Groin InjuryNCT04508192
Copenhagen Adduction Exercise Vs an Adductor Squeeze Exercise
A study testing Exercise in people with Groin Injury, run by Aspetar at 1 site in Greece.
Trial summary
The study aims to compare the effects of two different adduction exercises on adduction strength. Young male football players will be individually randomized to perform one of these exercises in addition to their normal training. The two exercise protocols are of 8 weeks duration and are matched in terms of total load. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 16 to 40 years, men onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Groin Injury
- What is being tested?
- Exercise
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 57 participants
- Where
- 1 siteGreece
- Study dates
- 3 Aug 2020to 24 Oct 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 16 to 40 years
- Men only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Male football players 16 years or older, who were participating in full team training in Greece.
Who cannot join
- any systematic resistance training of the hip adductors (> 1/week) in the preceding 1 month before study initiation.
- groin pain resulting in loss of one or more football matches/training sessions in the preceding 1 month prior to study initiation.
- any longstanding injury (≥ 6 weeks) in the lower extremities or in the hip/groin in the preceding 6 months prior to study initiation.
- pain of more than 2/10 on a numeric rating scale (NRS) when performing the adduction strength tests or exercises were also excluded.
- For analysis, players will be excluded if there was an adherence of less than 75% of the exercise sessions.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Strength Effects of the Copenhagen Adduction Exercise Vs an Adductor Squeeze Exercise in Male Soccer Players
The study aims to compare the effects of two different adduction exercises on adduction strength. Young male football players will be individually randomized to perform one of these exercises in addition to their normal training. The two exercise protocols are of 8 weeks duration and are matched in terms of total load.
Read the detailed description
Methods Participants Male football players 16 years or older, who are participating in full team training in Greece, will be included in the study. The study will be conducted pre-season. During that time each player will have at least 4 training sessions and 1 match per week.
Exclusion criteria were
- any systematic resistance training of the hip adductors (> 1/week) in the preceding 1 month before study initiation.
- groin pain resulting in loss of one or more football matches/training sessions in the preceding 1 month prior to study initiation.
- any longstanding injury (≥ 6 weeks) in the lower extremities or in the hip/groin in the preceding 6 months prior to study initiation.
- pain of more than 2/10 on a numeric rating scale (NRS) when performing the adduction strength tests or exercises were also excluded.
- For analysis, players will be excluded if there was an adherence of less than 75% of the exercise sessions.
Ethics Ethical approval was obtained from University of West Attica ethics committee and all players will give their informed consent prior to inclusion in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Randomisation Randomisation will be performed after baseline strength testing. Participants will be individually randomized to perform either the CA or the SQ exercise protocol. The randomisation sequence will be obtained using an online software (e.g. randomizer.org), and sealed, opaque envelopes containing group allocation will be prepared by an independent person not otherwise involved in the study, and who will be unaware of the baseline strength test results. All participants will be instructed not to perform any additional adductor exercise other than their allocated exercise and to keep their regular training as usual.
Blinding The person performing the strength tests will be blinded to group allocation, and participants will be instructed not to reveal any information about their group allocation. In addition, the physiotherapist supervising the intervention procedures will not be allowed to know the results of the strength measurements of each player.
Training intervention Both groups will perform an 8-week training protocol with either the CA or the SQ exercise performed before or after the normal football training sessions.
Copenhagen Adduction exercise The CA is a high-intensity partner exercise where the player is lying on their side using the elbow of the lower forearm to support their body and the other arm placed along their body. The upper arm is supported by the partner who places their one hand under the knee and the other under the ankle, holding the leg approximately in the height of their hip. The player performs a 3-second concentric movement lifting their body until it reaches a straight line. At the same time, the other leg is adducted so that it touches the other leg. A 3-second eccentric adduction then follows with the body lowered halfway to the ground and the foot of the lower leg touching the ground without supporting the body. To ensure a correct performance the therapist instructs the players that there should not be any side flexion of the trunk or hip during the exercise. Each player performs one set on each side and then the players change roles. Each couple will be comprised of players of similar height and weight to ensure optimal conditions.
Adductor Squeeze exercise The SQ exercise is an isometric hip adduction exercise with the player holding a ball between their knees. The player lies supine with the ball placed between the knees with the knees and hips flexed and the feet flat on the surface with the first toe is pointed straight forward. Then the player is asked to press against the ball as hard as they can. The contraction is held for 10 seconds.
Load progression The CA will be performed with increasing number of repetitions during the intervention period as the only load progression variable. The number of sets will be kept at 2 sets per side throughout the study. Additionally, the total time under tension (TUT) of the CA protocol is adjusted to that of the SQ exercise. The SQ exercise has previously been suggested to be performed in two positions with 5 repetitions of 10 seconds each. This study will use only one exercise position for comparison, the SQ exercise will be performed for 10 repetitions.
Outcome measures The primary outcome measure of the study will be maximal eccentric adduction strength (EHAD). Secondary outcome measures will be maximal unilateral isometric adduction strength (IHAD), and DOMS. The distance between anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) and the point of the handheld dynamometer placement will be measured to calculate torque (Nm/kg). Both the side-lying eccentric adduction and unilateral supine isometric strength measurements will be conducted on the dominant as well as non-dominant limb. Testing will be conducted in the club's training facility. The tester will use a handheld dynamometer following standardized procedures which have been shown to have a good intra-tester reliability: eccentric adduction strength ICC 0.91 (0.70-0.98), SEM: 6.3% and isometric adduction strength ICC 0.78 (0.30-0.95), SEM: 7.3%
Compliance Compliance and perceived loading will be recorded after every training session with the respective intervention exercise, while hip adductor DOMS will be recorded in respect of the previous training session. Perceived loading will be defined via the Borg CR10 scale and DOMS via a numerical ranking scale (NRS 0-10). All players will be instructed to avoid any type of training 24h before baseline and follow-up testing. Moreover, the follow-up testing will be conducted 3 days after the intervention to avoid DOMS potentially influencing the measures.
Statistical analyses Baseline and follow-up values as well as anthropometric data will be presented as mean SD, unless otherwise stated. A mixed analysis of variance (ANOVA) will be used to assess the interactions between groups (CA vs SQ) and time (baseline vs follow-up) on the dependent variables (EHAD, IHAD and DOMS). Additionally, the simple main effect of time will be analyzed using a dependent t-test. Cohen's d will be used for effect size (ES) calculation and will be set as small (0.2), moderate (0.5) and large (0.8) . Statistical significance level will be set at p 0.05. The data analysis will be performed using SPSS Statistics (v 26, IBM Corporation).
Sample size A sample size calculation was performed prior to study initiation using G*power software (v. 3.1, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Düsseldorf, Germany). Based on previous studies the expected mean normalized eccentric adduction strength was set at 3.0 Nm/kg with a standard deviation (SD) of 0.6 Nm/kg. The minimal relevant difference in EHAD strength between groups was chosen to be 20%, and correlation was arbitrarily set at 0.5. With 80% power and a type-1 error risk of 5%, and a correlation a total sample size of 42 participants was adequate to detect a large moderate effect size. To account for dropouts during the intervention a minimum of 60 participants are included.
- Conditions
- Groin Injury
- Being tested
- Exercise
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ExerciseOther
Both interventions are simple strength exercises without technical equipment
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Copenhagen Adduction | Experimental | The CA is a high-intensity partner exercise where the player is lying on their side using the elbow of the lower forearm to support their body and the other arm placed along their body. The upper arm is supported by the partner who places their one hand under the knee and the other under the ankle, holding the leg approximately in the height of their hip. The player performs a 3-second concentric movement lifting their body until it reaches a straight line. At the same time, the other leg is adducted so that it touches the other leg. A 3-second eccentric adduction then follows with the body lowered halfway to the ground and the foot of the lower leg touching the ground without supporting the body. Receives: Other: Exercise |
| Adductor Squeeze | Active comparator | The SQ exercise is an isometric hip adduction exercise with the player holding a ball between their knees. The player lies supine with the ball placed between the knees with the knees and hips flexed and the feet flat on the surface with the first toe is pointed straight forward.the player is asked to press against the ball as hard as they can The contraction is held for 10 seconds Receives: Other: Exercise |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Eccentric hip adductor strength
The athlete lies on the side of the tested leg with their hip and knee in a straight position. The hip and knee of the other leg are placed in 90deg of flexion with the knee placed on a box to maintain position of the pelvis. The athlete holds on to the side of the bed with one hand for stabilization. The examiner lifts the tested leg off the bed into full adduction and applies a downward force to the limb holding the HHD 5cm above the medial, while the athlete is asked to resist that force performing hip adduction "as hard as possible" Then the tester breaks the athlete's resistance applying a downward force. The procedure is performed three times with a 30-second rest between each of them and the highest value is recorded.
Measured: Change from baseline eccentric adductor strength at 8 weeks
Secondary outcomes (2)
Unilateral isometric adduction strength
The player is placed supine and stabilized themselves by holding onto the sides of the examination bed. A belt placed around the pelvis provides further stabilisation. The non-tested leg is placed with knee and hip flexed and the foot flat against the bed. The medial malleolus is in line with the contralateral knee joint line and the toes rest at the end of the bed. The examiner places the HHD 5cm above the medial malleolus and the elbow against the wall for stabilization. Τhe player performs a 5-second MVIC with the instruction to push "as hard as possible". The procedure is repeated two more times with a 30-second rest between each of them and the highest value is recorded.
Measured: Change from baseline isometric adductor strength at 8 weeks
Delayed onset muscle soreness
Numerical ranking scale from 0 to 10, where 0 is minimum and indicates no muscle soreness, and 10 is maximum and indicates worst imaginable muscle soreness
Measured: Difference in mean muscle soreness at 8 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Aug 2020
- Study start3 Aug 2020
- Primary completion20 Dec 2022
- Study completion24 Oct 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Groin InjuryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Randomisation will be performed after baseline strength testing. Participants will be individually randomized to perform either the CA or the SQ exercise protocol. The randomisation sequence will be obtained using an online software (e.g. randomizer.org), and sealed, opaque envelopes containing group allocation will be prepared by an independent person not otherwise involved in the study, and who will be unaware of the baseline strength test results. All participants will be instructed not to perform any additional adductor exercise other than their allocated exercise and to keep their regular training as usual.
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 57 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Aspetar
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Andreas Serner, Aspetar
- Investigators
- Vasileios Korakakis, PhD, Study director, Aspetar Orthopaedic & Sports Medicine Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04508192
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CAvsSQ
- Status last verified
- Oct 2024
- First submitted
- 5 Aug 2020
- Last updated
- 11 Feb 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Pippas C, Gioftsos G, Korakakis V, Serner A. Strength effects of the Copenhagen adduction exercise vs an adductor squeeze exercise in male football players - A randomized controlled trial. Sci Med Footb. 2025 Nov;9(4):382-391. doi: 10.1080/24733938.2024.2419659. Epub 2024 Oct 24.
PubMed 39444266
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Feb 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Strength Effects of the Copenhagen Adduction Exercise Vs an Adductor Squeeze Exercise in Male Soccer Players
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04508192
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CAvsSQ
- Conditions
- Groin Injury
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 57 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- AspetarUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 3 Aug 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 20 Dec 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 24 Oct 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Aug 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study aims to compare the effects of two different adduction exercises on adduction strength. Young male football players will be individually randomized to perform one of these exercises in addition to their normal training. The two exercise protocols are of 8 weeks duration and are matched in terms of total load.
Detailed description
Methods Participants Male football players 16 years or older, who are participating in full team training in Greece, will be included in the study. The study will be conducted pre-season. During that time each player will have at least 4 training sessions and 1 match per week.
Exclusion criteria were
- any systematic resistance training of the hip adductors (> 1/week) in the preceding 1 month before study initiation.
- groin pain resulting in loss of one or more football matches/training sessions in the preceding 1 month prior to study initiation.
- any longstanding injury (≥ 6 weeks) in the lower extremities or in the hip/groin in the preceding 6 months prior to study initiation.
- pain of more than 2/10 on a numeric rating scale (NRS) when performing the adduction strength tests or exercises were also excluded.
- For analysis, players will be excluded if there was an adherence of less than 75% of the exercise sessions.
Ethics Ethical approval was obtained from University of West Attica ethics committee and all players will give their informed consent prior to inclusion in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Randomisation Randomisation will be performed after baseline strength testing. Participants will be individually randomized to perform either the CA or the SQ exercise protocol. The randomisation sequence will be obtained using an online software (e.g. randomizer.org), and sealed, opaque envelopes containing group allocation will be prepared by an independent person not otherwise involved in the study, and who will be unaware of the baseline strength test results. All participants will be instructed not to perform any additional adductor exercise other than their allocated exercise and to keep their regular training as usual.
Blinding The person performing the strength tests will be blinded to group allocation, and participants will be instructed not to reveal any information about their group allocation. In addition, the physiotherapist supervising the intervention procedures will not be allowed to know the results of the strength measurements of each player.
Training intervention Both groups will perform an 8-week training protocol with either the CA or the SQ exercise performed before or after the normal football training sessions.
Copenhagen Adduction exercise The CA is a high-intensity partner exercise where the player is lying on their side using the elbow of the lower forearm to support their body and the other arm placed along their body. The upper arm is supported by the partner who places their one hand under the knee and the other under the ankle, holding the leg approximately in the height of their hip. The player performs a 3-second concentric movement lifting their body until it reaches a straight line. At the same time, the other leg is adducted so that it touches the other leg. A 3-second eccentric adduction then follows with the body lowered halfway to the ground and the foot of the lower leg touching the ground without supporting the body. To ensure a correct performance the therapist instructs the players that there should not be any side flexion of the trunk or hip during the exercise. Each player performs one set on each side and then the players change roles. Each couple will be comprised of players of similar height and weight to ensure optimal conditions.
Adductor Squeeze exercise The SQ exercise is an isometric hip adduction exercise with the player holding a ball between their knees. The player lies supine with the ball placed between the knees with the knees and hips flexed and the feet flat on the surface with the first toe is pointed straight forward. Then the player is asked to press against the ball as hard as they can. The contraction is held for 10 seconds.
Load progression The CA will be performed with increasing number of repetitions during the intervention period as the only load progression variable. The number of sets will be kept at 2 sets per side throughout the study. Additionally, the total time under tension (TUT) of the CA protocol is adjusted to that of the SQ exercise. The SQ exercise has previously been suggested to be performed in two positions with 5 repetitions of 10 seconds each. This study will use only one exercise position for comparison, the SQ exercise will be performed for 10 repetitions.
Outcome measures The primary outcome measure of the study will be maximal eccentric adduction strength (EHAD). Secondary outcome measures will be maximal unilateral isometric adduction strength (IHAD), and DOMS. The distance between anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) and the point of the handheld dynamometer placement will be measured to calculate torque (Nm/kg). Both the side-lying eccentric adduction and unilateral supine isometric strength measurements will be conducted on the dominant as well as non-dominant limb. Testing will be conducted in the club's training facility. The tester will use a handheld dynamometer following standardized procedures which have been shown to have a good intra-tester reliability: eccentric adduction strength ICC 0.91 (0.70-0.98), SEM: 6.3% and isometric adduction strength ICC 0.78 (0.30-0.95), SEM: 7.3%
Compliance Compliance and perceived loading will be recorded after every training session with the respective intervention exercise, while hip adductor DOMS will be recorded in respect of the previous training session. Perceived loading will be defined via the Borg CR10 scale and DOMS via a numerical ranking scale (NRS 0-10). All players will be instructed to avoid any type of training 24h before baseline and follow-up testing. Moreover, the follow-up testing will be conducted 3 days after the intervention to avoid DOMS potentially influencing the measures.
Statistical analyses Baseline and follow-up values as well as anthropometric data will be presented as mean SD, unless otherwise stated. A mixed analysis of variance (ANOVA) will be used to assess the interactions between groups (CA vs SQ) and time (baseline vs follow-up) on the dependent variables (EHAD, IHAD and DOMS). Additionally, the simple main effect of time will be analyzed using a dependent t-test. Cohen's d will be used for effect size (ES) calculation and will be set as small (0.2), moderate (0.5) and large (0.8) . Statistical significance level will be set at p 0.05. The data analysis will be performed using SPSS Statistics (v 26, IBM Corporation).
Sample size A sample size calculation was performed prior to study initiation using G*power software (v. 3.1, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Düsseldorf, Germany). Based on previous studies the expected mean normalized eccentric adduction strength was set at 3.0 Nm/kg with a standard deviation (SD) of 0.6 Nm/kg. The minimal relevant difference in EHAD strength between groups was chosen to be 20%, and correlation was arbitrarily set at 0.5. With 80% power and a type-1 error risk of 5%, and a correlation a total sample size of 42 participants was adequate to detect a large moderate effect size. To account for dropouts during the intervention a minimum of 60 participants are included.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Randomisation will be performed after baseline strength testing. Participants will be individually randomized to perform either the CA or the SQ exercise protocol. The randomisation sequence will be obtained using an online software (e.g. randomizer.org), and sealed, opaque envelopes containing group allocation will be prepared by an independent person not otherwise involved in the study, and who will be unaware of the baseline strength test results. All participants will be instructed not to perform any additional adductor exercise other than their allocated exercise and to keep their regular training as usual.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Copenhagen Adduction | Experimental | Other: ExerciseThe CA is a high-intensity partner exercise where the player is lying on their side using the elbow of the lower forearm to support their body and the other arm placed along their body. The upper arm is supported by the partner who places their one hand under the knee and the other under the ankle, holding the leg approximately in the height of their hip. The player performs a 3-second concentric movement lifting their body until it reaches a straight line. At the same time, the other leg is adducted so that it touches the other leg. A 3-second eccentric adduction then follows with the body lowered halfway to the ground and the foot of the lower leg touching the ground without supporting the body. |
| Adductor Squeeze | Active comparator | Other: ExerciseThe SQ exercise is an isometric hip adduction exercise with the player holding a ball between their knees. The player lies supine with the ball placed between the knees with the knees and hips flexed and the feet flat on the surface with the first toe is pointed straight forward.the player is asked to press against the ball as hard as they can The contraction is held for 10 seconds |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 16 to 40 years
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Male football players 16 years or older, who were participating in full team training in Greece.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- any systematic resistance training of the hip adductors (> 1/week) in the preceding 1 month before study initiation.
- groin pain resulting in loss of one or more football matches/training sessions in the preceding 1 month prior to study initiation.
- any longstanding injury (≥ 6 weeks) in the lower extremities or in the hip/groin in the preceding 6 months prior to study initiation.
- pain of more than 2/10 on a numeric rating scale (NRS) when performing the adduction strength tests or exercises were also excluded.
- For analysis, players will be excluded if there was an adherence of less than 75% of the exercise sessions.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ExerciseBoth interventions are simple strength exercises without technical equipment | Other | Adductor Squeeze, Copenhagen Adduction |
Primary outcome
Eccentric hip adductor strength
Time frame: Change from baseline eccentric adductor strength at 8 weeks
The athlete lies on the side of the tested leg with their hip and knee in a straight position. The hip and knee of the other leg are placed in 90deg of flexion with the knee placed on a box to maintain position of the pelvis. The athlete holds on to the side of the bed with one hand for stabilization. The examiner lifts the tested leg off the bed into full adduction and applies a downward force to the limb holding the HHD 5cm above the medial, while the athlete is asked to resist that force performing hip adduction "as hard as possible" Then the tester breaks the athlete's resistance applying a downward force. The procedure is performed three times with a 30-second rest between each of them and the highest value is recorded.
2 secondary outcomes
Unilateral isometric adduction strength
Time frame: Change from baseline isometric adductor strength at 8 weeks
Delayed onset muscle soreness
Time frame: Difference in mean muscle soreness at 8 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Feb 2025.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39444266Pippas C, Gioftsos G, Korakakis V, Serner A. Strength effects of the Copenhagen adduction exercise vs an adductor squeeze exercise in male football players - A randomized controlled trial. Sci Med Footb. 2025 Nov;9(4):382-391. doi: 10.1080/24733938.2024.2419659. Epub 2024 Oct 24.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Groin Injury
Not yet recruiting
Closed Incision NPWT to Prevent Wound Complications Post-ECMO
ExtraCorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO), Wound Complications
Not yet recruiting
Transversalis Fascia Plane Block Versus Surgical Wound Infiltration for Postoperative Analgesia in Open Inguinal Hernia Repair
Inguinal Hernia Unilateral, Postoperative Pain Management
Enrolling by invitation
STAPLES VERSUS SUTURES FOR MESH FIXATION IN LICHTENSTEIN HERNIOPLASTY: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL EVALUATING POSTOPERATIVE OUTCOMES IN INGUINAL HERNIA PATIENTS
Inguinal Hernia Unilateral
Recruiting
CLOSM Trial: Groin Closure Using Layered Option for Suture Material
Vascular Diseases
Not yet recruiting
Intraoperative Application of Cold Atmospheric Plasma to Prevent Postoperative Wound Complications in the Inguinal Region of High-risk Patients With Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease
Peripheral Occlusive Disease, Wound Healing
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Vasileios Korakakis, PhD study director
Aspetar Orthopaedic & Sports Medicine Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Exercise in people with Groin Injury, run by Aspetar at 1 site in Greece.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Feb 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Greece. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Eccentric hip adductor strength (time frame: Change from baseline eccentric adductor strength at 8 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04508192, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Feb 2025.