COVID-19BRAINSTEM-COVNCT04527198
Brainstem Dysfunction in COVID-19 Critically Ill Patients: a Prospective Observational Study
A study testing Brainstem Responses Assessment Sedation Score (BRASS) and Electroencephalogram with EKG lead in people with COVID-19, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 2 sites in France.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the prevalence of brainstem dysfunction in critically ill ventilated and deeply sedated patients hospitalized in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) for a SARS-CoV-s2 infection. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- COVID-19
- What is being tested?
- Brainstem Responses Assessment Sedation Score (BRASS) and Electroencephalogram with EKG lead
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 52 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- 14 Sep 2020to 31 Dec 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- ICU hospitalization
- Invasive mechanical ventilation
- Deep sedation (RASS<-3) >12 hours
- Positive SARS-COV-2 PCR
Who cannot join
- History of neurologic disease (stroke, degenerative disease)
- Pregnant women
- Moribund patients
- Minor patient
- Major patient under guardianship or curatorship
- Prior inclusion in the study
- Patient not affiliated to a social security scheme
- Limitations and cessation of active therapies
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Brainstem Dysfunction in Ventilated and Deeply Sedated COVID-19 Critically Ill Patients: a Prospective Observational Study
The purpose of this study is to determine the prevalence of brainstem dysfunction in critically ill ventilated and deeply sedated patients hospitalized in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) for a SARS-CoV-s2 infection.
Read the detailed description
The recent development of the pandemic due to the SARS-CoV-2 virus has showed that a substantial proportion of patients developed a severe condition requiring critical care, notably because of acute respiratory distress syndrome requiring mechanical ventilation and deep sedation. Outside of this coronavirus infection, this situation is classically associated with a high prevalence of brainstem dysfunction, even in the absence of brain injury. This dysfunction, either structural or functional, can be detected using appropriate clinical tools such as the BRASS score and/or using the quantitative analysis of EKG and EEG. Crucially, brainstem dysfunction is associated not only with ICU complications such as delirium, but also with a poorer survival.
Moreover, some reports of encephalitis cases and the presence of anosmia/agueusia raised the question of whether the virus could directly invade the central nervous system.
For these two reasons, it is reasonable to assume that brainstem dysfunction is particularly prevalent in critically ill patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 and that this dysfunction could be one of the major determinant of patients outcome.
- Conditions
- COVID-19
- Being tested
- Brainstem Responses Assessment Sedation Score (BRASS), Electroencephalogram with EKG lead
- Keywords
- Brainstem dysfunction, Delirium, Awareness, Arousal, Dysautonomia, Autonomic system, SARS-COV-2, COVID-19, sedation, mechanical ventilation, EEG, EKG
- Medical subject headings
- COVID-19, Delirium, Autonomic Nervous System Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Brainstem Responses Assessment Sedation Score (BRASS)Diagnostic test
It consists of a standardized evaluation of brainstem reflexes with a score of 1 attributed for absence of pupillary light reflex, cough reflex and the combined absence of grimace and oculocephalic reflex, a score of 2 for absent corneal reflex and a score of 3 for absent grimace in the presence of oculocephalic The resulting sum ranges from 0 to 7.
It will be performed at two times points: a first time under sedation and a second time 3 to 5 days after sedation weaning.
Electroencephalogram with EKG leadDiagnostic test
Also called EEG
A 20 minutes clinical (12 electrodes) EEG with an EKG lead will be performed a first time under sedation and a second time 3 to 5 days after sedation weaning.
These EEG recordings will allow to measure the sympathic-parasympathetic ratio using spectral analysis of the EKG and also to measure quantitative markers of brain EEG activity (spectral power and connectivity in delta, theta, alpha, beta and gamma band; complexity).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| group 1 | Experimental | Major patients, admitted in intensive care for a SARS-CoV-2 infection and requiring mechanical ventilation and deep sedation (with or without neuromuscular blockade) Receives: Diagnostic Test: Brainstem Responses Assessment Sedation Score (BRASS); Diagnostic Test: Electroencephalogram with EKG lead |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Brainstem dysfunction prevalence
Clinical cranial nerves anomalies using validated scale (BRASS score- ranges from 0 to 7 - ) in deeply sedated patient (RASS <-3)
Measured: At inclusion or in patients with neuromuscular blockade 12h-72h following neuromuscular blocking agent cessation
Secondary outcomes (17)
Brainstem dysfunction prevalence after sedation weaning
Clinical cranial nerves anomalies using validated scale (BRASS score)
Measured: Day 4 to day 7 after sedation weaning
Link between brainstem dysfunction and clinical dysautonomia
Analysis of the sympathico-parasympathetic ratio (using spectral analysis of the EKG signal) according to the presence or absence of brainstem dysfunction and its severity
Measured: At inclusion or in patients with neuromuscular blockade 12h-72h following neuromuscular blocking agent cessationn
Link between brainstem dysfunction and clinical dysautonomia after sedation weaning
Analysis of the sympathico-parasympathetic ratio (using spectral analysis of the EKG signal) according to the presence or absence of brainstem dysfunction and its severity
Measured: 4 to 7 days after sedation weaning
Characterization of brainstem dysfunction in COVID-19 patients: EEG power
EEG power in delta, theta, alpha, beta and gamma frequency bands according to the presence or absence of brainstem dysfunction and its severity
Measured: At inclusion or in patients with neuromuscular blockade 12h-72h following neuromuscular blocking agent cessation
Characterization of brainstem dysfunction in COVID-19 patients: EEG power after sedation weaning
EEG power in delta, theta, alpha, beta and gamma frequency bands according to the presence or absence of brainstem dysfunction and its severity
Measured: Day 4 to day 7 after sedation weaning.
Characterization of brainstem dysfunction in COVID-19 patients: EEG functional connectivity
EEG functional connectivity using weighted Symbolic Mutual Information and weighted Phase Lag Index according to the presence or absence of brainstem dysfunction and its severity
Measured: At inclusion or in patients with neuromuscular blockade 12h-72h following neuromuscular blocking agent cessation
Characterization of brainstem dysfunction in COVID-19 patients: EEG functional connectivity, after sedation weaning
EEG functional connectivity using weighted Symbolic Mutual Information and weighted Phase Lag Index according to the presence or absence of brainstem dysfunction and its severity
Measured: Day 4 to day 7 after sedation weaning.
Characterization of brainstem dysfunction in COVID-19 patients: EEG complexity
EEG complexity using Kolmogorov complexity and permutation entropy according to the presence or absence of brainstem dysfunction and its severity
Measured: At inclusion or in patients with neuromuscular blockade 12h-72h following neuromuscular blocking agent cessation
Characterization of brainstem dysfunction in COVID-19 patients: EEG complexity after sedation weaning
EEG complexity using Kolmogorov complexity and permutation entropy according to the presence or absence of brainstem dysfunction and its severity
Measured: Day 4 to day 7 after sedation weaning.
Characterization of brainstem dysfunction in COVID-19 patients: multivariate classification
Multivariate classification of the presence or absence of brainstem dysfunction using support vector machine and extra-trees algorithm based on the EEG derived quantitative features presented above
Measured: At inclusion or in patients with neuromuscular blockade 12h-72h following neuromuscular blocking agent cessation
Characterization of brainstem dysfunction in COVID-19 patients: multivariate classification after sedation weaning
Multivariate classification of the presence or absence of brainstem dysfunction using support vector machine and extra-trees algorithm based on the EEG derived quantitative features presented above
Measured: Day 4 to day 7 after sedation weaning.
Duration of mechanical ventilation
Measured: at ICU discharge up to 28 days
Mortality
Measured: at ICU discharge up to 28 days
Duration of hospitalisation
Measured: at hospital discharge up to 90 days
Duration of coma, disturbance of consciousness, delirium
Measured: at ICU discharge up to 28 days
Neurological functional evolution with mRankin
Using validated functional scale modified Rankin (mRankin) for independence assessment (mRankin ranges from 0 to 6 with higher scores indicating more severe disability)
Measured: 90 days after inclusion
Neurological functional evolution with GOSE
Using validated functional scale Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE) for independence assessment (GOSE ranges from 1 to 8 with higher scores indicating less severe disability outcome)
Measured: 90 days after inclusion
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Aug 2020
- Study start14 Sep 2020
- Primary completion31 Dec 2020
- Study completion31 Dec 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for COVID-19Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 52 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- URC-CIC Paris Descartes Necker Cochin
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Bertrand HERMANN, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04527198
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- APHP200644
- Other IDs
- 2020-A01559-30
- Acronym
- BRAINSTEM-COV
- Status last verified
- Mar 2026
- First submitted
- 2 Jun 2020
- Last updated
- 4 Mar 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Rohaut B, Porcher R, Hissem T, Heming N, Chillet P, Djedaini K, Moneger G, Kandelman S, Allary J, Cariou A, Sonneville R, Polito A, Antona M, Azabou E, Annane D, Siami S, Chretien F, Mantz J, Sharshar T; Groupe d'Exploration Neurologique en Reanimation (GENER). Brainstem response patterns in deeply-sedated critically-ill patients predict 28-day mortality. PLoS One. 2017 Apr 25;12(4):e0176012. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176012. eCollection 2017.
PubMed 28441453Benghanem S, Cariou A, Diehl JL, Marchi A, Charpentier J, Augy JL, Hauw-Berlemont C, Gavaret M, Pene F, Mira JP, Sharshar T, Hermann B. Early Clinical and Electrophysiological Brain Dysfunction Is Associated With ICU Outcomes in COVID-19 Critically Ill Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Prospective Bicentric Observational Study. Crit Care Med. 2022 Jul 1;50(7):1103-1115. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005491. Epub 2022 Feb 9.
PubMed 35135966
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Mar 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Brainstem Dysfunction in Ventilated and Deeply Sedated COVID-19 Critically Ill Patients: a Prospective Observational Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04527198
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BRAINSTEM-COV / APHP200644
- Conditions
- COVID-19
- Keywords
- Brainstem dysfunction, Delirium, Awareness, Arousal, Dysautonomia, Autonomic system, SARS-COV-2, COVID-19
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 52 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- URC-CIC Paris Descartes Necker Cochin
- Study start
- 14 Sep 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Aug 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to determine the prevalence of brainstem dysfunction in critically ill ventilated and deeply sedated patients hospitalized in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) for a SARS-CoV-s2 infection.
Detailed description
The recent development of the pandemic due to the SARS-CoV-2 virus has showed that a substantial proportion of patients developed a severe condition requiring critical care, notably because of acute respiratory distress syndrome requiring mechanical ventilation and deep sedation. Outside of this coronavirus infection, this situation is classically associated with a high prevalence of brainstem dysfunction, even in the absence of brain injury. This dysfunction, either structural or functional, can be detected using appropriate clinical tools such as the BRASS score and/or using the quantitative analysis of EKG and EEG. Crucially, brainstem dysfunction is associated not only with ICU complications such as delirium, but also with a poorer survival.
Moreover, some reports of encephalitis cases and the presence of anosmia/agueusia raised the question of whether the virus could directly invade the central nervous system.
For these two reasons, it is reasonable to assume that brainstem dysfunction is particularly prevalent in critically ill patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 and that this dysfunction could be one of the major determinant of patients outcome.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| group 1 | Experimental | Diagnostic Test: Brainstem Responses Assessment Sedation Score (BRASS), Diagnostic Test: Electroencephalogram with EKG leadMajor patients, admitted in intensive care for a SARS-CoV-2 infection and requiring mechanical ventilation and deep sedation (with or without neuromuscular blockade) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- ICU hospitalization
- Invasive mechanical ventilation
- Deep sedation (RASS<-3) >12 hours
- Positive SARS-COV-2 PCR
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- History of neurologic disease (stroke, degenerative disease)
- Pregnant women
- Moribund patients
- Minor patient
- Major patient under guardianship or curatorship
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Brainstem Responses Assessment Sedation Score (BRASS)It consists of a standardized evaluation of brainstem reflexes with a score of 1 attributed for absence of pupillary light reflex, cough reflex and the combined absence of grimace and oculocephalic reflex, a score of 2 for absent corneal reflex and a score of 3 for absent grimace in the presence of oculocephalic The resulting sum ranges from 0 to 7. It will be performed at two times points: a first time under sedation and a second time 3 to 5 days after sedation weaning. | Diagnostic test | group 1 |
| Electroencephalogram with EKG leadAlso: EEGA 20 minutes clinical (12 electrodes) EEG with an EKG lead will be performed a first time under sedation and a second time 3 to 5 days after sedation weaning. These EEG recordings will allow to measure the sympathic-parasympathetic ratio using spectral analysis of the EKG and also to measure quantitative markers of brain EEG activity (spectral power and connectivity in delta, theta, alpha, beta and gamma band; complexity). | Diagnostic test | group 1 |
Primary outcome
Brainstem dysfunction prevalence
Time frame: At inclusion or in patients with neuromuscular blockade 12h-72h following neuromuscular blocking agent cessation
Clinical cranial nerves anomalies using validated scale (BRASS score- ranges from 0 to 7 - ) in deeply sedated patient (RASS <-3)
17 secondary outcomes
Brainstem dysfunction prevalence after sedation weaning
Time frame: Day 4 to day 7 after sedation weaning
Link between brainstem dysfunction and clinical dysautonomia
Time frame: At inclusion or in patients with neuromuscular blockade 12h-72h following neuromuscular blocking agent cessationn
Link between brainstem dysfunction and clinical dysautonomia after sedation weaning
Time frame: 4 to 7 days after sedation weaning
Characterization of brainstem dysfunction in COVID-19 patients: EEG power
Time frame: At inclusion or in patients with neuromuscular blockade 12h-72h following neuromuscular blocking agent cessation
Characterization of brainstem dysfunction in COVID-19 patients: EEG power after sedation weaning
Time frame: Day 4 to day 7 after sedation weaning.
Characterization of brainstem dysfunction in COVID-19 patients: EEG functional connectivity
Time frame: At inclusion or in patients with neuromuscular blockade 12h-72h following neuromuscular blocking agent cessation
Characterization of brainstem dysfunction in COVID-19 patients: EEG functional connectivity, after sedation weaning
Time frame: Day 4 to day 7 after sedation weaning.
Characterization of brainstem dysfunction in COVID-19 patients: EEG complexity
Time frame: At inclusion or in patients with neuromuscular blockade 12h-72h following neuromuscular blocking agent cessation
Characterization of brainstem dysfunction in COVID-19 patients: EEG complexity after sedation weaning
Time frame: Day 4 to day 7 after sedation weaning.
Characterization of brainstem dysfunction in COVID-19 patients: multivariate classification
Time frame: At inclusion or in patients with neuromuscular blockade 12h-72h following neuromuscular blocking agent cessation
Characterization of brainstem dysfunction in COVID-19 patients: multivariate classification after sedation weaning
Time frame: Day 4 to day 7 after sedation weaning.
Duration of mechanical ventilation
Time frame: at ICU discharge up to 28 days
Mortality
Time frame: at ICU discharge up to 28 days
Duration of hospitalisation
Time frame: at hospital discharge up to 90 days
Duration of coma, disturbance of consciousness, delirium
Time frame: at ICU discharge up to 28 days
Neurological functional evolution with mRankin
Time frame: 90 days after inclusion
Neurological functional evolution with GOSE
Time frame: 90 days after inclusion
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Mar 2026.
- Background: PubMed 28441453Rohaut B, Porcher R, Hissem T, Heming N, Chillet P, Djedaini K, Moneger G, Kandelman S, Allary J, Cariou A, Sonneville R, Polito A, Antona M, Azabou E, Annane D, Siami S, Chretien F, Mantz J, Sharshar T; Groupe d'Exploration Neurologique en Reanimation (GENER). Brainstem response patterns in deeply-sedated critically-ill patients predict 28-day mortality. PLoS One. 2017 Apr 25;12(4):e0176012. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176012. eCollection 2017.
- Results publication: PubMed 35135966Benghanem S, Cariou A, Diehl JL, Marchi A, Charpentier J, Augy JL, Hauw-Berlemont C, Gavaret M, Pene F, Mira JP, Sharshar T, Hermann B. Early Clinical and Electrophysiological Brain Dysfunction Is Associated With ICU Outcomes in COVID-19 Critically Ill Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Prospective Bicentric Observational Study. Crit Care Med. 2022 Jul 1;50(7):1103-1115. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005491. Epub 2022 Feb 9.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for COVID-19
RecruitingObservational study
Viral Infections in Healthy and Immunocompromised Hosts
Anogenital Herpes, COVID-19
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Phase I Open-Label Safety Trial of Pembrolizumab for Neurological Post- Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PD1-PASC I)
Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 4
A Study to Investigate the Immunogenicity and Safety of mRNA COVID-19 Variant-containing Formulations
SARS-CoV-2
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Study of VYD2311 for the Treatment of Adults With Long-COVID or Post-Vaccination Syndrome
Long COVID, COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2 Infection)
Active, not recruitingObservational study
NCI COVID-19 in Cancer Patients, NCCAPS Study
COVID-19 Infection, Hematopoietic and Lymphatic System Neoplasm
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Bertrand HERMANN, MD, PhD principal investigator
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Brainstem Responses Assessment Sedation Score (BRASS) and Electroencephalogram with EKG lead in people with COVID-19, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 2 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Brainstem dysfunction prevalence (time frame: At inclusion or in patients with neuromuscular blockade 12h-72h following neuromuscular blocking agent cessation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04527198, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Mar 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 28 Oct 2026.