AzTrials
AzTrials

Discoloration, ToothNCT04515069

Survival of Hybrid Laminate Veneers Using Two Different Tooth Preparation Techniques:Randomized Clinical Trial

A study testing traditional technique of tooth preparation and aesthetic preevaluative temporary technique for tooth preparation in people with Discoloration, Tooth and Malformed Tooth, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this study was to evaluate the survival of laminate veneers constructed using a recent polymer-infiltrated ceramic network material following the aesthetic pre-evaluative temporary (APT) technique of tooth preparation in comparison to traditional technique. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 19 to 44 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Discoloration, Tooth, Malformed Tooth, Diastema
What is being tested?
traditional technique of tooth preparation and aesthetic preevaluative temporary technique for tooth preparation
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
6 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
13 Apr 2017to 5 May 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 19 to 44 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patient-related criteria:
  • Patients consulting the outpatient clinic of the department of Fixed Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University.
  • Able to tolerate necessary restorative procedures.
  • Provide written consent.
  • Accepts the one year follow-up period.
  • Tooth related criteria:
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Malaligned and malformed teeth in the aesthetics zone
  • Multiple spacing
  • Diastema
  • Slightly and moderately discolored teeth
  • Good oral hygiene

Who cannot join

  • Patient-related criteria:
  • Medically compromised patients, as they would not be able to attend multiple appointments or might require special management.
  • Uncooperative patients, who would not abide by the instructions or attend the appointments.
  • Tooth related criteria:
  • Deciduous teeth; as the study was targeting only permanent teeth.
  • Teeth with previous restorations, which might add another variable to the study (type of old restorative material, extent of recurrent caries). This could also affect the bond of laminate veneers to tooth structure.
  • Patients with parafunctional habits, large restorations, or excessive tooth wear.
  • Initially, scaling and polishing was performed. Patients were instructed on improving their oral hygiene and maintaining effective plaque control. However, if their gingival health did not improve, they were excluded from the study.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Egypt1 site
  • Yara Attia

    Cairo, 11728

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: Survival of a Recent Polymer- Infiltrated Ceramic Network Laminate Veneer Material Using Aesthetic Preevaluative Temporary (APT) Technique Versus Traditional Technique in the Aesthetic Zone:Randomized Clinical Trial

The aim of this study was to evaluate the survival of laminate veneers constructed using a recent polymer-infiltrated ceramic network material following the aesthetic pre-evaluative temporary (APT) technique of tooth preparation in comparison to traditional technique.

Read the detailed description

Six recruited patients (4 females, 2 males; ranging from: 20-30 years old and with mean age 24.6 years), who needed indirect laminate veneer restorations were included in this study. Patients were selected from the outpatient clinic of the Department of Fixed Prosthodontics,Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University The participants received a total of 54 laminate veneers between April 2017 and February 2018. Written informed consent was acquired from all participating patients. Randomization was done using a computer generated 2 column list by the aid of Random.org in a 1:1 ratio. Allocation concealment was achieved using numbered cards in opaque sealed envelopes. Aluminium foil was placed inside the envelope to render the envelope impermeable to intense light. These envelopes were placed in a box and each participant was allowed to grasp one envelop the day of operation. Allocation concealment was performed by an investigator with no clinical involvement in the trial. This study is a single blinded study as the assessor was blinded to the assigned study groups. Blinding of the participants was not applicable as one of the techniques required extra visits. Blinding of the operator was not applicable as one clinician performed the tooth preparation in both techniques.A total of 54 laminate veneers were divided into two equal groups (n=27) according to the technique of tooth preparation: group T: traditional technique and group A: aesthetic pre-evaluative temporary technique. VITA ENAMIC material was used for CAD/CAM construction of laminate veneers. Cementation was performed using a light cured resin cement. The laminate veneers were evaluated at baseline, after 3, 6 and 12 months according to the modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteriea. The data was collected, tabulated and statistically analyzed.

Being tested
traditional technique of tooth preparation, aesthetic preevaluative temporary technique for tooth preparation
Keywords
veneers, hybrid ceramics, CAD/CAM, tooth preparation techniques, USPHS criteria
Medical subject headings
Tooth Discoloration, Tooth Abnormalities, Diastema

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • traditional technique of tooth preparationProcedure or surgery

    Also called Group T

    Depth cutter wheels of predetermined depths (Komet, Germany) were used to perform the preparation directly on the tooth structure.

    Depth cuts were performed on the labial surface using depth cutter wheels (Komet, Germany) with radius of 0.3 mm and 0.5 mm which is directly related to the thickness of the laminate veneers in the cervical and incisal one thirds respectively. Then islands of tooth structure between depth orientation grooves were removed.

    Proximal reduction:

    The interproximal reduction was completed just labial to the contact areas using a round end tapered diamond stone (Mani, Japan), and polishing was performed using polishing strips (Sof-Lex, 3M ESPE, Seefeld, Germany).

    Incisal reduction:

    Vertical depth grooves were created. Then, the round end tapered diamond stone (Mani, Japan)was used to create 1.5 mm incisal butt joint preparation.

    Then, finishing and polishing of tooth preparation was performed.

  • aesthetic preevaluative temporary technique for tooth preparationProcedure or surgery

    Also called Group A

    The data obtained from digital smile design was used for construction of the diagnostic wax-up. The wax-up was then be transferred to the mouth using a silicone index, creating the aesthetic pre-evaluative temporary (APT). The APT was tested esthetically and functionally. Once approved by the operator and the patient, tooth preparation was performed through the APT. Depth cuts were performed similar to those performed in the traditional preparation with the difference of being prepared on the aesthetic pre-evaluative temporary instead of directly on the dental structure. Using tapered stone with round end (Mani, Japan), islands of tooth structure between depth orientation grooves were removed.

    Proximal reduction, Incisal reduction Finishing and polishing of tooth preparation were carried out using the same technique as in the Group T with the difference of being performed through the APT, resulting in minimal tooth preparation

Study groups in NCT04515069
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Traditional technique for tooth preparation.Active comparatorTooth preparation performed directly on the tooth structure
Receives: Procedure: traditional technique of tooth preparation
Aesthetic preevaluative temporary techniqueActive comparatorAesthetic pre-evaluative temporary (APT) was fabricated according the planned wax-up. Once the APT was approved both aesthetically and functionally, tooth preparation was performed through the APT.
Receives: Procedure: aesthetic preevaluative temporary technique for tooth preparation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Survival of laminate veneers using modified USPHS

    Patients were called back after 1 week as the baseline to assess the veneer restorations. Assessment was carried out by an experienced observer blinded to the assigned study group for each patient. Laminate veneers were examined at baseline, after 3, 6 and 12 months according to the modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteriae and the USPHS scores of Alfa, Bravo and Charlie were used for rating . Patients were also questioned about possible post-operative complaints. Digital photographs were made after placement of the veneers and during follow-up sessions.

    Measured: 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Aug 2020
  2. Study start13 Apr 2017
  3. Primary completion20 Mar 2019
  4. Study completion5 May 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
6 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04515069
Sponsor's protocol ID
151021
Status last verified
Aug 2020
First submitted
13 Aug 2020
Last updated
17 Aug 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Clinical Study Report

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing traditional technique of tooth preparation and aesthetic preevaluative temporary technique for tooth preparation in people with Discoloration, Tooth and Malformed Tooth, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Aug 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Survival of laminate veneers using modified USPHS (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Aug 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in