Spinal Cord InjuryNCT04500223
The Effect of Neck Stabilization Exercise Plus Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation on Pulmonary Function of SCI
A study testing Cervical Cranioflexion exercise plus cardiopulmonary exercise and Cervical stretch exercise plus cardiopulmonary rehabilitation in people with Spinal Cord Injury, run by Taoyuan General Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.
Trial summary
Cervicocranial flexion exercise (CCFE) and superficial neck flexor endurance training have been widely implemented in clinical practice for curing chronic neck pain. By means of CCFE, the muscle balance between deep neck flexor and superficial flexor would be optimal during neck movement. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Spinal Cord Injury
- What is being tested?
- Cervical Cranioflexion exercise plus cardiopulmonary exercise and Cervical stretch exercise plus cardiopulmonary rehabilitation
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 13 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTaiwan
- Study dates
- 1 Apr 2020to 28 Feb 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- SCI onset in a year.
- Motor level above T12 and American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) grade A, B, C, or D.
- Age from 20~70.
- FEV1< 80% prediction value.
Who cannot join
- Ventilation dependent
- Tracheostomy
- Psychiatric condition
- Progressive diseases
- infection
- Cancer
- Unable to speak Chinese or English.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Taiwan1 site
Taoyaun General Hospital, Ministry of Wealth and Health
Taoyuan, Taoyuan Dist., 330
About this study
Cervicocranial flexion exercise (CCFE) and superficial neck flexor endurance training have been widely implemented in clinical practice for curing chronic neck pain. By means of CCFE, the muscle balance between deep neck flexor and superficial flexor would be optimal during neck movement. In other words, the superficial neck flexor( scalenes, SCM, and trapezius) would not overactive and the fatigue threshold might increase. Superficial neck flexor endurance training is proved to be efficient in reducing superficial cervical flexor muscle fatigue as well as increasing cervical flexion strength.
Reasonably, Cervicocranial flexion exercise (CCFE) and superficial neck flexor endurance training are also beneficial to pulmonary function due to training the respiratory accessory muscle (scalens and SCM). Hence this article hypothesizes that Cervicocranial flexion exercise (CCFE) and superficial neck flexor endurance training combined with common pulmonary rehabilitation will manifest better outcomes (pulmonary function, dyspnea situation, pain and stiffness level of neck) than pulmonary rehabilitation only.
Read the detailed description
2.1 subject 20 patients were recruited in this article during 2020/03 to 2021/02. The inclusion criteria were 1.) SCI onset in a year; 2.) motor level above T12 and American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) grade A, B, C, or D; 3.) age from 20~70; 4.) FEV1< 80% prediction value. The exclusion criteria were 1.) ventilation dependence 2.) Tracheostomy 3.) Psychiatric condition 4.) Progressive diseases 5.) infection 6.) cancer 7.)unable to speak Chinese or English. Patient who met the criteria would were asked to provide written informed consent. The IRB were approved by Tao Yuan General Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare, IRB committee.(TYGH108045 ) 2.2 procedure The subjects included in this study were randomized assigned to experimental group and control group. The randomization orders were decided by computer, and all the contents were concealed into a dark color envelop. Before first treatment, the envelops were opened to determine which treatment protocol were adopted. The treatment of experimental group was consist of Cervicocranial flexion exercise (CCFE) and neck flexor endurance training plus normal cardiopulmonary rehabilitation. The treatment of control group was composed of general neck stretch exercise plus cardiopulmonary rehabilitation. Subsequently, initial measurement was conducted including lung capacity test, dyspnea situation, pain and stiffness of neck. Moreover, lung function such as FVC and FEV1, dyspnea situation, pain and stiffness of neck were also recorded one time in a week as a short-term outcome. Then, the treatment protocols were both executed for 30 minutes, ten times in a month. After completing the treatment process, the final measurement were conducted as the initial treatment. All the outcome were collected and analyzed by statistically method.
2.3 Outcome measurement Lung capacity was evaluated by in lung function examination center of Taoyaun general hospital. The parameters revealed by this test. Before the examination, bronchodilator should not be used to avoid interfering the outcome of examination. In addition, portable lung capacity device(ezOxygen, Taipei, Taiwan) were adopted to record lung function parameters such as FVC and FEV1. First, subjects were instructed to hold deep breath and let his mouth firmly contact to the mouthpiece. Second, subjects were asked to exhale the air into the mouth and the process was repeated three times, between each sessions, subjects were allowed to rest at least thirty seconds. Three tests were recorded and the mean value was calculated. The dyspnea situation was evaluated by the questionnaire Baseline Dyspnea Index (BDI) and Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI). The BDI measured the severity of dyspnea at the baseline and the TDI measured the change from baseline. Both questionnaires are composed of three parts: functional impairment, magnitude of task, and magnitude of effort required to evoke dyspnea. Each part in BDI is scored from 0(very severe) to 4(no impairment) and total score from 0~12( the lower the score, the worse the severity of dyspnea) is also recorded. Each component in TDI is rated by seven grades ranging from -3 (major deterioration) to +3 (major improvement). Total score ranged from - 9 to + 9. The lower the score is, the more deterioration of the severity of dyspnea revealed. The minimal clinical important difference(MCID) of TDI is ≥1 unit[31]. The number rating scale NRS is used to define the level of neck pain and stiffness. The MCID of neck pain VAS is 1.5.
2.4 Treatment Experimental group is consist of CCFE and neck flexor endurance training plus normal cardiopulmonary rehabilitation. Subjects were instructed to perform chin in without excessive SCM contraction. CCFE was conducted in supine position. Subjects were asked to maintain chin for 10 seconds each repetition, ten repetitions for a set, 3 sets in a treatment session[30]. The physiotherapist with abundant experience related to CCFE supervised all the treatment process to confirm the quality of execution. If no symptoms revealed, the neck endurance exercise would involve into the treatment sessions. Neck endurance exercise was also conducted in supine position. Subjects were taught to lift their head with a neutral upper cervical spine first. Then, they gradually move the head and neck through as full range as possible without induce discomfort or neck related symptom. This exercise was performed 12~15 repetition depends on patient's condition[33]. If the subjects were unable to achieve the training level, subject's bed were inclined up from horizontal. Hence, the demand of lifting neck and head declined and subjects could perform aimed repetitions. The cardiopulmonary rehabilitation protocol was based on Wu, Y.-T. et al[9], and it was divide into three stages. In first stage, subjects lied in supine position, and they were instructed to do diaphragm breath, pursed-lip breath, lateral coastal breath, cough training, and rib mobilization. The dosage and type of therapy was decided depending on subjects situation everyday. The total cardiopulmonary training was controlled in 20 minutes. In second stage, the incentive spirometer (picture A) was integrated into the therapy. Subjects were asked to inhale the air slowly with eye contact at the chamber of the spirometer for controlling the air flow velocity. Subject were also asked to inhale as many volumes as possible. Back support was inclined to hold subject in semi-sitting position. 15 repetitions was given to subjects and subjects received 20 second rest between each repetition. In addition, some upper extremities training combined with breath exercise were also involved in after incentive spirometer training. 15 repetitions, 3 sets was given to subjects. In stage 3, the upper extremities exercise were combined with spirometer training. 15 repetitions, 3 sets was given to subjects. The experienced physiotherapist decided the stages depends on patient's capability, that is, the stages were not the same for every subject. The control group were composed of neck stretch exercise plus cardiopulmonary rehabilitation. The neck stretch exercises were executed by physiotherapist before cardiopulmonary training. Neck flexion, neck extension, neck right rotation, neck left rotation, neck right side-bending, and neck left side-bending were applied to subjects 5 times for each direction, and neck maintained at end position for 30 seconds each time.
2.5 Statistical analysis The primary variable of the study were vital capacity, respiratory complication ,and dyspnea. The secondary variable of the study were FEV1, pain and stiffness of neck. Descriptive statistics for the categorical variable were documented as frequency counts and percentages. The continuous variables were reported as mean + SD, if they were normal distribution, or they were recorded as median and range.
The Wilcox signed test was adopted to analyze the treatment before and after the treatment sessions (time effect). The Mann-Whitney U was applied for the difference before and after treatment between two groups (group effect), and the baseline of two groups was also analyzed by this method. The significant level was set as p value< 0.05. All the statistical data analysis were performed by SPSS version 22.
- Conditions
- Spinal Cord Injury
- Being tested
- Cervical Cranioflexion exercise plus cardiopulmonary exercise, Cervical stretch exercise plus cardiopulmonary rehabilitation
- Keywords
- Cervical exercise, Cardiopulmonary rehabilitation, Pulmonary function
- Medical subject headings
- Spinal Cord Injuries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Cervical Cranioflexion exercise plus cardiopulmonary exerciseOther
Intervention:Cervical Cranioflexion exercise plus cardiopulmonary exercise
Cervical stretch exercise plus cardiopulmonary rehabilitationOther
control:Cervical stretch exercise plus cardiopulmonary rehabilitation
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cervical Cranioflexion exercise plus cardiopulmonary exercise | Experimental | subjects who received Cervical Cranioflexion exercise plus cardiopulmonary exercise Receives: Other: Cervical Cranioflexion exercise plus cardiopulmonary exercise |
| Cervical stretch exercise plus cardiopulmonary rehabilitation | Active comparator | subjects who received Cervical stretch exercise plus cardiopulmonary rehabilitation Receives: Other: Cervical stretch exercise plus cardiopulmonary rehabilitation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
FVC change
liter
Measured: initial points, first week, second week, final points.(total 3 week)
FEV1/FVC change
percentage
Measured: initial points, first week, second week, final points.(total 3 week)
Baseline Dyspnea Index (BDI) and Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI) score change
points
Measured: initial points, first week, second week, final points.(total 3 week)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Aug 2020
- Study start1 Apr 2020
- Primary completion1 Feb 2021
- Study completion28 Feb 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (34)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Spinal Cord InjuryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 13 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Taoyuan General Hospital
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04500223
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- TYGH108045
- Status last verified
- Jul 2023
- First submitted
- 7 May 2020
- Last updated
- 28 Jul 2023
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Burns AS, Marino RJ, Flanders AE, Flett H. Clinical diagnosis and prognosis following spinal cord injury. Handb Clin Neurol. 2012;109:47-62. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-52137-8.00003-6.
PubMed 23098705Brown R, DiMarco AF, Hoit JD, Garshick E. Respiratory dysfunction and management in spinal cord injury. Respir Care. 2006 Aug;51(8):853-68;discussion 869-70.
PubMed 16867197Mueller G, de Groot S, van der Woude L, Hopman MT. Time-courses of lung function and respiratory muscle pressure generating capacity after spinal cord injury: a prospective cohort study. J Rehabil Med. 2008 Apr;40(4):269-76. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0162.
PubMed 18382822Fishburn MJ, Marino RJ, Ditunno JF Jr. Atelectasis and pneumonia in acute spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1990 Mar;71(3):197-200.
PubMed 2317137Reines HD, Harris RC. Pulmonary complications of acute spinal cord injuries. Neurosurgery. 1987 Aug;21(2):193-6. doi: 10.1227/00006123-198708000-00010.
PubMed 3658131van den Berg ME, Castellote JM, de Pedro-Cuesta J, Mahillo-Fernandez I. Survival after spinal cord injury: a systematic review. J Neurotrauma. 2010 Aug;27(8):1517-28. doi: 10.1089/neu.2009.1138.
PubMed 20486810Schilero GJ, Spungen AM, Bauman WA, Radulovic M, Lesser M. Pulmonary function and spinal cord injury. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2009 May 15;166(3):129-41. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2009.04.002. Epub 2009 Apr 9.
PubMed 19442929Fawcett JW, Curt A, Steeves JD, Coleman WP, Tuszynski MH, Lammertse D, Bartlett PF, Blight AR, Dietz V, Ditunno J, Dobkin BH, Havton LA, Ellaway PH, Fehlings MG, Privat A, Grossman R, Guest JD, Kleitman N, Nakamura M, Gaviria M, Short D. Guidelines for the conduct of clinical trials for spinal cord injury as developed by the ICCP panel: spontaneous recovery after spinal cord injury and statistical power needed for therapeutic clinical trials. Spinal Cord. 2007 Mar;45(3):190-205. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3102007. Epub 2006 Dec 19.
PubMed 17179973Wu, Y.-T., 脊髓損傷病人的呼吸功能復健, in Cardiopulmonary Physical Therapy-Basic to practice-second edition. 2012: Taiwan. p. 417~432
Hopman MT, van der Woude LH, Dallmeijer AJ, Snoek G, Folgering HT. Respiratory muscle strength and endurance in individuals with tetraplegia. Spinal Cord. 1997 Feb;35(2):104-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3100353.
PubMed 9044518Mateus SR, Beraldo PS, Horan TA. Maximal static mouth respiratory pressure in spinal cord injured patients: correlation with motor level. Spinal Cord. 2007 Aug;45(8):569-75. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101998. Epub 2006 Nov 28.
PubMed 17130889Liaw MY, Lin MC, Cheng PT, Wong MK, Tang FT. Resistive inspiratory muscle training: its effectiveness in patients with acute complete cervical cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000 Jun;81(6):752-6. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(00)90106-0.
PubMed 10857519Berlowitz DJ, Tamplin J. Respiratory muscle training for cervical spinal cord injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 23;2013(7):CD008507. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008507.pub2.
PubMed 23881660Hart JE, Goldstein R, Walia P, Teylan M, Lazzari A, Tun CG, Garshick E. FEV1 and FVC and systemic inflammation in a spinal cord injury cohort. BMC Pulm Med. 2017 Aug 15;17(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12890-017-0459-6.
PubMed 28810847Garshick E, Mulroy S, Graves DE, Greenwald K, Horton JA, Morse LR. Active Lifestyle Is Associated With Reduced Dyspnea and Greater Life Satisfaction in Spinal Cord Injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Oct;97(10):1721-7. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.02.010. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
PubMed 26951870
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Jul 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of Neck Stabilization Exercise Plus Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation on Pulmonary Function of SCI
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04500223
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TYGH108045
- Conditions
- Spinal Cord Injury
- Keywords
- Cervical exercise, Cardiopulmonary rehabilitation, Pulmonary function
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 13 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Taoyuan General HospitalOther government
- Study start
- 1 Apr 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Feb 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 28 Feb 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Aug 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Cervicocranial flexion exercise (CCFE) and superficial neck flexor endurance training have been widely implemented in clinical practice for curing chronic neck pain. By means of CCFE, the muscle balance between deep neck flexor and superficial flexor would be optimal during neck movement. In other words, the superficial neck flexor( scalenes, SCM, and trapezius) would not overactive and the fatigue threshold might increase. Superficial neck flexor endurance training is proved to be efficient in reducing superficial cervical flexor muscle fatigue as well as increasing cervical flexion strength.
Reasonably, Cervicocranial flexion exercise (CCFE) and superficial neck flexor endurance training are also beneficial to pulmonary function due to training the respiratory accessory muscle (scalens and SCM). Hence this article hypothesizes that Cervicocranial flexion exercise (CCFE) and superficial neck flexor endurance training combined with common pulmonary rehabilitation will manifest better outcomes (pulmonary function, dyspnea situation, pain and stiffness level of neck) than pulmonary rehabilitation only.
Detailed description
2.1 subject 20 patients were recruited in this article during 2020/03 to 2021/02. The inclusion criteria were 1.) SCI onset in a year; 2.) motor level above T12 and American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) grade A, B, C, or D; 3.) age from 20~70; 4.) FEV1< 80% prediction value. The exclusion criteria were 1.) ventilation dependence 2.) Tracheostomy 3.) Psychiatric condition 4.) Progressive diseases 5.) infection 6.) cancer 7.)unable to speak Chinese or English. Patient who met the criteria would were asked to provide written informed consent. The IRB were approved by Tao Yuan General Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare, IRB committee.(TYGH108045 ) 2.2 procedure The subjects included in this study were randomized assigned to experimental group and control group. The randomization orders were decided by computer, and all the contents were concealed into a dark color envelop. Before first treatment, the envelops were opened to determine which treatment protocol were adopted. The treatment of experimental group was consist of Cervicocranial flexion exercise (CCFE) and neck flexor endurance training plus normal cardiopulmonary rehabilitation. The treatment of control group was composed of general neck stretch exercise plus cardiopulmonary rehabilitation. Subsequently, initial measurement was conducted including lung capacity test, dyspnea situation, pain and stiffness of neck. Moreover, lung function such as FVC and FEV1, dyspnea situation, pain and stiffness of neck were also recorded one time in a week as a short-term outcome. Then, the treatment protocols were both executed for 30 minutes, ten times in a month. After completing the treatment process, the final measurement were conducted as the initial treatment. All the outcome were collected and analyzed by statistically method.
2.3 Outcome measurement Lung capacity was evaluated by in lung function examination center of Taoyaun general hospital. The parameters revealed by this test. Before the examination, bronchodilator should not be used to avoid interfering the outcome of examination. In addition, portable lung capacity device(ezOxygen, Taipei, Taiwan) were adopted to record lung function parameters such as FVC and FEV1. First, subjects were instructed to hold deep breath and let his mouth firmly contact to the mouthpiece. Second, subjects were asked to exhale the air into the mouth and the process was repeated three times, between each sessions, subjects were allowed to rest at least thirty seconds. Three tests were recorded and the mean value was calculated. The dyspnea situation was evaluated by the questionnaire Baseline Dyspnea Index (BDI) and Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI). The BDI measured the severity of dyspnea at the baseline and the TDI measured the change from baseline. Both questionnaires are composed of three parts: functional impairment, magnitude of task, and magnitude of effort required to evoke dyspnea. Each part in BDI is scored from 0(very severe) to 4(no impairment) and total score from 0~12( the lower the score, the worse the severity of dyspnea) is also recorded. Each component in TDI is rated by seven grades ranging from -3 (major deterioration) to +3 (major improvement). Total score ranged from - 9 to + 9. The lower the score is, the more deterioration of the severity of dyspnea revealed. The minimal clinical important difference(MCID) of TDI is ≥1 unit[31]. The number rating scale NRS is used to define the level of neck pain and stiffness. The MCID of neck pain VAS is 1.5.
2.4 Treatment Experimental group is consist of CCFE and neck flexor endurance training plus normal cardiopulmonary rehabilitation. Subjects were instructed to perform chin in without excessive SCM contraction. CCFE was conducted in supine position. Subjects were asked to maintain chin for 10 seconds each repetition, ten repetitions for a set, 3 sets in a treatment session[30]. The physiotherapist with abundant experience related to CCFE supervised all the treatment process to confirm the quality of execution. If no symptoms revealed, the neck endurance exercise would involve into the treatment sessions. Neck endurance exercise was also conducted in supine position. Subjects were taught to lift their head with a neutral upper cervical spine first. Then, they gradually move the head and neck through as full range as possible without induce discomfort or neck related symptom. This exercise was performed 12~15 repetition depends on patient's condition[33]. If the subjects were unable to achieve the training level, subject's bed were inclined up from horizontal. Hence, the demand of lifting neck and head declined and subjects could perform aimed repetitions. The cardiopulmonary rehabilitation protocol was based on Wu, Y.-T. et al[9], and it was divide into three stages. In first stage, subjects lied in supine position, and they were instructed to do diaphragm breath, pursed-lip breath, lateral coastal breath, cough training, and rib mobilization. The dosage and type of therapy was decided depending on subjects situation everyday. The total cardiopulmonary training was controlled in 20 minutes. In second stage, the incentive spirometer (picture A) was integrated into the therapy. Subjects were asked to inhale the air slowly with eye contact at the chamber of the spirometer for controlling the air flow velocity. Subject were also asked to inhale as many volumes as possible. Back support was inclined to hold subject in semi-sitting position. 15 repetitions was given to subjects and subjects received 20 second rest between each repetition. In addition, some upper extremities training combined with breath exercise were also involved in after incentive spirometer training. 15 repetitions, 3 sets was given to subjects. In stage 3, the upper extremities exercise were combined with spirometer training. 15 repetitions, 3 sets was given to subjects. The experienced physiotherapist decided the stages depends on patient's capability, that is, the stages were not the same for every subject. The control group were composed of neck stretch exercise plus cardiopulmonary rehabilitation. The neck stretch exercises were executed by physiotherapist before cardiopulmonary training. Neck flexion, neck extension, neck right rotation, neck left rotation, neck right side-bending, and neck left side-bending were applied to subjects 5 times for each direction, and neck maintained at end position for 30 seconds each time.
2.5 Statistical analysis The primary variable of the study were vital capacity, respiratory complication ,and dyspnea. The secondary variable of the study were FEV1, pain and stiffness of neck. Descriptive statistics for the categorical variable were documented as frequency counts and percentages. The continuous variables were reported as mean + SD, if they were normal distribution, or they were recorded as median and range.
The Wilcox signed test was adopted to analyze the treatment before and after the treatment sessions (time effect). The Mann-Whitney U was applied for the difference before and after treatment between two groups (group effect), and the baseline of two groups was also analyzed by this method. The significant level was set as p value< 0.05. All the statistical data analysis were performed by SPSS version 22.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Cervical Cranioflexion exercise plus cardiopulmonary exercise | Experimental | Other: Cervical Cranioflexion exercise plus cardiopulmonary exercisesubjects who received Cervical Cranioflexion exercise plus cardiopulmonary exercise |
| Cervical stretch exercise plus cardiopulmonary rehabilitation | Active comparator | Other: Cervical stretch exercise plus cardiopulmonary rehabilitationsubjects who received Cervical stretch exercise plus cardiopulmonary rehabilitation |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- SCI onset in a year.
- Motor level above T12 and American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) grade A, B, C, or D.
- Age from 20~70.
- FEV1< 80% prediction value.
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Ventilation dependent
- Tracheostomy
- Psychiatric condition
- Progressive diseases
- infection
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Cervical Cranioflexion exercise plus cardiopulmonary exerciseIntervention:Cervical Cranioflexion exercise plus cardiopulmonary exercise | Other | Cervical Cranioflexion exercise plus cardiopulmonary exercise |
| Cervical stretch exercise plus cardiopulmonary rehabilitationcontrol:Cervical stretch exercise plus cardiopulmonary rehabilitation | Other | Cervical stretch exercise plus cardiopulmonary rehabilitation |
Primary outcome
FVC change
Time frame: initial points, first week, second week, final points.(total 3 week)
liter
FEV1/FVC change
Time frame: initial points, first week, second week, final points.(total 3 week)
percentage
Baseline Dyspnea Index (BDI) and Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI) score change
Time frame: initial points, first week, second week, final points.(total 3 week)
points
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Jul 2023.
- Background: PubMed 23098705Burns AS, Marino RJ, Flanders AE, Flett H. Clinical diagnosis and prognosis following spinal cord injury. Handb Clin Neurol. 2012;109:47-62. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-52137-8.00003-6.
- Background: PubMed 16867197Brown R, DiMarco AF, Hoit JD, Garshick E. Respiratory dysfunction and management in spinal cord injury. Respir Care. 2006 Aug;51(8):853-68;discussion 869-70.
- Background: PubMed 18382822Mueller G, de Groot S, van der Woude L, Hopman MT. Time-courses of lung function and respiratory muscle pressure generating capacity after spinal cord injury: a prospective cohort study. J Rehabil Med. 2008 Apr;40(4):269-76. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0162.
- Background: PubMed 2317137Fishburn MJ, Marino RJ, Ditunno JF Jr. Atelectasis and pneumonia in acute spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1990 Mar;71(3):197-200.
- Background: PubMed 3658131Reines HD, Harris RC. Pulmonary complications of acute spinal cord injuries. Neurosurgery. 1987 Aug;21(2):193-6. doi: 10.1227/00006123-198708000-00010.
- Background: PubMed 20486810van den Berg ME, Castellote JM, de Pedro-Cuesta J, Mahillo-Fernandez I. Survival after spinal cord injury: a systematic review. J Neurotrauma. 2010 Aug;27(8):1517-28. doi: 10.1089/neu.2009.1138.
- Background: PubMed 19442929Schilero GJ, Spungen AM, Bauman WA, Radulovic M, Lesser M. Pulmonary function and spinal cord injury. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2009 May 15;166(3):129-41. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2009.04.002. Epub 2009 Apr 9.
- Background: PubMed 17179973Fawcett JW, Curt A, Steeves JD, Coleman WP, Tuszynski MH, Lammertse D, Bartlett PF, Blight AR, Dietz V, Ditunno J, Dobkin BH, Havton LA, Ellaway PH, Fehlings MG, Privat A, Grossman R, Guest JD, Kleitman N, Nakamura M, Gaviria M, Short D. Guidelines for the conduct of clinical trials for spinal cord injury as developed by the ICCP panel: spontaneous recovery after spinal cord injury and statistical power needed for therapeutic clinical trials. Spinal Cord. 2007 Mar;45(3):190-205. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3102007. Epub 2006 Dec 19.
- BackgroundWu, Y.-T., 脊髓損傷病人的呼吸功能復健, in Cardiopulmonary Physical Therapy-Basic to practice-second edition. 2012: Taiwan. p. 417~432
- Background: PubMed 9044518Hopman MT, van der Woude LH, Dallmeijer AJ, Snoek G, Folgering HT. Respiratory muscle strength and endurance in individuals with tetraplegia. Spinal Cord. 1997 Feb;35(2):104-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3100353.
- Background: PubMed 17130889Mateus SR, Beraldo PS, Horan TA. Maximal static mouth respiratory pressure in spinal cord injured patients: correlation with motor level. Spinal Cord. 2007 Aug;45(8):569-75. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101998. Epub 2006 Nov 28.
- Background: PubMed 10857519Liaw MY, Lin MC, Cheng PT, Wong MK, Tang FT. Resistive inspiratory muscle training: its effectiveness in patients with acute complete cervical cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000 Jun;81(6):752-6. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(00)90106-0.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Spinal Cord Injury
Recruiting
MyHand-SCI: An Active Hand Orthosis for Spinal Cord Injury
Spinal Cord Injuries, Tetraplegia
Recruiting
Clinical Outcome Assessment for AT & BCI
Spinal Cord Injury, ALS (Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis)
Recruiting
Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation Combined With 4-Aminopyridine and Intensive Rehabilitation in SCI
Spinal Cord Injuries
Not yet recruiting
Evaluating the Effect of the Zeen Mobility Device on Clinical Practicality, Safety, and Impact (Via Assessments of Walking, Standing Tolerance, Balance, Endurance, Effort, and Participation in Daily Tasks) in an Outpatient Rehabilitation Setting for Individuals With Mobility Impairments.
Stroke, Parkinson's Disease (PD)
RecruitingPhase 3
A Trial Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of NVG-291 in Subjects With Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Cervical Cranioflexion exercise plus cardiopulmonary exercise and Cervical stretch exercise plus cardiopulmonary rehabilitation in people with Spinal Cord Injury, run by Taoyuan General Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Jul 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
FVC change (time frame: initial points, first week, second week, final points.(total 3 week)). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04500223, which also lists 34 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Jul 2023.