AzTrials
AzTrials

Acute Kidney InjuryHDFAKINCT04525092

Online Hemodiafiltration vs Conventional Hemodialysis in Acute Kidney Injury

A study testing Online Pre-dilution Hemodiafiltration, Conventional Hemodialysis and Online Post-dilution Hemodiafiltration in people with Acute Kidney Injury, run by Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) at 2 sites in 2 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Only limited data exist on the benefit of online hemodiafiltration in patient with Acute kidney injury. The objective of this pilot RCT is to assess the feasibility of a large multicentre RCT to determine whether, in patients with AKI requiring acute renal replacement therapy, does exposure to Online Hemodiafiltration… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Acute Kidney Injury
What is being tested?
Online Pre-dilution Hemodiafiltration, Conventional Hemodialysis and Online Post-dilution Hemodiafiltration
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
45 participants
Where
2 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
1 Jan 2021to 1 Dec 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Hospitalised in the ICU
  • Acute kidney injury stage 3 (KDIGO-AKI Criteria)
  • Requiring RRT for AKI, as judged by the attending clinician (initiation) or conversion from CRRT to intermittent dialysis
  • Adult of 18 years or more

Who cannot join

  • Female subjects who are pregnant or breast-feeding or considering becoming pregnant during the study.
  • Subjects who are participating in another study involving dialysis interventions
  • Subjects or relatives/next-of-kin unable to provide written informed consent
  • Creatinine clearance (CrCl) < 30 mL/min measured by 24-hour urine collection or eGFR or on chronic dialysis at baseline
  • Subjects on active immunosuppressive therapy (>10mg of prednisone, biologic therapies, calcineurin inhibitors, mTOR inhibitors or antimetabolites)
  • Subjects with active contraindication to anticoagulation during dialysis session
  • Subjects whose RRT is not part of their life goal

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 2 countries.

2 sites in 2 countries

Canada1 site
  • Centre de recherche du CHUM

    Montreal, Quebec, H2X 0C1

Other trials in Canada

Ireland1 site
  • Clinical Research Centre University College Dublin

    Dublin

Other trials in Ireland

About this study

Official title: Evaluation of the Impact of Online Hemodiafiltration vs Conventional Hemodialysis in Acute Kidney Injury on Inflammatory and Clinical Outcomes

Only limited data exist on the benefit of online hemodiafiltration in patient with Acute kidney injury. The objective of this pilot RCT is to assess the feasibility of a large multicentre RCT to determine whether, in patients with AKI requiring acute renal replacement therapy, does exposure to Online Hemodiafiltration reduce the inflammatory status and improve renal recovery compared to conventional intermittent hemodialysis at the ICU.

Read the detailed description

Despite sparse data on the advantages of hemodiafiltration over conventional hemodialysis for intermittent dialysis, there is limited data comparing these modalities in AKI from various aetiologies in critically ill patients. As RCTs involving renal replacement therapy at the ICU are exceptionally challenging to complete, thus a rigorous RCT based on appropriate sample size and relevant clinical outcomes is crucial. The objective of this pilot RCT is to assess the feasibility of a larger multicentre RCT to determine whether, in patients with AKI requiring acute renal replacement therapy, does exposure to Post-dilution Hemodiafiltration or Pre-dilution Hemodiafiltration reduce the inflammatory status and improve renal recovery compared to conventional intermittent hemodialysis at the ICU. As post-dilution HDF has never been adequately evaluated in an ICU context, comparison between pre-dilution and post-dilution HDF is also required to confirm feasibility.

This proof-of-concept pilot trial will focus on three feasibility endpoints. It will be considered successful if the following criteria are achieved :

  • Protocol adherence: If ≥85% of overall dialysis sessions are administered per-protocol according to the allocated modality
  • Adherence to follow-up: If it was possible to obtain end-of-study outcomes in ≥90% of participants, and
  • Participant accrual: If the average monthly enrolment is 4 or more participants per months.
Being tested
Online Pre-dilution Hemodiafiltration, Conventional Hemodialysis, Online Post-dilution Hemodiafiltration
Keywords
hemodialysis, hemodiafiltration, Acute kidney injury, AKI, Renal replacement therapy, Inflammation
Medical subject headings
Acute Kidney Injury, Inflammation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Online Pre-dilution HemodiafiltrationDevice

    The following parameters: maximum Blood flow rate allowed by vascular access, dialyste rate of 500 mL/min and average convective volume of >44L/session reinjected in pre-dilution mode. The dialysate composition, net ultrafiltration rate and use of anticoagulation will be prescribed according to participant's characteristics.

  • Conventional HemodialysisDevice

    Using the following parameters: maximum Blood flow rate allowed by vascular access, dialysate rate of 500 mL/min, no convection. The dialysate composition, net ultrafiltration rate and use of anticoagulation will be prescribed according to participant's characteristics.

  • Online Post-dilution HemodiafiltrationDevice

    The following parameters: maximum Blood flow rate allowed by vascular access, dialyste rate of 500 mL/min and average convective volume of >22L/session reinjected in pre-dilution mode. The dialysate composition and net ultrafiltration rate will be prescribed according to participant's characteristics. Usage of intra-dialysis anticoagulation is mandatory.

Study groups in NCT04525092
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Conventional HemodialysisActive comparatorParticipants will receive intermittent HD for a minimum of 4hours per session, 3 to 4 times/week, using the 5008 High-Volume HDF Machine from Fresenius Medical Care with High Flux FX1000 Dialyzer (Mode HD).
Receives: Device: Conventional Hemodialysis
Pre-dilution HemodiafiltrationExperimentalParticipants will receive intermittent pre-dilution HDF for a minimum of 4hours per session, 3 to 4 times/week, using the 5008 High-Volume HDF Machine from Fresenius Medical Care with High Flux FX1000 Dialyzer (Mode pre-dilution HDF).
Receives: Device: Online Pre-dilution Hemodiafiltration
Post-dilution HemodiafiltrationExperimentalParticipants will receive intermittent post-dilution HDF for a minimum of 4hours per session, 3 to 4 times/week, using the 5008 High-Volume HDF Machine from Fresenius Medical Care with High Flux FX1000 Dialyzer (Mode post-dilution HDF).
Receives: Device: Online Post-dilution Hemodiafiltration

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Protocol adherence (feasibility)

    If ≥85% of overall dialysis sessions are administered per-protocol according to the allocated modality

    Measured: 90 days

  2. Adherence to follow-up (feasibility)

    If it was possible to obtain end-of-study outcomes in ≥90% of participants

    Measured: 90 days

  3. Participant accrual (feasibility)

    If the average monthly enrolment is 4 or more participants per months

    Measured: 90 days

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Mortality

    (overall mortality)

    Measured: 30 days

  2. Mortality

    (overall mortality)

    Measured: 90 days

  3. End-of-study eGFR

    (mL/min/1.73m2)

    Measured: 90 days

  4. Dialysis dependence

    Defined as the receipt of dialysis at day 90

    Measured: 90 days

  5. Total number of days on dialysis

    (in patients with renal recovery)

    Measured: 90 days

  6. Length of hospitalisation stay

    (days)

    Measured: 90 days

  7. Number of patients with hemodynamic instability during dialysis treatment (first week)

    (using two definitions):

    • Defined as systolic blood pressure drop <90 mmHg requiring intervention (one of the following: increase of vasopressor, Ultrafiltration cessation/reduction, termination of the dialysis session or fluid bolus)
    • Variations in the vasoactive-inotropic score between pre-dialysis and per-dialysis timepoint

    Measured: 7 days

  8. Number of dialysis session complicated by Circuit/filter clotting

    (proportion)

    Measured: 90 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Aug 2020
  2. Study start1 Jan 2021
  3. Primary completion30 Nov 2024
  4. Study completion1 Dec 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Pilot, Randomised, Open-label, Parallel Groups (co-intervention, 1:1:1) of three interventions: conventional HD, pre-dilution HDF and post-dilution HDF
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
45 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04525092
Sponsor's protocol ID
20.147
Acronym
HDFAKI
Status last verified
Feb 2025
First submitted
17 Aug 2020
Last updated
18 Feb 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Online Pre-dilution Hemodiafiltration, Conventional Hemodialysis and Online Post-dilution Hemodiafiltration in people with Acute Kidney Injury, run by Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) at 2 sites in 2 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Feb 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Canada, Ireland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Protocol adherence (feasibility) (time frame: 90 days). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Feb 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in