AzTrials
AzTrials

Tuberculous PericarditisPhase 2IMPI-3NCT04521803

High vs. Standard Dose Rifampicin for Effusive Tuberculous Pericarditis

A Phase 2 study testing high dose Rifampicin (RIF) in people with Tuberculous Pericarditis and HIV Status, run by University of Cape Town at 2 sites in South Africa.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The investigators hypothesise that high dose RIF (RIF35) will increase pericardial fluid RIF exposure and so enhance mycobacterial clearance, compared to standard of care dosing (RIF10). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Tuberculous Pericarditis, HIV Status
What is being tested?
high dose Rifampicin (RIF)
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
52 participants
Where
2 sitesSouth Africa
Study dates
10 Jan 2022to 10 Jun 2026
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Aged >18 years
  • Suspected PCTB with confirmed pericardial effusion on echocardiography (i.e., echo free space of ≥1 cm anterior to the right ventricle in diastole)
  • Consent to study participation including testing for HIV-1 (if HIV status is unknown)
  • Microbiologically detected Mtb in PCF or diagnosis of probable PCTB. Probable PCTB (in the absence of a positive pericardial fluid culture) will be defined as per Mayosi et al.4:
  • Evidence of pericarditis with microbiologic confirmation of Mtb- infection elsewhere in the body and/or
  • Exudative, lymphocyte predominant effusion with elevated adenosine deaminase (≥35 U/L)
  • Participant will undergo pericardiocentesis (as per clinical indication)
  • Within 5 days of ATT initiation

Who cannot join

  • Glomerular filtration rate <30ml/min or renal failure requiring dialysis
  • Rifampin-resistant TB
  • Severe concurrent opportunistic infection
  • Contraindication to placement of intra-pericardial catheter
  • Failed pericardiocentesis procedure and/or failure of placement of intra-pericardial catheter
  • Any disease or condition in which the use of the standard anti-TB drugs (or any of their components) are contraindicated. This includes, but is not limited to, allergy to any TB drug or their components.
Show all 14Show fewer
  • In females: a positive urine pregnancy test result
  • Confirmed autoimmune disorders (e.g. systemic lupus erythematosus)
  • Additional Exclusions for Gadolinium contrasted CMR
  • Any implanted devices that are not MR compatible (e.g. pacemaker, defibrillators, cerebral aneurysm clips, cochlear implants etc.)
  • Claustrophobia
  • Gadolinium allergy
  • Inability to lie on a flat surface for prolonged periods of time (e.g. severe congestive cardiac failure)
  • Breastfeeding

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

South Africa2 sites
  • Groote Schuur Hospital

    Cape Town, Western Cape, 7925

  • Nelson Mandela Academic Hospital

    Mthatha, Eastern Cape, 5099

Other trials in South Africa

About this study

Official title: IMPI-3 - A Randomized Controlled Trial of High vs. Standard Dose Rifampicin for Effusive Tuberculous Pericarditis

The investigators hypothesise that high dose RIF (RIF35) will increase pericardial fluid RIF exposure and so enhance mycobacterial clearance, compared to standard of care dosing (RIF10).

This Phase 2b randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded trial will evaluate the efficacy and safety of RIF 35mg/kg compared 10mg/kg, added to standard first-line ATT, for the treatment of PCTB.

Read the detailed description

IMPI-3 - A Randomized Controlled Trial of High vs. Standard Dose Rifampicin for Effusive Tuberculous Pericarditis

Phase 2b Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded clinical trial

The trial will enroll 100 adult participants with pericardial TB from two research sites in South Africa, with no exclusions being made on the basis of sex/gender, racial or ethnic group.

Consenting participants will be stratified by HIV status and PCF GX-Ultra status, then randomized 1:1 to receive either standard of care anti-tuberculosis treatment (ATT) or standard of care plus high dose Rifampicin (RIF), both administered orally for 2 months, followed by a continuation phase of 4 months' RH at standard doses.

Being tested
high dose Rifampicin (RIF)
Medical subject headings
Pericarditis, Tuberculous

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • high dose Rifampicin (RIF)Drug

    Simulations were performed to determine the dose of RIF required to achieve the most equitable drug exposures across the weight range, 30 to 100 kg. Demographic data of a reference cohort of TB patients (n = 1225), with or without HIV-1 coinfection, recruited in clinical trials conducted in West Africa and South Africa were used for the simulations35-38. An additional 12 250 virtual patients were generated using the weight and height distributions of the 1225 patients to increase the number of patients with a weight close to the boundaries of the weight range. Parameter estimates of the population PK model for RIF were used to simulate (100 replicates) RIF exposures22. Four dosing scenarios were evaluated using the weight-band based dosing with 4-drug FDC tablets and extra RIF tablets with each tablet containing 150 mg or 600 mg RIF. The FDC tablets were assumed to have 20% reduced bioavailability based on data from a clinical trial where the same formulation was used

Study groups in NCT04521803
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Arm 1: Standard of care (RIF10)No interventionDosing of the daily oral RHZE fixed dose combination (FDC) will be according to WHO weight bands
Arm 2: High-dose RIF (RIF35)ExperimentalSimulations were performed to determine the dose of RIF required to achieve the most equitable drug exposures across the weight range, 30 to 100 kg. Demographic data of a reference cohort of TB patients (n = 1225), with or without HIV-1 coinfection, recruited in clinical trials conducted in West Africa and South Africa were used for the simulations35-38. An additional 12 250 virtual patients were generated using the weight and height distributions of the 1225 patients to increase the number of patients with a weight close to the boundaries of the weight range. Parameter estimates of the population PK model for RIF were used to simulate (100 replicates) RIF exposures22. Four dosing scenarios were evaluated using the weight-band based dosing with 4-drug FDC tablets and extra RIF tablets with each tablet containing 150 mg or 600 mg RIF. The FDC tablets were assumed to have 20% reduced bioavailability based on data from a clinical trial where the same formulation was used39
Receives: Drug: high dose Rifampicin (RIF)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Drug exposure in PCF and mediates in Mtb load

    To determine whether higher dose rifampicin (35mg/kg) increases pericardial fluid (AUC) RIF levels and increases time to positivity of mycobacterial culture at 72 hours compared to standard dose Rifampicin

    Measured: 72 hours and 52 weeks

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Mortality between study arms

    To investigate clinical outcome by mortality (attributable to PCTB and all cause)

    Measured: week 8 and 52 weeks

  2. re-accumulation of pericardial effusion between study arms

    To investigate clinical outcome by comparing clinical evidence of constrictive pericarditis between study arms

    Measured: 52 weeks

  3. TB-IRIS between study arms

    To investigate clinical outcome by comparison of the incidence of TB immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (TB-IRIS) between study arms

    Measured: 52 weeks

  4. Constrictive pericarditis between the study arms

    Comparison of the incidence of constrictive pericarditis between the study arms

    Measured: 52 weeks

  5. CMR evidence

    To investigate clinical outcome by evidence on week 52 CMR of:

    1. Constrictive physiology
    2. Pericardial inflammation
    3. Pericardial thickening
    4. Pericardial fibrosis
    5. Inflammatory exudative or hemorrhagic pericardial effusion

    Measured: 52 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Aug 2020
  2. Study start10 Jan 2022
  3. Primary completion26 Mar 2026
  4. Study completion10 Jun 2026

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Participant identification numbers (PID), assigned at the screening visit, will be used throughout the study. After signing the informed consent document; eligible participants will be stratified by HIV status and then further stratified by GX-Ultra status to ensure equal allocation regardless of HIV status and likely subsequent culture status. An electronic randomization tool will be used to randomize the subgroups in a 1:1 ratio. The randomization list will be generated and updated by the study coordinator, trial pharmacist, or statistician who will have no direct contact with trial participants or involvement with the assessment for eligibility in the trial.
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator
Enrolment
52 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04521803
Sponsor's protocol ID
IMPI-3 DMID 20-0007
Acronym
IMPI-3
Status last verified
Mar 2025
First submitted
16 Jul 2020
Last updated
1 Sep 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing high dose Rifampicin (RIF) in people with Tuberculous Pericarditis and HIV Status, run by University of Cape Town at 2 sites in South Africa.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in South Africa. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Drug exposure in PCF and mediates in Mtb load (time frame: 72 hours and 52 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Sep 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in