Prolonged Grief DisorderNCT04505904
Oxytocin and Approach-avoid in Grief
A study testing Syntocinon in people with Prolonged Grief Disorder and Bereavement, run by University of Arizona at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This is a completed project which was initiated prior to January 18,2017 Background: Theoretical models of complicated grief (CG) suggest that maladaptive approach (e.g., perseverative proximity-seeking of the deceased) or avoidance (e.g., excessive avoidance of reminders) behaviors interfere with a person's ability… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 55 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Prolonged Grief Disorder, Bereavement
- What is being tested?
- Syntocinon
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 44 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 20 Mar 2015to 12 May 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 55 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adult individual experiencing death of a spouse or partner between 6 and 36 months prior to enrollment
Who cannot join
- Inability to comprehend English;
- medical contraindications for other components of the study,
- active suicidality
- active homicidality
- active psychotic symptoms
- ongoing major health conditions such as cancer; uncontrolled hypertension; and medications likely to impact the oxytocin system (e.g., systemic corticosteroids).
- pregnant status or suspected pregnant status
- premenopausal status
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A Pull to be Close: the Differentiating Effects of Oxytocin and Grief Stimulus Type on Approach Behavior in Complicated Grief
This is a completed project which was initiated prior to January 18,2017
Background: Theoretical models of complicated grief (CG) suggest that maladaptive approach (e.g., perseverative proximity-seeking of the deceased) or avoidance (e.g., excessive avoidance of reminders) behaviors interfere with a person's ability to integrate the loss and recover from their loved one's death. Due in part to conflicting evidence, little mechanistic understanding of how these behaviors develop in grief exists. We sought to (1) identify behavioral differences between CG and non-CG groups based on implicit bias for grief-, deceased-, and social-related stimuli, and (2) test the role of the neuropeptide oxytocin in shaping approach/avoidance bias.
Methods: Widowed older adults with and without CG completed an approach/avoidance task measuring implicit bias for personalized, non-specific, grief-related, and other stimuli. In a double-blinded, randomized, counterbalanced design, each participant attended both an intranasal oxytocin session and a placebo session. Aims were to (1) identify differential effects of CG and stimulus type on implicit approach/avoidance bias [placebo session], and (2) investigate interactive effects of CG, stimulus type, and oxytocin vs. placebo on approach/avoidance bias [both sessions].
- Conditions
- Prolonged Grief Disorder, Bereavement
- Being tested
- Syntocinon, Placebo
- Keywords
- Oxytocin, Approach/Avoid, Older adults, Complicated Grief
- Medical subject headings
- Prolonged Grief Disorder
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SyntocinonDrug
Synthetic oxytocin spray, 24 IU per spray.
PlaceboDrug
Placebo spray with no active ingredient.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Syntocinon First | Experimental | Crossover design, all participants received experimental condition at either visit one or visit two, and the placebo at the other visit. This arm designates those who received syntocinon at visit one and placebo at visit two. Syntocinon is 24 IU dose administered intranasally in spray form. Receives: Drug: Syntocinon; Drug: Placebo |
| Placebo First | Placebo comparator | Crossover design, all participants received experimental condition at either visit one or visit two, and the placebo at the other visit. This arm designates those who received placebo at visit one, and syntocinon at visit two. Receives: Drug: Syntocinon; Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Reaction Time (ms) of a Push or Pull of a Joystick in a Standard Interactive Approach/Avoid Task.
Participants completed the approach avoid task twice per session, with reversed instructions on the second run (i.e., "pull for yellow" became "push for yellow"). Each seven-minute run of the task consisted of 144 2500ms trials (288 trials per visit, 576 trials total across runs/sessions; 500ms inter-trial-interval). Order of instructions (i.e., "push yellow" vs. "pull yellow") was randomized and counterbalanced across participants and sessions, to address potential for order effects/habituation. Stimuli were presented via Inquisit 4 (2014), in a pseudorandomized order determined by genetic algorithm (Wager \& Nichols, 2003).
Relative approach/avoidance bias was computed by subtracting median response time (RT; latency to joystick full extension) on PULL/approach trials in each stimulus category from PUSH/avoid trials in the same category (Rinck \& Becker, 2007). Positive response bias values indicate relative approach bias; negative values indicate relative avoidance bias.
Measured: 120 minutes
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Aug 2020
- Study start20 Mar 2015
- Primary completion12 May 2017
- Study completion12 May 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Prolonged Grief DisorderStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Enrolment
- 44 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Arizona
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04505904
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CGOT1620
- Status last verified
- Feb 2025
- First submitted
- 4 Aug 2020
- Last updated
- 4 Mar 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Mar 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Pull to be Close: the Differentiating Effects of Oxytocin and Grief Stimulus Type on Approach Behavior in Complicated Grief
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04505904
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CGOT1620
- Conditions
- Prolonged Grief Disorder, Bereavement
- Keywords
- Oxytocin, Approach/Avoid, Older adults, Complicated Grief
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 44 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of ArizonaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 20 Mar 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 12 May 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 12 May 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Aug 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 4 Mar 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a completed project which was initiated prior to January 18,2017
Background: Theoretical models of complicated grief (CG) suggest that maladaptive approach (e.g., perseverative proximity-seeking of the deceased) or avoidance (e.g., excessive avoidance of reminders) behaviors interfere with a person's ability to integrate the loss and recover from their loved one's death. Due in part to conflicting evidence, little mechanistic understanding of how these behaviors develop in grief exists. We sought to (1) identify behavioral differences between CG and non-CG groups based on implicit bias for grief-, deceased-, and social-related stimuli, and (2) test the role of the neuropeptide oxytocin in shaping approach/avoidance bias.
Methods: Widowed older adults with and without CG completed an approach/avoidance task measuring implicit bias for personalized, non-specific, grief-related, and other stimuli. In a double-blinded, randomized, counterbalanced design, each participant attended both an intranasal oxytocin session and a placebo session. Aims were to (1) identify differential effects of CG and stimulus type on implicit approach/avoidance bias [placebo session], and (2) investigate interactive effects of CG, stimulus type, and oxytocin vs. placebo on approach/avoidance bias [both sessions].
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Syntocinon First | Experimental | Drug: Syntocinon, Drug: PlaceboCrossover design, all participants received experimental condition at either visit one or visit two, and the placebo at the other visit. This arm designates those who received syntocinon at visit one and placebo at visit two. Syntocinon is 24 IU dose administered intranasally in spray form. |
| Placebo First | Placebo comparator | Drug: Syntocinon, Drug: PlaceboCrossover design, all participants received experimental condition at either visit one or visit two, and the placebo at the other visit. This arm designates those who received placebo at visit one, and syntocinon at visit two. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 55 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Adult individual experiencing death of a spouse or partner between 6 and 36 months prior to enrollment
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Inability to comprehend English;
- medical contraindications for other components of the study,
- active suicidality
- active homicidality
- active psychotic symptoms
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SyntocinonSynthetic oxytocin spray, 24 IU per spray. | Drug | Placebo First, Syntocinon First |
| PlaceboPlacebo spray with no active ingredient. | Drug | Placebo First, Syntocinon First |
Primary outcome
Reaction Time (ms) of a Push or Pull of a Joystick in a Standard Interactive Approach/Avoid Task.
Time frame: 120 minutes
Participants completed the approach avoid task twice per session, with reversed instructions on the second run (i.e., "pull for yellow" became "push for yellow"). Each seven-minute run of the task consisted of 144 2500ms trials (288 trials per visit, 576 trials total across runs/sessions; 500ms inter-trial-interval). Order of instructions (i.e., "push yellow" vs. "pull yellow") was randomized and counterbalanced across participants and sessions, to address potential for order effects/habituation. Stimuli were presented via Inquisit 4 (2014), in a pseudorandomized order determined by genetic algorithm (Wager \& Nichols, 2003). Relative approach/avoidance bias was computed by subtracting median response time (RT; latency to joystick full extension) on PULL/approach trials in each stimulus category from PUSH/avoid trials in the same category (Rinck \& Becker, 2007). Positive response bias values indicate relative approach bias; negative values indicate relative avoidance bias.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Mar 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Prolonged Grief Disorder
Recruiting
Technology-supported Interventions for Prolonged Grief Disorder (PGD)
Prolonged Grief Disorder (PGD)
Not yet recruiting
Mechanisms Underlying Late-Life Prolonged Grief Disorder
Prolonged Grief Disorder
Active, not recruiting
Iyengar Yoga for Prolonged Grief Disorder
Prolonged Grief Disorder
Recruiting
Emotion-Focused Therapy in the Treatment of Prolonged Grief Disorder
Prolonged Grief Disorder (PGD)
Recruiting
A Multifaceted Intervention Strategy for Relatives of End-of-life Patients in the Emergency Department
Grief Disorder, Prolonged
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Syntocinon in people with Prolonged Grief Disorder and Bereavement, run by University of Arizona at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 4 Mar 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Reaction Time (ms) of a Push or Pull of a Joystick in a Standard Interactive Approach/Avoid Task. (time frame: 120 minutes). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Mar 2025.