AzTrials
AzTrials

TraumaNCT04511754

Experiential Training in Eliciting Disclosure & Emotions for Mental Health Trainees

A study testing Experiential Psychotherapy Skill Training and Standard Psychotherapy Skill Training in people with Trauma and Emotions, run by Mark A. Lumley at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Many people seek psychotherapy to alleviate symptoms related to trauma and stressful conflicts, and many psychotherapy approaches aim to help people process trauma and conflicts through eliciting client disclosure of these experiences and activating related emotions. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Trauma, Emotions, Disclosure
What is being tested?
Experiential Psychotherapy Skill Training and Standard Psychotherapy Skill Training
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
102 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
9 Dec 2020to 22 Jun 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Graduate students in mental health-related graduate programs (e.g., social work, counseling, and clinical psychology).

Who cannot join

  • None

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Wayne State University Department of Psychology

    Detroit, Michigan, 48202

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Experiential Training in Disclosure Elicitation and Emotional Awareness and Activation: A Randomized Test

Many people seek psychotherapy to alleviate symptoms related to trauma and stressful conflicts, and many psychotherapy approaches aim to help people process trauma and conflicts through eliciting client disclosure of these experiences and activating related emotions. However, many therapists avoid implementing such approaches because they are emotionally challenging for both the client and the therapist, and because therapists lack direct training in specific skills related to eliciting client disclosure and working with emotions. This suggests that providing therapists with a training experience that is experiential, includes direct supervision and feedback, and addresses therapists' reservations and anxieties may be an important approach to increase therapist skills in disclosure elicitation and emotional activation.

This is a randomized trial that will test two methods of training (experiential vs. standard) of master's level psychotherapy students in specific therapeutic skills aimed at increasing trainees' emotional awareness and self-regulation and reducing trainee anxiety and avoidance of eliciting disclosure and working with emotions in psychotherapy. In the standard training condition, the trainee will receive a lecture about the skills including rationale and research background, examples, and opportunities to ask questions. In the experiential training condition, the trainees will receive information about the skills with examples and will have opportunity to practice using short video clips of actors portraying clients. The trainees will be asked to respond to the short clips using the skills they learned, and a trainer will process the trainees' reactions after they respond to each practice video clip and will provide feedback to the trainees about their performance on the practice. Findings from this study will provide information about the feasibility of training in specific disclosure elicitation and emotional activation therapy skills, and will provide information about whether or not live supervision will lead to greater improvement in the targeted skills compared to entirely standard training.

Read the detailed description

Experiences of trauma and stressful conflicts are common, with most adults in the United States reporting experiences of at least one traumatic event in their lifetimes. Experiences of stressful events vary, and may include war-related trauma, physical, emotional, and sexual abuse, witnessing violence or substance use in the household, and emotional and physical neglect. Exposure to traumatic and stressful events has been linked to adverse physical and psychological health outcomes, impaired functioning, and substantial reductions in quality of life. In addition to trauma exposure, many individuals experience interpersonal and intrapersonal conflicts such as experiences of social rejection, struggles with intimacy or autonomy in relationships, shameful secrets, and perfectionism. Such conflicts are also associated with poor psychological and physical health outcomes. Experiences of trauma and stressful conflicts often underlie many psychological problems that lead individuals to seek psychotherapy.

Many psychotherapy approaches aim to help people disclose and process difficult experiences and activate and experience their emotions, and research suggests that such psychotherapies improve psychological and physical health. For example, written emotional disclosure (or expressive writing) is a therapeutic approach in which a person is asked to write repeatedly about private stressful experiences and avoided emotions. Another psychotherapy approach, Prolonged Exposure Therapy (PE), is designed to help clients approach feared and avoided trauma-related material including memories, thoughts, emotions, and real-life situations. Short-Term Psychodynamic Psychotherapy (STPP) is an approach that helps clients acknowledge and engage with avoided emotions and psychological conflicts and express blocked emotions. One variant of STPP has been used to specifically treat affect phobia, a phobia of experiencing or expressing certain emotions. Emotional Awareness and Expression Therapy (EAET) borrows from STPP, exposure therapy, expressive writing, and other emotion-focused approaches and aims to help people disclose stressful experiences and emotional conflicts and experience and express their emotions related to stressful situations.

The aforementioned psychotherapy approaches have shown benefits for a range of populations and psychological and physical health outcomes; however, this therapeutic work can be challenging, and therapists may often avoid implementing such approaches and skills. Eliciting client disclosure and emotional activation can be especially challenging for novel therapists who may avoid directly inquiring about clients' traumas and conflicts and may experience difficulty tuning into and working with clients' emotions. These barriers are often observed in the implementation of exposure-based approaches, which are underutilized in day-to-day clinical practice. Barriers to therapist implementation of exposure-based techniques include lack of adequate training, the belief that exposure is likely to lead to an increase in symptoms or problems in therapy, and lack confidence in one's ability to handle a range of client emotional reactions.

Comprehensive training experiences are needed to address therapist-centric barriers to utilization of disclosure elicitation and emotional activation skills and to increase therapist self-efficacy related to such skills. Research suggests that entirely didactic training methods, such as reading manuals or watching lectures and training videos, are insufficient to lead to therapist behavior change. Several studies have highlighted the importance of supervision and supervisor feedback in increasing therapist knowledge, proficiency, and retention of therapeutic skills. Additionally, some researchers have highlighted the importance of key components of skill acquisition, such as repetitive or deliberate practice of specific skills through role plays and simulations, personalized performance feedback, and experiential/reflective training approaches. Therapist self-reflection and self-regulation practices have also been highlighted as an important component of skill training, as such practices can help therapists tune into and regulate their own in-session reactions and emotions. Several studies have also aimed to address, through training, therapists' anxiety, affect phobia (fear of intense emotional experiences), and the desire to avoid emotionally challenging therapeutic moments. These studies have highlighted the importance of increasing trainees' emotional awareness, helping trainees manage their reactions to client disclosure and emotional expression, and targeting and challenging clinician anxieties and concerns during psychotherapy skill training.

Overall, research suggests that efforts to improve therapist utilization of disclosure elicitation and emotional activation skills must not only provide "how to" training, but also directly address therapists' reservations, fears, and concerns related to disclosure and emotions. This suggests that providing therapists with a training experience that is experiential, includes practice, direct supervision and feedback, and addresses therapists' reservations and anxieties may be an important approach to increase therapist skills in disclosure elicitation and emotional activation. The current study aims to test the effects of an experiential, supervised training approach on therapy trainees' disclosure elicitation and emotional activation skills, and trainees' self-efficacy and affect phobia (fear of emotions), compared to a standard, didactic training approach. It is hypothesized that the experiential training condition will result in greater improvement in performance of the targeted skills and in higher participant ratings of satisfaction with the training compared to the standard training condition. It is also hypothesized that the experiential training condition will result in a greater increase in trainees' self-efficacy and greater decrease in trainees' affect phobia compared to the standard training condition.

Being tested
Experiential Psychotherapy Skill Training, Standard Psychotherapy Skill Training
Keywords
Clinical Training, Mental Health Trainees, Experiential
Medical subject headings
Wounds and Injuries

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Experiential Psychotherapy Skill TrainingBehavioural

    The Experiential Training intervention will include components of training not usually included in standard clinical training experiences; such components include opportunities for deliberate practice of the skills trained, live supervision and feedback, and discussion with a trainer focused on the skills taught and the trainees' performance.

  • Standard Psychotherapy Skill TrainingBehavioural

    Standard didactic training with research support, examples, and opportunities to ask questions.

Study groups in NCT04511754
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Experiential Training ConditionExperimentalTrainees will be taught the following skills during a single session: 1) Therapist in-session emotional-awareness and self-regulation; 2) Facilitating client disclosure of traumas and other difficult experiences; and 3) Helping clients access and experience adaptive emotions. In the experiential training condition, the trainees will receive information about the skills with examples and will have opportunity to practice using short video clips of actors portraying clients. The trainees will be asked to respond to the short clips using the skills they learned. A trainer (a graduate student in clinical psychology) will pause and process the trainees' reactions after they respond to each practice video clip and will provide feedback to the trainees about their performance on the practice.
Receives: Behavioral: Experiential Psychotherapy Skill Training
Standard Training ConditionActive comparatorTrainees will be taught the following skills during a single session: 1) Therapist in-session emotional-awareness and self-regulation; 2) Facilitating client disclosure of traumas and other difficult experiences; and 3) Helping clients access and experience adaptive emotions. In the standard training condition, the trainee will receive a lecture about the skills including rationale and research background, examples, and opportunities to ask questions. The standard training condition will not include opportunities for practice or live discussion and feedback from the trainer.
Receives: Behavioral: Standard Psychotherapy Skill Training

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in targeted therapy skills from baseline to post-training and 1-month follow-up

    Participant will respond brief pre-recorded videos of actors portraying clients in therapy, and the participant responses will be recorded and coded for skills acquisition using a structured protocol.

    Measured: Immediately Post-Training and 1-month follow-up

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Satisfaction with training content and satisfaction with training learning

    Satisfaction with Training Scale and Satisfaction with Learning Scale (participant ratings of 1 to 6; higher scores indicate higher satisfaction)

    Measured: Immediately Post-Training and 1-month follow-up

  2. Change in self-efficacy from baseline to 1-month follow-up

    Counselor Activity Self-Efficacy Scales; (0 to 9; higher values = higher self-efficacy)

    Measured: 1-month follow-up

  3. Change in affect phobia from baseline to 1-month follow-up

    Affect Phobia Test; (1 to 5; lower values = higher affect phobia)

    Measured: 1-month follow-up

  4. Change in anxiety from baseline to 1-month follow-up

    PROMIS Anxiety Scale; (1 to 5; higher values = greater anxiety)

    Measured: 1-month follow-up

  5. Change in depression from baseline to 1-month follow-up

    PROMIS Depression Scale; (1 to 5; higher values = greater depression)

    Measured: 1-month follow-up

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Aug 2020
  2. Study start9 Dec 2020
  3. Primary completion22 Jun 2021
  4. Study completion22 Jun 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Participants will be randomized at a 1:1 ratio to either the standard training or the experiential training condition.
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
102 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04511754
Sponsor's protocol ID
IRB20062468B3
Status last verified
Aug 2022
First submitted
7 Aug 2020
Last updated
4 Aug 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Yamin JB, Cannoy CN, Gibbins KM, Krohner S, Rapport LJ, Trentacosta CJ, Zeman LL, Lumley MA. Experiential training of mental health graduate students in emotional processing skills: A randomized, controlled trial. Psychotherapy (Chic). 2023 Dec;60(4):512-524. doi: 10.1037/pst0000495. Epub 2023 Jun 29.

    PubMed 37384434

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Experiential Psychotherapy Skill Training and Standard Psychotherapy Skill Training in people with Trauma and Emotions, run by Mark A. Lumley at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Aug 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in targeted therapy skills from baseline to post-training and 1-month follow-up (time frame: Immediately Post-Training and 1-month follow-up). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04511754, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Aug 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in