AzTrials
AzTrials

Covid19EARSATS-19NCT04529408

EARSATS-19: In-ear Measurement of Blood Oxygen Saturation in COVID-19 Follow up

An observational study of Covid19 and Pulmonary Disease, run by Imperial College London at 1 site in United Kingdom.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

TITLE EARSATS-19: In-ear measurement of blood oxygen saturation in COVID-19 follow up DESIGN Non-inferiority study AIMS To evaluate qualitative and quantitative performance of in-ear SpO2 monitoring against the gold standard right finger-clip pulse oximeter -- towards validation for use in COVID-19 in the acute… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Covid19, Pulmonary Disease
What is being tested?
EarSats Pulse Oximeter Probe
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteUnited Kingdom
Study dates
26 Aug 2020to 10 Aug 2022
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Outpatient population attending either COVID-19 follow up or chronic respiratory disease clinic

Who may be able to join

  • Patients attending respiratory clinic either for COVID-19 follow up or for chronic lung disease.
  • Able to give informed consent (where not able to use CIE, paper consent form will be made available)

Who cannot join

  • Abnormal ear canal anatomy

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United Kingdom1 site
  • Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust

    London, Non-US/Non-Canadian, E5 0LJ

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

TITLE EARSATS-19: In-ear measurement of blood oxygen saturation in COVID-19 follow up

DESIGN Non-inferiority study

Read more

AIMS To evaluate qualitative and quantitative performance of in-ear SpO2 monitoring against the gold standard right finger-clip pulse oximeter -- towards validation for use in COVID-19 in the acute ambulatory and long-term monitoring setting

OUTCOME MEASURES

In-ear SpO2 compared with gold-standard finger-clip pulse oximeter:

Correlation between SpO2 measurements at rest Correlation between SpO2 measurements during 6 minute walk test Signal quality during 6 minute walk test Qualitative evaluation of clinical and patient user acceptability using questionnaires

POPULATION 30 patients attending COVID-19 follow-up clinic and 30 patients with chronic lung disease attending routine outpatient investigations

ELIGIBILITY Aged 18 and above, no upper age limit Able to give informed consent No abnormal ear anatomy.

DURATION 12 months

Read the detailed description

Non-invasive ambulatory estimation of blood oxygen saturation (SpO2) has emerged as an important clinical requirement to detect hypoxia (low blood oxygen) in the delayed post-infective phase of COVID- 19, where dangerous hypoxia may occur in the absence of subjective breathlessness. This now commonly termed 'silent' hypoxia presents an immediate clinical driver.

The COVID-19 pandemic places substantial pressure on clinical resources with ambulatory patients who were often discharged home to be cared for on virtual wards with daily telephone consults. Now the initial surge has settled, we are beginning to understand the challenge of following up patients who have had COVID-19 at volumes that mean doing this in a timely fashion is not possible (BTS Guidance 6 weeks).

There is mounting concern that the huge number of COVID-19 survivors will be at increased risk of chronic lung diseases such as pulmonary fibrosis, where early capture of patterns of low SpO2 could unearth desperately needed insights for preventing disease progression. The inconveniences, impracticalities and inaccuracies of conventional measurement of SpO2 (the percentage unit of blood oxygen) using a conventional finger probe for discrete readings are well established. A user-friendly, remote continuous SpO2 monitoring tool would therefore allow the rapid identification of any deterioration post discharge and also track longer-term recovery, allowing the accurate triage of patients to limited follow up resources.

Hearables and In-Ear Photoplethysmography

Reflective photoplethysmography (PPG), which uses a changes in the ratio between red and infrared light to estimate SpO2, can be measured from any site with skin that has vasculature, but for SpO2 measurement has conventionally been from fingers or sometimes the earlobe. The recent interest in the development of Hearables9 has promoted the ear canal as a preferred site for the measurement of vital signs in digital health technology. Indeed, the ear canal, which acts as a shield from external electrical noise (resembling a nature-built Faraday cage), represents a unique opportunity for physiological measurements, due to its general fixed position relative to the heart (ear-electrocardiogram) and proximity to the brain (ear-electroencephalogram). Relative to limbs, the head moves less in daily life and this is one property that has helped establish the feasibility of wearables to detect Ear-ECG and Ear-EEG.

Unlike the finger and ear lobe PPG signal, in-ear PPG has shown that the ear canal, owing to being a narrow cavity with consistent blood supply, offers a signal which is stable and resistant to changes in blood volume occurring during hypothermia . This attribute has established the ear canal as a preferred site for accurate core body temperature measurement. In-ear PPG has also been shown to be far more sensitive than earlobe and finger PPG to amplitude variations that arise from respiration, thus allowing for a better measurement of respiratory rate. Furthermore, a significant delay has been evidenced between earlobe pulse oximetry and pulse oximetry on the hand or the foot for detection of hypoxemia (low levels of blood oxygen)..

Previous work led by Professor Mandic's group in the Faculty of Engineering showed that in a study of 14 healthy volunteers in-ear PPG compared with the current standard of care - the finger clip -- the in-ear sensor shows non-inferiority and potential superiority with regard to detection of a mean blood oxygen delay (the time it took from detecting minimal blood oxygen change in the ear to detecting minimal blood oxygen in the finger) reduction of 12.4 seconds, thus being faster at identifying acute desaturation.

RATIONALE FOR CURRENT STUDY

This project sets out to establish the feasibility of SpO2 measurement from the ear canal as a convenient site for monitoring in the post COVID-19 follow up patient population, and perform a comprehensive comparison with the right index finger - the conventional clinical measurement site. The initial phase of the study will start with a total of n = 60 patients; 30 patients, who will be attending hospital as part of their routine clinical post COVID-19 follow up, which already includes SpO2 monitoring and a six minute walk test (6MWT). This study will also recruit a further 30 patients with chronic lung disease also attending for these routine outpatient investigations.

The continuous monitoring and rapid detection of desaturation can provide earlier warning of deterioration or detailed tracking of an improving trajectory. Current alternative monitoring strategies are reactive and all revolve around the classical finger or earlobe clip, which are less sensitive and present a number of challenges for continual monitoring. Living daily life with a finger clip, or even an earlobe clip, is problematic with much higher signal noise from movement artefacts with the finger clip compared to the ear bud placed within a stable head position.

From a patient perspective, the ear bud form factor that will be used in this study is familiar to them, being similar to an in-ear headphone, and will be much less intrusive to daily activities than a finger clip. Therefore the potential for continuous monitoring during the active day and the night time is much more user-friendly, and vital for the younger and potentially more active COVID-19 patients. Continuous monitoring would allow the development of protocolised management pathways to provide increasing levels of supported self-care to patients, freeing up vital resources during future pandemics.

The data generated in this pilot feasibility study would allow scaling to prepare for larger research projects in any subsequent surge discharge and follow up. The next stage would move to outpatient monitoring, with ambulatory patients going home with the device and the incorporation of further COVID patient populations such as inpatients being monitored for deterioration, where these devices could provide accurate continuous monitoring of SpO2, detecting any deterioration before they develop breathlessness and their condition becomes life threatening. This project therefore directly complements the NHS' strategic priority for early supported discharge monitoring for COVID-19 positive patients and follow up for long-term complications.

The COVID-19 follow up clinic cohort (n = 30) is ideally placed to evaluate this technology; from a quantitative point of view, a significant number of these patients will likely experience desaturation during the 6MWT, serving as an opportunity to test the device's ability to detect this. Qualitatively, since many of these patients will have either had hospital admissions or home monitoring -- and therefore lived experience of SpO2 monitoring -- they are uniquely qualified to offer valuable input on user experience. Similarly, the chronic lung disease cohort (n = 30), attending for routine OP baseline SpO2 measurement and 6MWT are also well-suited to this study.

In the long term this technology will also prove an invaluable device for the home monitoring of respiratory patients. Beyond the current pandemic there exists a general quest for more personalised health data, such that pulse oximetry measurement of capillary oxygen saturation (SpO2) will likely expand into both the clinical and consumer market of wearable health technology in the near future.

Being tested
EarSats Pulse Oximeter Probe
Medical subject headings
COVID-19, Lung Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • EarSats Pulse Oximeter ProbeDevice

    Off-the-shelf pulse oximeter embedded into a memory foam ear plug for measuring blood oxygen saturation (SpO2) from the ear canal; in-ear SpO2 measured at-rest and during 6 minute walk test

Study groups in NCT04529408
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
COVID-19 Follow up clinicPatients attending routine post-COVID-19 follow up clinic
Receives: Device: EarSats Pulse Oximeter Probe
Pulmonary Disease clinicPatients attending routine outpatient appointment for pulmonary disease
Receives: Device: EarSats Pulse Oximeter Probe

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. In-Ear vs finger SpO2

    Mean error and root mean square error; measurements for statistical significance using a paired t-test.

    Measured: 12 months for full participant recruitment (actual head-to head comparison takes 1 minute for baseline reading and 6 minutes for 6-min walk test per patient)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Aug 2020
  2. Study start26 Aug 2020
  3. Primary completion10 Aug 2022
  4. Study completion10 Aug 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
60 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04529408
Sponsor's protocol ID
285603
Acronym
EARSATS-19
Status last verified
Oct 2023
First submitted
26 Aug 2020
Last updated
17 Oct 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: Held within Imperial College London as per standard local data protection guidelines. Data may be considered for sharing upon reasonable request.

Publications

  • Goverdovsky V, von Rosenberg W, Nakamura T, Looney D, Sharp DJ, Papavassiliou C, Morrell MJ, Mandic DP. Hearables: Multimodal physiological in-ear sensing. Sci Rep. 2017 Jul 31;7(1):6948. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-06925-2.

    PubMed 28761162

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Covid19 and Pulmonary Disease, run by Imperial College London at 1 site in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Oct 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

In-Ear vs finger SpO2 (time frame: 12 months for full participant recruitment (actual head-to head comparison takes 1 minute for baseline reading and 6 minutes for 6-min walk test per patient)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04529408, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Oct 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in