Cognitive ImpairmentNCT04527328
A Study to Assess the Tolerability and Efficacy of AKST1210 in Patients on Hemodialysis With Cognitive Impairment
A study testing AKST1210 and Hemodialysis in people with Cognitive Impairment and End Stage Renal Disease, run by Alkahest, Inc. at 4 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This study will evaluate the tolerability, feasibility, and efficacy of the AKST1210 column in subjects with end-stage renal disease with cognitive impairment (ESRD-CI) undergoing hemodialysis 3 times per week. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Cognitive Impairment, End Stage Renal Disease
- What is being tested?
- AKST1210 and Hemodialysis
- Type of treatment
- Medical device, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 10 participants
- Where
- 4 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 28 Apr 2020to 4 Jun 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- On chronic hemodialysis due to end-stage renal disease for ≥ 12 months.
- Score on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) ≥ 16 and ≤ 23.
- Body mass index (BMI) ≥ 20 and ≤ 36.
- The subject must be able to follow the study protocol, receive the treatment in the established timeframe, and continue during the follow-up interval.
- The subject must have sufficient visual and auditory acuity to reliably complete all study assessments.
- Provided a signed and dated informed consent form.
Who cannot join
- Subjects for whom adequate anticoagulation cannot be achieved. Use of antiplatelet drugs (e.g., aspirin or clopidogrel) is allowed.
- History of hypersensitivity to heparin.
- Pregnant or breast-feeding women or women who are planning to become pregnant.
- Clinically significant abnormalities on Screening ECG including QT interval corrected for heart rate (QTc) (using Fridericia's correction formula) of ≥ 500 ms in men and ≥ 520 ms in women.
- Clinically significant and unexpected abnormalities in this patient population in complete blood count, complete metabolic panel, coagulation, and thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH).
- Subjects with a hemoglobin level < 9.0 g/dL.
Show all 9Show fewer
- Concurrent or recent participation in another investigational clinical trial. Prior clinical trial subjects must have discontinued investigational agents at least 30 days prior to Screening.
- Subjects planning to receive renal transplantation during the study.
- Any other condition and/or situation that the investigator believes may interfere with the safety of the subject, study conduct, or interpretation of study data.
Trial locations and contacts
4 sites in 1 country.
United States4 sites
Renal Consultants Medical Group
Granada Hills, California, 91344
Valley Renal Medical Group
Northridge, California, 91324
Orlando Clinical Research Center
Orlando, Florida, 32809
US Renal Care Kidney Research
San Antonio, Texas, 78251
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 2a Study to Evaluate the Tolerability, Feasibility, and Efficacy of AKST1210 in Patients on Hemodialysis With Cognitive Impairment Associated With End-Stage Renal Disease
This study will evaluate the tolerability, feasibility, and efficacy of the AKST1210 column in subjects with end-stage renal disease with cognitive impairment (ESRD-CI) undergoing hemodialysis 3 times per week.
Read the detailed description
In this study, approximately 26 men and women on dialysis due to end stage renal disease and who have cognitive impairment will be randomly assigned to receive AKST1210 or control during each hemodialysis session for 3 months. The primary objective is to assess the safety and tolerability of AKST1210, and secondary objectives include changes in cognitive assessments as well as the feasibility of using AKST1210 in this setting.
- Conditions
- Cognitive Impairment, End Stage Renal Disease
- Being tested
- AKST1210, Sham Control (No Intervention), Hemodialysis
- Keywords
- Renal disease, Renal failure, chronic, End stage kidney disease, Chronic kidney failure, Kidney disease, Cognitive decline, Mental deterioration, Cognition disorder
- Medical subject headings
- Cognitive Dysfunction, Kidney Failure, Chronic, Kidney Diseases, Cognition Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
AKST1210Device
AKST1210
Sham Control (No Intervention)Other
A covered surrogate object of similar size and shape as the investigational device
HemodialysisProcedure or surgery
Hemodialysis
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| AKST1210 | Experimental | The AKST1210 column will be connected to the dialysis circuit during each dialysis session. Receives: Device: AKST1210; Procedure: Hemodialysis |
| Sham Control (No Intervention) | Sham comparator | A covered surrogate object of similar size and shape as the investigational device Receives: Other: Sham Control (No Intervention); Procedure: Hemodialysis |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Assessed by Intensity
Number of participants with Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) assessed by Intensity (mild, moderate, or severe) coded by the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA)
Measured: Baseline to Week 14
Secondary outcomes (14)
Tolerability as Measured by the Number of Subjects Who Complete Each Treatment Period
The number of subjects will be summarized by AKST1210 column size (small, S-15; medium, S-25; and large, S-35) and control for subjects who completed all visits in the treatment period
Measured: Baseline to Week 12
Number of Participants Who Discontinued Due to Intradialytic Hypotension (IDH)
The number and percentage of subjects requiring early discontinuation from study treatment due to IDH summarized by treatment group
Measured: Baseline to Week 12
Change From Baseline in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Change from baseline to EOS in the total Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score, which assesses executive functions, naming, attention and concentration, language, abstraction, delayed recall, and orientation. The MoCA has a total score from 0 to 30 whereby all sub sections are summed. The scoring breakdown for all sub sections includes the following: Visuospatial and executive functioning: 0-5 points, naming: 0-3 points, attention: 0-6 points, language: 0-3 points, abstraction: 0-2 points, delayed recall: 0- 5 points, orientation: 0-6 points. 1 point is added to the test-taker's score if they have 12 years or less of formal education. Higher scores in all sub categories and total score indicate better cognition. The Mean change from baseline is the post-treatment value minus baseline value.
Measured: Screening to Week 14
Change From Baseline in Computer-based Cognitive Assessment (CogState) Composite Score
Mean change from baseline to End of Treatment in CogState test battery composite scores. The CogState test battery is a simple, brief computerized battery designed to assess cognitive function in several areas including verbal learning, psychomotor function, visual attention, working memory, executive function, and verbal delayed recall. Higher scores indicate better outcomes for all composite scores. All composite scores have a range of -16 to 10. Z-Scores between ≥ 1 and < 1.5 standard deviations (SD) below age-matched normative data are considered minor cognitive impairment. Z-Scores between ≥ 1.5 and < 2 SD below age-matched normative data are considered mild cognitive impairment. Z-Scores ≥ 2 SD below age matched normative data are considered major cognitive impairment consistent with dementia.
Measured: Baseline to Week 12
Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Per the Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)
Mean change from baseline in quality of life per the Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), which evaluates quality of life measures. All scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating less disability. An increase or decrease in the mental health summary score or physical health summary score from baseline indicates a more favorable health status or a more unfavorable health status, respectfully, in the subject's quality of life related to mental or physical health.
Measured: Baseline to Week 12
Change From Baseline in the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)
Change from baseline to EOS in the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), which evaluates the severity of depression. Symptoms are rated from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day) and scores are summated for each subject across the 9 items. The total score range is 0-27. An increase or decrease in the PHQ-9 total score from baseline indicates greater severity or less severity, respectfully, in the subject's state of depression.
Measured: Baseline to Week 14
Change From Baseline in Sleep Quality Per the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
Change from baseline in sleep quality as measured by the Sleep Quality Per the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), which measures the quality and patterns of sleep in older adults. It differentiates "poor" from "good" sleep by measuring 7 domains: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleep medication, and daytime dysfunction over the last month. The subject self-rates each of these 7 areas of sleep. The score for each domain ranges from 0 to 3, whereby higher scores for each reflect the negative (worse) extreme on the Likert Scale. The sum of all 7 domains is used to compute the total score (0 to 21). A global sum of "5" or greater indicates a "poor" sleeper. An increase or decrease in the PSQI total score from baseline indicates worsening or improvement, respectfully, in the subject's overall sleep quality.
Measured: Baseline to Week 12
Change From Baseline in Fatigue Per the Fatigue Questionnaire - Functional Assessments of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)
Change from baseline to End of Treatment in fatigue as measured by the Functional Assessments of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT), which measures an individual's level of fatigue during their usual daily activities over the past week. The level of fatigue for each question is measured on a 4-point Likert scale (4 = not at all fatigued to 0 = very much fatigued). The total score range is 0 to 52. To get this total, each question answered is scored individually, summed, multiplied by 13, and lastly divided by the number of questions answered. The higher the total score, the better the quality of life.
Measured: Baseline to Week 12
Number of Participants Who Discontinued Due to Anemia.
The number and percentage of subjects with any anemia leading to discontinuation from AKST1210/control will be summarized by treatment group and total.
Measured: Baseline to Week 12
Tolerability as Measured by the Percentage of Subjects Who Complete Each Treatment Period
The percentage of subjects will be summarized by AKST1210 column size (small, S-15; medium, S-25; and large, S-35) and control for subjects who completed all visits in the treatment period
Measured: Baseline to Week 12
Tolerability as Measured by the Number of Subjects Who Complete the Run-In Period.
The number of subjects who completed the run-in period prior to randomization and initiation of study treatment. Subjects who met all eligibility criteria assessed during screening were monitored during a two-week run-in period for ongoing assessment of eligibility, safety, and baseline assessments prior to randomization and initiation of study treatment.
Measured: Week -2 (Day -14) to Week -1 (Day -1)
Tolerability as Measured by the Percentage of Subjects Who Complete the Run-in Period
The percentage of subjects who completed the run-in period prior to randomization and initiation of study treatment. Subjects who met all eligibility criteria assessed during screening were monitored during a two-week run-in period for ongoing assessment of eligibility, safety, and baseline assessments prior to randomization and initiation of study treatment.
Measured: Week -2 (Day -14) to Week -1 (Day -1)
Tolerability as Measured by the Number of Subjects Who Completed All Visits.
The number of subjects will be summarized by column size (small, S-15; medium, S-25; and large, S-35) and control for subjects who completed all visits
Measured: Baseline to Week 14
Tolerability as Measured by the Percentage of Subjects Who Completed All Visits.
The percentage of subjects will be summarized by column size (small, S-15; medium, S-25; and large, S-35) and control for subjects who completed all visits
Measured: Baseline to Week 14
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Aug 2020
- Study start28 Apr 2020
- Primary completion4 Jun 2021
- Study completion4 Jun 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Cognitive ImpairmentStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Alkahest, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Alkahest Medical Monitor, Study director, Alkahest, Inc.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04527328
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AKST1210-201
- Status last verified
- Nov 2022
- First submitted
- 22 May 2020
- Last updated
- 12 Dec 2022
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Dec 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 2a Study to Evaluate the Tolerability, Feasibility, and Efficacy of AKST1210 in Patients on Hemodialysis With Cognitive Impairment Associated With End-Stage Renal Disease
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04527328
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AKST1210-201
- Conditions
- Cognitive Impairment, End Stage Renal Disease
- Keywords
- Renal disease, Renal failure, chronic, End stage kidney disease, Chronic kidney failure, Kidney disease, Cognitive decline, Mental deterioration, Cognition disorder
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Alkahest, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 28 Apr 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 4 Jun 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 4 Jun 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Aug 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 12 Dec 2022
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will evaluate the tolerability, feasibility, and efficacy of the AKST1210 column in subjects with end-stage renal disease with cognitive impairment (ESRD-CI) undergoing hemodialysis 3 times per week.
Detailed description
In this study, approximately 26 men and women on dialysis due to end stage renal disease and who have cognitive impairment will be randomly assigned to receive AKST1210 or control during each hemodialysis session for 3 months. The primary objective is to assess the safety and tolerability of AKST1210, and secondary objectives include changes in cognitive assessments as well as the feasibility of using AKST1210 in this setting.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| AKST1210 | Experimental | Device: AKST1210, Procedure: HemodialysisThe AKST1210 column will be connected to the dialysis circuit during each dialysis session. |
| Sham Control (No Intervention) | Sham comparator | Other: Sham Control (No Intervention), Procedure: HemodialysisA covered surrogate object of similar size and shape as the investigational device |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- On chronic hemodialysis due to end-stage renal disease for ≥ 12 months.
- Score on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) ≥ 16 and ≤ 23.
- Body mass index (BMI) ≥ 20 and ≤ 36.
- The subject must be able to follow the study protocol, receive the treatment in the established timeframe, and continue during the follow-up interval.
- The subject must have sufficient visual and auditory acuity to reliably complete all study assessments.
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Subjects for whom adequate anticoagulation cannot be achieved. Use of antiplatelet drugs (e.g., aspirin or clopidogrel) is allowed.
- History of hypersensitivity to heparin.
- Pregnant or breast-feeding women or women who are planning to become pregnant.
- Clinically significant abnormalities on Screening ECG including QT interval corrected for heart rate (QTc) (using Fridericia's correction formula) of ≥ 500 ms in men and ≥ 520 ms in women.
- Clinically significant and unexpected abnormalities in this patient population in complete blood count, complete metabolic panel, coagulation, and thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| AKST1210AKST1210 | Device | AKST1210 |
| Sham Control (No Intervention)A covered surrogate object of similar size and shape as the investigational device | Other | Sham Control (No Intervention) |
| HemodialysisHemodialysis | Procedure or surgery | AKST1210, Sham Control (No Intervention) |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Assessed by Intensity
Time frame: Baseline to Week 14
Number of participants with Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) assessed by Intensity (mild, moderate, or severe) coded by the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA)
14 secondary outcomes
Tolerability as Measured by the Number of Subjects Who Complete Each Treatment Period
Time frame: Baseline to Week 12
Number of Participants Who Discontinued Due to Intradialytic Hypotension (IDH)
Time frame: Baseline to Week 12
Change From Baseline in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Time frame: Screening to Week 14
Change From Baseline in Computer-based Cognitive Assessment (CogState) Composite Score
Time frame: Baseline to Week 12
Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Per the Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)
Time frame: Baseline to Week 12
Change From Baseline in the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)
Time frame: Baseline to Week 14
Change From Baseline in Sleep Quality Per the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
Time frame: Baseline to Week 12
Change From Baseline in Fatigue Per the Fatigue Questionnaire - Functional Assessments of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)
Time frame: Baseline to Week 12
Number of Participants Who Discontinued Due to Anemia.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 12
Tolerability as Measured by the Percentage of Subjects Who Complete Each Treatment Period
Time frame: Baseline to Week 12
Tolerability as Measured by the Number of Subjects Who Complete the Run-In Period.
Time frame: Week -2 (Day -14) to Week -1 (Day -1)
Tolerability as Measured by the Percentage of Subjects Who Complete the Run-in Period
Time frame: Week -2 (Day -14) to Week -1 (Day -1)
Tolerability as Measured by the Number of Subjects Who Completed All Visits.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 14
Tolerability as Measured by the Percentage of Subjects Who Completed All Visits.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 14
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Dec 2022.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Cognitive Impairment
Recruiting
Early Motor-Cognitive Integrative Training on Cognitive and Motor Performance in Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Subarachnoid Aneurysm Hemorrhage
Recruiting
HEARS-NPS: Addressing Hearing Loss as a Common Unmet Contributor of Neuropsychiatric Symptoms
Alzheimer Disease, Dementia
RecruitingObservational study
Locus Coeruleus and CCHS (Congenital Central Hypoventilation Syndrome)
Ondine Syndrome (Congenital Central Hypoventilation Syndrome)
RecruitingPhase 1
PET Imaging of Phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE4) in Volunteers With Alzheimer Disease (AD) or Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI)
Alzheimer s Disease, Mild Cognitive Impairment
RecruitingObservational study
Community-based Screening for Alzheimer's Disease
Alzheimer's Disease(AD), Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Alkahest Medical Monitor study director
Alkahest, Inc.
4 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing AKST1210 and Hemodialysis in people with Cognitive Impairment and End Stage Renal Disease, run by Alkahest, Inc. at 4 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Dec 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 4 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 12 Dec 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Assessed by Intensity (time frame: Baseline to Week 14). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Dec 2022; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.