AzTrials
AzTrials

Coronary Artery Disease Left MainVIP-LMSNCT04531007

Imaging and Physiology for Intermediate Left Main Stem Stenosis

A study testing iFR/ FFR/ IVUS/ OCT in people with Coronary Artery Disease Left Main, run by Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia at 1 site in Brazil.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The present research aims to determine the impact of stenoses in downstream vessels on the FFR and iFR measurements of left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenoses of intermediate severity as determined by coronary angiography. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Coronary Artery Disease Left Main
What is being tested?
iFR/ FFR/ IVUS/ OCT
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
53 participants
Where
1 siteBrazil
Study dates
1 Jun 2020to 30 Dec 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • age >/= 18 years;
  • patients who have an intermediate (40-70% diameter stenosis) lesion located in the LMS and a concomitant significant (>/=70% diameter stenosis) in one of the two major downstream vessels (the LAD or the LCx). The severity of LMS and downstream lesions will be assessed by visual estimation of the coronary angiography;
  • need of complementary diagnostic work up to ascertain the functional/physiological significance of the LMS lesion, that is not possible from the analysis of angiographic images only:
  • Intermediate severity of LMS lesion, or angiographic ambiguity;
  • Impossibility to conclusively associate the LMS lesion with the patient's symptoms/clinical presentation due to confounders introduced by the significant downstream lesion;
  • Impossibility to conclusively determine the severity and functional/physiological significance of the LMS lesion solely by the visual analysis of the coronary angiography;
Show all 15Show fewer
  • Impossibility to conclusively determine the relative contribution of the LMS lesion to the ischemic burden determined by non-invasive functional tests due to the presence of a significant downstream lesion;
  • Clinical indication for PCI of the downstream lesion located in the LAD or LCx:
  • stable angina unresponsive to optimized medical treatment;
  • important ischemic burden (> 10% of myocardial mass in territories supplied by the diseased vessels);
  • Reduced FFR/iFR values indicative of myocardial ischemia with significant pressure gradient across the downstream lesion;
  • Acute coronary syndrome without ST elevation or stabilized (>7 days) acute myocardial infarction;
  • Downstream lesion anatomically suited for PCI;
  • LMS anatomy suited for PCI, with a low or intermediate SYNTAX score (< 32);
  • Lack of contra-indications for second-generation drug-eluting stents and/or use of dual antiplatelet therapy for at least 6 months.

Who cannot join

  • Left ventricular ejection fraction £ 40%;
  • Renal dysfunction with a glomerular filtration rate £ 45 mL/min;
  • Concomitance of right coronary artery occlusion supplied by collateral circulation from the left coronary;
  • Prior coronary artery bypass graft with at least on patent graft to any vessel of the left coronary;
  • Concomitant significant valvular heart disease;
  • The first 7 days of an acute myocardial infarction;
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Downstream lesion located only in branches from the major downstream vessels (e.g. diagonal branches of LAD or obtuse marginal branches of the LCx);
  • Downstream lesions located in the distal segments of LAD or LCx;
  • Significant tortuosity of the downstream vessels in which difficulty to navigate with the physiology wire and/or intravascular imaging catheter is anticipated

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Daniel Chamie, MD, PhD contact

+ 55 11 50856345

daniel.chamie@gmail.com

Brazil1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia

    São Paulo, 04012-909

    Daniel Chamie, MD, PhD, + 55 11 50856345, daniel.chamie@gmail.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in Brazil

About this study

Official title: Validation of Intravascular Imaging and Physiology for Intermediate Left Main Stem Stenosis With Downstream Coronary Lesions

The present research aims to determine the impact of stenoses in downstream vessels on the FFR and iFR measurements of left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenoses of intermediate severity as determined by coronary angiography. Anatomic metrics derived from intravascular imaging modalities of IVUS and optical coherence tomography (OCT) will also be validated using as the comparator the FFRtrue and iFRtrue measurements pf LMCA lesions.

Read the detailed description

Accurate characterization of the functional significance of intermediate stenoses located in the left main coronary artery (LMCA) is of central relevance for decisions about the need of myocardial revascularization. However, the physiological assessment of such lesions by means of fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurements are affected by stenoses in the downstream vessels (left anterior descending artery and/or left circumflex artery), which frequently coexist in series with LMCA lesions. More recently introduced, the instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) is a resting index that is less influenced by crosstalk between serial lesions and, in theory, could be more accurate for assessment of LMCA stenoses in the presence of downstream disease. Nonetheless, iFR has not been validated for assessment of LMCA lesions. Due to the difficulty in interpreting FFR results, the possibility of characterizing the atheroma type, precisely estimate lesion severity and disease extension and distribution, intravascular imaging [especially intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)] became an attractive alternative to assess LMCA lesions and guide the percutaneous treatment, whenever this strategy is selected. However, most IVUS validations for LMCA stenosis assessment used FFR as the standard comparator, which by itself has limited diagnostic ability in this anatomic scenario.

Thus, the main objective of the current research project is to determine the impact of stenoses in downstream vessels on FFR and iFR measurements of LMCA stenoses of intermediate severity as determined by coronary angiography. The primary endpoint is the change (delta) in FFR and iFR values prior and after percutaneous treatment of downstream stenoses. Assuming a change of 0.04 mmHg between the FFRpredicted and FFRtrue with a standard deviation of 0.04 mmHg, and a change of 0.01 mmHg between iFRpredicted and iFRtrue with a standard deviation of 0.03 mmHg, a total of 53 patients are needed to confirm the mean difference of 0.03 mmHg between iFR and FFR changes before and after treatment of downstream stenoses. Anatomic metrics derived from intravascular imaging modalities of IVUS and optical coherence tomography (OCT) will also be validated using as the comparator the FFRtrue and iFRtrue measurements.

Being tested
iFR/ FFR/ IVUS/ OCT
Keywords
Left Main Coronary Artery (LMCA), FFR, iFR, OCT, IVUS, intracoronary imaging
Medical subject headings
Coronary Artery Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • iFR/ FFR/ IVUS/ OCTDiagnostic test

    intermediate lesion evaluation with intracoronary physiology and imaging

Study groups in NCT04531007
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Intermediate LMS stenosisExperimentalPatients with intermediate left main stem stenosis with additional severe downstream lesion will be subject to physiology (FFR and iFR) at multiple sites along the target vessels before and after PCI of the severe lesion located in the downstream vessel. Intravascular imaging (IVUS and OCT) will be performed for additional evaluation of the left main stem stenosis.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: iFR/ FFR/ IVUS/ OCT

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change of iFR and FFR values of the LMS stenosis before and after PCI of the significant downstream stenosis

    determine the change of iFR and FFR values of the LMS stenosis before and after PCI of the significant downstream stenosis (iFRtrue - iFRpred and FFRtrue - FFRpred)

    Measured: diagnostic procedure

  2. Accuracy of intravascular imaging in predicting functionally signifcant LMS stenosis

    establish the diagnostic accuracy of the minimum lumen areas determined by IVUS and OCT in the LMS in comparison with the iFRtrue and FFRtrue)

    Measured: diagnostic procedure

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Accuracy of pressure changes in the iFR and FFR pullback curves before PCI of the downstream lesion in predicting the functional significance of LMS stenosis

    Establish the accuracy of pressure changes in the iFR and FFR pullback curves before PCI of the downstream lesion to predict the iFRtue and FFRtrue observed after PCI of the downstream lesion;

    Measured: diagnostic procedure

  2. Accuracy of iFRpred-contra and FFRpred-contra before PCI of the downstream lesion in predicting the functional significance of LMS stenosis

    Establish the ability of iFRpred-contra and FFRpred-contra before PCI of the downstream lesion in predict the iFRtrue and FFRtrue of the LMS stenosis;

    Measured: diagnostic procedure

  3. Agreement of the iFRcontra and FFRcontra after PCI of the downstream stenosis with the iFRtrue and FFRtrue.

    Verify the agreement of the iFRcontra and FFRcontra after PCI of the downstream stenosis with the iFRtrue and FFRtrue.

    Measured: diagnostic procedure

  4. Accuracy of minimum lumen area determined by IVUS and OCT in the LMS to predict the functional significance of LMS stenosis

    Diagnostic accuracy of the minimum lumen area in the LMS by IVUS and OCT to predict iFRtrue and FFRtrue of the LMS stenosis

    Measured: diagnostic procedure

  5. Accuracy of minimum lumen diameter determined by IVUS and OCT in the LMS to predict the functional significance of LMS stenosis

    Diagnostic accuracy of the minimum lumen diameter in the LMS by IVUS and OCT to predict iFRtrue and FFRtrue of the LMS stenosis

    Measured: diagnostic procedure

  6. Accuracy of percent diameter stenosis determined by IVUS and OCT in the LMS to predict the functional significance of LMS stenosis

    Diagnostic accuracy of the percent diameter stenosis in the LMS by IVUS and OCT to predict iFRtrue and FFRtrue of the LMS stenosis

    Measured: diagnostic procedure

  7. Accuracy of percent area stenosis determined by IVUS and OCT in the LMS to predict the functional significance of LMS stenosis

    Diagnostic accuracy of the percent area stenosis in the LMS by IVUS and OCT to predict iFRtrue and FFRtrue of the LMS stenosis

    Measured: diagnostic procedure

  8. Accuracy of lesion length determined by IVUS and OCT in the LMS to predict the functional significance of LMS stenosis

    Diagnostic accuracy of lesion length in the LMS by IVUS and OCT to predict iFRtrue and FFRtrue of the LMS stenosis

    Measured: diagnostic procedure

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Aug 2020
  2. Study start1 Jun 2020
  3. Primary completion30 Jun 2022 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Dec 2022 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
53 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04531007
Sponsor's protocol ID
4978/2019
Acronym
VIP-LMS
Status last verified
Nov 2021
First submitted
26 Jun 2020
Last updated
11 Nov 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing iFR/ FFR/ IVUS/ OCT in people with Coronary Artery Disease Left Main, run by Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia at 1 site in Brazil.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 15 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Nov 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Daniel Chamie, MD, PhD (+ 55 11 50856345, daniel.chamie@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change of iFR and FFR values of the LMS stenosis before and after PCI of the significant downstream stenosis (time frame: diagnostic procedure). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Nov 2021.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in