Nasopharyngeal CarcinomaPhase 1NCT04522050
Gemcitabine-based Induction Chemotherapy Combined With Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
A Phase 1 study testing Gemcitabine combined with cisplatin induction chemotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy with gemcitabine in people with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, run by Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
Researchers conduct the clinical trial (gemcitabine combined with cisplatin induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy with gemcitabine for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma) to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of gemcitabine in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
- What is being tested?
- Gemcitabine combined with cisplatin induction chemotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy with gemcitabine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 65 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 1 Oct 2018to 1 Dec 2024
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with newly histologically confirmed non-keratinizing carcinoma (according to WHO histological type)
- Tumor staged as Ⅲ-Ⅳa (according to the 8th AJCC edition staging system)
- Age :18-60
- Performance status: KPS > 70
- Normal liver function test: Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) < 1.5×upper limit of normal (ULN) concomitant with alkaline phosphatase (ALP) < 2.5×ULN, and bilirubin < ULN
- Renal: creatinine clearance > 60ml/min
- Adequate marrow: leucocyte count > 4×109/L, neutrophil count > 2×109/L, and platelet count > 100×109/L
- Written informed consent
Who cannot join
- History of allergy to related drugs
- Prior malignancy (except adequately treated carcinoma in-situ of the cervix or basal/squamous cell carcinoma of the skin)
- History of previous RT (except for non-melanomatous skin cancers outside intended RT treatment volume)
- Prior chemotherapy or surgery (except diagnostic) to primary tumor or nodes
- Any severe intercurrent disease, which may bring unacceptable risk or affect the compliance of the trial, for example, unstable cardiac disease requiring treatment, renal disease, chronic hepatitis, diabetes with poor control (fasting plasma glucose > 1.5×ULN), and emotional disturbance
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University
Zhuhai, Guangdong, 519000
Qi Zeng, Doctor, 18898534065, zengqi37@mail.sysu.edu.cn
About this study
Official title: A Multicenter and Prospective Clinical Trial of Gemcitabine-based Induction Chemotherapy Combined With Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Researchers conduct the clinical trial (gemcitabine combined with cisplatin induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy with gemcitabine for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma) to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of gemcitabine in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Read the detailed description
Diagnosed as locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (stage III-IV), and pathologically confirmed as a differentiated or undifferentiated non-keratinizing nasopharyngeal carcinoma, the patient is eligible to participate in the study. Patients receive gemcitabine (1000mg/m² d1,8) and cisplatin (80mg/m², d1) every 3 weeks for 2 cycles before radiotherapy. And then intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is given a total dose of GTVnx 70Gy, GTVnd 66Gy, CTV1 60Gy and CTV2 54Gy for 33 times in total, concurrently with gemcitabine. The initial dose of gemcitabine is 25mg/m² once a week for 6 times. The patients are divided into 9 groups (25mg/m², 50mg/m², 100mg/m², 200mg/m², 300mg/m², 350mg/m², 400mg/m², 450mg/m², 500mg/m²) with 6 patients in each group. Considering about 20% of the cases of dropout, withdrawal, and loss to follow-up in clinical trials, a total of 65 cases are needed in this study. The efficacy is evaluated according to the European Solid Tumor Efficacy Evaluation Standard (RECIST1.1). After induction chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and 3 months after radiotherapy, nasopharyngeal endoscopy and magnetic resonance imaging of the would be reviewed for 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years to evaluate the curative effect. The chest CT, abdominal B-ultrasound, bone scan or PETCT examinations are reviewed to exclud distant metastases. Biopsy diagnosis can be performed for patients suspected of local residual and recurrence.
- Conditions
- Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
- Being tested
- Gemcitabine combined with cisplatin induction chemotherapy, concurrent chemoradiotherapy with gemcitabine
- Medical subject headings
- Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Gemcitabine combined with cisplatin induction chemotherapyDrug
Also called concurrent chemoradiotherapy with gemcitabine
Patients receive gemcitabine (1000mg/m² d1,8) and cisplatin (80mg/m², d1) every 3 weeks for 2 cycles before radiotherapy. And then intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is given a total dose of GTVnx 70Gy, GTVnd 66Gy, CTV1 60Gy and CTV2 54Gy for 33 times in total, concurrently with gemcitabine. The initial dose of gemcitabine is 25mg/m² once a week for 6 times. The patients are divided into 9 groups (25mg/m², 50mg/m², 100mg/m², 200mg/m², 300mg/m², 350mg/m², 400mg/m², 450mg/m², 500mg/m²) with 6 patients in each group.
concurrent chemoradiotherapy with gemcitabineDrug
followed by concurrent gemcitabine chemoradiotherapy
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Induction chemotherapy + IMRT and concurrent gemcitabine | Other | Patients receive gemcitabine (1000mg/m² d1,8) and cisplatin (80mg/m²,d1) every 3weeks for 2 cycles before radiotherapy, and then receive intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) concurrently with gemcitabine. The initial dose of gemcitabine is 25mg/m² once a week for 6 times. Patients are divided into 9 groups (25mg/m², 50mg/m², 100mg/m², 200mg/m², 300mg/m², 350mg/m², 400mg/m², 450mg/m², 500mg/m²) with 6 patients in each group. Receives: Drug: Gemcitabine combined with cisplatin induction chemotherapy; Drug: concurrent chemoradiotherapy with gemcitabine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Maximum tolerance dose(MTD)
MTD is detemined by the dose that is immediately lower than the dose that produced dose limiting toxicity (DLT). If DLT occurs in more than half of patients at a certain dose level, the test will be terminated. If DLT occurs in 2 cases,another 6 patients will be treated with this dose. If DLT does not occur in 6 cases, the dose will continue to increase. If it still occurs, the next dose is MTD.
Measured: 3 years
Secondary outcomes (2)
Dose limiting toxicity (DLT)
We determined DLT: a) grade ≥ 3 anemia; b) grade ≥ 3 thrombocytopenia; c) grade ≥ 3 neutropenia no less than 5 days, d) grade 3 febrile neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count < 1.0 x 10^9/L, fever ≥ 38.5℃) despite therapy with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; and e) any other grades 3-4 toxicity (except alopecia and nausea).
Measured: 3 years
Tumor response rates
Tumor response rate was evaluated according to the RECIST1.1. After induction chemotherapy, radiotherapy and 3 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years of radiotherapy, nasal endoscope and magnetic resonance imaging results were used to evaluate the efficacy. And chest CT scanning, abdominal ultrasound, bone scan or PETCT examination were used to exclude the distant metastases. Pathologic biopsy can be performed for patients who are suspected of locally residual or recurrence.
Measured: 3 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Aug 2020
- Study start1 Oct 2018
- Primary completion1 Oct 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Dec 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (16)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Nasopharyngeal CarcinomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- The initial dose of gemcitabine is 25mg/m² once a week for 6 times. The patients are divided into 9 groups (25mg/m², 50mg/m², 100mg/m², 200mg/m², 300mg/m², 350mg/m², 400mg/m², 450mg/m², 500mg/m²) with 6 patients in each group.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 65 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Qi Zeng, Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
- Investigators
- siyang wang, Principal investigator, Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04522050
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ZDWY.TJZLK.111
- Status last verified
- Jun 2023
- First submitted
- 15 Aug 2020
- Last updated
- 12 Jul 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Jia WH, Huang QH, Liao J, Ye W, Shugart YY, Liu Q, Chen LZ, Li YH, Lin X, Wen FL, Adami HO, Zeng Y, Zeng YX. Trends in incidence and mortality of nasopharyngeal carcinoma over a 20-25 year period (1978/1983-2002) in Sihui and Cangwu counties in southern China. BMC Cancer. 2006 Jul 6;6:178. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-6-178.
PubMed 16822324Zeng Q, Wang J, Lv X, Li J, Yin LJ, Xiang YQ, Guo X. Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Radiotherapy versus Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in elderly patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: finding from a propensity-matched analysis. BMC Cancer. 2016 Aug 30;16(1):693. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2661-y.
PubMed 27577729Meng R, Wei K, Xia L, Xu Y, Chen W, Zheng R, Lin L. Cancer incidence and mortality in Guangdong province, 2012. Chin J Cancer Res. 2016 Jun;28(3):311-20. doi: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2016.03.05.
PubMed 27478316Peng G, Wang T, Yang KY, Zhang S, Zhang T, Li Q, Han J, Wu G. A prospective, randomized study comparing outcomes and toxicities of intensity-modulated radiotherapy vs. conventional two-dimensional radiotherapy for the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Radiother Oncol. 2012 Sep;104(3):286-93. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2012.08.013. Epub 2012 Sep 17.
PubMed 22995588Zhang MX, Li J, Shen GP, Zou X, Xu JJ, Jiang R, You R, Hua YJ, Sun Y, Ma J, Hong MH, Chen MY. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy prolongs the survival of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma compared with conventional two-dimensional radiotherapy: A 10-year experience with a large cohort and long follow-up. Eur J Cancer. 2015 Nov;51(17):2587-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.08.006. Epub 2015 Aug 26.
PubMed 26318726Huang PY, Zeng Q, Cao KJ, Guo X, Guo L, Mo HY, Wu PH, Qian CN, Mai HQ, Hong MH. Ten-year outcomes of a randomised trial for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A single-institution experience from an endemic area. Eur J Cancer. 2015 Sep;51(13):1760-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.05.025. Epub 2015 Jun 17.
PubMed 26093812Sun Y, Li WF, Chen NY, Zhang N, Hu GQ, Xie FY, Sun Y, Chen XZ, Li JG, Zhu XD, Hu CS, Xu XY, Chen YY, Hu WH, Guo L, Mo HY, Chen L, Mao YP, Sun R, Ai P, Liang SB, Long GX, Zheng BM, Feng XL, Gong XC, Li L, Shen CY, Xu JY, Guo Y, Chen YM, Zhang F, Lin L, Tang LL, Liu MZ, Ma J. Induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a phase 3, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Nov;17(11):1509-1520. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30410-7. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
PubMed 27686945Chua MLK, Wee JTS, Hui EP, Chan ATC. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Lancet. 2016 Mar 5;387(10022):1012-1024. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00055-0. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
PubMed 26321262Ke LR, Xia WX, Qiu WZ, Huang XJ, Yang J, Yu YH, Liang H, Liu GY, Ye YF, Xiang YQ, Guo X, Lv X. Safety and efficacy of lobaplatin combined with 5-fluorouracil as first-line induction chemotherapy followed by lobaplatin-radiotherapy in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: preliminary results of a prospective phase II trial. BMC Cancer. 2017 Feb 15;17(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3080-4.
PubMed 28202000Tang LQ, Chen DP, Guo L, Mo HY, Huang Y, Guo SS, Qi B, Tang QN, Wang P, Li XY, Li JB, Liu Q, Gao YH, Xie FY, Liu LT, Li Y, Liu SL, Xie HJ, Liang YJ, Sun XS, Yan JJ, Wu YS, Luo DH, Huang PY, Xiang YQ, Sun R, Chen MY, Lv X, Wang L, Xia WX, Zhao C, Cao KJ, Qian CN, Guo X, Hong MH, Nie ZQ, Chen QY, Mai HQ. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with nedaplatin versus cisplatin in stage II-IVB nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018 Apr;19(4):461-473. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30104-9. Epub 2018 Feb 28.
PubMed 29501366Vanderveken OM, Szturz P, Specenier P, Merlano MC, Benasso M, Van Gestel D, Wouters K, Van Laer C, Van den Weyngaert D, Peeters M, Vermorken J. Gemcitabine-Based Chemoradiation in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer: Systematic Review of Literature and Meta-Analysis. Oncologist. 2016 Jan;21(1):59-71. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0246. Epub 2015 Dec 28.
PubMed 26712958Zhang L, Huang Y, Hong S, Yang Y, Yu G, Jia J, Peng P, Wu X, Lin Q, Xi X, Peng J, Xu M, Chen D, Lu X, Wang R, Cao X, Chen X, Lin Z, Xiong J, Lin Q, Xie C, Li Z, Pan J, Li J, Wu S, Lian Y, Yang Q, Zhao C. Gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus fluorouracil plus cisplatin in recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2016 Oct 15;388(10054):1883-1892. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31388-5. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
PubMed 27567279Mason KA, Milas L, Hunter NR, Elshaikh M, Buchmiller L, Kishi K, Hittelman K, Ang KK. Maximizing therapeutic gain with gemcitabine and fractionated radiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999 Jul 15;44(5):1125-35. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(99)00134-0.
PubMed 10421547Milas L, Fujii T, Hunter N, Elshaikh M, Mason K, Plunkett W, Ang KK, Hittelman W. Enhancement of tumor radioresponse in vivo by gemcitabine. Cancer Res. 1999 Jan 1;59(1):107-14.
PubMed 9892194El Deen DA, Toson EA, El Morsy SM. Gemcitabine-based induction chemotherapy and concurrent with radiation in advanced head and neck cancer. Med Oncol. 2012 Dec;29(5):3367-73. doi: 10.1007/s12032-012-0269-x. Epub 2012 Jun 8.
PubMed 22678924
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Jul 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Multicenter and Prospective Clinical Trial of Gemcitabine-based Induction Chemotherapy Combined With Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04522050
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ZDWY.TJZLK.111
- Conditions
- Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 65 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Oct 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Oct 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Dec 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 21 Aug 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Researchers conduct the clinical trial (gemcitabine combined with cisplatin induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy with gemcitabine for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma) to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of gemcitabine in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Detailed description
Diagnosed as locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (stage III-IV), and pathologically confirmed as a differentiated or undifferentiated non-keratinizing nasopharyngeal carcinoma, the patient is eligible to participate in the study. Patients receive gemcitabine (1000mg/m² d1,8) and cisplatin (80mg/m², d1) every 3 weeks for 2 cycles before radiotherapy. And then intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is given a total dose of GTVnx 70Gy, GTVnd 66Gy, CTV1 60Gy and CTV2 54Gy for 33 times in total, concurrently with gemcitabine. The initial dose of gemcitabine is 25mg/m² once a week for 6 times. The patients are divided into 9 groups (25mg/m², 50mg/m², 100mg/m², 200mg/m², 300mg/m², 350mg/m², 400mg/m², 450mg/m², 500mg/m²) with 6 patients in each group. Considering about 20% of the cases of dropout, withdrawal, and loss to follow-up in clinical trials, a total of 65 cases are needed in this study. The efficacy is evaluated according to the European Solid Tumor Efficacy Evaluation Standard (RECIST1.1). After induction chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and 3 months after radiotherapy, nasopharyngeal endoscopy and magnetic resonance imaging of the would be reviewed for 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years to evaluate the curative effect. The chest CT, abdominal B-ultrasound, bone scan or PETCT examinations are reviewed to exclud distant metastases. Biopsy diagnosis can be performed for patients suspected of local residual and recurrence.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- The initial dose of gemcitabine is 25mg/m² once a week for 6 times. The patients are divided into 9 groups (25mg/m², 50mg/m², 100mg/m², 200mg/m², 300mg/m², 350mg/m², 400mg/m², 450mg/m², 500mg/m²) with 6 patients in each group.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Induction chemotherapy + IMRT and concurrent gemcitabine | Other | Drug: Gemcitabine combined with cisplatin induction chemotherapy, Drug: concurrent chemoradiotherapy with gemcitabinePatients receive gemcitabine (1000mg/m² d1,8) and cisplatin (80mg/m²,d1) every 3weeks for 2 cycles before radiotherapy, and then receive intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) concurrently with gemcitabine. The initial dose of gemcitabine is 25mg/m² once a week for 6 times. Patients are divided into 9 groups (25mg/m², 50mg/m², 100mg/m², 200mg/m², 300mg/m², 350mg/m², 400mg/m², 450mg/m², 500mg/m²) with 6 patients in each group. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Patients with newly histologically confirmed non-keratinizing carcinoma (according to WHO histological type)
- Tumor staged as Ⅲ-Ⅳa (according to the 8th AJCC edition staging system)
- Age :18-60
- Performance status: KPS > 70
- Normal liver function test: Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) < 1.5×upper limit of normal (ULN) concomitant with alkaline phosphatase (ALP) < 2.5×ULN, and bilirubin < ULN
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- History of allergy to related drugs
- Prior malignancy (except adequately treated carcinoma in-situ of the cervix or basal/squamous cell carcinoma of the skin)
- History of previous RT (except for non-melanomatous skin cancers outside intended RT treatment volume)
- Prior chemotherapy or surgery (except diagnostic) to primary tumor or nodes
- Any severe intercurrent disease, which may bring unacceptable risk or affect the compliance of the trial, for example, unstable cardiac disease requiring treatment, renal disease, chronic hepatitis, diabetes with poor control (fasting plasma glucose > 1.5×ULN), and emotional disturbance
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Gemcitabine combined with cisplatin induction chemotherapyAlso: concurrent chemoradiotherapy with gemcitabinePatients receive gemcitabine (1000mg/m² d1,8) and cisplatin (80mg/m², d1) every 3 weeks for 2 cycles before radiotherapy. And then intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is given a total dose of GTVnx 70Gy, GTVnd 66Gy, CTV1 60Gy and CTV2 54Gy for 33 times in total, concurrently with gemcitabine. The initial dose of gemcitabine is 25mg/m² once a week for 6 times. The patients are divided into 9 groups (25mg/m², 50mg/m², 100mg/m², 200mg/m², 300mg/m², 350mg/m², 400mg/m², 450mg/m², 500mg/m²) with 6 patients in each group. | Drug | Induction chemotherapy + IMRT and concurrent gemcitabine |
| concurrent chemoradiotherapy with gemcitabinefollowed by concurrent gemcitabine chemoradiotherapy | Drug | Induction chemotherapy + IMRT and concurrent gemcitabine |
Primary outcome
Maximum tolerance dose(MTD)
Time frame: 3 years
MTD is detemined by the dose that is immediately lower than the dose that produced dose limiting toxicity (DLT). If DLT occurs in more than half of patients at a certain dose level, the test will be terminated. If DLT occurs in 2 cases,another 6 patients will be treated with this dose. If DLT does not occur in 6 cases, the dose will continue to increase. If it still occurs, the next dose is MTD.
2 secondary outcomes
Dose limiting toxicity (DLT)
Time frame: 3 years
Tumor response rates
Time frame: 3 years
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Jul 2023.
- Background: PubMed 16822324Jia WH, Huang QH, Liao J, Ye W, Shugart YY, Liu Q, Chen LZ, Li YH, Lin X, Wen FL, Adami HO, Zeng Y, Zeng YX. Trends in incidence and mortality of nasopharyngeal carcinoma over a 20-25 year period (1978/1983-2002) in Sihui and Cangwu counties in southern China. BMC Cancer. 2006 Jul 6;6:178. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-6-178.
- Background: PubMed 27577729Zeng Q, Wang J, Lv X, Li J, Yin LJ, Xiang YQ, Guo X. Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Radiotherapy versus Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in elderly patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: finding from a propensity-matched analysis. BMC Cancer. 2016 Aug 30;16(1):693. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2661-y.
- Background: PubMed 27478316Meng R, Wei K, Xia L, Xu Y, Chen W, Zheng R, Lin L. Cancer incidence and mortality in Guangdong province, 2012. Chin J Cancer Res. 2016 Jun;28(3):311-20. doi: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2016.03.05.
- Background: PubMed 22995588Peng G, Wang T, Yang KY, Zhang S, Zhang T, Li Q, Han J, Wu G. A prospective, randomized study comparing outcomes and toxicities of intensity-modulated radiotherapy vs. conventional two-dimensional radiotherapy for the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Radiother Oncol. 2012 Sep;104(3):286-93. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2012.08.013. Epub 2012 Sep 17.
- Background: PubMed 26318726Zhang MX, Li J, Shen GP, Zou X, Xu JJ, Jiang R, You R, Hua YJ, Sun Y, Ma J, Hong MH, Chen MY. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy prolongs the survival of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma compared with conventional two-dimensional radiotherapy: A 10-year experience with a large cohort and long follow-up. Eur J Cancer. 2015 Nov;51(17):2587-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.08.006. Epub 2015 Aug 26.
- Background: PubMed 26093812Huang PY, Zeng Q, Cao KJ, Guo X, Guo L, Mo HY, Wu PH, Qian CN, Mai HQ, Hong MH. Ten-year outcomes of a randomised trial for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A single-institution experience from an endemic area. Eur J Cancer. 2015 Sep;51(13):1760-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.05.025. Epub 2015 Jun 17.
- Background: PubMed 27686945Sun Y, Li WF, Chen NY, Zhang N, Hu GQ, Xie FY, Sun Y, Chen XZ, Li JG, Zhu XD, Hu CS, Xu XY, Chen YY, Hu WH, Guo L, Mo HY, Chen L, Mao YP, Sun R, Ai P, Liang SB, Long GX, Zheng BM, Feng XL, Gong XC, Li L, Shen CY, Xu JY, Guo Y, Chen YM, Zhang F, Lin L, Tang LL, Liu MZ, Ma J. Induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a phase 3, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Nov;17(11):1509-1520. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30410-7. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
- Background: PubMed 26321262Chua MLK, Wee JTS, Hui EP, Chan ATC. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Lancet. 2016 Mar 5;387(10022):1012-1024. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00055-0. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
- Background: PubMed 28202000Ke LR, Xia WX, Qiu WZ, Huang XJ, Yang J, Yu YH, Liang H, Liu GY, Ye YF, Xiang YQ, Guo X, Lv X. Safety and efficacy of lobaplatin combined with 5-fluorouracil as first-line induction chemotherapy followed by lobaplatin-radiotherapy in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: preliminary results of a prospective phase II trial. BMC Cancer. 2017 Feb 15;17(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3080-4.
- Background: PubMed 29501366Tang LQ, Chen DP, Guo L, Mo HY, Huang Y, Guo SS, Qi B, Tang QN, Wang P, Li XY, Li JB, Liu Q, Gao YH, Xie FY, Liu LT, Li Y, Liu SL, Xie HJ, Liang YJ, Sun XS, Yan JJ, Wu YS, Luo DH, Huang PY, Xiang YQ, Sun R, Chen MY, Lv X, Wang L, Xia WX, Zhao C, Cao KJ, Qian CN, Guo X, Hong MH, Nie ZQ, Chen QY, Mai HQ. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with nedaplatin versus cisplatin in stage II-IVB nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018 Apr;19(4):461-473. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30104-9. Epub 2018 Feb 28.
- Background: PubMed 26712958Vanderveken OM, Szturz P, Specenier P, Merlano MC, Benasso M, Van Gestel D, Wouters K, Van Laer C, Van den Weyngaert D, Peeters M, Vermorken J. Gemcitabine-Based Chemoradiation in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer: Systematic Review of Literature and Meta-Analysis. Oncologist. 2016 Jan;21(1):59-71. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0246. Epub 2015 Dec 28.
- Background: PubMed 27567279Zhang L, Huang Y, Hong S, Yang Y, Yu G, Jia J, Peng P, Wu X, Lin Q, Xi X, Peng J, Xu M, Chen D, Lu X, Wang R, Cao X, Chen X, Lin Z, Xiong J, Lin Q, Xie C, Li Z, Pan J, Li J, Wu S, Lian Y, Yang Q, Zhao C. Gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus fluorouracil plus cisplatin in recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2016 Oct 15;388(10054):1883-1892. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31388-5. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Docetaxel and SX-682 in Recurrent/Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Salivary Gland Carcinoma, and Advanced Prostate Cancer
Head and Neck Cancer, Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing the Addition of BMS-986016 (Relatlimab) to the Usual Immunotherapy After Initial Treatment for Recurrent or Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Cancer
Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Recurrent Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
P-MUC1C-ALLO1 Allogeneic CAR-T Cells in the Treatment of Subjects With Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors
Breast Cancer, Ovarian Cancer
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Development and Validation of a Biopsy Decision Model for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Based on Serological Markers and Endoscopic Features
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma (NPC)
RecruitingPhase 1/2
VMD-928 Monotherapy and in Combination With Pembrolizumab to Treat TrkA Overexpression Driven Solid Tumors or Lymphoma
Head and Neck Carcinoma, Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
siyang wang principal investigator
Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1 study testing Gemcitabine combined with cisplatin induction chemotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy with gemcitabine in people with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, run by Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Jul 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact qi zeng, Doctor (18898534065, zengqi37@mail.sysu.edu.cn), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Maximum tolerance dose(MTD) (time frame: 3 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04522050, which also lists 16 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Jul 2023.