Circulatory FailureNCT04526249
Evaluation of Efficacy of the Prototype RPC (Rapid Pulse Confirmation) Device in Detecting Return of Pulsatile Flow in Patients Preparing to Separate From CPB (Cardiopulmonary Bypass)
An observational study of Circulatory Failure and Cardiac Arrest, run by Michael Kyle Ritchie at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Effective chest compressions are essential to survival in an arrest patient receiving CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation). A challenge in providing effective chest compressions is frequent interruption of compressions. A major cause of a recurrent interruption of chest compressions is pulse checks. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Circulatory Failure, Cardiac Arrest
- What is being tested?
- rapid pulse confirmation device
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 10 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 17 Oct 2017to 20 Jan 2019
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients scheduled isolated open-heart valve or isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
Inclusion: 1.18 or older 2.EF >40% on pre-operative echocardiogram 3.Patient with isolated cardiac valve disease to be repaired during scheduled surgery Exclusion: 1.Redo procedure 2.Emergency procedure 3.Peripheral vascular disease 4.Previous cannulation or harvesting of radial artery 5.Arterial stents in the radial, ulnar, brachial, femoral, or carotid arteries 6.History of peripheral arterial bypass 7.History of carotid artery stenosis 8.Thoracic outlet syndrome 9.Valvular heart disease NOT being repaired day of surgery 10.Heart rhythm other than sinus prior to procedure (occasional PVC's ok) 11.Patient refusal
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
West Virginia University Ruby Memorial Hospital
Morgantown, West Virginia, 26506
About this study
Effective chest compressions are essential to survival in an arrest patient receiving CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation). A challenge in providing effective chest compressions is frequent interruption of compressions. A major cause of a recurrent interruption of chest compressions is pulse checks. Pulse checks are difficult to quickly and accurately perform in the AHA recommended time interval of under 10 seconds for reasons ranging from inexperience to body habitus. Unnecessarily long pulse checks often delay reinitiating chest compressions leading to a fall in perfusion pressure to the coronary arteries lowering the chances of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). To potentially solve the issues of evaluating the chest compression effectiveness and minimize the time interval of pulse checks, the authors have constructed a novel device that can be rapidly applied to an arresting patient and evaluate the current state of the circulatory system. The device is called the Rapid Pulse Confirmation (RPC) device. It is designed to applied over a major artery (radial, ulnar, brachial, carotid, and femoral) and detect Doppler shift of red blood cells to gauge red blood cell velocity and rate of pulsation. Feasibility testing on the device was carried out using patients requiring cardiopulmonary bypass. Arrest and return of spontaneous circulation during cardiopulmonary bypass is predictable and provided an ideal environment to test the initial performance of a device meant to detect return of spontaneous circulation. The primary working hypothesis was that there would be no significant difference in time of detection of ROSC between the arterial line catheter and the RPC device at the end of cardiopulmonary bypass. The secondary hypothesis was that there would be no difference in pulse rate reading between the arterial line catheter and the RPC device.
- Conditions
- Circulatory Failure, Cardiac Arrest
- Being tested
- rapid pulse confirmation device
- Keywords
- cardio pulmonary resuscitation, pulse detection, chest compressions
- Medical subject headings
- Shock, Heart Arrest
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
rapid pulse confirmation deviceDevice
device used to detect pulsatile blood blood during and after cardiac arrest
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
detection of return of spontaneous circulation by experimental device vs. indwelling arterial catheter
Timed in seconds
Measured: less than 5 minutes
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Aug 2020
- Study start17 Oct 2017
- Primary completion20 Jan 2019
- Study completion20 Jan 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Circulatory FailureStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Michael Kyle Ritchie
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- West Virginia Clinical and Translational Science Institute
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Michael Kyle Ritchie, West Virginia University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04526249
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1708690742
- Status last verified
- Aug 2020
- First submitted
- 6 Jun 2019
- Last updated
- 25 Aug 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Aug 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of Efficacy of the Prototype RPC (Rapid Pulse Confirmation) Device in Detecting Return of Pulsatile Flow in Patients Preparing to Separate From CPB (Cardiopulmonary Bypass)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04526249
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 1708690742
- Conditions
- Circulatory Failure, Cardiac Arrest
- Keywords
- cardio pulmonary resuscitation, pulse detection, chest compressions
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Michael Kyle RitchieUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- West Virginia Clinical and Translational Science Institute
- Study start
- 17 Oct 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 20 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 20 Jan 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 Aug 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Effective chest compressions are essential to survival in an arrest patient receiving CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation). A challenge in providing effective chest compressions is frequent interruption of compressions. A major cause of a recurrent interruption of chest compressions is pulse checks. Pulse checks are difficult to quickly and accurately perform in the AHA recommended time interval of under 10 seconds for reasons ranging from inexperience to body habitus. Unnecessarily long pulse checks often delay reinitiating chest compressions leading to a fall in perfusion pressure to the coronary arteries lowering the chances of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). To potentially solve the issues of evaluating the chest compression effectiveness and minimize the time interval of pulse checks, the authors have constructed a novel device that can be rapidly applied to an arresting patient and evaluate the current state of the circulatory system. The device is called the Rapid Pulse Confirmation (RPC) device. It is designed to applied over a major artery (radial, ulnar, brachial, carotid, and femoral) and detect Doppler shift of red blood cells to gauge red blood cell velocity and rate of pulsation. Feasibility testing on the device was carried out using patients requiring cardiopulmonary bypass. Arrest and return of spontaneous circulation during cardiopulmonary bypass is predictable and provided an ideal environment to test the initial performance of a device meant to detect return of spontaneous circulation. The primary working hypothesis was that there would be no significant difference in time of detection of ROSC between the arterial line catheter and the RPC device at the end of cardiopulmonary bypass. The secondary hypothesis was that there would be no difference in pulse rate reading between the arterial line catheter and the RPC device.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients scheduled isolated open-heart valve or isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| rapid pulse confirmation devicedevice used to detect pulsatile blood blood during and after cardiac arrest | Device | – |
Primary outcome
detection of return of spontaneous circulation by experimental device vs. indwelling arterial catheter
Time frame: less than 5 minutes
Timed in seconds
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Aug 2020.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Circulatory Failure
Active, not recruiting
CT for Personalized Mechanical Ventilation
Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury, Sepsis Syndrome
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
A Study of Bimagrumab in Participants With HFpEF
Heart Failure, Diastolic, Diastolic Heart Failure
Recruiting
Evaluation of a French Hospital Discharge Therapeutic Education Program by Nurses for Heart Failure Patient (EduSor)
Heart Failure
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Thymosin Alpha 1 and IgM Levels in Sepsis
Sepsis, Septic Shock
Active, not recruiting
Assessment of Combined CCM and ICD Device in HFrEF
Heart Failure, Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Circulatory Failure and Cardiac Arrest, run by Michael Kyle Ritchie at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Aug 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
detection of return of spontaneous circulation by experimental device vs. indwelling arterial catheter (time frame: less than 5 minutes). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Aug 2020.