Hemodynamic MonitoringGOAL-HEMONCT04517409
Goal-directed Hemodynamic Therapy in Patiens Undergoing Major Hepatic Resection
A study testing Goal-directed hemodynamic therapy in people with Hemodynamic Monitoring, run by Castilla-La Mancha Health Service.
Trial summary
The aim of the study of patients undergoing major hepatic resection was compared standard perioperative (control Group) with hemodinamic management based on PPV, VVS, continuos CO trending and dynamic arterial elastance using radial artery pulse contour analysis (GDHT group). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Hemodynamic Monitoring
- What is being tested?
- Goal-directed hemodynamic therapy
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 45 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 5 Nov 2015to 5 Nov 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- All patients scheduled for hepatic resection of more than two segments
Who cannot join
- age less than 18, body weight less than 50 kg or more than 150 kg, irregular heart rhythm, severe cardiovascular disease (chronic heart failure, valvular abnormality, cardiomyopathy, etc.), severe liver dysfunction (Child Pugh score B or C).
About this study
Official title: Goal-directed Hemodynamic Therapy Based on Stroke Volume, Pulse Pressure Variation and Continuosus Cardiac Index in Patiens Undergoing Major Hepatic Resection
The aim of the study of patients undergoing major hepatic resection was compared standard perioperative (control Group) with hemodinamic management based on PPV, VVS, continuos CO trending and dynamic arterial elastance using radial artery pulse contour analysis (GDHT group). We hypothessized that following this treatment regimen after hepatic resection results in reduced postoperative complications (primary endpoint) and reduced length of hospital stay (secundary endpoint)
Read the detailed description
The study was performed as a prospective randomized trial at the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine and the Department of Surgery of the Hospital Universitario de Ciudad Real, Spain.Faculty. The study was approved by the local ethical committee. All patients scheduled for hepatic resection of more than two segments were found eligible for study inclusion. Exclusion criteria were: age less than 18, body weight less than 50 kg or more than 150 kg, irregular heart rhythm, severe cardiovascular disease (chronic heart failure, valvular abnormality, cardiomyopathy, etc.), severe liver dysfunction (Child Pugh score B or C). All participants signed informed consent prior study inclusion.
Protocol of the study.
Eligible patients were equally randomized into two study groups: 1) Standard perioperative (Control group ) and 2) hemodinamic management based using radial artery pulse contour analysis (GDHT group). Randomization was performed the day before surgery by the study member responsable for anesthesia delivery using sealed opaque envelope technique stored in non-transparent containers with group allocation in a 1:1 ratio. Only patients were blinded to group allocation. Care providers and investigators could not be blinded due to the presence of the cardiac index trending monitor.
Intraoperative management.
All subjects received balanced anaesthesia, i.v. anaesthetic induction, and neuromuscular relaxants; for pragmatic reasons, their administration was at the discretion of the anaesthetist. Bispectral index monitoring was used to monitor the depth of anaesthesia. Sevoflurane was used for anaesthesia maintenance, with a BIS target range of 40-60. Central venous catheter placement and invasive radial arterial blood pressure monitoring were performed per preference of the anaesthetist.
All subjects had basic anaesthetic monitoring with fivelead ECG, pulse oximetry, and oscillometric blood pressure; at least one peripheral i.v. line was established. All subjects received standard measures to maintain oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry >94%, normothermia, and heart rate <100 beats min-1. Ventilation with inspired oxygen fraction of 60% was mechanically controlled to maintain PaCO2 between 4.7 and 6.0 kPa, with a positive end-expiratory pressure of 4-6mm Hg and tidal volume of 6-8 ml kg-1.
In cases when PM was used, hemodynamic data were recorded one minute before the clamp, one minute after the clamp and one minute afterthe PM's release. Ephedrine was given in case of hemodynamic instability (mean arterial pressure <65 mmHg) and if repeated boluses were ineffective, noradrenaline infusion was started.
In a case of acute blood loss (more than 150 mL/ min or more than 500 mL), colloid infusion of was administered with respect to maximal recommended dose (30 mL/kg).
In both groups, blood loss was compensated for by infusión of colloid in a 1:1 ratio. Packed red cells were transfused for haemoglobin <10 g dl-1 in subjects with cardiac comorbidities, or <7 g dl-1 in those without cardiac comorbidities.
Hemodynamic data were documented every 15 minutes. At the beginning of hepatic resection, middle and at the end of surgery blood samples were drawn for arterial and central venous blood gas analysis. At the end of surgery total catecholamine administration, estimated blood loss, urine output and infused fluids were recorded. The time between the end of surgery and extubation was recorded.
GDHT group.
The arterial line was additionally connected to the cardiac index trending monitor (ProAQT, PULSION Medical Systems SE, Munich, Germany).
Fluid therapy was given. Before hepatic resection (Static phase) all patiens received continuous infusion of balanced crystalloid fluids (Ringer,s lactate) at 1 ml kg-1h-1 After hepatic resection (Dynamic phase), the patients received an initial hemodynamic assessment based on PPV, CI and MAP, as shown in Figure 1. First, preload was optimized by fluid loading until PPV was <14% or VVS <12%, subjects were given 4 ml kg-1 boluses colloid solution every 5 minutes. At this point, the patient's individual preload optimized CI was determined and used as the hemodynamic goal until the end of surgery. Only if this value was below 2.5 L/min/(m2), inotropes were applied to reach this minimum CI, serving as a safety parameter to prevent patients from low cardiac output. If PPV and CI were within the target range but MAP was below 65 mmHg or PPV/VVS>1,2, vasopressors were started. After the initial assessment, patients were reassessed every 15 minutes intraoperatively to maintain values
- Conditions
- Hemodynamic Monitoring
- Being tested
- Goal-directed hemodynamic therapy, Control
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Goal-directed hemodynamic therapyProcedure or surgery
Also called GDHT
Eligible patients were equally randomized into two study groups: 1) Standard perioperative (Control group ) and 2) hemodinamic management based using radial artery pulse contour analysis (GDHT group). Randomization was performed the day before surgery by the study member responsable for anesthesia delivery using sealed opaque envelope technique stored in non-transparent containers with group allocation in a 1:1 ratio. Only patients were blinded to group allocation. Care providers and investigators could not be blinded due to the presence of the cardiac index trending monitor
ControlProcedure or surgery
Before hepatic resection (Static phase) all patiens received continuous infusion of balanced crystalloid with the goal of CVP of 5 mmHg.
After hepatic resection (Dynamic phase), the patiens received colloid solution, vasopressors, and inotropes at the discretion of the anaesthetist, acording to CVP, MAP and orine output. In this group, CO monitoring was not performed. Intraoperative treatment goals in the control arm were flexible to avoid both extremes of clinical practice and practice misalignment.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| GDHT | Experimental | After hepatic resection (Dynamic phase), the patients received an initial hemodynamic assessment based on PPV, CI and MAP. First, preload was optimized by fluid loading until PPV was <14% or VVS <12%, subjects were given 4 ml kg-1 boluses colloid solution every 5 minutes. At this point, the patient's individual preload optimized CI was determined and used as the hemodynamic goal until the end of surgery. Only if this value was below 2.5 L/min/(m2), inotropes were applied to reach this minimum CI, serving as a safety parameter to prevent patients from low cardiac output. If PPV and CI were within the target range but MAP was below 65 mmHg or PPV/VVS>1,2, vasopressors were started. After the initial assessment, patients were reassessed every 15 minutes intraoperatively to maintain values. Receives: Procedure: Goal-directed hemodynamic therapy |
| Control | Other | Before hepatic resection (Static phase) all patiens received continuous infusion of balanced crystalloid with the goal of CVP of 5 mmHg.
After hepatic resection (Dynamic phase), the patiens received colloid solution, vasopressors, and inotropes at the discretion of the anaesthetist, acording to CVP, MAP and orine output. In this group, CO monitoring was not performed. Intraoperative treatment goals in the control arm were flexible to avoid both extremes of clinical practice and practice misalignment Receives: Procedure: Control |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Postoperative complications
Pre-defined postoperative complications for each patient were recorded after surgery from the patient record and by visiting patients on the ward by the investigators
Measured: 180 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Aug 2020
- Study start5 Nov 2015
- Primary completion5 Nov 2017
- Study completion5 Nov 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Hemodynamic MonitoringStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- Prospective randomized trial
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 45 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Castilla-La Mancha Health Service
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04517409
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 4161
- Acronym
- GOAL-HEMO
- Status last verified
- Aug 2020
- First submitted
- 14 Aug 2020
- Last updated
- 18 Aug 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Aug 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Goal-directed Hemodynamic Therapy Based on Stroke Volume, Pulse Pressure Variation and Continuosus Cardiac Index in Patiens Undergoing Major Hepatic Resection
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04517409
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- GOAL-HEMO / 4161
- Conditions
- Hemodynamic Monitoring
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 45 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Castilla-La Mancha Health ServiceUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 5 Nov 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 5 Nov 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 5 Nov 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Aug 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of the study of patients undergoing major hepatic resection was compared standard perioperative (control Group) with hemodinamic management based on PPV, VVS, continuos CO trending and dynamic arterial elastance using radial artery pulse contour analysis (GDHT group). We hypothessized that following this treatment regimen after hepatic resection results in reduced postoperative complications (primary endpoint) and reduced length of hospital stay (secundary endpoint)
Detailed description
The study was performed as a prospective randomized trial at the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine and the Department of Surgery of the Hospital Universitario de Ciudad Real, Spain.Faculty. The study was approved by the local ethical committee. All patients scheduled for hepatic resection of more than two segments were found eligible for study inclusion. Exclusion criteria were: age less than 18, body weight less than 50 kg or more than 150 kg, irregular heart rhythm, severe cardiovascular disease (chronic heart failure, valvular abnormality, cardiomyopathy, etc.), severe liver dysfunction (Child Pugh score B or C). All participants signed informed consent prior study inclusion.
Protocol of the study.
Eligible patients were equally randomized into two study groups: 1) Standard perioperative (Control group ) and 2) hemodinamic management based using radial artery pulse contour analysis (GDHT group). Randomization was performed the day before surgery by the study member responsable for anesthesia delivery using sealed opaque envelope technique stored in non-transparent containers with group allocation in a 1:1 ratio. Only patients were blinded to group allocation. Care providers and investigators could not be blinded due to the presence of the cardiac index trending monitor.
Intraoperative management.
All subjects received balanced anaesthesia, i.v. anaesthetic induction, and neuromuscular relaxants; for pragmatic reasons, their administration was at the discretion of the anaesthetist. Bispectral index monitoring was used to monitor the depth of anaesthesia. Sevoflurane was used for anaesthesia maintenance, with a BIS target range of 40-60. Central venous catheter placement and invasive radial arterial blood pressure monitoring were performed per preference of the anaesthetist.
All subjects had basic anaesthetic monitoring with fivelead ECG, pulse oximetry, and oscillometric blood pressure; at least one peripheral i.v. line was established. All subjects received standard measures to maintain oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry >94%, normothermia, and heart rate <100 beats min-1. Ventilation with inspired oxygen fraction of 60% was mechanically controlled to maintain PaCO2 between 4.7 and 6.0 kPa, with a positive end-expiratory pressure of 4-6mm Hg and tidal volume of 6-8 ml kg-1.
In cases when PM was used, hemodynamic data were recorded one minute before the clamp, one minute after the clamp and one minute afterthe PM's release. Ephedrine was given in case of hemodynamic instability (mean arterial pressure <65 mmHg) and if repeated boluses were ineffective, noradrenaline infusion was started.
In a case of acute blood loss (more than 150 mL/ min or more than 500 mL), colloid infusion of was administered with respect to maximal recommended dose (30 mL/kg).
In both groups, blood loss was compensated for by infusión of colloid in a 1:1 ratio. Packed red cells were transfused for haemoglobin <10 g dl-1 in subjects with cardiac comorbidities, or <7 g dl-1 in those without cardiac comorbidities.
Hemodynamic data were documented every 15 minutes. At the beginning of hepatic resection, middle and at the end of surgery blood samples were drawn for arterial and central venous blood gas analysis. At the end of surgery total catecholamine administration, estimated blood loss, urine output and infused fluids were recorded. The time between the end of surgery and extubation was recorded.
GDHT group.
The arterial line was additionally connected to the cardiac index trending monitor (ProAQT, PULSION Medical Systems SE, Munich, Germany).
Fluid therapy was given. Before hepatic resection (Static phase) all patiens received continuous infusion of balanced crystalloid fluids (Ringer,s lactate) at 1 ml kg-1h-1 After hepatic resection (Dynamic phase), the patients received an initial hemodynamic assessment based on PPV, CI and MAP, as shown in Figure 1. First, preload was optimized by fluid loading until PPV was <14% or VVS <12%, subjects were given 4 ml kg-1 boluses colloid solution every 5 minutes. At this point, the patient's individual preload optimized CI was determined and used as the hemodynamic goal until the end of surgery. Only if this value was below 2.5 L/min/(m2), inotropes were applied to reach this minimum CI, serving as a safety parameter to prevent patients from low cardiac output. If PPV and CI were within the target range but MAP was below 65 mmHg or PPV/VVS>1,2, vasopressors were started. After the initial assessment, patients were reassessed every 15 minutes intraoperatively to maintain values
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Prospective randomized trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| GDHT | Experimental | Procedure: Goal-directed hemodynamic therapyAfter hepatic resection (Dynamic phase), the patients received an initial hemodynamic assessment based on PPV, CI and MAP. First, preload was optimized by fluid loading until PPV was <14% or VVS <12%, subjects were given 4 ml kg-1 boluses colloid solution every 5 minutes. At this point, the patient's individual preload optimized CI was determined and used as the hemodynamic goal until the end of surgery. Only if this value was below 2.5 L/min/(m2), inotropes were applied to reach this minimum CI, serving as a safety parameter to prevent patients from low cardiac output. If PPV and CI were within the target range but MAP was below 65 mmHg or PPV/VVS>1,2, vasopressors were started. After the initial assessment, patients were reassessed every 15 minutes intraoperatively to maintain values. |
| Control | Other | Procedure: ControlBefore hepatic resection (Static phase) all patiens received continuous infusion of balanced crystalloid with the goal of CVP of 5 mmHg. After hepatic resection (Dynamic phase), the patiens received colloid solution, vasopressors, and inotropes at the discretion of the anaesthetist, acording to CVP, MAP and orine output. In this group, CO monitoring was not performed. Intraoperative treatment goals in the control arm were flexible to avoid both extremes of clinical practice and practice misalignment |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- All patients scheduled for hepatic resection of more than two segments
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- age less than 18, body weight less than 50 kg or more than 150 kg, irregular heart rhythm, severe cardiovascular disease (chronic heart failure, valvular abnormality, cardiomyopathy, etc.), severe liver dysfunction (Child Pugh score B or C).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Goal-directed hemodynamic therapyAlso: GDHTEligible patients were equally randomized into two study groups: 1) Standard perioperative (Control group ) and 2) hemodinamic management based using radial artery pulse contour analysis (GDHT group). Randomization was performed the day before surgery by the study member responsable for anesthesia delivery using sealed opaque envelope technique stored in non-transparent containers with group allocation in a 1:1 ratio. Only patients were blinded to group allocation. Care providers and investigators could not be blinded due to the presence of the cardiac index trending monitor | Procedure or surgery | GDHT |
| ControlBefore hepatic resection (Static phase) all patiens received continuous infusion of balanced crystalloid with the goal of CVP of 5 mmHg. After hepatic resection (Dynamic phase), the patiens received colloid solution, vasopressors, and inotropes at the discretion of the anaesthetist, acording to CVP, MAP and orine output. In this group, CO monitoring was not performed. Intraoperative treatment goals in the control arm were flexible to avoid both extremes of clinical practice and practice misalignment. | Procedure or surgery | Control |
Primary outcome
Postoperative complications
Time frame: 180 days
Pre-defined postoperative complications for each patient were recorded after surgery from the patient record and by visiting patients on the ward by the investigators
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Aug 2020.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Hemodynamic Monitoring
RecruitingObservational study
Comparison of Hemodynamic Responses During Anesthesia Induction Using Eleveld and Schnider
Spinal (Fusion) Surgery, Total Intravenous Anesthesia
Recruiting
Trial to Evaluate Safety And Effectiveness of Mechanical Circulatory Support in Patients With Advancing Heart Failure
Heart Failure, Heart Diseases
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Ultrasound-Calibrated Pulse Contour Cardiac Output Monitoring: Value and Accuracy in Hemodynamic Care
Sepsis, Circulatory Instability
Not yet recruiting
UltraTrac for Cardiac Output Monitoring in Congenital Heart Disease
Congenital Heart Disease, Cardiac Output
Not yet recruiting
ASSISTED FLUID MANAGEMENT SYSTEM IN KIDENY TRANSPLANTATION
Kidney Transplant
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Goal-directed hemodynamic therapy in people with Hemodynamic Monitoring, run by Castilla-La Mancha Health Service.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Aug 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Postoperative complications (time frame: 180 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Aug 2020.