AzTrials
AzTrials

ARDS, HumanNCT04508296

The Effect pf Goal-directed De-escalation in ARDS on Organ Function and Mortality

A study testing Goal directed de-escalation therapy in people with ARDS, Human and Sepsis, Severe, run by Northern State Medical University at 1 site in Russia.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Objective: To compare two de-escalation strategies guided by either extravascular lung water or global end-diastolic volume-oriented algorithms in patients with sepsis and ARDS. Design: A prospective randomized study. Setting: City Hospital #1 of Arkhangelsk, Russia, mixed ICU. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
ARDS, Human, Sepsis, Severe
What is being tested?
Goal directed de-escalation therapy
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
46 participants
Where
1 siteRussia
Study dates
10 Mar 2016to 10 Dec 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • The presence of sepsis ( the third international definition of sepsis and septic shock )
  • The precence of ARDS (the Berlin definition of ARDS)
  • mechanical ventilation before the study for at least 24 hrs
  • the age of the patient > 18 years.

Who cannot join

  • continuous infusion of norepinephrine in a dose exceeding 0.4 mcg/kg/min to maintain mean arterial pressure (MAP) within 65-75 mm Hg,
  • morbid obesity with BMI > 40 kg/m2,
  • severe brain injury,
  • chronic kidney diseases,
  • pregnancy,
  • known irreversible underlying conditions such as end-stage neoplasms.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Russia1 site
  • City Hospital # 1 n.a. E.E. Volosevich

    Arkhangelsk, 163000

Other trials in Russia

About this study

Official title: De-escalation Fluid Management Guided by Volumetric Parameters in Patients With Sepsis and ARDS

Objective: To compare two de-escalation strategies guided by either extravascular lung water or global end-diastolic volume-oriented algorithms in patients with sepsis and ARDS.

Design: A prospective randomized study. Setting: City Hospital #1 of Arkhangelsk, Russia, mixed ICU. Patients: Sixty patients with sepsis and ARDS were randomized to receive de-escalation fluid therapy, guided either by extravascular lung water index (EVLWI, n = 30) or global end-diastolic volume index (GEDVI, n = 30).

Intervention: In case of GEDVI > 650 mL/m2 or EVLWI > 10 mL/kg, diuretics and/or controlled ultrafiltration were administered. The primary goal of de-escalation was to achieve the cumulative 48-hr fluid balance in the range of 0 to - 3000 mL. If GEDVI < 650 mL/m2 or EVLWI < 10 mL/kg, the target fluid balance was set from 0 to +3000 mL.

Read the detailed description

In all patients, investigators catheterized the internal jugular or the subclavian vein with a triple-lumen central venous catheter (Certofix, B|Braun, Germany) and the femoral artery with a thermistor-tipped arterial catheter (5F, PV2015L20, Pulsion Medical Systems, Munich, Germany). The arterial blood pressure was recorded from a side port of the catheter. Hemodynamic monitoring was carried out using the method of transpulmonary thermodilution (PiCCO2 monitor, Pulsion Medical Systems, Germany) by a triplicate 15 mL bolus of cold (< 8 °C) 0.9% saline solution.

Mechanical ventilation (Puritan Bennett 840 and 980, Medtronic, USA) was performed according to the ARDS Network protocol, using pressure-controlled ventilation with tidal volume 6-7 ml/kg of predicted body weight, with a Ppeak not exceeding 35 cm H2O, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and a fraction of inspiratory oxygen (FiO2) levels adjusted to maintain SpO2 within a 92-97% range.

The target fluid balance was achieved by continuous infusion of furosemide with an initial dose of 0.07 mcg/kg/hr and a minimal duration of 12 hrs. In case of failure to reach a negative fluid balance by means of diuretics, started controlled ultrafiltration using continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH, multiFiltrate, Fresenius Medical Care, Germany). For fluid replacement, if necessary, investigators administered balanced crystalloid solutions (Sterofundin Iso/G5, B|Braun, Germany) with an initial infusion rate of 6-7 ml/kg/hr.

Heart rate (HR), MAP, cardiac index (CI), GEDVI, EVLWI, pulmonary vascular permeability index (PVPI), central venous pressure (CVP), systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI), pulse pressure variation (PPV), and stroke volume variation (SVV) were assessed using transpulmonary thermodilution and arterial pulse contour analysis. During the study, investigators also assessed blood gases (ABL Flex 800 Radiometer, Denmark) and biochemical parameters (Random Access A-25, BioSystems, Spain). All measurements were performed at baseline, at 24 and at 48 hrs of the goal-directed de-escalation

Being tested
Goal directed de-escalation therapy
Keywords
de-escalation therapy, acute respiratory distress syndrome, extravascular lung water, global end-diastolic volume, sepsis
Medical subject headings
Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Sepsis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Goal directed de-escalation therapyDiagnostic test

    Patients received de-escalation fluid management using either diuretics or ultrafiltration during continuous RRT in the case of GEDVI > 650 mL/m2 or EVLWI > 10 mL/kg depending on the randomization group. The primary goal of de-escalation was to obtain a cumulative fluid balance after 48 hrs from the study baseline of 0 to -3000 mL. In the case of GEDVI < 650 mL/m2 or EVLWI < 10 mL/kg, the target fluid balance was in the range of 0 to +3000 mL

Study groups in NCT04508296
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
GEDVI-oriented de-escalationExperimentalPatients received de-escalation fluid management using either diuretics or ultrafiltration during continuous RRT. In the case of GEDVI > 650 mL/m2 the primary goal of de-escalation is to obtain a cumulative fluid balance after 48 hrs from the study baseline of 0 to -3000 mL. In the case of GEDVI < 650 mL/m2 he target fluid balance is in the range of 0 to +3000 mL
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Goal directed de-escalation therapy
EVLWI-oriented de-escalationExperimentalPatients received de-escalation fluid management using either diuretics or ultrafiltration during continuous RRT. In the case of EVLWI > 10 mL/kg the primary goal of de-escalation is to obtain a cumulative fluid balance after 48 hrs from the study baseline of 0 to -3000 mL. In the case of EVLWI < 10 mL/kg, the target fluid balance is in the range of 0 to +3000 mL
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Goal directed de-escalation therapy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Improvement of organ function

    To assess if ELWI- or GEDVI-oriented goal-directed therapy can lead to the decrement of the SOFA scale by more than 20% in comparison with baseline values.

    Measured: 48 hours

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Survival

    The secondary endpoint was to evaluate whether ELWI- or GEDVI-oriented goal-directed therapy can lead to the decrement of the 28-days mortality

    Measured: 28-day

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Aug 2020
  2. Study start10 Mar 2016
  3. Primary completion10 Dec 2020
  4. Study completion10 Dec 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
46 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04508296
Sponsor's protocol ID
De-escalation ARDS_2016
Status last verified
Mar 2024
First submitted
5 Aug 2020
Last updated
22 Mar 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Goal directed de-escalation therapy in people with ARDS, Human and Sepsis, Severe, run by Northern State Medical University at 1 site in Russia.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Mar 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Russia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Improvement of organ function (time frame: 48 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Mar 2024.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in