Extreme PrematurityNCT04527601
Extremely Premature Births During the Peak of the COVID-19 Pandemic: an International Study of the Active SafeBoosC III Departments
An observational study of Extreme Prematurity and Covid19, run by Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet at 1 site in Denmark.
Trial summary
This is a retrospective, observational study based on the consortium of the SafeBoosC-III randomised clinical trial. This study will evaluate if the number of admitted extremely preterm infants has decreased in the SafeBoosC-III departments during the global lockdown, and whether there is an association between the… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 22 to 28 weeks
- Conditions the study is for
- Extreme Prematurity, Covid19
- How many people
- 885 participants
- Where
- 1 siteDenmark
- Study dates
- 21 Aug 2020to 13 Sep 2020
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 22 to 28 weeks
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Study population: Extremely premature infants (GA<28)
Who may be able to join
- Extremely low gestational age neonates admitted to participating NICUs
Who cannot join
- -
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
This is a retrospective, observational study based on the consortium of the SafeBoosC-III randomised clinical trial. This study will evaluate if the number of admitted extremely preterm infants has decreased in the SafeBoosC-III departments during the global lockdown, and whether there is an association between the level of lockdown restrictions and change in the number of ELGAN admissions.
Read the detailed description
On the 11th of March 2020, COVID-19 was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organisation, which led to an almost worldwide lockdown (1). During the lockdown, reductions in preterm birth rates and very low birth weight infants have been reported in both Danish and Irish studies. Within the SafeBoosC-III investigator group, several neonatologists concurrently observed that the number of extremely low gestational age neonates (ELGAN) (gestational age below 28 weeks) admitted to their respective departments, had declined during the pandemic, while others observed no difference in the number of admitted ELGAN (oral communication). Furthermore, despite a 60% increase in the number of hospitals open for randomisation in the SafeBoosC-III trial from January to May, the randomisation rate has not increased as expected. Investigators are therefore curious to evaluate if the number of admitted extremely preterm infants has decreased in the SafeBoosC-III departments during the global lockdown, and whether there is an association between the level of lockdown restrictions and change in the number of ELGAN admissions. Investigators hope that this study will contribute further to the knowledge of the COVID-19 pandemics' effect on ELGAN birth as well as its effect on international randomised clinical trials.
This is a retrospective, observational study based on the consortium of the SafeBoosC-III randomised clinical trial. The SafeBoosC-III trial investigates the benefit and harms of treatment guided by cerebral near-infrared spectroscopy monitoring compared with treatment and monitoring as usual in extremely preterm infants. All 79 neonatal intensive care units (NICU) that are active in the consortium will be invited to participate in this study. Primary investigators will be contacted and asked to provide the number of extremely low gestational age neonates (ELGAN) admitted to their NICU within the most rigorous three months of the COVID-19 pandemic as well as the number of ELGAN admitted within the same period in 2019. The most rigorous three months of the COVID-19 pandemic will be a subjective definition by the local investigator, based on when the lockdown restrictions were strictest. Investigators will be asked to clarify how and where the information has been obtained from. Furthermore, investigators will be asked to classify the level of restrictions imposed upon the public, during the lockdown period, in a Likert scale format from 1-5. Additionally, investigators will be asked to categorize the impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on the everyday life of a pregnant woman.
The number of ELGAN admissions during the three peak months in total, during the same months in 2019, within each region and within each level of lockdown restriction, will be reported as numbers. The primary outcome and the secondary outcome regarding the difference in the number of ELGAN admissions between years and regions will be analysed by using Fisher's Exact test for 1x2 tables. To analyse the correlation between the level of lockdown restrictions and the change in number of ELGAN admissions, investigators will use simple linear regression. The exploratory outcome investigating if lockdown restrictions could lead to non-admittance of ELGAN will not undergo statistical analysis but will be reported and discussed. For the primary outcome, an alfa level of 5% is chosen as a threshold for significance. To correct for multiple testing in the secondary outcomes, investigators have chosen an alfa level of 1%
In a previous funding application for the SafeBoosC-III trial, investigators estimated that the 93 departments taking part in the application, had a total of 3000 ELGAN admissions per year. Therefore, investigators expect participating departments on average to have had approximately 30 admissions in 2019, i.e. approximately seven admissions in a three months period. Therefore, if half of the NICUs (i.e. 40 departments) participate, investigators would expect a total of 280 EP infant admissions within the 40 departments in 2019. Thus, a 16.5% change in the primary outcome is needed to show a statistical significance at a 5% alfa level.
- Conditions
- Extreme Prematurity, Covid19
- Keywords
- extreme prematurity, safeboosc, RCT, COVID-19
- Medical subject headings
- COVID-19
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| ELGAN admissions during peak three months of COVID-19 pandemic | Not described | |
| ELGAN admissions in the three corresponding months of 2019 | Not described |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of ELGAN admissions during peak three months of COVID-19 compared to corresponding months in 2019
The primary outcome will be the difference in the total number of ELGAN admissions in SafeBoosC-III departments during the peak three months of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 compared to the same three months period in 2019. The most rigorous three months of the COVID-19 pandemic will be a subjective definition by the local investigator, based on when the lockdown restrictions were strictest.
Measured: 3 months
Secondary outcomes (2)
Regional difference in ELGAN admissions during peak three months of COVID-19 compared to corresponding months in 2019
The difference in the number of ELGAN admissions during the peak three months of the COVID-19 pandemic versus the same three months in 2019, within the following regions:
North America: USA Northern Europe: Denmark, Norway Eastern Europe: Austria, Poland, Czech Republic, Ukraine, Turkey Western Europe: Germany, UK, Ireland, Switzerland, Belgium Southern Europe: Spain, Portugal, Italy, Greece Asia: India, China
Measured: 3 months
Correlation between the level of lockdown restrictions and number of ELGAN admissions during peak three months of COVID-19 compared to corresponding months in 2019
Investigators will be asked to clarify how and where the information has been obtained from. Furthermore, investigators will be asked to classify the level of restrictions imposed upon the public, during the lockdown period, in a Likert scale format from 1-5.
Measured: 3 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Aug 2020
- Study start21 Aug 2020
- Primary completion13 Sep 2020
- Study completion13 Sep 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Extreme PrematurityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Copenhagen University Hospital, RigshospitaletThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 885 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Gorm Greisen, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet
- Investigators
- Gorm Greisen, MD, Prof, Study director, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04527601
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SafeBoosC COVID-19 ELGAN study
- Status last verified
- Oct 2020
- First submitted
- 25 Aug 2020
- Last updated
- 8 Oct 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Hansen ML, Pellicer A, Gluud C, Dempsey E, Mintzer J, Hyttel-Sorensen S, Heuchan AM, Hagmann C, Ergenekon E, Dimitriou G, Pichler G, Naulaers G, Cheng G, Guimaraes H, Tkaczyk J, Kreutzer KB, Fumagalli M, Claris O, Lemmers P, Fredly S, Szczapa T, Austin T, Jakobsen JC, Greisen G. Cerebral near-infrared spectroscopy monitoring versus treatment as usual for extremely preterm infants: a protocol for the SafeBoosC randomised clinical phase III trial. Trials. 2019 Dec 30;20(1):811. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3955-6.
PubMed 31888764Rasmussen MI, Hansen ML, Pichler G, Dempsey E, Pellicer A, El-Khuffash A, A S, Piris-Borregas S, Alsina M, Cetinkaya M, Chalak L, Ozkan H, Baserga M, Sirc J, Fuchs H, Ergenekon E, Arruza L, Mathur A, Stocker M, Otero Vaccarello O, Szczapa T, Sarafidis K, Krolak-Olejnik B, Memisoglu A, Reigstad H, Rafinska-Wazny E, Hatzidaki E, Peng Z, Gkentzi D, Viellevoye R, De Buyst J, Mastretta E, Wang P, Hahn GH, Bender L, Cornette L, Tkaczyk J, Del Rio R, Fumagalli M, Papathoma E, Wilinska M, Naulaers G, Sadowska-Krawczenko I, Lecart C, Couce ML, Fredly S, Heuchan AM, Karen T, Greisen G. Extremely Preterm Infant Admissions Within the SafeBoosC-III Consortium During the COVID-19 Lockdown. Front Pediatr. 2021 Jul 12;9:647880. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.647880. eCollection 2021.
PubMed 34322460
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Oct 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Extremely Premature Births During the Peak of the COVID-19 Pandemic: an International Study of the Active SafeBoosC III Departments
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04527601
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SafeBoosC COVID-19 ELGAN study
- Conditions
- Extreme Prematurity, Covid19
- Keywords
- extreme prematurity, safeboosc, RCT, COVID-19
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 885 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Copenhagen University Hospital, RigshospitaletUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 21 Aug 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 13 Sep 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 13 Sep 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Aug 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a retrospective, observational study based on the consortium of the SafeBoosC-III randomised clinical trial. This study will evaluate if the number of admitted extremely preterm infants has decreased in the SafeBoosC-III departments during the global lockdown, and whether there is an association between the level of lockdown restrictions and change in the number of ELGAN admissions.
Detailed description
On the 11th of March 2020, COVID-19 was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organisation, which led to an almost worldwide lockdown (1). During the lockdown, reductions in preterm birth rates and very low birth weight infants have been reported in both Danish and Irish studies. Within the SafeBoosC-III investigator group, several neonatologists concurrently observed that the number of extremely low gestational age neonates (ELGAN) (gestational age below 28 weeks) admitted to their respective departments, had declined during the pandemic, while others observed no difference in the number of admitted ELGAN (oral communication). Furthermore, despite a 60% increase in the number of hospitals open for randomisation in the SafeBoosC-III trial from January to May, the randomisation rate has not increased as expected. Investigators are therefore curious to evaluate if the number of admitted extremely preterm infants has decreased in the SafeBoosC-III departments during the global lockdown, and whether there is an association between the level of lockdown restrictions and change in the number of ELGAN admissions. Investigators hope that this study will contribute further to the knowledge of the COVID-19 pandemics' effect on ELGAN birth as well as its effect on international randomised clinical trials.
This is a retrospective, observational study based on the consortium of the SafeBoosC-III randomised clinical trial. The SafeBoosC-III trial investigates the benefit and harms of treatment guided by cerebral near-infrared spectroscopy monitoring compared with treatment and monitoring as usual in extremely preterm infants. All 79 neonatal intensive care units (NICU) that are active in the consortium will be invited to participate in this study. Primary investigators will be contacted and asked to provide the number of extremely low gestational age neonates (ELGAN) admitted to their NICU within the most rigorous three months of the COVID-19 pandemic as well as the number of ELGAN admitted within the same period in 2019. The most rigorous three months of the COVID-19 pandemic will be a subjective definition by the local investigator, based on when the lockdown restrictions were strictest. Investigators will be asked to clarify how and where the information has been obtained from. Furthermore, investigators will be asked to classify the level of restrictions imposed upon the public, during the lockdown period, in a Likert scale format from 1-5. Additionally, investigators will be asked to categorize the impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on the everyday life of a pregnant woman.
The number of ELGAN admissions during the three peak months in total, during the same months in 2019, within each region and within each level of lockdown restriction, will be reported as numbers. The primary outcome and the secondary outcome regarding the difference in the number of ELGAN admissions between years and regions will be analysed by using Fisher's Exact test for 1x2 tables. To analyse the correlation between the level of lockdown restrictions and the change in number of ELGAN admissions, investigators will use simple linear regression. The exploratory outcome investigating if lockdown restrictions could lead to non-admittance of ELGAN will not undergo statistical analysis but will be reported and discussed. For the primary outcome, an alfa level of 5% is chosen as a threshold for significance. To correct for multiple testing in the secondary outcomes, investigators have chosen an alfa level of 1%
In a previous funding application for the SafeBoosC-III trial, investigators estimated that the 93 departments taking part in the application, had a total of 3000 ELGAN admissions per year. Therefore, investigators expect participating departments on average to have had approximately 30 admissions in 2019, i.e. approximately seven admissions in a three months period. Therefore, if half of the NICUs (i.e. 40 departments) participate, investigators would expect a total of 280 EP infant admissions within the 40 departments in 2019. Thus, a 16.5% change in the primary outcome is needed to show a statistical significance at a 5% alfa level.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| ELGAN admissions during peak three months of COVID-19 pandemic | – | – |
| ELGAN admissions in the three corresponding months of 2019 | – | – |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 22 to 28 weeks
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
- Study population
- Extremely premature infants (GA<28)
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Extremely low gestational age neonates admitted to participating NICUs
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- -
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Number of ELGAN admissions during peak three months of COVID-19 compared to corresponding months in 2019
Time frame: 3 months
The primary outcome will be the difference in the total number of ELGAN admissions in SafeBoosC-III departments during the peak three months of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 compared to the same three months period in 2019. The most rigorous three months of the COVID-19 pandemic will be a subjective definition by the local investigator, based on when the lockdown restrictions were strictest.
2 secondary outcomes
Regional difference in ELGAN admissions during peak three months of COVID-19 compared to corresponding months in 2019
Time frame: 3 months
Correlation between the level of lockdown restrictions and number of ELGAN admissions during peak three months of COVID-19 compared to corresponding months in 2019
Time frame: 3 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Oct 2020.
- Background: PubMed 31888764Hansen ML, Pellicer A, Gluud C, Dempsey E, Mintzer J, Hyttel-Sorensen S, Heuchan AM, Hagmann C, Ergenekon E, Dimitriou G, Pichler G, Naulaers G, Cheng G, Guimaraes H, Tkaczyk J, Kreutzer KB, Fumagalli M, Claris O, Lemmers P, Fredly S, Szczapa T, Austin T, Jakobsen JC, Greisen G. Cerebral near-infrared spectroscopy monitoring versus treatment as usual for extremely preterm infants: a protocol for the SafeBoosC randomised clinical phase III trial. Trials. 2019 Dec 30;20(1):811. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3955-6.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34322460Rasmussen MI, Hansen ML, Pichler G, Dempsey E, Pellicer A, El-Khuffash A, A S, Piris-Borregas S, Alsina M, Cetinkaya M, Chalak L, Ozkan H, Baserga M, Sirc J, Fuchs H, Ergenekon E, Arruza L, Mathur A, Stocker M, Otero Vaccarello O, Szczapa T, Sarafidis K, Krolak-Olejnik B, Memisoglu A, Reigstad H, Rafinska-Wazny E, Hatzidaki E, Peng Z, Gkentzi D, Viellevoye R, De Buyst J, Mastretta E, Wang P, Hahn GH, Bender L, Cornette L, Tkaczyk J, Del Rio R, Fumagalli M, Papathoma E, Wilinska M, Naulaers G, Sadowska-Krawczenko I, Lecart C, Couce ML, Fredly S, Heuchan AM, Karen T, Greisen G. Extremely Preterm Infant Admissions Within the SafeBoosC-III Consortium During the COVID-19 Lockdown. Front Pediatr. 2021 Jul 12;9:647880. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.647880. eCollection 2021.
- trial websiteLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Extreme Prematurity
Not yet recruitingObservational study
The Effects of Extreme Prematurity on Parenting
Depression Disorder, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder PTSD
Recruiting
Effect of Support for Low-Income Mothers of Preterm Infants
Preterm Birth, Low; Birthweight, Extremely (999 Grams or Less)
Recruiting
Ventilator Pressure and Optimization of Compliance and Hemodynamics
Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia, Pulmonary Hypertension Due to Lung Diseases and Hypoxia
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Effects of Transitional Circulation in ELBW Infants
Neonatal Prematurity, Hypotension
RecruitingPhase 4
Impact of Higher Zinc Supplementation on Neonatal Weight Velocity
Extreme Prematurity,Extremely Low Birthweight, BPD - Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Gorm Greisen, MD, Prof study director
Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Extreme Prematurity and Covid19, run by Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet at 1 site in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Oct 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of ELGAN admissions during peak three months of COVID-19 compared to corresponding months in 2019 (time frame: 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04527601, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Oct 2020.