Colorectal CancerCSILSNCT04527861
Oncologic Outcomes of Single-incision Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer
A study testing Single-incision Laparoscopic Surgery and Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery in people with Colorectal Cancer and Colon Cancer, run by Ruijin Hospital at 11 sites in China.
Trial summary
This study is designed to investigate long-term oncologic outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) for colorectal cancer. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Colorectal Cancer, Colon Cancer, Rectal Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Single-incision Laparoscopic Surgery and Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 710 participants
- Where
- 11 sitesChina
- Study dates
- 8 Apr 2021to Apr 2029
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- 18 years < age ≤85 years
- Tumor located in colon and high rectum ( the lower border of the tumor is above the peritoneal reflection)
- Pathological or highly suspected colorectal carcinoma
- Clinically diagnosed cT1-4aN0-2 M0 lesions according to the 8th Edition of AJCC Cancer Staging Manual
- Tumor size of 5 cm or less
- ECOG score is 0-1
- ASA score is Ⅰ-Ⅲ
- Informed consent
Who cannot join
- Body mass index (BMI) >35 kg/m2
- The lower border of the tumor is located distal to the peritoneal reflection
- Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP)
- Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)
- Multiple malignant colorectal tumors
- Pregnant woman or lactating woman
Show all 11Show fewer
- Severe mental disease
- Previous gastrointestinal surgery (except appendectomy )
- Emergency operation due to complication (bleeding, perforation or obstruction) caused by colorectal cancer
- Requirement of simultaneous surgery for other disease
- Simultaneous or metachronous multiple cancers with disease-free survival ≤ 5 years
Trial locations and contacts
11 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
11 sites in 1 country
China11 sites, 11 recruiting
- Recruiting
The General Hospital of Western Theater Command
Chengdu, Sichuan, 610083
Lin Zhang, MD, flysky8026@aliyun.com
- Recruiting
Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310014
Shiliang Tu, MD, yuanhang1981@126.com
- Recruiting
Shandong Provincial Hospital
Jinan, Shandong, 250021
Xiaoqiao Zhang, MD, xqz@vip.163.com
- Recruiting
The 940th Hospital of Joint Logistic Support Force of Chinese of PLA
Lanzhou, Gansu, 730050
Feng Gao, MD, gaof678@sohu.com
- Recruiting
Shanghai Cancer Center
Shanghai, 200032
Ye Xu, MD, xu_shirley021@163.com
- Recruiting
Dongfang Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University
Shanghai, 200120
Chun Song, MD, chunsong163@163.com
- Recruiting
RenJi Hospital
Shanghai, 200127
Hong Zhou, MD, renjizhouhong@163.com
- Recruiting
Changhai Hospital
Shanghai, 200438
Liqiang Hao, MD, hao_liqiang@139.com
- Recruiting
Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine
Shanghai, 201801
Kun Liu, MD, +8618121263082, lookiere@126.com
- Recruiting
Shengjing Hospital
Shenyang, Liaoning, 110004
Hong Zhang, MD, haojiubujian1203@sina.com
- Recruiting
Liaoning Tumor Hospital & Institute
Shenyang, Liaoning, 110801
Qingtong Zhang, MD, 2690960111@qq.com
About this study
Official title: Oncologic Outcomes of Single-incision Laparoscopic Surgery Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: A Multi-center, Prospective, Open Label, Non-inferiority, Randomized Controlled Trial
This study is designed to investigate long-term oncologic outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) for colorectal cancer.
Read the detailed description
In order to improve cosmetic effect and reduce postoperative pain, single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) is attracting increasing attention. SILS is considered to be the next major advance in the progress of minimally invasive surgical approaches to colorectal disease that is more feasible in generalized use. In most previous studies, SILS for colorectal cancer was feasible and short-term safe compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) . However, there is still controversy over its potential better cosmetic effect and less postoperative pain. Moreover, the long-term oncologic outcomes are still inconclusive as only a few studies showed long-term survival data. Up to now, most studies were limited to their retrospective nature and small samples. So more studies, especially large-scale, randomized controlled trials are needed to establish the best indications for SILS for colorectal cancer.
- Conditions
- Colorectal Cancer, Colon Cancer, Rectal Cancer
- Being tested
- Single-incision Laparoscopic Surgery, Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery
- Keywords
- single-incision laparoscopic surgery, conventional laparoscopic surgery, colorectal cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Colorectal Neoplasms, Colonic Neoplasms, Rectal Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Single-incision Laparoscopic SurgeryProcedure or surgery
Also called SILS
In this group,the surgery is performed through a single incision. The surgeon will adjust surgical position to expose the operative field with the help of gravity. Besides,hand over hand cross and parallel techniques are needed to achieve the SILS. All the other operative procedures are the same as conventional laparoscopic surgery.
Conventional Laparoscopic SurgeryProcedure or surgery
Also called CLS
In this group,the surgery is performed through 3-5 ports according to the surgeons habits and specific conditions.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Single-incision Laparoscopic Surgery | Experimental | Patients with colorectal cancer undergo single-incision laparoscopic surgery. Receives: Procedure: Single-incision Laparoscopic Surgery |
| Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery | Active comparator | Patients with colorectal cancer undergo conventional laparoscopic surgery(3~5 ports). Receives: Procedure: Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
3-year disease free survival rate
3-year disease free survival rate
Measured: 36 months after surgery
Secondary outcomes (16)
Operative time
Operative time(minutes)
Measured: intraoperative
Intraoperative blood loss
Estimated blood loss(milliliters,ml)
Measured: intraoperative
Incision length
Incision length(centimeters,cm)
Measured: intraoperative
Total incision length
The sum of all incision lengths(centimeters,cm)
Measured: intraoperative
Conversion rate
The proportion of converted to laparotomy and added trocars(%)
Measured: intraoperative
Length of stay
The postoperative day when patients complied with the predefined discharge criteria(days after surgery)
Measured: 1-14 days after surgery
Postoperative recovery course
Time to first ambulation, flatus, liquid diet and semi-liquid diet (hours after surgery)
Measured: 1-14 days after surgery
Early morbidity rate
morbidity rate 30 days after surgery
Measured: 30 days after surgery
Pain score
Postoperative pain is recorded using the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score (0-10 points)tool on postoperative day 1, 2, 3
Measured: 1-3 days after surgery
Tumor size
The diameter of tumors(centimeters,cm)
Measured: 14 days after surgery
Incisal margin
Length of proximal and distal margin (centimeters,cm)
Measured: 14 days after surgery
Lymph node detection
Lymph nodes harvested(numbers)
Measured: 14 days after surgery
Cosmetic effect
Assessed using a "Beauty Questionnaire" evaluating patient's satisfaction according to a 5-scale score, ranging from ''Not satisfied at all'' to ''Very satisfied''
Measured: 1 month, 6 months and 1 year after surgery
The quality of life-Core
European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)
Measured: 1 month, 6 months and 1 year after surgery
The quality of life-Colorectal
European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Colorectal 29 (EORTC QLQ-CR29)
Measured: 1 month, 6 months and 1 year after surgery
5-year overall survival rate
5-year overall survival rate
Measured: 60 months after surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Aug 2020
- Study start8 Apr 2021
- Primary completionApr 2024 (estimated)
- Study completionApr 2029 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Colorectal CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Ruijin HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 710 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ruijin Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Dongfang Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University, Fudan University, Changhai Hospital, Shengjing Hospital, RenJi Hospital, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Shandong Provincial Hospital, The General Hospital of Western Theater Command, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Zhao Ren, Ruijin Hospital
- Investigators
- Ren Zhao, MD, PHD, Principal investigator, Ruijin Hospitlal , Shanghai Jiaotong University School of MedicineChun Song, MD, Study director, Dongfang Hospital Affiliated to Tongji UniversityYe Xu, MD, Study director, Shanghai Cancer CenterLiqiang Hao, MD, Study director, Changhai HospitalHong Zhang, MD, Study director, Shengjing HospitalHong Zhou, MD, Study director, RenJi HospitalQingtong Zhang, MD, Study director, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & InstituteShiliang Tu, MD, Study director, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04527861
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CSILS
- Acronym
- CSILS
- Status last verified
- Oct 2022
- First submitted
- 19 Aug 2020
- Last updated
- 10 Oct 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Maggiori L, Tuech JJ, Cotte E, Lelong B, Denost Q, Karoui M, Vicaut E, Panis Y. Single-incision Laparoscopy Versus Multiport Laparoscopy for Colonic Surgery: A Multicenter, Double-blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg. 2018 Nov;268(5):740-746. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002836.
PubMed 30303873Lee YS, Kim JH, Kim HJ, Lee SC, Kang BM, Kim CW, Lim SW, Lee SH, Kim JG. Short-term Outcomes of Single-port Versus Multiport Laparoscopic Surgery for Colon Cancer: The SIMPLE Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial. Ann Surg. 2021 Feb 1;273(2):217-223. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003882.
PubMed 32209897Song Z, Liu K, Zhang T, Wang B, Shi Y, Jiang Y, Wang C, Chen X, Ji X, Zhao R. Oncologic outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer (CSILS): study protocol for a multicentre, prospective, open-label, noninferiority, randomized controlled trial. BMC Cancer. 2022 Jul 7;22(1):743. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09821-9.
PubMed 35799145
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Oct 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Oncologic Outcomes of Single-incision Laparoscopic Surgery Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: A Multi-center, Prospective, Open Label, Non-inferiority, Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04527861
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CSILS / CSILS
- Conditions
- Colorectal Cancer, Colon Cancer, Rectal Cancer
- Keywords
- single-incision laparoscopic surgery, conventional laparoscopic surgery, colorectal cancer
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 710 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Ruijin HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Dongfang Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University, Fudan University, Changhai Hospital, Shengjing Hospital, RenJi Hospital, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Shandong Provincial Hospital, The General Hospital of Western Theater Command, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
- Study start
- 8 Apr 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Apr 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Apr 2029 (estimated)
- First posted
- 27 Aug 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is designed to investigate long-term oncologic outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) for colorectal cancer.
Detailed description
In order to improve cosmetic effect and reduce postoperative pain, single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) is attracting increasing attention. SILS is considered to be the next major advance in the progress of minimally invasive surgical approaches to colorectal disease that is more feasible in generalized use. In most previous studies, SILS for colorectal cancer was feasible and short-term safe compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) . However, there is still controversy over its potential better cosmetic effect and less postoperative pain. Moreover, the long-term oncologic outcomes are still inconclusive as only a few studies showed long-term survival data. Up to now, most studies were limited to their retrospective nature and small samples. So more studies, especially large-scale, randomized controlled trials are needed to establish the best indications for SILS for colorectal cancer.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Single-incision Laparoscopic Surgery | Experimental | Procedure: Single-incision Laparoscopic SurgeryPatients with colorectal cancer undergo single-incision laparoscopic surgery. |
| Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery | Active comparator | Procedure: Conventional Laparoscopic SurgeryPatients with colorectal cancer undergo conventional laparoscopic surgery(3~5 ports). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- 18 years < age ≤85 years
- Tumor located in colon and high rectum ( the lower border of the tumor is above the peritoneal reflection)
- Pathological or highly suspected colorectal carcinoma
- Clinically diagnosed cT1-4aN0-2 M0 lesions according to the 8th Edition of AJCC Cancer Staging Manual
- Tumor size of 5 cm or less
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Body mass index (BMI) >35 kg/m2
- The lower border of the tumor is located distal to the peritoneal reflection
- Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP)
- Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)
- Multiple malignant colorectal tumors
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Single-incision Laparoscopic SurgeryAlso: SILSIn this group,the surgery is performed through a single incision. The surgeon will adjust surgical position to expose the operative field with the help of gravity. Besides,hand over hand cross and parallel techniques are needed to achieve the SILS. All the other operative procedures are the same as conventional laparoscopic surgery. | Procedure or surgery | Single-incision Laparoscopic Surgery |
| Conventional Laparoscopic SurgeryAlso: CLSIn this group,the surgery is performed through 3-5 ports according to the surgeons habits and specific conditions. | Procedure or surgery | Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery |
Primary outcome
3-year disease free survival rate
Time frame: 36 months after surgery
3-year disease free survival rate
16 secondary outcomes
Operative time
Time frame: intraoperative
Intraoperative blood loss
Time frame: intraoperative
Incision length
Time frame: intraoperative
Total incision length
Time frame: intraoperative
Conversion rate
Time frame: intraoperative
Length of stay
Time frame: 1-14 days after surgery
Postoperative recovery course
Time frame: 1-14 days after surgery
Early morbidity rate
Time frame: 30 days after surgery
Pain score
Time frame: 1-3 days after surgery
Tumor size
Time frame: 14 days after surgery
Incisal margin
Time frame: 14 days after surgery
Lymph node detection
Time frame: 14 days after surgery
Cosmetic effect
Time frame: 1 month, 6 months and 1 year after surgery
The quality of life-Core
Time frame: 1 month, 6 months and 1 year after surgery
The quality of life-Colorectal
Time frame: 1 month, 6 months and 1 year after surgery
5-year overall survival rate
Time frame: 60 months after surgery
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Oct 2022.
- Background: PubMed 30303873Maggiori L, Tuech JJ, Cotte E, Lelong B, Denost Q, Karoui M, Vicaut E, Panis Y. Single-incision Laparoscopy Versus Multiport Laparoscopy for Colonic Surgery: A Multicenter, Double-blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg. 2018 Nov;268(5):740-746. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002836.
- Background: PubMed 32209897Lee YS, Kim JH, Kim HJ, Lee SC, Kang BM, Kim CW, Lim SW, Lee SH, Kim JG. Short-term Outcomes of Single-port Versus Multiport Laparoscopic Surgery for Colon Cancer: The SIMPLE Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial. Ann Surg. 2021 Feb 1;273(2):217-223. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003882.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35799145Song Z, Liu K, Zhang T, Wang B, Shi Y, Jiang Y, Wang C, Chen X, Ji X, Zhao R. Oncologic outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer (CSILS): study protocol for a multicentre, prospective, open-label, noninferiority, randomized controlled trial. BMC Cancer. 2022 Jul 7;22(1):743. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09821-9.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Colorectal Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingObservational study
Pre- and On-treatment Multi-omics Profiling of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
Rectal Neoplasms
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 2
Tislelizumab in People With Colorectal Cancer
Colorectal Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Ren Zhao, MD, PHD principal investigator
Ruijin Hospitlal , Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine
Chun Song, MD study director
Dongfang Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University
Ye Xu, MD study director
Shanghai Cancer Center
11 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Single-incision Laparoscopic Surgery and Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery in people with Colorectal Cancer and Colon Cancer, run by Ruijin Hospital at 11 sites in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Oct 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 11 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Ren Zhao, MD, PHD (+8618917762018, zhaorensurgeon@aliyun.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
3-year disease free survival rate (time frame: 36 months after surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04527861, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Oct 2022.