AzTrials
AzTrials

Atrial FibrillationCPAPAFNCT04513483

CPAP in AF Patients With OSA

A study testing continuous positive airway pressure in people with Atrial Fibrillation and Sleep Apnea, run by National Taiwan University Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Obstructive sleep apnea is associated with atrial fibrillation. This study is to evaluate the effect of continuous positive airway pressure on the burden of atrial fibrillation in the patients with obstructive sleep apnea and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Atrial Fibrillation, Sleep Apnea
What is being tested?
continuous positive airway pressure
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
25 participants
Where
1 siteTaiwan
Study dates
7 Aug 2020to 31 Aug 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • men or women aged 18 to 80 years
  • paroxysmal AF, diagnosed based on the ACC/AHA/HRS 2014 guideline, and is defined as AF that terminates spontaneously or with intervention within 7 d of onset either by 12-lead EKG, 24-hr Holter, or 14-day ECG monitor.
  • OSA, defined as an AHI>15/hr of sleep, of which >50% of events are obstructive.
  • Informed consent signed

Who cannot join

  • Moderate-severe valvular heart diseases (regurgitation or stenosis)
  • post heart surgery
  • Uncontrolled systemic hypertension or pulmonary hypertension
  • Use of psychoactive or other drugs that could influence breathing patterns
  • Current use of CPAP treatment
  • Epworth sleepiness scale>10
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Congestive heart failure (LVEF≦45%)
  • Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
  • History of stroke or neuromuscular disease
  • Severe insomnia

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Taiwan1 site
  • National Taiwan University Hospital

    Taipei

Other trials in Taiwan

About this study

Official title: The Effect of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Obstructive sleep apnea is associated with atrial fibrillation. This study is to evaluate the effect of continuous positive airway pressure on the burden of atrial fibrillation in the patients with obstructive sleep apnea and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Read the detailed description

Traditional risk factors for AF were established from the original Framingham Heart Study cohort which showed aging, hypertension, congestive heart failure, coronary artery disease, valvular heart disease and diabetes mellitus (DM) as independent risk factors. In the past decade, several important risk factors not encompassed in previous studies have also been found to have a link with AF. One of these newly-identified risk factors is obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), which has been listed as one of the risk factor needed to be assessed and treated in AF patients.

OSA and AF often co-exist and indeed share some risk factors, such as hypertension. AF Patients are more likely to have OSA, with reported prevalence rates of OSA (apnea-hypopnea index [AHI] ≥15) as high as 62% in AF cohorts from hospital-based studies. In community-based cohort studies, a cross-sectional analysis from sleep heart health study (SHSS) found those with sleep-disordered breathing(SDB)/sleep apnea (SA) (respiratory disturbance index [RDI] ≥ 30) had four times the odds of a polysomnography (PSG)-detected nocturnal AF as compared to those without SDB/SA after adjusting confounders. Following from this, a cross-sectional study on Outcomes of Sleep Disorders in Older Men Study (MrOS Sleep Study) showed a dose-response association between RDI and AF.

There are several pathophysiological mechanisms by which OSA could potentially increase the risk of development of new AF, or trigger a recurrence of AF in a patient with an established history of AF. OSA is characterized by repetitive collapse of the upper airway (UA) during sleep. The UA collapses when sleep-related loss in UA dilator muscle tone is superimposed upon a narrow and/or collapsible airway. These obstructive apneas or hypopneas, characterized by unsuccessful inspiratory efforts against an occluded airway, lead to 1) exaggerated negative intrathoracic pressure swings 2) hypoxia, and 3) co-activation of sympathetic and parasympathetic systems, all of which have been shown to potentiate a pro-arrhythmic state. Given that these mechanisms are pro-arrhythmic, CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure), the gold standard therapy for OSA, works by splinting the upper airway open during sleep with subsequent abolition of swings in pressure, hypoxia and arousals, can potentially modify the risk of development of AF or recurrence of AF in OSA patients.

There is a growing body of literature supporting that OSA being as a risk factor for recurrence of AF after cardioversion or ablation and treatment of OSA with CPAP decreased the risk of recurrence of AF. Nevertheless, all of the aforementioned studies are observational or retrospective in nature. Recently, Caples et al. conducted the first randomized control trial using CPAP in patients with AF and OSA but failed to find a difference of recurrence of AF between those treated with CPAP versus usual care. Notably, there are several issues in the study design and methodology that do not allow for firm conclusion from the results of this study. It was a single-center study, enrolling very small number of patients, and used a low cut-off AHI>5/h as inclusion criteria. More importantly, only patients with persistent AF scheduled for cardioversion were included. Given the natural time-course from paroxysmal AF to persistent AF, long-term remodeling or established atrial arrythmogenic substrate in persistent AF may be less or not reversible even when the initial risk factor is removed. In this regard, early intervention with CPAP in patients with paroxysmal AF and OSA, which has never been done in previous studies, should confer a better antiarrythmic effect. Therefore, the investigators aim to test the hypothesis that treatment of OSA with CPAP would reduce the burden of AF in patients with paroxysmal AF.

Being tested
continuous positive airway pressure, Placebo
Keywords
Atrial Fibrillation, sleep apnea
Medical subject headings
Atrial Fibrillation, Sleep Apnea Syndromes

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • continuous positive airway pressureDevice

    CPAP treatment at night. Treat AF as cardiologist's discretion.

  • PlaceboDevice

    Observation. Treat AF as cardiologist's discretion.

Study groups in NCT04513483
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
CPAP treatment for 12 monthsExperimentalCPAP treatment for 12 months
Receives: Device: continuous positive airway pressure
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorobservation
Receives: Device: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change of AF burden

    The duration in AF on 14-day ECG monitor (percent)

    Measured: 0, 6, 12 months

  2. change of left atrium volume

    LA volume index measured by ultrasonocardiography

    Measured: 0, 6, 12 months

  3. change of Quality of Life

    Questionnaire (Short Form Health Survey-36); higher scores means a better quality of life; maximal score 100%

    Measured: 0, 6, 12 months

  4. Number of participants hospitalized for cardiovascular or all causes

    Hospitalization for cardiovascular or all causes within the follow-up period

    Measured: 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Aug 2020
  2. Study start7 Aug 2020
  3. Primary completion6 Aug 2025
  4. Study completion31 Aug 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
25 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04513483
Sponsor's protocol ID
202002128RINC
Acronym
CPAPAF
Status last verified
Jan 2026
First submitted
6 Aug 2020
Last updated
16 Jan 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing continuous positive airway pressure in people with Atrial Fibrillation and Sleep Apnea, run by National Taiwan University Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change of AF burden (time frame: 0, 6, 12 months). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Jan 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in