AzTrials
AzTrials

Diabetic RetinopathyPhase 3PAVILIONNCT04503551

A Multicenter, Randomized Study in Participants With Diabetic Retinopathy Without Center-involved Diabetic Macular Edema To Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of Ranibizumab Delivered Via the Port Delivery System Relative to the Comparator Arm

A Phase 3 study testing PDS Implant Pre-Filled with 100 mg/mL Ranibizumab and Intravitreal Ranibizumab 0.5 mg Injection in people with Diabetic Retinopathy, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 65 sites in 2 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Study GR41675 is a Multicenter, Randomized Study in Participants with Diabetic Retinopathy (DR) Without Center-Involved Diabetic Macular Edema (CI-DME) to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety of the Port Delivery System with Ranibizumab (PDS) Relative to the Comparator Arm Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Diabetic Retinopathy
What is being tested?
PDS Implant Pre-Filled with 100 mg/mL Ranibizumab and Intravitreal Ranibizumab 0.5 mg Injection
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
174 participants
Where
65 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
10 Aug 2020to 23 Feb 2026
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age ≥18 years at time of signing Informed Consent Form
  • Documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (Type 1 or Type 2)
  • HbA1c level of ≤12% within 2 months prior to screening or at screening
  • Moderately severe or severe NPDR (ETDRS-DRSS level 47 or 53)
  • BCVA score of ≥ 69 letters (20/40 approximate Snellen equivalent or better)

Who cannot join

  • Uncontrolled blood pressure
  • Cerebrovascular accident or myocardial infarction within 6 months prior to randomization
  • Atrial fibrillation diagnosis or worsening within 6 months prior to randomization
  • Current systemic treatment for a confirmed active systemic infection
  • Renal failure requiring renal transplant, hemodialysis, or peritoneal dialysis, or anticipated to require hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis at any time during the study
  • History of other disease, other non-diabetic metabolic dysfunction, physical examination finding, or clinical laboratory finding giving reasonable suspicion of a condition that contraindicates the use of ranibizumab or surgical placement of the PDS implant; that might affect interpretation of the results of the study; or that renders the patient at high risk for treatment complications in the opinion of the investigator or Sponsor
Show all 24Show fewer
  • Ocular Exclusion Criteria for Study Eye:
  • Presence of center-involved diabetic macular edema (defined as CST ≥325 µm)
  • Any intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment at any time prior to randomization
  • Any use of medicated intraocular implants, including Ozurdex® or Iluvien® implants at any time prior to randomization
  • Any intravitreal corticosteroid treatment at any time prior to randomization
  • Any periocular (e.g., subtenon) corticosteroid treatment at any time prior to randomization
  • Any PRP at any time prior to randomization
  • Any macular laser photocoagulation (such as micropulse and focal or grid laser) at any time prior to randomization
  • Active intraocular inflammation (grade trace or above)
  • Clinically significant abnormalities of the vitreous-retinal interface involving the macular area or disrupting the macular architecture, such as vitreous-retinal traction or epiretinal membrane (assessed by the investigator and confirmed by the central reading center)
  • Uncontrolled ocular hypertension or glaucoma and any such condition the investigator determines may require a glaucoma-filtering surgery during a participant's participation in the study
  • History of glaucoma-filtering surgery, tube shunts, or microinvasive glaucoma surgery
  • Any concurrent ocular condition (e.g., cataract, epiretinal membrane) that would require surgical intervention during the study to prevent or treat visual loss that might result from that condition
  • Any concurrent ocular condition (e.g., amblyopia, strabismus) that may affect interpretation of study results
  • History of other ocular diseases that gives reasonable suspicion of a disease or condition that contraindicates the use of ranibizumab, that might affect interpretation of study results, or that renders the participant at high risk for treatment complications
  • Ocular Exclusion Criteria for Either Eye
  • Suspected or active ocular or periocular infection of either eye
  • Any history uveitis including idiopathic, drug-associated or autoimmune-associated uveitis

Trial locations and contacts

65 sites in 2 countries.

65 sites in 2 countries

United States64 sites
  • Retina Consultants of Hawaii at Pali Momi Medical Center

    ‘Aiea, Hawaii, 96701

  • Retina Research Institute of Texas

    Abilene, Texas, 79606

  • Asheville Eye Associates Western Carolina Retinal Associates;Clinical Research

    Asheville, North Carolina, 28803

  • Southeast Retina Center

    Augusta, Georgia, 30909

  • Austin Retina Associates;Opthalmology

    Austin, Texas, 78705

  • California Retina Consultants

    Bakersfield, California, 93309

  • The Retina Care Center

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21209

  • Johns Hopkins Hospital;Johns Hopkins Med;Wilmer Eye Inst

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21287

  • Retina & Vitreous of Texas

    Bellaire, Texas, 77401

  • Envision Ocular, LLC

    Bloomfield, New Jersey, 07003

  • Charlotte Eye Ear Nose and Throat Associates- SouthPark;Retina

    Charlotte, North Carolina, 28210

  • Pepose Vision Institute

    Chesterfield, Missouri, 63017

  • Northwestern Memorial Hospital

    Chicago, Illinois, 60611

  • Ohio State Havener Eye Institute;Ophthalmology Research

    Columbus, Ohio, 43212

  • Texas Retina Associates;Research

    Dallas, Texas, 75231

  • Southwest Retina Research Center

    Durango, Colorado, 81303

  • Duke Eye Center

    Durham, North Carolina, 27705

  • Retina Vitreous Center - Glen Eagles

    Edmond, Oklahoma, 73013

  • The Retina Partners

    Encino, California, 91436

  • Retina Consultants of Orange County;Clinical Research

    Fullerton, California, 92835

  • Charles Retina Institution;Retina surgery

    Germantown, Tennessee, 38138

  • Retina Center of Texas

    Grapevine, Texas, 76051

  • Cumberland Valley Retina Consultants;Clinical Research

    Hagerstown, Maryland, 21740

  • Retina Consultants of Texas

    Houston, Texas, 77401

  • Illinois Retina Associates

    Joliet, Illinois, 60435

  • Southeastern Retina Associates

    Knoxville, Tennessee, 37922

  • Charleston Neuroscience

    Ladson, South Carolina, 29456

  • Colorado Clinical Research

    Lakewood, Colorado, 80228

  • University Retina

    Lemont, Illinois, 60439

  • Retina Associates

    Lenexa, Kansas, 66215

  • Retina Vitreous Surgeons of Central New York

    Liverpool, New York, 13088

  • Jules Stein Eye Institute/ UCLA

    Los Angeles, California, 90095

  • Piedmont Eye Center

    Lynchburg, Virginia, 24502

  • Georgia Retina

    Marietta, Georgia, 30060

  • Barnet Dulaney Perkins Eye Center

    Mesa, Arizona, 85206

  • VitreoRetinal Surgery PLLC;DBA Retina Consultants of Minnesota

    Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55435

  • Rocky Mountain Retina Consultants

    Murray, Utah, 84107

  • Tennessee Retina

    Nashville, Tennessee, 37203

  • New York University (NYU)

    New York, New York, 10012

  • Wagner Kapoor Institute;Opthalmology

    Norfolk, Virginia, 23502

  • California Eye Specialists Medical Group

    Pasadena, California, 91107

  • Retina Specialty Institute

    Pensacola, Florida, 32503

  • Mid Atlantic Retina;Retina Research

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107

  • Retinal Consultants of Arizona;Opthalmology

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85014

  • Associated Retina Consultants

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85020

  • Fort Lauderdale Eye Institute

    Plantation, Florida, 33324

  • Maine Eye Center

    Portland, Maine, 04605

  • Retina Northwest;Research Department

    Portland, Oregon, 97221

  • Sierra Eye Associates

    Reno, Nevada, 89502

  • Retina Institute of Virginia

    Richmond, Virginia, 23235

  • Kaiser Permanente;RESEARCH AND EVALUATION

    Riverside, California, 92505

  • Associated Retinal Consultants - Royal Oak

    Royal Oak, Michigan, 48073

  • Retina Consultants Medical Group

    Sacramento, California, 95841

  • Retina Associates of Utah, PLLC;Clinical Research

    Salt Lake City, Utah, 84107

  • Medical Center Ophthalmology Associates

    San Antonio, Texas, 78240

  • Orange County Retina Medical Group

    Santa Ana, California, 92705

  • Pacific Northwest Retina

    Silverdale, Washington, 98383

  • Spokane Eye Clinical Research;Spokane Eye Surgery Center

    Spokane, Washington, 99204

  • Retina Associates of Florida;Retina Associates of Florida

    Tampa, Florida, 33609

  • Retina Associates of New Jersey

    Teaneck, New Jersey, 07666

  • Retina Consultants of Texas

    The Woodlands, Texas, 77384

  • Retina Group of New England

    Waterford, Connecticut, 06385

  • Palmetto Retina Center

    West Columbia, South Carolina, 29169

  • Cape Fear Retinal Associates

    Wilmington, North Carolina, 28401

Other trials in United States

Puerto Rico1 site
  • Emanuelli Research & Development Center

    Arecibo, 612

Other trials in Puerto Rico

About this study

Official title: A Phase III, Multicenter, Randomized Study of the Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of the Port Delivery System With Ranibizumab in Patients With Diabetic Retinopathy

Study GR41675 is a Multicenter, Randomized Study in Participants with Diabetic Retinopathy (DR) Without Center-Involved Diabetic Macular Edema (CI-DME) to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety of the Port Delivery System with Ranibizumab (PDS) Relative to the Comparator Arm

Being tested
PDS Implant Pre-Filled with 100 mg/mL Ranibizumab, Intravitreal Ranibizumab 0.5 mg Injection
Keywords
Port Delivery System; ranibizumab; Diabetic Retinopathy; anti-VEGF, nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy, retina, vision loss, retinal disease, eye disease
Medical subject headings
Diabetic Retinopathy, Vision Disorders, Retinal Diseases, Eye Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PDS Implant Pre-Filled with 100 mg/mL RanibizumabDrug

    Will be administered as per the schedule described in individual arm.

  • Intravitreal Ranibizumab 0.5 mg InjectionDrug

    Will be administered as per the schedule described in individual arm.

Study groups in NCT04503551
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PDS ArmExperimentalParticipants randomized to the PDS arm will receive two intravitreal ranibizumab injections and will then have the PDS implant (pre-filled with ranibizumab) surgically inserted. PDS implant refill-exchange procedures will be performed on a fixed interval every 36-weeks (Q36W) thereafter
Receives: Drug: PDS Implant Pre-Filled with 100 mg/mL Ranibizumab; Drug: Intravitreal Ranibizumab 0.5 mg Injection
Comparator ArmOtherParticipants randomized to the comparator arm will undergo study visits every 4 weeks (Q4W) for comprehensive clinical monitoring until they receive the PDS implant (pre-filled with ranibizumab). PDS implant refill-exchange procedures will be performed on a fixed interval Q36W thereafter. Participants will be eligible to receive intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5 mg injections if treatment eligibility criteria are met.
Receives: Drug: PDS Implant Pre-Filled with 100 mg/mL Ranibizumab; Drug: Intravitreal Ranibizumab 0.5 mg Injection

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants With a ≥2-Step Improvement From Baseline on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study-Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (ETDRS-DRSS) at Week 52

    ETDRS-DRSS classifies diabetic retinopathy (DR) into 12 severity steps ranging from absence of retinopathy to advanced proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). DRSS grades= 10 (DR absent) - 85 (very advanced PDR), DRSS 90 = ungradable. All DRSS values are converted into a 12-level scale, from 1 (DR absent) to 12 (very advanced PDR), allowing derivation of ≥2-step change from baseline for post-baseline assessment. A lower score represents less advanced diabetic retinopathy. The Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) method was used for analysis and weighted percentage of participants are estimated and reported in this outcome measure. Participants receiving supplemental treatments, prohibited therapy, or panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) were considered non-responders. Missing values not preceded by these intercurrent events were imputed using the last observation carried forward method. SD OCT= spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 52

Secondary outcomes (34)
  1. Rate of Participants Developing a Vision-Threatening Complication or Center-involved Diabetic Macular Edema (CI-DME) Through Week 52

    A vision threatening complication is defined as proliferative DR (PDR) or anterior segment neovascularization (ASNV) or center-involved diabetic macular edema (CI-DME). CI-DME is defined as central foveal thickness (CST) ≥325 micrometres (μm) on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). Composite strategy (i.e., considered to be an event) was applied to participants who received supplemental or prohibited therapy or PRP in the study eye. The rate of participants was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier (KM) method.

    Measured: From Baseline through Week 52

  2. Rate of Participants Developing PDR or ASNV Through Week 52

    The KM method was used for analysis, and estimates are in terms of event rate. Composite strategy (i.e., considered to be an event) was applied to participants who received supplemental or prohibited therapy or PRP in the study eye.

    Measured: From Baseline through Week 52

  3. Rate of Participants Developing CI-DME Through Week 52

    CI-DME is defined as CST ≥325 μm on SD-OCT. The KM method was used for analysis, and estimated in terms of event rate. Composite strategy (i.e., considered to be an event) was applied to participants who received supplemental or prohibited therapy or PRP in the study eye.

    Measured: From Baseline through Week 52

  4. Rate of Participants Developing a ≥ 2-Step Worsening From Baseline on the ETDRS-DRSS Through Week 52

    ETDRS-DRSS classifies diabetic retinopathy (DR) into 12 severity steps ranging from absence of retinopathy to advanced proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). DRSS grades= 10 (DR absent) - 85 (very advanced PDR ), DRSS 90 = ungradable. All DRSS values are converted into a 12-level scale, from 1 (DR absent) to 12 (very advanced PDR), allowing derivation of ≥2-step change from baseline for post-baseline assessment. A lower score represents less advanced diabetic retinopathy. Composite strategy (i.e., considered to be an event) was applied to participants who received supplemental or prohibited therapy or PRP in the study eye. The rate of participants developing ≥ 2-step worsening on the ETDRS-DRSS was calculated using the KM method.

    Measured: From Baseline through Week 52

  5. Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 3-Step Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS-DRSS at Week 52

    ETDRS-DRSS classifies diabetic retinopathy (DR) into 12 severity steps ranging from absence of retinopathy to advanced proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). DRSS grades= 10 (DR absent) - 85 (very advanced PDR ), DRSS 90 = ungradable. All DRSS values are converted into a 12-level scale, from 1 (DR absent) to 12 (very advanced PDR), allowing derivation of ≥2-step change from baseline for post-baseline assessment. A lower score represents less advanced diabetic retinopathy. Participants receiving supplemental treatments, prohibited therapy, or panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) were considered non-responders. Missing values not preceded by these intercurrent events were imputed using the last observation carried forward method. Percentages are rounded off to the nearest decimal point.

    Measured: Week 52

  6. Rate of Participants Developing a ≥ 3-Step Worsening From Baseline on the ETDRS-DRSS Through Week 52

    ETDRS-DRSS classifies diabetic retinopathy (DR) into 12 severity steps ranging from absence of retinopathy to advanced proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). DRSS grades= 10 (DR absent) - 85 (very advanced PDR ), DRSS 90 = ungradable. All DRSS values are converted into a 12-level scale, from 1 (DR absent) to 12 (very advanced PDR), allowing derivation of ≥2-step change from baseline for post-baseline assessment. A lower score represents less advanced diabetic retinopathy. Composite strategy (i.e., considered to be an event) was applied to participants who received supplemental or prohibited therapy or PRP in the study eye. The rate of participants developing ≥ 3-step worsening on the ETDRS-DRSS was calculated using the KM method.

    Measured: From Baseline through Week 52

  7. Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 2-Step Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS-DRSS Over Time

    ETDRS-DRSS classifies diabetic retinopathy (DR) into 12 severity steps ranging from absence of retinopathy to advanced proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). DRSS grades= 10 (DR absent) - 85 (very advanced PDR), DRSS 90 = ungradable. All DRSS values are converted into a 12-level scale , from 1 (DR absent) to 12 (very advanced PDR), allowing derivation of ≥2-step change from baseline for post-baseline assessment. A lower score represents less advanced diabetic retinopathy.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 112

  8. Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 3-step Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS-DRSS Over Time

    ETDRS-DRSS classifies diabetic retinopathy (DR) into 12 severity steps ranging from absence of retinopathy to advanced proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). DRSS grades= 10 (DR absent) - 85 (very advanced PDR ), DRSS 90 = ungradable. All DRSS values are converted into a 12-level scale , from 1 (DR absent) to 12 (very advanced PDR), allowing derivation of ≥2-step change from baseline for post-baseline assessment. A lower score represents less advanced diabetic retinopathy.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 112

  9. Time to First Development of Either PDR, ASNV, or CI-DME

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 112

  10. Time to First Development of PDR or ASNV

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 112

  11. Time to First Development of CI-DME

    CI-DME is defined as CST ≥325 μm on SD-OCT.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 112

  12. Time to First Development of a ≥ 2-Step Worsening From Baseline on the ETDRS-DRSS

    ETDRS-DRSS classifies diabetic retinopathy (DR) into 12 severity steps ranging from absence of retinopathy to advanced proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). DRSS grades= 10 (DR absent) - 85 (very advanced PDR), DRSS 90 = ungradable. All DRSS values are converted into a 12-level scale, from 1 (DR absent) to 12 (very advanced PDR), allowing derivation of ≥2-step change from baseline for post-baseline assessment. A lower score represents less advanced diabetic retinopathy.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 112

  13. Time to First Development of a ≥ 3-Step Worsening From Baseline on the ETDRS-DRSS

    ETDRS-DRSS classifies diabetic retinopathy (DR) into 12 severity steps ranging from absence of retinopathy to advanced proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). DRSS grades= 10 (DR absent) - 85 (very advanced PDR), DRSS 90 = ungradable. All DRSS values are converted into a 12-level scale, from 1 (DR absent) to 12 (very advanced PDR), allowing derivation of ≥2-step change from baseline for post-baseline assessment. A lower score represents less advanced diabetic retinopathy.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 112

  14. Change From Baseline in Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) as Measured on the ETDRS Chart Over Time

    BCVA was measured at a starting test distance of 4 meters using a set of three Precision Vision^TM or Lighthouse distance acuity charts (modified ETDRS Charts 1, 2, and R). The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score attainable), and a higher score indicates better visual acuity.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 112

  15. Percentage of Participants Who Lost <15, <10 and <5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline Over Time

    BCVA was measured at a starting test distance of 4 meters using a set of three Precision VisionTM or Lighthouse distance acuity charts (modified ETDRS Charts 1, 2, and R). The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score attainable), and a higher score indicates better visual acuity.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 112

  16. Percentage of Participants With a BCVA Score of 69 Letters (20/40 Approximate Snellen Equivalent) or Better Over Time

    BCVA is measured using the ETDRS visual acuity chart starting at a test distance of 4 meters. The number of letters read correctly, Snellen fraction are converted to a decimal scale. There are 11 lines on a standard Snellen chart ranging from 0.1 (20/200) at worst to 2.0 (20/10) at best. 20/20 on the decimal scale is equal to 1.0. The higher the number of letters read correctly (higher number on the decimal scale), the better the vision (or visual acuity). The Snellen equivalent of 20/40 or better is 69 or more letters correctly read in the ETDRS chart.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 112

  17. Change From Baseline in CST as Measured on SD-OCT Over Time

    CST is defined as the average thickness of the central 1 millimeter (mm) circle of the ETDRS grid centered on the fovea measured between the internal limiting membrane and the Bruch's membrane. CST is measured using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). A central reading center graded the SD-OCT digital images. A negative change from baseline value represents a reduction in macular edema.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 112

  18. Change From Baseline in Total Macular Volume (TMV) as Measured on SD-OCT Over Time

    Total macular volume in cubic millimeter (mm^3), is the calculated volume from the layers of the retina based off OCT imaging. TMV is measured using SD-OCT.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 112

  19. Number of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events (AEs) and Severity of Ocular AEs in the PDS Arm

    An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product,regardless of causal attribution.An adverse event can therefore be any unfavourable \& unintended sign,symptom,or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product,whether considered related to the pharmaceutical product.Preexisting conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as adverse events.Ocular AEs are the events which are localized in the ocular region,graded according to the AE Severity Grading Scale as Mild:discomfort noticed,but no disruption of normal daily activity;Moderate:Discomfort sufficient to reduce or affect normal daily activity;Severe incapacitating with inability to work or to perform normal daily activity.Number of participants with ocular AEs in the study eye are reported in this outcome measure.As prespecified in the protocol, this outcome measure was applicable to participants in the PDS arm only.

    Measured: From first dose of study drug through Week 52

  20. Number of Participants With Non-ocular AEs in the PDS Arm

    An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant subject administered a pharmaceutical product, regardless of causal attribution. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Preexisting conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as adverse events. As prespecified in the protocol, this outcome measure was applicable to participants in the PDS arm only.

    Measured: From first dose of study drug through Week 52

  21. Number of Participants With At Least One Ocular Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI) in the PDS Arm

    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product, regardless of causal attribution. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Preexisting conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as adverse events. Ocular AESI include vitreous hemorrhage; endophthalmitis; retinal detachment; conjunctival retraction; conjunctival erosion; conjunctival bleb or conjunctival filtering bleb leak; hyphema; cataract; device dislocation. As prespecified in the protocol, this outcome measure was applicable to participants in the PDS arm only.

    Measured: From first dose of study drug through Week 52

  22. Number of Participants With At Least One Ocular AESI During the Postoperative Period in the PDS Arm

    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product, regardless of causal attribution. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Preexisting conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as adverse events. Ocular AESI include vitreous hemorrhage; endophthalmitis; retinal detachment; conjunctival retraction; conjunctival erosion; conjunctival bleb or conjunctival filtering bleb leak; hyphema; cataract; device dislocation. The ocular AESIs in the study eye were categorized based on onset as, Postoperative Period: onset within 37 days post initial implantation. As prespecified in the protocol, this outcome measure was applicable to participants in the PDS arm only.

    Measured: From Day 1 to Day 37 Postoperative Period

  23. Serum Concentration of Ranibizumab Observed Over Time

    Measured: Baseline up to week 112

  24. Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter Value Area Under the Concentration

    Measured: At Baseline and multiple time points up to week 112

  25. Minimum Serum Concentration (Cmin) of Ranibizumab Observed Over Time

    Measured: Baseline up to week 112

  26. Half-Life (t ½) of Ranibizumab Observed Over Time

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 112

  27. Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs) to Ranibizumab

    The numbers of ADA-positive participants at baseline and after drug administration were to be summarized for participants exposed to Ranibizumab. PDS patients who were ADA positive at the reference visit and ADA titer increased after implant; in this case, the titer of one or more samples collected after implant must be at least 4-fold greater than the titer of the reference visit sample. These patients are considered to have treatment-enhanced ADA responses.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 112

  28. Number of Participants With Neutralizing Antibodies to Ranibizumab

    The numbers of neutralizing antibodies positive participants at baseline and after drug administration were to be summarized for participants exposed to Ranibizumab.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 112

  29. Percentage of Participants Who do Not Undergo Supplemental Treatment With Intravitreal Ranibizumab Within Each Refill-Exchange Interval

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 112

  30. Percentage of Participants With At Least One AE Related to Study Device or Procedure in the PDS Arm

    An AE related to study device or procedure is defined as any adverse event related to the use of an investigational medical device. This includes any adverse events resulting from insufficient or inadequate instructions for use, deployment, implantation, installation, operation, or any malfunction of the investigational medical device and any adverse event resulting from use error or from intentional misuse of the investigational medical device. PDS Device refers to the implant, insertion tool, initial fill needle, refill needle, and explant tool. PDS Procedure refers to the initial fill, implant insertion, refill-exchange, and explantation. As prespecified in the protocol, this outcome measure was applicable to participants in the PDS arm only. Percentages are rounded off to the nearest decimal point.

    Measured: From first dose of study drug through Week 52

  31. Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Effects Related to Study Device or Procedure in the PDS Arm

    An AE related to study device or procedure is defined as any AE related to the use of an investigational medical device \& includes any AE resulting from insufficient or inadequate instructions for use, deployment, implantation, installation, operation, or any malfunction of the investigational medical device \& any AE resulting from use error or from intentional misuse of the investigational medical device. PDS refers to the implant, insertion tool, initial fill needle, refill needle \& explant tool. PDS procedure refers to the initial fill, implant insertion, refill-exchange, \& explantation. Any AE related to study device or procedure that resulted in any of a serious AE such as death, life-threatening illness or injury or permanent impairment of a body structure or a body function was considered serious. As prespecified in the protocol, this outcome measure was applicable to participants in the PDS arm only. Percentages are rounded off to the nearest decimal point.

    Measured: From Day 1 up to Week 52

  32. Percentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid, Subretinal Fluid or Both Over Time

    Absence of intraretinal fluid and subretinal fluid are measured in the central 1 mm subfield on SD-OCT. Percentages are rounded off to the nearest decimal point.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 112

  33. Percentage of Participants Who Report Preferring PDS Treatment to Intravitreal Ranibizumab Treatment, as Measured by the PDS Patient Preference Questionnaire (PPPQ) at Week 52

    The PPPQ is a 3-item questionnaire that captures a participant's preference for treatment (PDS or intravitreal injections), the strength of their preference (very strong, fairly strong, and not very strong) and the reasons for their preference (less worry or nervousness, requires less time for treatment, less discomfort, fewer treatments and other reason). As prespecified in the protocol, this outcome measure was applicable to participants in the PDS arm only. Percentages are rounded off to the nearest decimal point.

    Measured: Week 52

  34. Number of Participants With Device Deficiencies

    A device deficiency is defined as any inadequacy with respect to labeling, identity, quality, durability, reliability, usability, safety, or performance of an investigational device, including malfunctions, use errors, or inadequacy in information supplied by the manufacturer. As prespecified in the protocol, this outcome measure was applicable to participants in the PDS arm only and device deficiencies were to be recorded in the electronic capture system (EDC) after implementation of protocol Version 2 (i.e., for participants implanted after 14 June 2021).

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 52

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Aug 2020
  2. Study start10 Aug 2020
  3. Primary completion3 Oct 2022
  4. Study completion23 Feb 2026

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
174 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04503551
Sponsor's protocol ID
GR41675
Acronym
PAVILION
Status last verified
Mar 2026
First submitted
5 Aug 2020
Last updated
2 Apr 2026
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: For eligible studies, qualified researchers may request access to individual patient level clinical data. See Roche's commitment to transparency of clinical study information here: https://go.roche.com/data\_sharing

Publications

  • Pieramici DJ, Awh CC, Chang M, Emanuelli A, Holekamp NM, Hu AY, Suner IJ, Wykoff CC, Brittain C, Howard D, Quezada-Ruiz C, Santhanakrishnan A, Latkany P. Port Delivery System With Ranibizumab vs Monitoring in Nonproliferative Diabetic Retinopathy Without Macular Edema: The Pavilion Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2025 Apr 1;143(4):317-325. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2025.0001.

    PubMed 40048178

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing PDS Implant Pre-Filled with 100 mg/mL Ranibizumab and Intravitreal Ranibizumab 0.5 mg Injection in people with Diabetic Retinopathy, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 65 sites in 2 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 24 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 65 sites in United States, Puerto Rico. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 25 Nov 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants With a ≥2-Step Improvement From Baseline on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study-Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (ETDRS-DRSS) at Week 52 (time frame: Baseline, Week 52). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04503551, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Apr 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in