AzTrials
AzTrials

AnalgesiaNCT04531215

Ultrasound Guided Retrolaminar Versus Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia

A study testing ultrasound guided Retrolaminar Block and ultrasound guided Erector Spinae Plane in people with Analgesia, run by Zagazig University at 1 site in Egypt.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA) and paravertebral block (PVB) have been utilized to give perioperative regional anesthesia in the trunk. TEA is technically troublesome in some cases, and is associated with a danger of serious complications, such as epidural hematoma, nerve injury, and hypotension. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 21 to 64 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Analgesia
What is being tested?
ultrasound guided Retrolaminar Block and ultrasound guided Erector Spinae Plane
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
46 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
1 Feb 2021to 1 Apr 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 21 to 64 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patient acceptance.
  • 21 - 64 years of age.
  • American Society of Anesthesiologist physical status class I,II.
  • Body Mass Index 25-35 kg/m2.
  • Female patient undergoing elective unilateral modified radical mastectomy under general anesthesia.

Who cannot join

  • Coagulation disorders or anticoagulant therapy.
  • Known allergy to study drugs (Bupivacaine, Fentanyl)
  • Infection at the injection site.
  • Patients having chronic pain or on pain treatment.
  • Advanced renal, respiratory, hepatic or cardiovascular disorders.
  • Uncooperative patients.
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Duration of surgery > 3hours.
  • Pregnant or lactating females.
  • Metastasis.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Egypt1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Zagazig University, Faculty of medicine

    Zagazig

    Alshaimaa Kamel, M.D, 01005593169 ext. 002, AlshaimaaKamel80@yahoo.com

    Alshaimaa Kamel, M.D

    Recruiting

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: Ultrasound Guided Retrolaminar Versus Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Modified Radical Mastectomy

Thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA) and paravertebral block (PVB) have been utilized to give perioperative regional anesthesia in the trunk. TEA is technically troublesome in some cases, and is associated with a danger of serious complications, such as epidural hematoma, nerve injury, and hypotension. PVB has the benefit of perception of the needle position using ultrasonography. However, PVB is also additionally connected with a danger of serious complications, such as pneumothorax, hypotension, or nerve injury. Newer approaches to deal with PVB have been the focal point of numerous techniques lately; these methodologies incorporate retrolaminar block (RLB) and erector spinae plane block (ESPB)

Read the detailed description

Modified radical mastectomy is one of the commonly performed breast surgery. Postoperative pain following mastectomy should be minimized, as in a number of women it may chronically persist for months in the form of post-mastectomy pain syndrome.

Morphine administration for acute pain after mastectomy surgery has many side effects. Regional block techniques as para-vertebral block and thoracic epidural anesthesia have possible complications and technical difficulties.

The new alternative regional techniques such as erector spinae plane block and retrolaminar block are clinical trials for providing a safe and easy with good hemodynamic and recovery profile with adequate perioperative analgesia for a large section of patients undergoing mastectomy operation in order to reduce opioids consumption and subsequently avoid opioid-related adverse effects.

As percent of post-operative rescue analgesia is 16.7% and 60% for RLB group and ESPB group respectively. So, sample size is 46 patients (23 patients in each group). Sample was calculated using OPEN EPI program with confidence level 95% and power 80%.

Conditions
Analgesia
Being tested
ultrasound guided Retrolaminar Block, ultrasound guided Erector Spinae Plane
Medical subject headings
Agnosia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ultrasound guided Retrolaminar BlockDrug

    ultrasound guided Retrolaminar Block (RLB) with 20 ml (0.5% Bupivacaine) plus 5 mic/ml Adrenaline (1:200,000) at the level of T4 of the surgical side

  • ultrasound guided Erector Spinae PlaneDrug

    ultrasound guided Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) with 20 ml (0.5% Bupivacaine) plus 5 mic/ml Adrenaline (1:200,000) at the level of T4 of the surgical side.

Study groups in NCT04531215
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ultrasound guided Retrolaminar BlockActive comparatorultrasound guided Retrolaminar Block (RLB) with 20 ml (0.5% Bupivacaine) plus 5 mic/ml Adrenaline (1:200,000) at the level of T4 of the surgical side.
Receives: Drug: ultrasound guided Retrolaminar Block
ultrasound guided erector spinaeActive comparatorultrasound guided Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) with 20 ml (0.5% Bupivacaine) plus 5 mic/ml Adrenaline (1:200,000) at the level of T4 of the surgical side.
Receives: Drug: ultrasound guided Erector Spinae Plane

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Total fentanyl dose.

    The anesthesiologist will administer intravenous fentanyl 0.5 μg/kg when the heart rate or blood pressure of the patients increased >20% from basal measurements after exclusion of other causes.

    Measured: from induction to end of surgery

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. pain intensity by Visual Analogue Scale

    • Static and dynamic pain scores (VAS) at 30 minutes, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18 and 24 hours post-operatively. pain intensity will be evaluated by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). VAS is a 10 cm horizontal line labeled "no pain" at one end and "worst pain" imaginable on the other end. The patient will be asked to mark on this line where the intensity of the patient lies.

    Measured: at 30 minutes then at 2, 4, 8, 12, 18 and 24 hours post-operatively.

  2. Time of requirement of rescue dose of Fentanyl.

    Time of requirement of rescue dose of Fentanyl.

    Measured: up to 24hour postoperative

  3. Total amount of postoperative Fentanyl

    Total amount of Fentanyl consumed during the first 24 hours after surgery.

    Measured: up to 24hour postoperative

  4. Post-operative nausea and vomiting

    • Post-operative nausea and vomiting will be noticed, recorded using a categorical scoring system (0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe) and treated, Ondansetron 4 mg IV will be administered in case of reported nausea and/or vomiting

    Measured: up to 24hour postoperative

  5. Complications including hypotension MAP < 60, bradycardia HR < 60b/m, nausea, vomiting and allergic reactions.

    Complications including hypotension MAP < 60, bradycardia HR < 60b/m, nausea, vomiting and allergic reactions.

    Measured: up to 24hour postoperative

  6. Overall patient satisfaction

    • Overall patient satisfaction at the end of the 24 hours post-operative using short assessment patient satisfaction scale (SAPS scale fully satisfied, neutral satisfied or unsatisfied)

    Measured: up to 24hour postoperative

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Aug 2020
  2. Study start1 Feb 2021
  3. Primary completion30 Mar 2024 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Apr 2024 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
46 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04531215
Sponsor's protocol ID
6236
Status last verified
Feb 2024
First submitted
25 Aug 2020
Last updated
1 Mar 2024
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing ultrasound guided Retrolaminar Block and ultrasound guided Erector Spinae Plane in people with Analgesia, run by Zagazig University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Mar 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Alshaimaa Kamel, M.D (01005593169 ext. 002, AlshaimaaKamel80@yahoo.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Total fentanyl dose. (time frame: from induction to end of surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Mar 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in