Cardiac Valve DiseaseValvExNCT04502121
Preoperative Optimization of Cardiac Valve Patients' Expectations
A study testing EXPECT: Preoperative optimization of cardiac valve patient's expectations in people with Cardiac Valve Disease, run by Philipps University Marburg at 1 site in Germany.
Trial summary
Recovery after surgery depends on psychological factors such as preoperative information, expectations and surgery-associated anxiety. Prior studies have shown that even short preoperative psychological interventions can improve postoperative outcomes in heart surgery patients. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Cardiac Valve Disease
- What is being tested?
- EXPECT: Preoperative optimization of cardiac valve patient's expectations
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 89 participants
- Where
- 1 siteGermany
- Study dates
- 17 Jul 2020to 7 Jul 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients who are scheduled for elective cardiac valve procedure
- Age 18 or above
- Fluency in German
- Informed consent
Who cannot join
- Comorbid medical/psychiatric condition that causes more extensive disability than the coronary condition
- Participation in other research programs: in agreement with Coordinating Investigator patient can participate substudies, if this do not interfere with the main study
- Emergency surgery
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Preoperative Optimization of Cardiac Valve Patients' Expectations - a Randomized Controlled Trial
Recovery after surgery depends on psychological factors such as preoperative information, expectations and surgery-associated anxiety. Prior studies have shown that even short preoperative psychological interventions can improve postoperative outcomes in heart surgery patients. However, what content works best for which patient group and how long an intervention has to be is still largely unknown. The aims of this study are thus to examine if the developed preoperative psychological intervention (i) reduces preoperative anxiety, (ii) increases positive expectations, and (iii) improves the long-term outcome postoperative recovery. Therefore, a brief intervention has been developed. Heart valve patients who undergo a heart surgery will be randomized into two groups (Control vs. intervention group) after baseline assessment. Following this the intervention group will participate in the psychological intervention (30-40 minutes). To increase patients' positive expectations the intervention will focus on treatment outcome expectations and personal control expectations. Furthermore, patients in the intervention group will have two booster-telephone calls (four and eight weeks after the surgery) to check if their developed plans work out. The control group will receive the standard medical procedure. Both groups will fill out questionnaires again at the evening before the surgery, around one week after the surgery and three months after surgery.
- Conditions
- Cardiac Valve Disease
- Being tested
- EXPECT: Preoperative optimization of cardiac valve patient's expectations
- Keywords
- Expectations, Preoperative intervention, placebo effect, cardiac valve surgery, clinical trial, recovery
- Medical subject headings
- Heart Valve Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
EXPECT: Preoperative optimization of cardiac valve patient's expectationsBehavioural
The psychological, preoperative intervention follows a treatment manual. Patients get a personal intervention one day before surgery (30-40 minutes). It includes the development of an individual, subjectively perceived disease model, the treatment outcome expectations and the personalized outcome expectancy. Additionally they get two booster telephone calls 4 and 8 weeks after the surgery to recall the discussed topics and to talk about their recovery process (10-15 minutes).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group (IG) | Experimental | Not described Receives: Behavioral: EXPECT: Preoperative optimization of cardiac valve patient's expectations |
| Standard of Care (SOC) | No intervention | Not described |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Pain Disability Index (PDI) from Baseline to one day pre-surgery to one week post-surgery to three months post-surgery
Items range from 0 (no disability at all) - 10 (total disability). Consequently higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Measured: Baseline, one day pre-surgery, up to one week post-surgery, up to three months post-surgery
Secondary outcomes (7)
Change in Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) from Baseline to one week post-surgery to three months post-surgery
Items range from 0 (no restriction), 1 (nearly not restricted) - 5 (very strongly restricted). Consequently higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Measured: Baseline, up to one week post-surgery, up to three months post-surgery
Change in Health Related Quality of Life (Short Form 12, SF-12) from Baseline to one week post-surgery to three months post-surgery
There are different item scales. The item scale of the first item (General health perceptions) ranges from 1 (excellent) to 5 (bad). The item scales of the second and third item (limitations in physical activities because of health problems) range from 1 (yes, absolutely restricted) to 2 (yes, a bit restricted) to 3 (no, not restricted at all). The item scales of the items 4-7 (limitations in usual role activities because of physical health or emotional problems) are just "yes" and "no". The item scale of the eighth item (bodily pain) ranges from 1 (Absolutely not) to 5 (a lot). The item scales of the items 9-12 (general mental health, vitality and limitations in social activities because of physical or emotional problems) range from 1 (always) to 5 (never).
Measured: Baseline, up to one week post-surgery, up to three months post-surgery
Change in Patient health questionnaire screener (PHQ) from Baseline to one week post-surgery to three months post-surgery
Items range from 1 (not at all) - 4 (nearly everyday). Consequently higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Measured: Baseline, up to one week post-surgery, up to three months post-surgery
Change in Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 (GAD-7) from Baseline to one week post-surgery to three months post-surgery
Items range from 1 (not at all) - 4 (nearly everyday). Consequently higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Measured: Baseline, up to one week post-surgery, up to three months post-surgery
Change in Anxiety (The Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale, APAIS) from Baseline to one day pre-surgery
Items range from 1 (not at all) - 5 (extremely). Higher scores mean patients are more interested in information and do have greater worries.
Measured: Baseline, one day pre-surgery
Days the patient stays in the hospital, days at the intensive care unit
Measured: up to one week post-surgery
Change of Concentration of Inflammatory marker C-reactive protein (CRP) in mg/l
Change from baseline to postoperative day 1 (POD1) to approx. POD2 to approx. POD 5; higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Measured: Baseline, up to one day, two days and five days post-surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Aug 2020
- Study start17 Jul 2020
- Primary completion29 Nov 2022
- Study completion7 Jul 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (17)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cardiac Valve DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Patients will be randomly allocated to the intervention group (IG) or the control group (SOC). The intervention group will receive a psychological preoperative intervention to optimize expectations (in addition to standard medical care). The control group will receive the standard of care only.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Care provider
- Enrolment
- 89 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Philipps University Marburg
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Heart Centre Rotenburg, Justus-Liebig University Gießen Medical Center
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Winfried Rief, Philipps University Marburg
- Investigators
- Winfried Rief, Prof. Dr., Principal investigator, Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy Dept. of Psychology, Philipps-University MarburgArdawan Rastan, Prof. Dr., Principal investigator, Cardiac surgery University Hospital Gießen und Marburg
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04502121
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ValvEx
- Acronym
- ValvEx
- Status last verified
- Sep 2023
- First submitted
- 23 Jun 2020
- Last updated
- 21 Sep 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Auer CJ, Glombiewski JA, Doering BK, Winkler A, Laferton JA, Broadbent E, Rief W. Patients' Expectations Predict Surgery Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis. Int J Behav Med. 2016 Feb;23(1):49-62. doi: 10.1007/s12529-015-9500-4.
PubMed 26223485Juergens MC, Seekatz B, Moosdorf RG, Petrie KJ, Rief W. Illness beliefs before cardiac surgery predict disability, quality of life, and depression 3 months later. J Psychosom Res. 2010 Jun;68(6):553-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.10.004. Epub 2009 Dec 5.
PubMed 20488272Laferton JA, Kube T, Salzmann S, Auer CJ, Shedden-Mora MC. Patients' Expectations Regarding Medical Treatment: A Critical Review of Concepts and Their Assessment. Front Psychol. 2017 Feb 21;8:233. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00233. eCollection 2017.
PubMed 28270786Moerman N, van Dam FS, Muller MJ, Oosting H. The Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS). Anesth Analg. 1996 Mar;82(3):445-51. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199603000-00002.
PubMed 8623940Rief W, Shedden-Mora MC, Laferton JA, Auer C, Petrie KJ, Salzmann S, Schedlowski M, Moosdorf R. Preoperative optimization of patient expectations improves long-term outcome in heart surgery patients: results of the randomized controlled PSY-HEART trial. BMC Med. 2017 Jan 10;15(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0767-3.
PubMed 28069021Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Lowe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092.
PubMed 16717171Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996 Mar;34(3):220-33. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003.
PubMed 8628042Löwe, B., Spitzer, R. L., Zipfel, S., & Herzog, W. (2002). PHQ-D Gesundheitsfragebogen für Patienten (German Version of the Patient Health Questionnaire). Karlsruhe: Pfizer.
Rector TS, Kubo SH, Cohn JN. Validity of the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire as a measure of therapeutic response to enalapril or placebo. Am J Cardiol. 1993 May 1;71(12):1106-7. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(93)90582-w. No abstract available.
PubMed 8475878Rief, W., & Glombiewski, J. A. (2016). Erwartungsfokussierte Psychotherapeutische Interventionen (EFPI). Verhaltenstherapie, 26(1), 47-54.
Salzmann, S., Laferton, J., Auer, C., Shedden-Mora, M., Wambach, K., & Rief, W. (2018). Patientenerwartungen optimieren: Beschreibung einer präoperativen Kurzintervention am Beispiel von Patienten vor einer Bypass-Operation. Verhaltenstherapie, 28(3), 157-165.
Gaab, J. (2009). PASA-Primary Appraisal Secondary Appraisal-Ein Fragebogen zur Erfassung von situations-bezogenen kognitiven Bewertungen. Verhaltenstherapie, 19(2), 114-115.
Broadbent E, Petrie KJ, Main J, Weinman J. The brief illness perception questionnaire. J Psychosom Res. 2006 Jun;60(6):631-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2005.10.020.
PubMed 16731240Scheier MF, Carver CS, Bridges MW. Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): a reevaluation of the Life Orientation Test. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994 Dec;67(6):1063-78. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.67.6.1063.
PubMed 7815302Rammstedt, B. und O. P. John, 2007: Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German. Journal of Research in Personality 41: 203-212
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Sep 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Preoperative Optimization of Cardiac Valve Patients' Expectations - a Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04502121
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ValvEx / ValvEx
- Conditions
- Cardiac Valve Disease
- Keywords
- Expectations, Preoperative intervention, placebo effect, cardiac valve surgery, clinical trial, recovery
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 89 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Philipps University MarburgUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Heart Centre Rotenburg, Justus-Liebig University Gießen Medical Center
- Study start
- 17 Jul 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 29 Nov 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 7 Jul 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Aug 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Recovery after surgery depends on psychological factors such as preoperative information, expectations and surgery-associated anxiety. Prior studies have shown that even short preoperative psychological interventions can improve postoperative outcomes in heart surgery patients. However, what content works best for which patient group and how long an intervention has to be is still largely unknown. The aims of this study are thus to examine if the developed preoperative psychological intervention (i) reduces preoperative anxiety, (ii) increases positive expectations, and (iii) improves the long-term outcome postoperative recovery. Therefore, a brief intervention has been developed. Heart valve patients who undergo a heart surgery will be randomized into two groups (Control vs. intervention group) after baseline assessment. Following this the intervention group will participate in the psychological intervention (30-40 minutes). To increase patients' positive expectations the intervention will focus on treatment outcome expectations and personal control expectations. Furthermore, patients in the intervention group will have two booster-telephone calls (four and eight weeks after the surgery) to check if their developed plans work out. The control group will receive the standard medical procedure. Both groups will fill out questionnaires again at the evening before the surgery, around one week after the surgery and three months after surgery.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (care provider)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Patients will be randomly allocated to the intervention group (IG) or the control group (SOC). The intervention group will receive a psychological preoperative intervention to optimize expectations (in addition to standard medical care). The control group will receive the standard of care only.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group (IG) | Experimental | Behavioral: EXPECT: Preoperative optimization of cardiac valve patient's expectations |
| Standard of Care (SOC) | No intervention | – |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients who are scheduled for elective cardiac valve procedure
- Age 18 or above
- Fluency in German
- Informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Comorbid medical/psychiatric condition that causes more extensive disability than the coronary condition
- Participation in other research programs: in agreement with Coordinating Investigator patient can participate substudies, if this do not interfere with the main study
- Emergency surgery
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| EXPECT: Preoperative optimization of cardiac valve patient's expectationsThe psychological, preoperative intervention follows a treatment manual. Patients get a personal intervention one day before surgery (30-40 minutes). It includes the development of an individual, subjectively perceived disease model, the treatment outcome expectations and the personalized outcome expectancy. Additionally they get two booster telephone calls 4 and 8 weeks after the surgery to recall the discussed topics and to talk about their recovery process (10-15 minutes). | Behavioural | Intervention group (IG) |
Primary outcome
Change in Pain Disability Index (PDI) from Baseline to one day pre-surgery to one week post-surgery to three months post-surgery
Time frame: Baseline, one day pre-surgery, up to one week post-surgery, up to three months post-surgery
Items range from 0 (no disability at all) - 10 (total disability). Consequently higher scores mean a worse outcome.
7 secondary outcomes
Change in Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) from Baseline to one week post-surgery to three months post-surgery
Time frame: Baseline, up to one week post-surgery, up to three months post-surgery
Change in Health Related Quality of Life (Short Form 12, SF-12) from Baseline to one week post-surgery to three months post-surgery
Time frame: Baseline, up to one week post-surgery, up to three months post-surgery
Change in Patient health questionnaire screener (PHQ) from Baseline to one week post-surgery to three months post-surgery
Time frame: Baseline, up to one week post-surgery, up to three months post-surgery
Change in Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 (GAD-7) from Baseline to one week post-surgery to three months post-surgery
Time frame: Baseline, up to one week post-surgery, up to three months post-surgery
Change in Anxiety (The Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale, APAIS) from Baseline to one day pre-surgery
Time frame: Baseline, one day pre-surgery
Days the patient stays in the hospital, days at the intensive care unit
Time frame: up to one week post-surgery
Change of Concentration of Inflammatory marker C-reactive protein (CRP) in mg/l
Time frame: Baseline, up to one day, two days and five days post-surgery
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Sep 2023.
- Background: PubMed 26223485Auer CJ, Glombiewski JA, Doering BK, Winkler A, Laferton JA, Broadbent E, Rief W. Patients' Expectations Predict Surgery Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis. Int J Behav Med. 2016 Feb;23(1):49-62. doi: 10.1007/s12529-015-9500-4.
- Background: PubMed 20488272Juergens MC, Seekatz B, Moosdorf RG, Petrie KJ, Rief W. Illness beliefs before cardiac surgery predict disability, quality of life, and depression 3 months later. J Psychosom Res. 2010 Jun;68(6):553-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.10.004. Epub 2009 Dec 5.
- Background: PubMed 28270786Laferton JA, Kube T, Salzmann S, Auer CJ, Shedden-Mora MC. Patients' Expectations Regarding Medical Treatment: A Critical Review of Concepts and Their Assessment. Front Psychol. 2017 Feb 21;8:233. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00233. eCollection 2017.
- Background: PubMed 8623940Moerman N, van Dam FS, Muller MJ, Oosting H. The Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS). Anesth Analg. 1996 Mar;82(3):445-51. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199603000-00002.
- Background: PubMed 28069021Rief W, Shedden-Mora MC, Laferton JA, Auer C, Petrie KJ, Salzmann S, Schedlowski M, Moosdorf R. Preoperative optimization of patient expectations improves long-term outcome in heart surgery patients: results of the randomized controlled PSY-HEART trial. BMC Med. 2017 Jan 10;15(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0767-3.
- Background: PubMed 16717171Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Lowe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092.
- Background: PubMed 8628042Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996 Mar;34(3):220-33. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003.
- BackgroundLöwe, B., Spitzer, R. L., Zipfel, S., & Herzog, W. (2002). PHQ-D Gesundheitsfragebogen für Patienten (German Version of the Patient Health Questionnaire). Karlsruhe: Pfizer.
- Background: PubMed 8475878Rector TS, Kubo SH, Cohn JN. Validity of the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire as a measure of therapeutic response to enalapril or placebo. Am J Cardiol. 1993 May 1;71(12):1106-7. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(93)90582-w. No abstract available.
- BackgroundRief, W., & Glombiewski, J. A. (2016). Erwartungsfokussierte Psychotherapeutische Interventionen (EFPI). Verhaltenstherapie, 26(1), 47-54.
- BackgroundSalzmann, S., Laferton, J., Auer, C., Shedden-Mora, M., Wambach, K., & Rief, W. (2018). Patientenerwartungen optimieren: Beschreibung einer präoperativen Kurzintervention am Beispiel von Patienten vor einer Bypass-Operation. Verhaltenstherapie, 28(3), 157-165.
- BackgroundGaab, J. (2009). PASA-Primary Appraisal Secondary Appraisal-Ein Fragebogen zur Erfassung von situations-bezogenen kognitiven Bewertungen. Verhaltenstherapie, 19(2), 114-115.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Cardiac Valve Disease
Recruiting
Trial of the F2 Filter and Delivery System for Embolic Protection During TAVR
Aortic Stenosis Treated With TAVI, Aortic Diseases
Not yet recruiting
Human Experimental Models of Pain (HEMP)
Acute Pain
RecruitingObservational study
A Post-Market Assessment of the Safety and Performance of the TriClip™ System
Tricuspid Regurgitation (TR)
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Intravascular Lithotripsy in High Risk Calcified Iliac Anatomy for Transfemoral TAVR
Iliac Disease, Aortic Valve Stenosis
Not yet recruiting
NHLBI SESAME (SEptal Scoring Along Midline Endocardium) Multi-Center Prospective Study Using Improvised Off-Label Devices
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy, Left Ventricular Outflow Obstruction
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Winfried Rief, Prof. Dr. principal investigator
Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy Dept. of Psychology, Philipps-University Marburg
Ardawan Rastan, Prof. Dr. principal investigator
Cardiac surgery University Hospital Gießen und Marburg
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing EXPECT: Preoperative optimization of cardiac valve patient's expectations in people with Cardiac Valve Disease, run by Philipps University Marburg at 1 site in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Sep 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Pain Disability Index (PDI) from Baseline to one day pre-surgery to one week post-surgery to three months post-surgery (time frame: Baseline, one day pre-surgery, up to one week post-surgery, up to three months post-surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04502121, which also lists 17 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Sep 2023.