AzTrials
AzTrials

Psoriatic ArthritisNCT04517669

Effectiveness of Treatment With Tofacitinib in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis in Routine Clinical Practice

An observational study of Psoriatic Arthritis, run by Pfizer at 41 sites in 8 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a Multinational Study of Tofacitinib in Patients Treated for Psoriatic Arthritis in order to evaluate the effectiveness of treatment with tofacitinib on disease activity, remission, and Quality of Life, in a real-world setting over a 12-month observation period Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Psoriatic Arthritis
How many people
116 participants
Where
41 sitesin 8 countries
Study dates
17 May 2021to 30 Jul 2024
How long will I take part?
12 Months
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: This study will enroll approximately 500 patients from rheumatologists and/or PsA specialist centers in 10 countries (Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Israel, Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, and Switzerland) over an enrollment period of 12 months. The above list of countries are anticipated to participate in this study, however additional countries may be included at a later time. Each patient will have up to 12 months of follow-up for a total study duration of 24 months. Consecutive patients attending a routine clinical visit will be invited to participate if they meet the eligibility criteria for the study and are to start on treatment with tofacitinib for active PsA.

Inclusion Criteria: Patients must meet all of the following inclusion criteria to be eligible for inclusion in the study:

  1. Patients aged ≥ 18 years
  2. Moderate to severe PsA disease activity diagnosed
  3. Patients for whom the physician's decision has been made to initiate treatment with tofacitinib, in usual clinical practice conditions and in compliance with the local label
  4. Patients are treatment naïve to tofacitinib on the date of providing informed consent
  5. Evidence of a personally signed and dated informed consent document indicating that the patient (or a legally acceptable representative) has been informed of all pertinent aspects of the study
  6. Patients on DMARDs must have not had a treatment change in the past 3 months

Exclusion Criteria: Patients meeting any of the following criteria will not be included in the study:

  1. Contraindications according to the Xeljanz® (tofacitinib) Prescribing Information
  2. Receipt of any investigational drug within 3 months before study inclusion
  3. Patient is pregnant or breastfeeding
  4. Recent herpes zoster infection (within past 6 months) or history of severe disseminated herpes zoster infection
  5. Active treatment for a malignancy
  6. Concomitant treatment with a biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARD)

Trial locations and contacts

41 sites in 8 countries.

41 sites in 8 countries

Israel12 sites
  • Barzilai Medical Center

    Ashkelon

  • Soroka University Medical Center

    Beersheba, 84001

  • Bnai Zion Medical Center

    Haifa, 31048

  • The Lady Davis Carmel Medical Center

    Haifa, 3436212

  • Rambam Health Care Center

    Haifa

  • Hadassah University Hospital - Ein Kerem

    Jerusalem, 246000

  • Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center - Ein Kerem

    Jerusalem, 91120

  • Galilee Medical Center

    Nahariya

  • Chaim Sheba Medical Center

    Ramat Gan, 52621

  • Sheba Medical Center

    Ramat Gan

  • Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center

    Tel Aviv

  • The Baruch Padeh Medical Center - Poriya

    Tiberias, 15208

Other trials in Israel

Spain10 sites
  • Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar

    Cadiz, 11009

  • Hospital de Especialidades de Jerez de la Frontera

    Cadiz, 11407

  • Hospital Universitario Reina Sofia

    Córdoba, 14004

  • Hospital Universitario San Cecilio

    Granada, 18012

  • Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves

    Granada, 18014

  • Hospital Regional Universitario de Malaga

    Málaga, 29010

  • Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias

    Oviedo, 33011

  • Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena

    Seville, 41009

  • Hospital Quironsalud Infanta Luisa

    Seville, 41010

  • C.H. Universitario de Vigo- Hospital Meixoeiro

    Vigo, Galicia, 36200

Other trials in Spain

France8 sites
  • CHU Besançon - Hôpital Jean Minjoz

    Besançon, 25000

  • Centre Hospitalier Jean Rougier

    Cahors, 46000

  • Infirmerie Protestante de Lyon

    Caluire-et-Cuire, 69300

  • CHU Clermont Ferrand - Hopital Gabriel Montpied

    Clermont-Ferrand, 63000

  • Hopital Pasteur

    Nice, 6001

  • CHR Orleans

    Orléans, 45067

  • Hopital Purpan

    Toulouse, 31059

  • CHU Tours - Hôpital Trousseau

    Tours, 37044

Other trials in France

Sweden4 sites
  • Lund University

    Lund

  • Skånes Universitetssjukhus, Malmö

    Malmö

  • Karolinska University Hospital, Solna

    Stockholm

  • Norrlands University Hospital Umeå, Reumatologiska kliniken Västerbotten

    Umeå

Other trials in Sweden

Belgium3 sites
  • Algemeen Stedelijk Ziekenhuis

    Aalst, 9300

  • AZ Sint-Jan

    Bruges, 8000

  • Nova Reuma Społka Partnerska

    Genk, 3600

Other trials in Belgium

Netherlands2 sites
  • Medisch Spectrum Twente, Haaksbergerstraat

    Enschede, 7512 KZ

  • Medisch Centrum Leeuwarden

    Leeuwarden

Other trials in Netherlands

Denmark1 site
  • Sygehus Vendsyssel Hospital

    Hjørring

Other trials in Denmark

Finland1 site
  • Turku University Hospital

    Turku

Other trials in Finland

About this study

Official title: A Non-Interventional Multinational Study of Tofacitinib in Patients Treated for Psoriatic Arthritis

This is a Multinational Study of Tofacitinib in Patients Treated for Psoriatic Arthritis in order to evaluate the effectiveness of treatment with tofacitinib on disease activity, remission, and Quality of Life, in a real-world setting over a 12-month observation period

Medical subject headings
Arthritis, Psoriatic

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity (LDA) Based on Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) at Month 6

    PASDAS=composite disease activity measure for PsA which incorporated assessment of the following: participant global psoriatic arthritis assessment (PAA), physician global PAA, each scored on 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS), 0=no disease activity (DA), 100=maximum DA; tender joint count (TJC) (0-68); swollen joint count (SJC) (0-66); Leed's Enthesitis index (LEI) score ranging from 0-6; where 0=non tender, 6=more enthesitis burden; tender dactylitis digit score ranging from 0-3 where 0=no tenderness, 3=participant withdrew digit; physical component summary (PCS) of short form 36 (SF-36) score ranging from 0-100; where 0=severe physical health limitations and 100=excellent physical health and C-reactive protein (CRP) in milligram per liter (mg/L). PASDAS total score was calculated using a weighted formula and ranged from 0 (no disease) to 10 (severe disease); higher scores indicated more severe disease. LDA was defined as PASDAS score less than or equal to (<=) 3.2.

    Measured: At Month 6

Secondary outcomes (22)
  1. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved LDA Based on PASDAS at Months 3 and 12

    PASDAS=composite disease activity measure for PsA which incorporated assessment of the following: participant global PAA, physician global PAA, each scored on 100 mm VAS, 0=no DA, 100=maximum DA; TJC (0-68); SJC (0-66); LEI score ranging from 0-6; where 0=non tender, 6=more enthesitis burden; tender dactylitis digit score ranging from 0-3 where 0=no tenderness, 3=participant withdrew digit; PCS of SF-36 score ranging from 0-100; where 0=severe physical health limitations and 100=excellent physical health and CRP in mg/L. PASDAS total score was calculated using a weighted formula and ranged from 0 (no disease) to 10 (severe disease); higher scores indicated more severe disease. LDA was defined as PASDAS score less than or equal to (<=) 3.2.

    Measured: At Month 3 and Month 12

  2. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Minimum Disease Activity (MDA) at Months 3, 6 and 12

    A participant was classified as MDA achieved if they met 5 of 7 criteria: (i) (TJC66) <=1, (ii) (SJC68)<=1, (iii) psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) score <=1 (PASI=combined assessment of lesion severity and area affected into single score; range=0 [no disease] to 72 [maximal disease], higher scores=more disease. or body surface area (BSA) <=3%,(iv) patient pain assessment (VAS, 0-100) <=15; where 0='no pain' and 100='pain as severe as can be imagined', higher scores=more pain, (v) patient global assessment (VAS, 0-100) <=20, where 0='lowest level of disease activity' and 100= 'highest level of disease activity, higher scores=more disease activity, (vi) health assessment questionnaire-disability index (HAQ- DI) <=0.5; scale ranged=0-3, where 0='normal or no difficulty' and 3='inability to perform', higher scores=more difficulty, (vii) tender enthesial points <=1 using Leed's index range=0=non tender to 6=more enthesitis burden, higher scores=more burden.

    Measured: At Month 3, Month 6 and Month 12

  3. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Remission Based on PASDAS at Months 3, 6 and 12

    PASDAS=composite disease activity measure for PsA which incorporated assessment of the following: participant global PAA, physician global PAA, each scored on 100 mm VAS, 0=no DA, 100=maximum DA; TJC (0-68); SJC (0-66); LEI score ranging from 0-6; where 0=non tender, 6=more enthesitis burden; tender dactylitis digit score ranging from 0-3 where 0=no tenderness, 3=participant withdrew digit; PCS of SF-36 score ranging from 0-100; where 0=severe physical health limitations and 100=excellent physical health and CRP in mg/L. PASDAS total score was calculated using a weighted formula and ranged from 0 (no disease) to 10 (severe disease); higher scores indicated more severe disease. Remission was defined as PASDAS score less than or equal to (<=) 1.9.

    Measured: At Month 3, Month 6 and Month 12

  4. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Remission Based on Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) Score at Months 3, 6 and 12

    DAPSA was composite disease activity measure and was calculated as: SJC66 + TJC68 + patient global assessment VAS (0 to 10 cm VAS, 0= excellent and 10= poor, higher scores indicated more disease activity) + patient pain assessment (0 to 10 cm VAS, 0= no pain, 10= worst possible pain, higher scores indicated more pain) + CRP (mg/dL). DAPSA score ranged from 0 to 164, higher scores indicated more disease activity. Remission was defined as DAPSA score =<4.0.

    Measured: At Month 3, Month 6 and Month 12

  5. Change From Baseline in Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease 12 Questions (PsAID12) Score at Months 3, 6 and 12

    PsAID12: questionnaire used for evaluating how much PsA impacted quality of life (QoL) and comprised of following domains: Pain, Fatigue, Skin problems, Work and/or leisure activities, Function, Discomfort, Sleep disturbance, Coping, Anxiety, Embarrassment, Social life and Depression. Each one of domain was based on a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS) and with different weight. PsAID12= (PsAID12.Q1 [pain] NRS value*3) +(PsAID12.Q2[fatigue] NRS value*2) +(PsAID12.Q3 [skin] NRS value*2) +(PsAID12.Q4[Work and/or leisure activities] NRS value*2) +(PsAID12.Q5[function] NRS value*2) +(PsAID12.Q6[discomfort]NRS value*2) +(PsAID12.Q7[sleep] NRS value*2) +(PsAID12.Q8 [coping]NRS value*1) +(PsAID12.Q9[anxiety] NRS value*1) +(PsAID12.Q10[embarrassment] NRS value*1) +(PsAID12.Q11[social life] NRS value*1) +(PsAID12.Q12[depression] NRS value*1). Total is divided by 20 for final score. Range of final PsAID score is 0-10 (higher numbers indicate worse status).

    Measured: Baseline (measurement at enrollment), at Month 3, Month 6 and Month 12

  6. Change From Baseline in Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada Enthesitis Index (SPARCC-EI) Score at Months 3, 6 and 12

    The SPARCC-EI evaluated 16 enthesial sites: greater trochanter (Right/Left [R/L]), quadriceps tendon insertion into the patella (R/L), patellar ligament insertion into the patella and tibial tuberosity (R/L), achilles tendon insertion (R/L), plantar fascia insertion (R/L), medial epicondyles (R/L), lateral epicondyles (R/L) and supraspinatus insertion (R/L) for the presence or absence of tenderness. Tenderness at each site was quantified as: 0 = non-tender and 1 = tender. The maximum score of the SPARCC-EI was 16. SPARCC-EI score range: 0 (no enthesitis) to 16 (enthesitis is present at all assessed sites), higher scores indicated more presence of enthesitis.

    Measured: Baseline (measurement at enrollment), at Month 3, Month 6 and Month 12

  7. Number of Participants Who Achieved LDA According to Body Mass Index (BMI) at Months 3, 6 and 12

    BMI = Weight (kilograms [kg]) / Height (meter square [m]^2). LDA was defined as PASDAS score =<3.2. PASDAS=composite disease activity measure for PsA which incorporated assessment of the following: participant global PAA, physician global PAA, each scored on 100 mm VAS, 0=no DA, 100=maximum DA; TJC (0-68); SJC (0-66); LEI score ranging from 0-6; where 0=non tender, 6=more enthesitis burden; tender dactylitis digit score ranging from 0-3 where 0=no tenderness, 3=participant withdrew digit; PCS of SF-36 score ranging from 0-100; where 0=severe physical health limitations and 100=excellent physical health and CRP in mg/L. PASDAS total score was calculated using a weighted formula and ranged from 0 (no disease) to 10 (severe disease); higher scores indicated more severe disease. In this outcome measure, participants with PASDAS scores are reported according to BMI categories of 18.5 - <25 kg/m^2, 25 - <30 kg/m^2, >= 30 kg/m^2 and missing.

    Measured: At Month 3, Month 6 and Month 12

  8. Number of Participants Who Achieved LDA According to Treatment Line at Months 3, 6 and 12

    Participants who achieved LDA according to treatment line were reported in this outcome measure. Treatment line included: tofacitinib monotherapy, combination therapy with MTX, and combination therapy with other csDMARDs. LDA was defined as PASDAS score =<3.2. PASDAS=composite disease activity measure for PsA which incorporated assessment of the following: participant global PAA, physician global PAA, each scored on 100 mm VAS, 0=no DA, 100=maximum DA; TJC (0-68); SJC (0-66); LEI score ranging from 0-6; where 0=non tender, 6=more enthesitis burden; tender dactylitis digit score ranging from 0-3 where 0=no tenderness, 3=participant withdrew digit; PCS of SF-36 score ranging from 0-100; where 0=severe physical health limitations and 100=excellent physical health and CRP in mg/L. PASDAS total score was calculated using a weighted formula and ranged from 0 (no disease) to 10 (severe disease); higher scores indicated more severe disease.

    Measured: At Month 3, Month 6 and Month 12

  9. Number of Participants Who Achieved LDA According to Duration of Current Episode Symptoms of at Least 6 Weeks Prior to Enrollment at Months 3, 6 and 12

    Duration of current episode of symptoms prior to enrollment were presented as: < 6, >=6 weeks. LDA was defined as PASDAS score =<3.2. PASDAS=composite disease activity measure for PsA which incorporated assessment of the following: participant global PAA, physician global PAA, each scored on 100 mm VAS, 0=no DA, 100=maximum DA; TJC (0-68); SJC (0-66); LEI score ranging from 0-6; where 0=non tender, 6=more enthesitis burden; tender dactylitis digit score ranging from 0-3 where 0=no tenderness, 3=participant withdrew digit; PCS of SF-36 score ranging from 0-100; where 0=severe physical health limitations and 100=excellent physical health and CRP in mg/L. PASDAS total score was calculated using a weighted formula and ranged from 0 (no disease) to 10 (severe disease); higher scores indicated more severe disease.

    Measured: At Month 3, Month 6 and Month 12

  10. Number of Participants Who Achieved LDA According to Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) Results at Months 3, 6 and 12

    ESR result=abnormal if test result was above normal range. ESR normal range:0-50 years(male <15 mm/h, female <20 mm/h), 51-85 years(<20 mm/h males and <30 mm/h females),older than 85 years(<30 mm/h males and <42 mm/h females). Number of participants who achieved LDA according to ESR results(normal and abnormal) were reported. LDA=PASDAS score =<3.2. PASDAS=composite disease activity measure for PsA which incorporated assessment of following:participant global PAA,physician global PAA,each scored on 100 mm VAS,0=no DA, 100=maximum DA; TJC(0-68); SJC(0-66); LEI score=0-6;0=non tender,6=more enthesitis burden; tender dactylitis digit score=0-3,0=no tenderness,3=participant withdrew digit; PCS of SF-36 score=0-100; 0=severe physical health limitations and 100=excellent physical health and CRP in mg/L. PASDAS total score was calculated using a weighted formula and ranged=0(no disease)to 10(severe disease);higher scores=more severe disease.

    Measured: At Month 3, Month 6 and Month 12

  11. Number of Participants Who Achieved LDA According to C-reactive Protein (CRP) Results at Months 3, 6 and 12

    For CRP, result was considered abnormal if t the test result was above the normal range (0.3 to 10 mg/L). LDA was defined as PASDAS score =<3.2. PASDAS=composite disease activity measure for PsA which incorporated assessment of the following: participant global PAA, physician global PAA, each scored on 100 mm VAS, 0=no DA, 100=maximum DA; TJC (0-68); SJC (0-66); LEI score ranging from 0-6; where 0=non tender, 6=more enthesitis burden; tender dactylitis digit score ranging from 0-3 where 0=no tenderness, 3=participant withdrew digit; PCS of SF-36 score ranging from 0-100; where 0=severe physical health limitations and 100=excellent physical health and CRP in mg/L. PASDAS total score was calculated using a weighted formula and ranged from 0 (no disease) to 10 (severe disease); higher scores indicated more severe disease.

    Measured: At Month 3, Month 6 and Month 12

  12. Number of Participants Who Achieved LDA According to Presence of Rheumatoid Nodules at Months 3, 6 and 12

    Number of participants who achieved LDA according to presence (present/absent) of rheumatoid nodules is presented in this outcome measure. LDA was defined as PASDAS score =<3.2. PASDAS=composite disease activity measure for PsA which incorporated assessment of the following: participant global PAA, physician global PAA, each scored on 100 mm VAS, 0=no DA, 100=maximum DA; TJC (0-68); SJC (0-66); LEI score ranging from 0-6; where 0=non tender, 6=more enthesitis burden; tender dactylitis digit score ranging from 0-3 where 0=no tenderness, 3=participant withdrew digit; PCS of SF-36 score ranging from 0-100; where 0=severe physical health limitations and 100=excellent physical health and CRP in mg/L. PASDAS total score was calculated using a weighted formula and ranged from 0 (no disease) to 10 (severe disease); higher scores indicated more severe disease.

    Measured: At Month 3, Month 6 and Month 12

  13. Number of Participants Who Achieved LDA According to Presence of Unequivocal Radiological Erosion at Months 3, 6 and 12

    Unequivocal radiological erosion: 'present',if Sharp-Van der Heijde modified score (S-VH MS)for erosion >0;'absent',if S-VH MS for erosion score=0. S-VH MS sum of erosion,JSN scores(range 0-528). Higher score=more severe disease. If a component score is missing, S-VH MS is missing. LDA=PASDAS score =<3.2. PASDAS=composite disease activity measure for PsA which incorporated assessment of following: participant global PAA,physician global PAA,each scored on 100 mm VAS,0=no DA,100=maximum DA; TJC(0-68); SJC(0-66); LEI score range=0-6; where 0=non tender, 6=more enthesitis burden; tender dactylitis digit score range=0-3 where 0=no tenderness, 3=participant withdrew digit; PCS of SF-36 score range=0-100; where 0=severe physical health limitations and 100=excellent physical health and CRP in mg/L. PASDAS total score was calculated using a weighted formula and ranged from 0(no disease)to 10(severe disease); higher scores=more severe disease.

    Measured: At Month 3, Month 6 and Month 12

  14. Number of Participants Who Achieved LDA According to Presence of Unequivocal Bony Decalcification Localized to the Joints of the Hands and Wrists at Months 3, 6 and 12

    Unequivocal Bony decalcification was reported as present or absent at enrollment. LDA was defined as PASDAS score =<3.2. PASDAS=composite disease activity measure for PsA which incorporated assessment of the following: participant global PAA, physician global PAA, each scored on 100 mm VAS, 0=no DA, 100=maximum DA; TJC (0-68); SJC (0-66); LEI score ranging from 0-6; where 0=non tender, 6=more enthesitis burden; tender dactylitis digit score ranging from 0-3 where 0=no tenderness, 3=participant withdrew digit; PCS of SF-36 score ranging from 0-100; where 0=severe physical health limitations and 100=excellent physical health and CRP in mg/L. PASDAS total score was calculated using a weighted formula and ranged from 0 (no disease) to 10 (severe disease); higher scores indicated more severe disease.

    Measured: At Month 3, Month 6 and Month 12

  15. Number of Participants Who Achieved LDA According to Presence of Symmetric Arthritis at Months 3, 6 and 12

    Arthritis at enrollment was identified when a participant reported swelling and/or tenderness/pain in any joint. Number of participants who achieved LDA according to presence (Yes/No) of symmetric arthritis was reported. LDA was defined as PASDAS score =<3.2. PASDAS=composite disease activity measure for PsA which incorporated assessment of following: participant global PAA, physician global PAA, each scored on 100 mm VAS, 0=no DA, 100=maximum DA; TJC (0-68); SJC (0-66); LEI score ranging from 0-6; where 0=non tender, 6=more enthesitis burden; tender dactylitis digit score ranging from 0-3 where 0=no tenderness, 3=participant withdrew digit; PCS of SF-36 score ranging from 0-100; where 0=severe physical health limitations and 100=excellent physical health and CRP in mg/L. PASDAS total score was calculated using a weighted formula and ranged from 0 (no disease) to 10 (severe disease); higher scores indicated more severe disease.

    Measured: At Month 3, Month 6 and Month 12

  16. Number of Participants Who Achieved LDA According to Arthritis of the Hand Joints at Months 3, 6 and 12

    Hand joints included metacarpal phalangeal joints(MCP), finger proximal interphalangeal and finger distal interphalangeal joints. Number of participants who achieved LDA according to presence(Yes/No) of arthritis of any of hand joints was reported. LDA=PASDAS score =<3.2. PASDAS=composite disease activity measure for PsA which incorporated assessment of following: participant global PAA,physician global PAA, each scored on 100 mm VAS,0=no DA,100=maximum DA;TJC(0-68); SJC(0-66); LEI score ranging from 0-6; where 0=non tender, 6=more enthesitis burden; tender dactylitis digit score ranging from 0-3 where 0=no tenderness, 3=participant withdrew digit; PCS of SF-36 score ranging from 0-100; where 0=severe physical health limitations and 100=excellent physical health and CRP in mg/L. PASDAS total score was calculated using a weighted formula and ranged from 0 (no disease) to 10 (severe disease); higher scores indicated more severe disease.

    Measured: At Month 3, Month 6 and Month 12

  17. Number of Participants Who Achieved LDA According to Arthritis of Only 1 Medium-Large Joint at Months 3, 6 and 12

    Medium joints=temporomandibular, sternoclavicular, acromioclavicular, finger proximal interphalangeal, finger distal interphalangeal and tarsus/midfoot(feet) joints. Large joints=glenohumeral, elbows, hips, knees and ankles joint. Number of participants who achieved LDA according to presence (Yes/No) of arthritis of only 1 medium-large joint was reported. LDA=PASDAS score =<3.2. PASDAS=composite disease activity measure for PsA incorporated assessment of: participant global PAA, physician global PAA, each scored on 100 mm VAS, 0=no DA, 100=maximum DA;TJC(0-68);SJC(0-66); LEI score ranging from 0-6;0=non tender, 6=more enthesitis burden; tender dactylitis digit score ranging from 0-3;0=no tenderness, 3=participant withdrew digit; PCS of SF-36 score ranging from 0-100;0=severe physical health limitations and 100=excellent physical health and CRP in mg/L. PASDAS score (0-10) uses a weighted formula; higher scores=more severe disease.

    Measured: At Month 3, Month 6 and Month 12

  18. Number of Participants Who Achieved LDA According to Arthritis of 2-10 Medium-Large Joints and/or 1-3 Small Joints at Months 3, 6 and 12

    Medium joints=temporomandibular, sternoclavicular, acromioclavicular, finger proximal interphalangeal (IP), finger distal interphalangeal, tarsus/midfoot (feet). Large joints=glenohumeral, elbows, hips, knees, ankles. Small joints=MCP, proximal IP, second through fifth metatarsal phalangeal (MTP), thumb IP, wrists. Number of participants who achieved LDA according to presence (Yes/No) arthritis of 2-10 medium-large joints and/or 1-3 small joints was reported. LDA=PASDAS score =<3.2. PASDAS is a composite PsA activity score including: participant /physician global (VAS 0-100; 0=no DA, 100=maximum DA), TJC (0-68), SJC (0-66), LEI (0-6; 0=non tender, 6=more enthesitis burden), tender dactylitis digit score (0-3; 0=no tenderness, 3=participant withdrew digit), SF-36 PCS (0-100; 0=severe physical health limitations, 100=excellent physical health),CRP in mg/L. PASDAS score (0-10) uses a weighted formula; higher scores=more severe disease.

    Measured: At Month 3, Month 6 and Month 12

  19. Number of Participants Who Achieved LDA According to Arthritis of 4-10 Small Joints With or Without Involvement of Large Joints at Months 3, 6 and 12

    Large joints=glenohumeral, elbows, hips, knees and ankles joint. Small joints=MCP, proximal IP, second through fifth MTP, thumb IP, wrists. Number of participants who achieved LDA according to presence (Yes/No) of arthritis of 4-10 small joints with or without involvement of large joints was reported. LDA=PASDAS score =<3.2. PASDAS=composite disease activity measure for PsA incorporated assessment of: participant global PAA, physician global PAA, each scored on 100 mm VAS, 0=no DA, 100=maximum DA;TJC(0-68); SJC(0-66); LEI score range=0-6; 0=non tender, 6=more enthesitis burden; tender dactylitis digit score range=0-3; 0=no tenderness, 3=participant withdrew digit; PCS of SF-36 score ranging from 0-100; 0=severe physical health limitations and 100=excellent physical health and CRP in mg/L. PASDAS total score was calculated using a weighted formula and ranged from 0 (no disease) to 10 (severe disease); higher scores=more severe disease.

    Measured: At Month 3, Month 6 and Month 12

  20. Number of Participants Who Achieved LDA According to Arthritis of >10 Joints (With at Least One Small Joint) at Months 3, 6 and 12

    Small joints=MCP, proximal IP, second through fifth MTP, thumb IP, wrists. Number of participants who achieved LDA according to presence (Yes/No) of arthritis of >10 joints (with at least one small joint) was reported in this outcome measure. LDA=PASDAS score =<3.2. PASDAS=composite disease activity measure for PsA incorporated assessment of: participant global PAA, physician global PAA, each scored on 100 mm VAS, 0=no DA, 100=maximum DA; TJC(0-68); SJC(0-66); LEI score ranging from 0-6; 0=non tender, 6=more enthesitis burden; tender dactylitis digit score ranging from 0-3; 0=no tenderness, 3=participant withdrew digit; PCS of SF-36 score ranging from 0-100; 0=severe physical health limitations and 100=excellent physical health and CRP in mg/L. PASDAS total score was calculated using a weighted formula and ranged from 0 (no disease) to 10 (severe disease); higher scores=more severe disease.

    Measured: At Month 3, Month 6 and Month 12

  21. Change From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) Based on Short Form 36 (SF-36) Score at Months 3, 6 and 12

    The SF-36 is a participant administered scale assessing general quality of life. It consists of self-administered 36-item questionnaire that measured 8 health domains: physical function, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social function, role-emotional, and mental health. These 8 domains are also summarized as physical and mental component scores. The score for each domain and component score is the mean of the individual question scores, which are scaled from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum), where high scores in each dimension and high overall scores indicate a better quality of life.

    Measured: Baseline (measurement at enrollment), Month 3, Month 6 and Month 12

  22. Change From Baseline in QoL Based on Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI41) at Months 3, 6 and 12

    The HAQ-DI41 assessed the degree of difficulty a participant had experienced during the past week in 8 domains of daily living activities: dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and other activities. Each activity category consisted of 2-3 items. For each question in the questionnaire, the level of difficulty was scored from 0 to 3 with 0 =no difficulty," 1 = "some difficulty," 2 = "much difficulty," and 3 = "unable to do". The disability index was computed by adding the scores for each of the components and dividing by the number of components with an available score. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0 (least difficulty) and 3 (extreme difficulty), where higher scores indicate more difficulty while performing daily living activities.

    Measured: Baseline (measurement at enrollment), Month 3, Month 6 and Month 12

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Aug 2020
  2. Study start17 May 2021
  3. Primary completion30 Jul 2024
  4. Study completion30 Jul 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
116 participants (actual)
Target duration
12 Months
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04517669
Sponsor's protocol ID
A3921332
Other IDs
TOPSATI
Status last verified
Sep 2025
First submitted
14 Aug 2020
Last updated
14 Oct 2025
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No: Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical\_trials/trial\_data\_and\_results/data\_requests.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Psoriatic Arthritis, run by Pfizer at 41 sites in 8 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Oct 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 41 sites in Israel, Spain, France, Sweden, Belgium and 3 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 14 Oct 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity (LDA) Based on Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) at Month 6 (time frame: At Month 6). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Oct 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in