AzTrials
AzTrials

Osteo Arthritis KneeNCT04502459

A Study on the Use of Tourniquet Use In Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

A study testing Tourniquet in people with Osteo Arthritis Knee and Rheumatoid Arthritis of Knee, run by The University of Hong Kong.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

A tourniquet is often used in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to achieve better visualization, reduce intra-operative bleeding and facilitate cement interdigitation. On the other hand, the associated risks include skin burns, soft tissue and muscle damage, injury of calcified vessels, increased swelling and stiffness of… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Tourniquet
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
90 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
5 May 2015to 15 Dec 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients suffer from primary osteoarthritis indicated for total knee arthroplasty
  • Subject is physically and mentally willing and able to comply with the postoperative scheduled clinical and radiographic evaluations
  • Subject must have signed an informed consent document specific to the study, and approved by the Ethics Committee, indicating that they understand the purpose of and procedures required for the study and are willing to participate in the study

Who cannot join

  • Subject requires a revision knee arthroplasty surgery
  • Subject is currently on anti-coagulant therapy or has coagulopathy
  • Subject has peripheral vascular disease of the lower limb evidenced by the presence of blood vessel calcification on the radiographs or the absence of dorsalis pedis/popliteal pulses
  • Subject suffers from conditions other than primary knee osteoarthritis, e.g. inflammatory arthritis
  • Subject having associated medical diseases affecting rehabilitation
  • Subject has active systemic infection or infection near the knee joint
  • Subject having current medical condition that render them unfit for surgery
  • Any criterion which in the opinion of the investigator, suggests that the subject would not be compliant with the study protocol

About this study

Official title: A Prospective Randomized Trial on the Use of Tourniquet in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

A tourniquet is often used in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to achieve better visualization, reduce intra-operative bleeding and facilitate cement interdigitation. On the other hand, the associated risks include skin burns, soft tissue and muscle damage, injury of calcified vessels, increased swelling and stiffness of the joints, nerve injury, paralysis, and thromboembolic events. The automatic lower limb pneumatic tourniquet system (Zimmer) was applied to reduce blood loss during surgery. A prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) was performed to investigate the best tourniquet strategy in TKA. The participants were randomly allocated to groups with different tourniquet strategies: Group 1) tourniquet inflation from skin to cement hardening (skin to cement); Group 2) tourniquet inflation only from cementation (cement only) and Group 3) tourniquet inflation from skin incision to skin closure (skin to skin). In addition to the blood loss and early postoperative outcomes, pain, soft tissue injury, and rehabilitation were also strictly monitored with a longer follow-up duration up to 6 months.

Read the detailed description

A tourniquet is often used in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to achieve better visualization, reduce intra-operative bleeding and facilitate cement interdigitation. On the other hand, the associated risks include skin burns, soft tissue and muscle damage, injury of calcified vessels, increased swelling and stiffness of the joints, nerve injury, paralysis, and thromboembolic events.

The automatic lower limb pneumatic tourniquet system (Zimmer) was applied to reduce blood loss during surgery. The skin under the tourniquet was covered by cast padding. The operated leg was elevated and exsanguinated before inflating the automatic pneumatic tourniquet. There are three main strategies for the use of a tourniquet in TKR: A) inflate before incision and deflate following cement hardening ('skin to cement'); B) inflate prior to cement application and deflated following hardening ('cement only'); C) inflate before incision and deflate following completion of skin closure ('skin to skin'). The optimal timing of tourniquet application during primary TKA is still a matter of debate. Most previous reports have failed to show significant differences among different tourniquet strategies.

Kvederas et al. compared these three strategies in a randomized double-blind clinical trial, and demonstrated that the estimated blood loss was highest when the tourniquet was inflated just before cement application and deflated after its hardening ('cement only'), while inflation of tourniquet before skin incision and its deflation after hardening of cement ('skin to cement') tends to give better early postoperative mobilization. However, this was an interim report with limited number of patients, and only limited outcome parameters were reported, which were insufficient to draw firm conclusions regarding the differences in outcome.

Therefore we performed this prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) with a decent sample size to investigate the best tourniquet strategy in TKA. In addition to the blood loss and early postoperative outcomes, we also strictly monitored pain, soft tissue injury, and rehabilitation with a longer follow-up duration up to 6 months.

All of the operations were performed through the medial parapatellar approach by the same experienced joint replacement surgeon. All patients underwent primary TKA with minimally invasive techniques and cemented prostheses (EvolutionTM medial pivot, MicroPort, USA). An intramedullary guide was used for both tibial and femoral cuts.

The automatic lower limb pneumatic tourniquet system was applied to reduce blood loss during surgery. The skin under the tourniquet was covered by cast padding. The operated leg was elevated and exsanguinated before inflating the automatic pneumatic tourniquet. One of the three tourniquet treatment strategies was used, as determined by the group allocation of the patient. In all the three groups, the tourniquet was inflated to a pressure of 280 mm Hg. The wound was closed after wound irrigation and hemostasis and then was wrapped with elastic bandages. One drainage was applied postoperatively in all patients and was kept until 24h to monitor blood loss.

Being tested
Tourniquet
Keywords
Tourniquet, Total Knee Arthroplasty

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • TourniquetProcedure or surgery

    A tourniquet is often used in total knee arthroplasty to achieve better visualization, reduce intra-operative bleeding and facilitate cement interdigitation

Study groups in NCT04502459
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Cement onlyActive comparatorThe tourniquet was inflated just before cement application and deflated after its hardening
Receives: Procedure: Tourniquet
Skin to CementActive comparatorInflation of tourniquet before skin incision and its deflation after hardening of cement
Receives: Procedure: Tourniquet
Skin to SkinActive comparatorInflate of tourniquet before incision and deflate following completion of skin closure
Receives: Procedure: Tourniquet

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Blood Loss

    We calculated the intraoperative blood loss by measuring the suction volume and weighing the sponges. Hemoglobin (Hb) and hematocrit (Hct) levels were examined preoperatively, and on Day 1 to Day 4 after surgery. Change of Hb and Hct was calculated as the value of postoperative D1 to D4 minus preoperative value. The number of patients undergoing blood transfusion were recorded. The criterion for a blood transfusion was set as a Hb level of <8 g/dL with symptomatic anemia. The calculated blood loss, which reflects actual blood loss, was determined with use of a previously described method. Briefly, the patients blood volume (PBV) is calculated using a formula, and multiplying the PBV by the change of haematocrit (preoperative value minus value on postoperative Day 2) will give the estimated total blood loss (ETBL).

    Measured: 4 days after surgery

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Soft-tissue damage

    We assessed soft-tissue damage by examining serum C-reactive protein (CRP), creatine kinase (CK), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels preoperatively and on postoperative days 1, 2, 3 and 4

    Measured: 4 days after surgery

  2. Thigh circumference

    Thigh circumference was measured 10 cm proximal to the patella and leg circumference was measured 15 cm distal to the patella, to determine the degree of swelling, and was measured on postoperative days 1, 2, 3 and 4. X-rays were taken after surgery to measure the lower limb alignment, and tibial and femoral components position.

    Measured: 4 days after surgery

  3. Postoperative Visual Analog Scale

    Postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) scores were obtained for both knee and thigh pain preoperatively and on postoperative.

    Measured: Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 7, Week 6, Month 3, and Month 6

  4. Peak Quadriceps Strength

    The strength of each leg was evaluated by using an isokinetic dynamometer. Peak torque measured in both the concentric and eccentric modes.

    Measured: Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 7, Week 6, Month 3, and Month 6

  5. Time-up-and-go (TUG) Test

    he TUG test was used to evaluate the preoperative degree of mobility. This test involves measuring the time a patient needs to get up from a chair, walk three meters, turn, walk back to the chair and then sit down again.

    Measured: Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 7, Week 6, Month 3, and Month 6

  6. 6-minute Walking Test

    A test that evaluates the functional capacity of the patient while walking on a flat, hard surface in the 6-minute window. It assess all the systems that are involved in the 6-minute window.

    Measured: Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 7, Week 6, Month 3, and Month 6

  7. Berg Balance Scale

    The BBS test is used to objectively determine a patient's ability (or inability) to safely balance during a series of predetermined tasks.

    Measured: Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 7, Week 6, Month 3, and Month 6

  8. Knee Society Knee Score

    A knee score that rates only the knee joint itself, there are three main parameters which are pain, stability and the range of motion. Whereas flexion contracture, extension lag and misalignment would be different ways for point deductions. 100 points would refer to a patient with no knee pain, 125 degree range of motion and negligible anteroposterior and mediolateral instability.

    Measured: Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 7, Week 6, Month 3, and Month 6

  9. Knee Society Function Score

    A functional score that rates the patient's ability to walk and climb stairs, points would be deducted if the patient uses any walking aids for the two. 100 points would refer to a patient that can walk for an unlimited distance and go up and down the stairs without any trouble.

    Measured: Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 7, Week 6, Month 3, and Month 6

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Aug 2020
  2. Study start5 May 2015
  3. Primary completion15 Dec 2017
  4. Study completion15 Dec 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
A randomization list was generated prior to recruitment using a computer software (Random Allocation Software Version 1.0.0, Isfahan, Iran). The participants were randomly allocated to either of the 3 groups with different tourniquet strategies: Group 1) tourniquet inflation from skin to cement hardening (skin to cement); Group 2) tourniquet inflation only from cementation (cement only); Group 3) tourniquet inflation from skin incision to skin closure (skin to skin). The surgeon opened a sealed envelope containing the allocation right before the operation in the theatre. The evaluators who examined and collected the data were blinded to the patients' allocation to the study groups.
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
90 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04502459
Sponsor's protocol ID
UW 15-129
Status last verified
Aug 2020
First submitted
14 Jul 2020
Last updated
6 Aug 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Tai TW, Chang CW, Lai KA, Lin CJ, Yang CY. Effects of tourniquet use on blood loss and soft-tissue damage in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Dec 19;94(24):2209-15. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00813.

    PubMed 23318610
  • Tarwala R, Dorr LD, Gilbert PK, Wan Z, Long WT. Tourniquet use during cementation only during total knee arthroplasty: a randomized trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jan;472(1):169-74. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3124-2.

    PubMed 23836239

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Tourniquet in people with Osteo Arthritis Knee and Rheumatoid Arthritis of Knee, run by The University of Hong Kong.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Aug 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Blood Loss (time frame: 4 days after surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04502459, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Aug 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in