitz DJ, Tamplin J. Respiratory muscle training for cervical spinal cord injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 23;2013(7):CD008507. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008507.pub2.

    PubMed 23881660
  • Hart JE, Goldstein R, Walia P, Teylan M, Lazzari A, Tun CG, Garshick E. FEV1 and FVC and systemic inflammation in a spinal cord injury cohort. BMC Pulm Med. 2017 Aug 15;17(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12890-017-0459-6.

    PubMed 28810847
  • Garshick E, Mulroy S, Graves DE, Greenwald K, Horton JA, Morse LR. Active Lifestyle Is Associated With Reduced Dyspnea and Greater Life Satisfaction in Spinal Cord Injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Oct;97(10):1721-7. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.02.010. Epub 2016 Mar 4.

    PubMed 26951870

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Cervical Cranioflexion exercise plus cardiopulmonary exercise and Cervical stretch exercise plus cardiopulmonary rehabilitation in people with Spinal Cord Injury, run by Taoyuan General Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Jul 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

FVC change (time frame: initial points, first week, second week, final points.(total 3 week)). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04500223, which also lists 34 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Jul 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in