Septic ShockPhase 3NCT04508946
Triple Therapy in Septic Shock Patients
A Phase 3 study testing vitamin c - thiamine- hydrocortisone in people with Septic Shock and Sepsis, run by Air Force Specialized Hospital, Cairo, Egypt at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
this study is conducted to evaluate the role of the novel triple therapy combination in reducing the mortality rate, reducing the shock time, and reversal of organ damage. the study includes two arms, the first arm is the control which received hydrocortisone monotherapy and the second arm is the intervention arm… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Septic Shock, Sepsis, Organ Dysfunction Syndrome Sepsis
- What is being tested?
- vitamin c - thiamine- hydrocortisone
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 94 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 1 Aug 2019to 9 Nov 2020
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age >18 years.
- Diagnosis of septic shock has been established (need vasopressors to maintain MAP ≥ 65, lactate ≥ 2mmol/L and SOFA score ≥2) [25,26].
Who cannot join
- Pregnancy and lactation.
- Refusal of attending staff or patient family.
- Contraindication to any of the components of the triple therapy regimen such as (hypersensitivity to vitamin C and Patients with G6PD deficiency).
- Patients on immunosuppressive medications and oncology patients. Do not resuscitate/do not intubate (DNR, DNI) patients
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Study Comparing Triple Therapy Regimen to Hydrocortisone Monotherapy in Reducing Mortality in Septic Shock Patients
this study is conducted to evaluate the role of the novel triple therapy combination in reducing the mortality rate, reducing the shock time, and reversal of organ damage.
the study includes two arms, the first arm is the control which received hydrocortisone monotherapy and the second arm is the intervention arm which received the triple therapy regimen.
Read more
calculation of 28 days in-hospital mortality is the primary outcome. shock time, vasopressor doses, infection markers, and organ function tests are the secondary outcomes.
the data will be analyzed by student t-test or Mann Whitney test, Fischer exact or chi-square test for numbers, repeated measures ANOVA will be used to consider confounders and other parameters, mortality will be expressed by Kaplan Meier and ROC curve.
For Multivariate analysis of repeated quantitative outcomes, linear mixed models were used to quantify the relationship between one dependent variable (SOFA, SCr, doses of vasopressors) and many independent variables including group type and sepsis phenotype adjusted to other clinical and demographic factors.
Read the detailed description
Background:
"Sepsis" is a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by the dysregulated host response to infection. Septic Shock: Subset of sepsis with circulatory and cellular/metabolic dysfunction associated with a higher risk of mortality. Organ dysfunction can be identified by acute change in the total Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score of 2 points or higher consequent to the infection.
Septic shock patients can be identified by developing sepsis with persistent arterial hypotension requiring vasopressors to keep mean arterial pressure (MAP) above 65 mm Hg and having serum lactate above 2 mmol/L. In hospitals, the mortality of septic shock according to retrospective studies is around 35%-54%. Pneumonia is the most common site of infection (about 50%) of cases, followed by intra-abdominal infection and urinary tract infection.
The (1-hr Bundle) is the cornerstone of the management, it encourages clinicians to act as quickly as possible to obtain blood cultures, administer broad-spectrum antibiotics, start appropriate fluid resuscitation, measure lactate, and begin vasopressors if clinically indicated. Ideally, these interventions would all begin in the first hour from sepsis recognition but may not necessarily be completed in the first hour. However, over the last few years, there have been interesting investigational novel therapeutic approaches. One of them is the use of high dose vitamin C. A small retrospective study demonstrated a mortality benefit by using high dose vitamin C, thiamine (vitamin B1), and hydrocortisone (Triple therapy) for treatment of septic shock in the adult population.
The normal plasma vitamin C level is ≥ 23 µmol/l. A recent study found that 88% of septic shock patients have hypovitaminosis C (<23 µmol/l), while 38% have a scurvy level (<11 µmol/l). The acute deficiency of vitamin C in this category of patients may be caused by the increased metabolic consumption due to critical illness such (trauma, burn, septic shock, etc.).
Vitamin C has pleiotropic effects such as antioxidant (direct radical scavenger- reduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS) production-regeneration of antioxidants), anti-inflammatory, and immune-supporting, cofactor/co-substrate biosynthesis, increasing catecholamine sensitivity and protection of microcirculation. Vitamin C enteral intake is insufficient in critically ill patients due to saturable mucosal sodium-dependent vitamin C transporter 1 (SCVC1). So, supplementation of high doses of vitamin C by intravenous route can restore normal plasma concentration and reverse the stress and its sequences (reduce the incidence of organ failure, reduce vasopressor support, and may reduce the overall mortality).
Recent small controlled studies suggested the dosing range of vitamin C is from 6-16 gm/day. Also, a dose-response relationship in patients who received high doses of vitamin C was proven. Vitamin C is actively transported in tissue cells by (SCVC2), leading to achieving a high intracellular level than the plasma especially in leukocytes and neurons protecting them against ROS. While high doses of vitamin C given were not associated with any harms related to the drug, there is a theoretical concern regarding the use of high doses related to the potential risk for developing oxalate crystals in the urinary tract, For this reason, co-administration of thiamine with these high doses of vitamin C acts as a co-enzyme for the function of glyoxalate-amino transferase which catalyzes the degradation of glyoxalate to carbon dioxide instead of the oxalate. Another note is a short course of high doses vitamin C has not been found to increase the risk of renal calculi in the previous studies. Also, patients with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) enzyme deficiency are at risk of hemolysis with high doses of vitamin C.
Thiamine has a crucial role in cellular metabolic processes. Thiamine deficiency is common in critically ill patients when becomes insufficient pyruvate not converted to acetyl coenzyme A resulting in impaired aerobic respiration and switch to anaerobic respiration leading to elevate of lactate level. Previous studies showed improvement in lactate level and in organ dysfunction with supplementation of thiamine for critically ill patients, thiamine dose is 200mg every 12 hours.
Hydrocortisone is another major component of the recommended triple therapy, the dose of hydrocortisone in septic shock is 200 mg/day, The rationale for its use is that, in septic shock, the released component of the cell membrane of gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria and endotoxins induce nitric oxide synthase which promotes the relaxation of vascular beds in addition to releasing of inflammatory cytokines such tumor necrosis factor (TNF-alpha) and interleukins (IL-1). These cytokines suppress the action of Adreno-Cortico Trophic Hormone (ACTH) on the adrenal gland and decrease the endogenous cortisol and compete with cortisol on receptor sites and diminish its effect, By supplying hydrocortisone, reversing of these mechanisms occurs which improves response to vasopressors, blocks phospholipase A2 then reduces prostacyclins and prostaglandins (vasodilators), reducing the diminished steroid action at receptor sites. Synergism appears between hydrocortisone and vitamin C based on two roles, one of them is glucocorticoid binding to glucocorticoid receptors is negatively affected by oxidizing molecules and this can be reversed by administration of high doses of vitamin C which restores the glucocorticoid receptor functions.
Also, it was found that the transcellular transportation of vitamin C via SVCT2 is impaired due to the downregulation of this transporter during septic shock, hydrocortisone has been shown increasing the expression of this transporter and then increases the cellular uptake.
Aim of the study To determine the effectiveness of triple therapy regimen (vitamin C, vitamin B1, and Hydrocortisone) in the reduction of mortality of septic shock patients.
Methodology Study subjects and designs This is an interventional, controlled, single-blind prospective parallel study to be conducted in the (ICUs) at the Air Force Specialized Hospital (AFSH), Cairo, Egypt.
Subjects will be selected according to the following inclusion and exclusion criteria:
Sample size Sample size will be calculated based on this equation
assuming the following parameters: Anticipated Incidence of mortality: GP1 (hydrocortisone arm) = 40.4%, in GP 2 (triple therapy arm) = 8.5%.
Alpha = 0.05, power = 95%, enrollment ratio = 1 So each group will consist of 44 patients (total = 88).
- By considering dropout rate = 20%, So each group will consist of 53 patients and the total sample size =106 patients.
- The first arm will take the triple therapy regimen (vitamin C, vitamin B1, and Hydrocortisone), the Second arm will take Hydrocortisone as the standard of care.
Data collection:
From each patient the following data will be collected:
- Age, gender, height and weight, and any allergies (on admission)
- Causes of ICU admission (on admission).
- Patient's past medical history (PMH) (on admission)
- SOFA score to be assessed on admission and daily (primary outcome) [28] and Acute Physiologic Assessment and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE ӏӏ) [29] score (on admission only).
- Hemodynamic data (blood pressure, pulse, central venous pressure (CVP), respiratory rate, O2 saturation) on admission, and daily.
- Infection markers (total leukocytic count, CRP), lactate level, serum creatinine, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine aminotransferase (ALT). on admission and for follow- up daily (secondary outcome).
Statistical analysis
Different statistical tests selection will be based on the type of data and the calculated outcome:
- Mortality (primary outcome) calculation will be evaluated by the chi-square test.
- Reversal of organs failure, weaning from the mechanical ventilator, and vasopressors will be evaluated using the Mann-Whitney test.
- Conditions
- Septic Shock, Sepsis, Organ Dysfunction Syndrome Sepsis
- Being tested
- vitamin c - thiamine- hydrocortisone
- Keywords
- Septic shock, Vitamin C, Thiamine, Hydrocortisone, sepsis
- Medical subject headings
- Shock, Septic, Sepsis, Toxemia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
vitamin c - thiamine- hydrocortisoneDrug
Also called Triple therapy
Triple therapy regimen (vitamin c - thiamine- hydrocortisone)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Hydrocortisone Monotherapy | Active comparator | Hydrocortisone Monotherapy Receives: Drug: vitamin c - thiamine- hydrocortisone |
| triple therapy regimen (vitamin c - thiamine- hydrocortisone) | Experimental | triple therapy regimen (vitamin c - thiamine- hydrocortisone) Receives: Drug: vitamin c - thiamine- hydrocortisone |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The number of patients who died within 28 days.
patients were followed up daily for 28 days, this is the number of patients who died within 28 days.
Measured: 28 days
ICU Mortality
The number of patients who died during ICU stay
Measured: Within 28 days
Secondary outcomes (3)
the number of days that are needed to off the patients from vasopressors.
average number of days that are needed to off the patients from vasopressors.
Measured: 28 Days
the number of days that are needed to off the patients from mechanical ventilation.
average number of days that are needed to off the patients from mechanical ventilation.
Measured: 28 days
Change in organ's functions test such as (serum creatinine, Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT)
change was calculated as the values at ICU stay and specific cut off points (after 48 hr, after 96 hr).
Measured: 28 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Aug 2020
- Study start1 Aug 2019
- Primary completion9 Nov 2020
- Study completion9 Nov 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Septic ShockStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 94 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Air Force Specialized Hospital, Cairo, Egypt
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Abdelrhman Hussein, Principal investigator, Air Force Specialized Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04508946
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2019/11
- Status last verified
- Jan 2021
- First submitted
- 8 Aug 2020
- Last updated
- 26 Jan 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, Annane D, Gerlach H, Opal SM, Sevransky JE, Sprung CL, Douglas IS, Jaeschke R, Osborn TM, Nunnally ME, Townsend SR, Reinhart K, Kleinpell RM, Angus DC, Deutschman CS, Machado FR, Rubenfeld GD, Webb SA, Beale RJ, Vincent JL, Moreno R; Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines Committee including the Pediatric Subgroup. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012. Crit Care Med. 2013 Feb;41(2):580-637. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31827e83af.
PubMed 23353941Plevin R, Callcut R. Update in sepsis guidelines: what is really new? Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2017 Sep 7;2(1):e000088. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2017-000088. eCollection 2017.
PubMed 29766091Korosec Jagodic H, Jagodic K, Podbregar M. Long-term outcome and quality of life of patients treated in surgical intensive care: a comparison between sepsis and trauma. Crit Care. 2006;10(5):R134. doi: 10.1186/cc5047.
PubMed 16978417Zahar JR, Timsit JF, Garrouste-Orgeas M, Francais A, Vesin A, Descorps-Declere A, Dubois Y, Souweine B, Haouache H, Goldgran-Toledano D, Allaouchiche B, Azoulay E, Adrie C. Outcomes in severe sepsis and patients with septic shock: pathogen species and infection sites are not associated with mortality. Crit Care Med. 2011 Aug;39(8):1886-95. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31821b827c.
PubMed 21516036Angus DC, van der Poll T. Severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2013 Aug 29;369(9):840-51. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1208623. No abstract available.
PubMed 23984731
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Jan 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Study Comparing Triple Therapy Regimen to Hydrocortisone Monotherapy in Reducing Mortality in Septic Shock Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04508946
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2019/11
- Conditions
- Septic Shock, Sepsis, Organ Dysfunction Syndrome Sepsis
- Keywords
- Septic shock, Vitamin C, Thiamine, Hydrocortisone, sepsis
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 94 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Air Force Specialized Hospital, Cairo, EgyptUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Aug 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 9 Nov 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 9 Nov 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Aug 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
this study is conducted to evaluate the role of the novel triple therapy combination in reducing the mortality rate, reducing the shock time, and reversal of organ damage.
the study includes two arms, the first arm is the control which received hydrocortisone monotherapy and the second arm is the intervention arm which received the triple therapy regimen.
calculation of 28 days in-hospital mortality is the primary outcome. shock time, vasopressor doses, infection markers, and organ function tests are the secondary outcomes.
the data will be analyzed by student t-test or Mann Whitney test, Fischer exact or chi-square test for numbers, repeated measures ANOVA will be used to consider confounders and other parameters, mortality will be expressed by Kaplan Meier and ROC curve.
For Multivariate analysis of repeated quantitative outcomes, linear mixed models were used to quantify the relationship between one dependent variable (SOFA, SCr, doses of vasopressors) and many independent variables including group type and sepsis phenotype adjusted to other clinical and demographic factors.
Detailed description
Background:
"Sepsis" is a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by the dysregulated host response to infection. Septic Shock: Subset of sepsis with circulatory and cellular/metabolic dysfunction associated with a higher risk of mortality. Organ dysfunction can be identified by acute change in the total Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score of 2 points or higher consequent to the infection.
Septic shock patients can be identified by developing sepsis with persistent arterial hypotension requiring vasopressors to keep mean arterial pressure (MAP) above 65 mm Hg and having serum lactate above 2 mmol/L. In hospitals, the mortality of septic shock according to retrospective studies is around 35%-54%. Pneumonia is the most common site of infection (about 50%) of cases, followed by intra-abdominal infection and urinary tract infection.
The (1-hr Bundle) is the cornerstone of the management, it encourages clinicians to act as quickly as possible to obtain blood cultures, administer broad-spectrum antibiotics, start appropriate fluid resuscitation, measure lactate, and begin vasopressors if clinically indicated. Ideally, these interventions would all begin in the first hour from sepsis recognition but may not necessarily be completed in the first hour. However, over the last few years, there have been interesting investigational novel therapeutic approaches. One of them is the use of high dose vitamin C. A small retrospective study demonstrated a mortality benefit by using high dose vitamin C, thiamine (vitamin B1), and hydrocortisone (Triple therapy) for treatment of septic shock in the adult population.
The normal plasma vitamin C level is ≥ 23 µmol/l. A recent study found that 88% of septic shock patients have hypovitaminosis C (<23 µmol/l), while 38% have a scurvy level (<11 µmol/l). The acute deficiency of vitamin C in this category of patients may be caused by the increased metabolic consumption due to critical illness such (trauma, burn, septic shock, etc.).
Vitamin C has pleiotropic effects such as antioxidant (direct radical scavenger- reduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS) production-regeneration of antioxidants), anti-inflammatory, and immune-supporting, cofactor/co-substrate biosynthesis, increasing catecholamine sensitivity and protection of microcirculation. Vitamin C enteral intake is insufficient in critically ill patients due to saturable mucosal sodium-dependent vitamin C transporter 1 (SCVC1). So, supplementation of high doses of vitamin C by intravenous route can restore normal plasma concentration and reverse the stress and its sequences (reduce the incidence of organ failure, reduce vasopressor support, and may reduce the overall mortality).
Recent small controlled studies suggested the dosing range of vitamin C is from 6-16 gm/day. Also, a dose-response relationship in patients who received high doses of vitamin C was proven. Vitamin C is actively transported in tissue cells by (SCVC2), leading to achieving a high intracellular level than the plasma especially in leukocytes and neurons protecting them against ROS. While high doses of vitamin C given were not associated with any harms related to the drug, there is a theoretical concern regarding the use of high doses related to the potential risk for developing oxalate crystals in the urinary tract, For this reason, co-administration of thiamine with these high doses of vitamin C acts as a co-enzyme for the function of glyoxalate-amino transferase which catalyzes the degradation of glyoxalate to carbon dioxide instead of the oxalate. Another note is a short course of high doses vitamin C has not been found to increase the risk of renal calculi in the previous studies. Also, patients with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) enzyme deficiency are at risk of hemolysis with high doses of vitamin C.
Thiamine has a crucial role in cellular metabolic processes. Thiamine deficiency is common in critically ill patients when becomes insufficient pyruvate not converted to acetyl coenzyme A resulting in impaired aerobic respiration and switch to anaerobic respiration leading to elevate of lactate level. Previous studies showed improvement in lactate level and in organ dysfunction with supplementation of thiamine for critically ill patients, thiamine dose is 200mg every 12 hours.
Hydrocortisone is another major component of the recommended triple therapy, the dose of hydrocortisone in septic shock is 200 mg/day, The rationale for its use is that, in septic shock, the released component of the cell membrane of gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria and endotoxins induce nitric oxide synthase which promotes the relaxation of vascular beds in addition to releasing of inflammatory cytokines such tumor necrosis factor (TNF-alpha) and interleukins (IL-1). These cytokines suppress the action of Adreno-Cortico Trophic Hormone (ACTH) on the adrenal gland and decrease the endogenous cortisol and compete with cortisol on receptor sites and diminish its effect, By supplying hydrocortisone, reversing of these mechanisms occurs which improves response to vasopressors, blocks phospholipase A2 then reduces prostacyclins and prostaglandins (vasodilators), reducing the diminished steroid action at receptor sites. Synergism appears between hydrocortisone and vitamin C based on two roles, one of them is glucocorticoid binding to glucocorticoid receptors is negatively affected by oxidizing molecules and this can be reversed by administration of high doses of vitamin C which restores the glucocorticoid receptor functions.
Also, it was found that the transcellular transportation of vitamin C via SVCT2 is impaired due to the downregulation of this transporter during septic shock, hydrocortisone has been shown increasing the expression of this transporter and then increases the cellular uptake.
Aim of the study To determine the effectiveness of triple therapy regimen (vitamin C, vitamin B1, and Hydrocortisone) in the reduction of mortality of septic shock patients.
Methodology Study subjects and designs This is an interventional, controlled, single-blind prospective parallel study to be conducted in the (ICUs) at the Air Force Specialized Hospital (AFSH), Cairo, Egypt.
Subjects will be selected according to the following inclusion and exclusion criteria:
Sample size Sample size will be calculated based on this equation
assuming the following parameters: Anticipated Incidence of mortality: GP1 (hydrocortisone arm) = 40.4%, in GP 2 (triple therapy arm) = 8.5%.
Alpha = 0.05, power = 95%, enrollment ratio = 1 So each group will consist of 44 patients (total = 88).
- By considering dropout rate = 20%, So each group will consist of 53 patients and the total sample size =106 patients.
- The first arm will take the triple therapy regimen (vitamin C, vitamin B1, and Hydrocortisone), the Second arm will take Hydrocortisone as the standard of care.
Data collection:
From each patient the following data will be collected:
- Age, gender, height and weight, and any allergies (on admission)
- Causes of ICU admission (on admission).
- Patient's past medical history (PMH) (on admission)
- SOFA score to be assessed on admission and daily (primary outcome) [28] and Acute Physiologic Assessment and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE ӏӏ) [29] score (on admission only).
- Hemodynamic data (blood pressure, pulse, central venous pressure (CVP), respiratory rate, O2 saturation) on admission, and daily.
- Infection markers (total leukocytic count, CRP), lactate level, serum creatinine, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine aminotransferase (ALT). on admission and for follow- up daily (secondary outcome).
Statistical analysis
Different statistical tests selection will be based on the type of data and the calculated outcome:
- Mortality (primary outcome) calculation will be evaluated by the chi-square test.
- Reversal of organs failure, weaning from the mechanical ventilator, and vasopressors will be evaluated using the Mann-Whitney test.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Hydrocortisone Monotherapy | Active comparator | Drug: vitamin c - thiamine- hydrocortisoneHydrocortisone Monotherapy |
| triple therapy regimen (vitamin c - thiamine- hydrocortisone) | Experimental | Drug: vitamin c - thiamine- hydrocortisonetriple therapy regimen (vitamin c - thiamine- hydrocortisone) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Age >18 years.
- Diagnosis of septic shock has been established (need vasopressors to maintain MAP ≥ 65, lactate ≥ 2mmol/L and SOFA score ≥2) [25,26].
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Pregnancy and lactation.
- Refusal of attending staff or patient family.
- Contraindication to any of the components of the triple therapy regimen such as (hypersensitivity to vitamin C and Patients with G6PD deficiency).
- Patients on immunosuppressive medications and oncology patients. Do not resuscitate/do not intubate (DNR, DNI) patients
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| vitamin c - thiamine- hydrocortisoneAlso: Triple therapyTriple therapy regimen (vitamin c - thiamine- hydrocortisone) | Drug | Hydrocortisone Monotherapy, triple therapy regimen (vitamin c - thiamine- hydrocortisone) |
Primary outcome
The number of patients who died within 28 days.
Time frame: 28 days
patients were followed up daily for 28 days, this is the number of patients who died within 28 days.
ICU Mortality
Time frame: Within 28 days
The number of patients who died during ICU stay
3 secondary outcomes
the number of days that are needed to off the patients from vasopressors.
Time frame: 28 Days
the number of days that are needed to off the patients from mechanical ventilation.
Time frame: 28 days
Change in organ's functions test such as (serum creatinine, Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT)
Time frame: 28 days
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Jan 2021.
- Results publication: PubMed 23353941Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, Annane D, Gerlach H, Opal SM, Sevransky JE, Sprung CL, Douglas IS, Jaeschke R, Osborn TM, Nunnally ME, Townsend SR, Reinhart K, Kleinpell RM, Angus DC, Deutschman CS, Machado FR, Rubenfeld GD, Webb SA, Beale RJ, Vincent JL, Moreno R; Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines Committee including the Pediatric Subgroup. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012. Crit Care Med. 2013 Feb;41(2):580-637. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31827e83af.
- Results publication: PubMed 29766091Plevin R, Callcut R. Update in sepsis guidelines: what is really new? Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2017 Sep 7;2(1):e000088. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2017-000088. eCollection 2017.
- Results publication: PubMed 16978417Korosec Jagodic H, Jagodic K, Podbregar M. Long-term outcome and quality of life of patients treated in surgical intensive care: a comparison between sepsis and trauma. Crit Care. 2006;10(5):R134. doi: 10.1186/cc5047.
- Results publication: PubMed 21516036Zahar JR, Timsit JF, Garrouste-Orgeas M, Francais A, Vesin A, Descorps-Declere A, Dubois Y, Souweine B, Haouache H, Goldgran-Toledano D, Allaouchiche B, Azoulay E, Adrie C. Outcomes in severe sepsis and patients with septic shock: pathogen species and infection sites are not associated with mortality. Crit Care Med. 2011 Aug;39(8):1886-95. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31821b827c.
- Results publication: PubMed 23984731Angus DC, van der Poll T. Severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2013 Aug 29;369(9):840-51. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1208623. No abstract available.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Septic Shock
RecruitingPhase 3
Systematic Adjunction of Vasopressine in Septic Shock
Septic Shock
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Clinical Value of EMR3 in Sepsis Diagnosis, Monitoring, and Prognosis: A Multicenter Prospective Observational Study
Sepsis
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Neutrophil Activation and NETosis in Sepsis
Sepsis, Septic Shock
Recruiting
Efficacy and Safety of Methylene Blue in the Treatment of Severe Septic Shock
Septic Shock, Methylene Blue
Not yet recruiting
Perfusion Efficiency-Guided MAP De-escalation in Elderly Septic Shock
Sepsis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Abdelrhman Hussein principal investigator
Air Force Specialized Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing vitamin c - thiamine- hydrocortisone in people with Septic Shock and Sepsis, run by Air Force Specialized Hospital, Cairo, Egypt at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Jan 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The number of patients who died within 28 days. (time frame: 28 days). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04508946, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Jan 2021.