GoutNCT04519021
Knowledge, Attitude and Practice Regarding Diagnosis and Management of Gout Among Clinicians in Nepal
An observational study of Gout, run by National Center for Rheumatic Diseases, Nepal at 1 site in Nepal.
Trial summary
A web-based descriptive survey was conducted among doctors with regular interaction with gout patients. The questionnaire comprised of 38 multiple choice questions; 9 questions for demographic data, 8, 11 and 10 questions each for knowledge, attitude and practice, respectively. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Gout
- How many people
- 380 participants
- Where
- 1 siteNepal
- Study dates
- 1 Nov 2019to 31 Jan 2020
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Physicians (including practicing medical graduates, post-graduates in internal medicine, family medicine) and orthopedic surgeons were selected randomly from the list of data from the Nepal Medical Council registry. All internists with valid email ID on the registry of the "society of internal medicine of Nepal" (SIMON) were included.
Who may be able to join
- Physicians (including practicing medical graduates, post-graduates in internal medicine, family medicine)
- orthopedic surgeons
- with valid email ID on the registry of the "society of internal medicine of Nepal" (SIMON)
Who cannot join
- who did not give consent
- clinicians other than above mentioned faculty
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Knowledge, Attitude and Practice Regarding Diagnosis and Management of Gout Among Clinicians in Nepal: A Report From Web-Based Survey
A web-based descriptive survey was conducted among doctors with regular interaction with gout patients. The questionnaire comprised of 38 multiple choice questions; 9 questions for demographic data, 8, 11 and 10 questions each for knowledge, attitude and practice, respectively. Simple descriptive statistics were used to describe the correct responses.
Read the detailed description
Objective To understand the knowledge, attitude and treatment practices of gout among doctors who regularly interacted with gout patients.
Methodology Study population: Physicians (including practicing medical graduates, post-graduates in internal medicine, family medicine) and orthopedic surgeons were selected randomly from the list of data from the Nepal Medical Council registry. All internists with valid email ID on the registry of the "society of internal medicine of Nepal" (SIMON) were included. Also, a list of MBBS graduates, family medicine and orthopedic practitioners working in the peripheral set-up of Nepal was obtained and a random selection with computer-generated random number table based on council registration number was made for enrollment into the survey. Estimating a response rate of 30%, a total of 1200 clinicians were selected based on their council registration number for the invitation to participate in the survey.
Survey instrument: A standardized questionnaire was designed by a 3-member committee of NRA focusing on the areas of knowledge, attitude and practice of gout with 9 questions pertaining to demographic parameters, 8 to knowledge about the disease, 11 to attitude and 10 to practice behaviors [tables 1-4]. The questions were designed as multiple-choice questions (MCQ) to be marked by the respondent. Few questions had the provision of selecting more than 1 options. Open- ended questions were avoided to save the time of the respondents and thus reduce the attrition rates[10].
Procedure: An email containing a letter of invitation for participation was sent to each of the selected participant. It mentioned why they were receiving the email, the objectives of the survey, the assurance of anonymity and confidentiality and a total answering time of less than 5 minutes for encouraging participation. A link to the Google-form was attached in the mail itself and a mention was made on the implied consent for participation in clicking the link. A reminder email was sent after 1 week to all irrespective of whether they had responded earlier.
Platform: A web-based platform was chosen with the use of Google-forms which was compatible and user friendly to both browser and mobile users and to both iOS and Android users. Multiple entries from the same email link were blocked. Web-based platform was chosen over email survey because it provides the ability to transfer survey responses directly into a database, eliminating transcription errors and preventing survey alteration by the survey respondent and most importantly maintaining confidentiality and anonymity of respondents[11]. The answers were collected anonymously in an excel sheet at the main server for analysis.
Statistical analysis: Simple descriptive statistics were used to describe the frequency or correct responses. Chi-square test was performed to assess the difference in knowledge, attitude, and practices between clinicians with different medical qualifications. Analysis was done using SPSS version 21 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
- Conditions
- Gout
- Keywords
- gout, survey, knowledge, practice, nepal
- Medical subject headings
- Gout
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
evaluation of knowledge
evaluation of knowledge on gout among clinicians
Measured: 3 months
evaluation of attitude
evaluation of attitude on gout among clinicians
Measured: 3 months
evaluation of practice
evaluation of practice on gout among clinicians
Measured: 3 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Aug 2020
- Study start1 Nov 2019
- Primary completion31 Dec 2019
- Study completion31 Jan 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for GoutStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 380 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- National Center for Rheumatic Diseases, Nepal
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04519021
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 07/2076
- Status last verified
- Aug 2020
- First submitted
- 16 Aug 2020
- Last updated
- 19 Aug 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Aug 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Knowledge, Attitude and Practice Regarding Diagnosis and Management of Gout Among Clinicians in Nepal: A Report From Web-Based Survey
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04519021
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 07/2076
- Conditions
- Gout
- Keywords
- gout, survey, knowledge, practice, nepal
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 380 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- National Center for Rheumatic Diseases, NepalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Nov 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Jan 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Aug 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
A web-based descriptive survey was conducted among doctors with regular interaction with gout patients. The questionnaire comprised of 38 multiple choice questions; 9 questions for demographic data, 8, 11 and 10 questions each for knowledge, attitude and practice, respectively. Simple descriptive statistics were used to describe the correct responses.
Detailed description
Objective To understand the knowledge, attitude and treatment practices of gout among doctors who regularly interacted with gout patients.
Methodology Study population: Physicians (including practicing medical graduates, post-graduates in internal medicine, family medicine) and orthopedic surgeons were selected randomly from the list of data from the Nepal Medical Council registry. All internists with valid email ID on the registry of the "society of internal medicine of Nepal" (SIMON) were included. Also, a list of MBBS graduates, family medicine and orthopedic practitioners working in the peripheral set-up of Nepal was obtained and a random selection with computer-generated random number table based on council registration number was made for enrollment into the survey. Estimating a response rate of 30%, a total of 1200 clinicians were selected based on their council registration number for the invitation to participate in the survey.
Survey instrument: A standardized questionnaire was designed by a 3-member committee of NRA focusing on the areas of knowledge, attitude and practice of gout with 9 questions pertaining to demographic parameters, 8 to knowledge about the disease, 11 to attitude and 10 to practice behaviors [tables 1-4]. The questions were designed as multiple-choice questions (MCQ) to be marked by the respondent. Few questions had the provision of selecting more than 1 options. Open- ended questions were avoided to save the time of the respondents and thus reduce the attrition rates[10].
Procedure: An email containing a letter of invitation for participation was sent to each of the selected participant. It mentioned why they were receiving the email, the objectives of the survey, the assurance of anonymity and confidentiality and a total answering time of less than 5 minutes for encouraging participation. A link to the Google-form was attached in the mail itself and a mention was made on the implied consent for participation in clicking the link. A reminder email was sent after 1 week to all irrespective of whether they had responded earlier.
Platform: A web-based platform was chosen with the use of Google-forms which was compatible and user friendly to both browser and mobile users and to both iOS and Android users. Multiple entries from the same email link were blocked. Web-based platform was chosen over email survey because it provides the ability to transfer survey responses directly into a database, eliminating transcription errors and preventing survey alteration by the survey respondent and most importantly maintaining confidentiality and anonymity of respondents[11]. The answers were collected anonymously in an excel sheet at the main server for analysis.
Statistical analysis: Simple descriptive statistics were used to describe the frequency or correct responses. Chi-square test was performed to assess the difference in knowledge, attitude, and practices between clinicians with different medical qualifications. Analysis was done using SPSS version 21 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Physicians (including practicing medical graduates, post-graduates in internal medicine, family medicine) and orthopedic surgeons were selected randomly from the list of data from the Nepal Medical Council registry. All internists with valid email ID on the registry of the "society of internal medicine of Nepal" (SIMON) were included.
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Physicians (including practicing medical graduates, post-graduates in internal medicine, family medicine)
- orthopedic surgeons
- with valid email ID on the registry of the "society of internal medicine of Nepal" (SIMON)
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- who did not give consent
- clinicians other than above mentioned faculty
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
evaluation of knowledge
Time frame: 3 months
evaluation of knowledge on gout among clinicians
evaluation of attitude
Time frame: 3 months
evaluation of attitude on gout among clinicians
evaluation of practice
Time frame: 3 months
evaluation of practice on gout among clinicians
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Aug 2020.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Gout
RecruitingPhase 4
Treat-to-Target Serum Urate Versus Treat-to-Avoid Symptoms in Gout
Gout
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Dotinurad Versus Allopurinol in Participants With Gout
Gout
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Dotinurad Versus Allopurinol in Tophaceous Gout
Tophaceous Gout
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Combined Metabolic Activator Supplementation in Subjects Diagnosed With Gout
Gout Disease
Enrolling by invitation
The Remote Monitoring of Gout Study
Gout Initiating Urate-loweringUrate-lowering Therapy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Gout, run by National Center for Rheumatic Diseases, Nepal at 1 site in Nepal.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Aug 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Nepal. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
evaluation of knowledge (time frame: 3 months). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Aug 2020.